Uncyclopedia:FFS/archive3

Oscar Wilde (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 4 somdomites

• Nom & For Hasn't written anything at all in 109 years. All he does is spam quotes everywhere. -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 03:14, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
• For Per Above, damn spammer. ----Pleb- Sawblade5 ^{( yell | FAQ | I did this )} 05:45, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
• For--Sir Manforman 12:45, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
• For A poor imposter of the real Oscar Wilde. Mr. Briggs Inc. 16:17, 27 October 2007 (UTC) Eh?

No user, only a user page (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 1 userpages

• Nom & Strong For--Sir Manforman 23:26, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

Sawblade5 (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 2

• Self-Nom & For - Becasue I never get picked for anything, and I keep making Fatal mistakes. --Pleb- Sawblade5 ^{( yell | FAQ | I did this )} 08:29, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
• I pick Sawblade5! because he's one of those people who uses a 5 as an S. Either that, or he killed the other 4 Sawblades... no wait, that would be pretty cool. --  Le Cejak • <-> 13:24, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

George W. Bush (Talk • Contribs • Block • Groups)

Score: 3 monkeys

• Nom & For--Sir Manforman 13:29, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
• This time voting for him won't be a mistake. -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 13:32, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Absolutely --Sir Manforman 13:33, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
    • START A HUGE WAR AND KILL 10000'S OF INNOCENT PE0PLE WILL HE?!!? BLOCK HIM 4 GOOD Elassint 19:46, 14 October 2007 (UTC) (You know what would be funny, if this ban sucseeds we can block the White House's ip address! Elassint Throw things at me 23:08, 25 October 2007 (UTC))
• Impeach I ment ban. --Pleb- Sawblade5 ^{( yell | FAQ | I did this )} 08:34, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Keysniper (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 3

• Self-Nom & For - This guy is hopeless--Keysniper 11:42, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
• Sure, because I'm bored Yeah. I didn't even look at the guys name or anything he's ever done, but I'm sure that somebody out there dislikes him. Maybe he was a bully on the playground once. Maybe he made fun of someone's mom. Give banning a chance, I always say. --  Le Cejak • <-> 19:04, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
• Support Block Becasue a pole issn't as good --Pleb- Sawblade5 ^{( yell | FAQ | I did this )} 17:25, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

Manforman (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +3 misunderstood jokes

• NF. The kid needs it until he learns the definitions of words like "joke," "satire," and "funny." -- Village Idiot♠KUN Free Speech 13:12, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
• Self For - I was already nominated, if you looked at the contents--Sir Manforman 13:14, 23

September 2007 (UTC)

• For it - Becasue he wants it real bad. --Pleb- Sawblade5 ^{( yell | FAQ | I did this )} 17:24, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

Famine (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 1 tragic suicides

• Nom & Against How can you people even think of voting for such a god-like user? -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 22:24, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
  • For Cuz he's a meanie. Mr. Briggs Inc. 10:41, 2 October 2007 (UTC) Eh?
  • I am so Against this, they have to invent a new word for it Too Cool for FFS. --Pleb- Sawblade5 ^{( yell | FAQ | I did this )} 15:03, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
• For - that was hilarious when he banned me for a month, and Kip the Dip for 3 months--Sir Manforman 13:19, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

AAA! (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: -(-1) flamers

• Nom & For--Sir Manforman 01:08, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
• Against - What? --AAA! (AAAA) 07:04, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

Well, you did nom him for UGotM, he is just returning the favor :) ~ 07:14, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

Ah yes. That takes me back.... --AAA! (AAAA) 07:23, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

• Against. This seems like a payback to me. So, as per my vote on UgotM. If you didn't smile when you nom him Manforman, and I beliave you didn't - I'll be standing in front of him waving my hands in a threatening manner. ~ 07:16, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
• No. If you're serious, absolutely serious, then put simply you sir are a prick. He's a good contributor, a great guy, was once (and I think still is) an op on IRC, very funny (and not stupid), but if you mean by "flamer" he's a flaming homo, then you're STILL a prick (albeit a correct prick.) --Asema 07:20, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

Let's watch our manners here shall we? ~ 10:52, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

Can I still be a flamer if I have a flame thrower? --AAA! (AAAA) 10:48, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

• Comment - AAA! is an IRC op?--Sir Manforman 20:51, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

No, lost ops, since sannse said I wasn't ready yet. But that doesn't mean I can't get it later... --AAA! (AAAA) 07:22, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

• Comment: HEY GUYS! YOO HOO! Yeah, remember, this is joke banning, eh? No need for spite and anger. Yeesh.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 11:10, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
• AAAmazing Grace, how sweet the sound! -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 18:47, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
• AAA AAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAA AAA!--Keysniper 19:32, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
• Allen wrenches, gerbil feeders, toilet seats, electric heaters Trash compactors, juice extractor, shower rods and water meters, walkie-talkies, copper wires safety goggles, radial tires, BB pellets, rubber mallets, fans and dehumidifiers, picture hangers, paper cutters, waffle irons, window shutters, paint removers, window louvers, masking tape and plastic gutters, kitchen faucets, folding tables, weather stripping, jumper cables, hooks and tackle, grout and spackle, power foggers, spoons and ladles, pesticides for fumigation, high-performance lubrication, metal roofing, water proofing, multi-purpose insulation, air compressors, brass connectors, wrecking chisels, smoke detectors, tire gauges, hamster cages, thermostats and bug deflectors, trailer hitch demagnetizers, automatic circumcisers, tennis rackets, angle brackets, Duracells and Energizers, Soffit panels, circuit breakers, vacuum cleaners, coffee makers, calculators, generators, matching salt and pepper shakers. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 01:16, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

That's a For. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 01:16, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

Flammable (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 1.39744... IPs

• Nom & For- Hes gone ban crazy, in fact I estimate that by 2009 he'll have banned everyone on uncyclopedia, he must be stopped! -- Mr.ZinkyWinks 18:25, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

• You seemed ready to start an edit war over... this Ahuh.--Sir Flammable KUN (Na Naaaaa...) 18:30, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

It was the pirate article, I thought it should have at least poked a little fun at ninjas, I had no intention to start a flame war, I just thought it was funny, guess not..... Mr.ZinkyWinks 18:34, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

• FOR -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 06:24, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
• AGAINST -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 06:24, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
• FOR -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 06:24, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
• AGAINST -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 06:24, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
• FOR -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 06:24, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
• FOR AND POINT THREE NINE TWO NINE SEVEN FOUR FOUR FOUR REPEATING -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 06:24, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
• AGAINST -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 06:24, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
• FOR -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 06:24, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
• AGAINST -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 06:24, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
• AGAINST -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 06:24, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

69.248.175.25 (Talk • Contribs (del) • Block (rem-lst-all) • Whois • City • Proxy? • WP Edits • Checkuser)

Score: 1 IPs

• Nom & For - because he needs something to fill his blank userpage--Sir Manforman 23:45, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
• Agree - This would most defiantly put something there. --Pleb- Sawblade5 ^{( yell | FAQ | I did this )} 17:29, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
• Against. Ban Patrol down the hallway, to your right.--Jtaylor1 14:24, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Enzo Aquarius (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 1

• S-Nom & For - wtf, he made El Hormiguero the 20th article?! What a numbnut. - Admiral Enzo Aquarius-Dial the Gate 04:18, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

Chronarion (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: -1 Dictators

• Nom & For - according to his block log, he hasn't been blocked at all, and thus needs one, NOW!--Sir Manforman 22:18, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
• Fir - Trees that is. But in reality, Against, for really no good reason. -RAHB 08:21, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
• The Giant Redwood. The Larch. The Fir! The mighty Scots Pine! The lofty flowering Cherry! The plucky little Apsen! The limping Roo tree of Nigeria! The towering Wattle of Aldershot! The Maidenhead Weeping Water Plant! The naughty Leicestershire Flashing Oak! The flatulent Elm of West Ruislip! The Quercus Maximus Bamber Gascoigni! The Epigillus! The Barter Hughius Greenus! With my best buddy by my side, we'd sing! Sing! SING! -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 22:34, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

That's an Against, too. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 22:34, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Dr. Skullthumper (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +4 bent spoons

• Self-Nomination and For. One of those users Uncyclopedia would be better off without. ICU abuser, RC flooder, can't follow basic directions, reverts legitimate edits, complainer, writes shit articles, votes For stupid articles, recreates deleted content, only gets his articles featured by bribes and whoring. I can't think of a more worthy candidate. Ban! – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • SU&W) 00:02 Sep 01, 2007
• For closing out this on FFS, shame on him--Sir Manforman 01:02, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
• For this nomination. -RAHB 09:37, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
• For - the silly idiot tried to use something I said to get him banned on FFS. Twice. -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 22:29, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Roman Dog Bird (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +2 Fred Savages

• Self Nom & For I hate this guy so much. All he ever does is yell at people and act like he's God. AND he's a hypocrite and an asshat. Infiniban him. --Roman Dog Bird 00:26, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
• Douche. I also heard he may be a girl, which is just unheard of on the internets!-- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 21:32, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

David Gerard is a gay fag. (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 1 infi-banned users

• Nom & For Because he is infibanned and we'd have to unblock, reblock for something so ridiculous --Sir Manforman 01:15, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

• Read the bleeding rules. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • SU&W) 01:16 Aug 25, 2007
• Nobody cares--Sir Manforman 01:18, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

Read the rules, Manforman. Or else. --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 00:51, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

Yeah. or else. P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 02:53, Oct 2

Manforman (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +2 wannabes

• Self Nom & For Because I have nothing else to do right now.--Sir Manforman 01:15, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
• Yeah, he sucks --Roman Dog Bird 00:26, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
• A☭AINST, Gobshite.
• Go sit in a corner --Pleb- Sawblade5 ^{( yell | FAQ | I did this )} 15:00, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

BENSON

Score: +3BHOPs

• Nom & For --Sir Manforman 13:43, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
• For - Of course, BENSON's block log needs more blocking. --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 17:12, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
• Way for it Gotta do something about him. --Pleb- Sawblade5 ^{( yell | FAQ | I did this )} 17:20, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

Thekillerfroggy

Score: +2 Murderous Amphibians

• Nom + Strong For. This guy is so dumb. Not only did he nominate himself, but he nominated himself twice. Seriously, what a fagbag. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 21:57, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
• For - As per TKF. --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 20:45, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

<insert name here>'s Mum

Score: 1 dead horses who continue to be beaten

• For - I think <insert name here>'s Mum should be permenently banned from Uncyclopedia! —Comrade Pongo (V2) GS Implementor (Talk | Contribs | Award) 11:11, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
• HELL YES. I know I don't want my mom to come here. —Hinoa talk.kun 18:48, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
• Strong Against - I said it before and I'll say it again: QUIT BEATING THE DEAD HORSE. --AAA! (AAAA) 02:25, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
• Strong For Dead horses deserve to be beaten. -- Kip > Talk • Works • •
• Strong forBecause she/he most certainly not my mother and should receive a B.A.N. Richardson j 22:55, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
• UBERSTRONGFOR - Beating dead horses is fun. --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 16:08, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
• FOR - We don't need Codeine's mum telling us what to do! Mr. Briggs Inc. 22:28, 14 August 2007 (UTC) Eh?
• Against Hey <insert name here>! Someone just said your Mum was a horse! -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 19:14, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
• HOW DARE YOU! MY MOTHER WAS A SAINT --Roman Dog Bird 05:47, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
• Against, only edit involved a spellcheck. Ж Kalir, Crazy Indie Gamer _{(missile ponies for everyone!)} 22:26, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
• AS PER ROMAN DOG BIRD. SEE, I USED ALL BOLD CAPS JUST LIKE HIM 'CAUSE MY FEELINGS ARE THE SAME AND HOPEFULLY THE BOLD CAPS HELP TO BETTER ILLUSTRATE THAT FACT. P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 16:28, Sep 3, 2007

Capercorn (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +1 Users with annoying sibilings

• Nom and For - This user is so annoying. The only article he's written is crap, and he never makes any funny forum topics. And one can never forget that mexican guy. Seriously, this guy sucks. --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 03:02, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
• OK. You asked for it. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 03:02, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
• Against because this is such a lacklustre attempt at an FFS entry and didn't entertain me enough. -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 22:32, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment How's this? --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 03:02, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

EugeneKay (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +2 Useless non-contributing users

• Nom and For User is worthless, contributing nothing but crap articles that they should be banned for. Only other thing the user does is troll IRC and make pointless VFH noms and act as the sole dissenter on featured articles, making a complete ass of himself. Also, the userpage is horrible and abuses the <choose> tag to no end. How this use has not been named UGotM is a mystery to me, even though that is a fate worse than ED. Oh, and he's a useless name-changing prick.     EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)      15:38, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
• For. What a loser! • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 03:03, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

Trar (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +5 Grueslayer whoring Creator

• Nom and For Because I could. --Trar (talk|contribs|grueslayer) 15:01, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
• For. You asked for it. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 01:26, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
• For You might have created Grueslayer, but what have you done for us lately? Huh, HUH? -- Kip > Talk • Works • •
• For unbulleted lists that come out horrendously in MediaWiki, Against the user. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 13:07, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
• BIGGEST 'FOR' POSSIBLE --Hotadmin4u69 ^[TALK] 19:40, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
• FOR! —Comrade Pongo (V2) GS Implementor (Talk | Contribs | Award) 10:41, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

Strange but untrue (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +3 outraged poopy-heads.

• Nom Because she's been getting way too much good press lately and is liable to get a big head if everyone doesn't immediately call her a poopy-head. Also, this could be her last chance to get a meaningful ban if she gets opped this month. -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 23:59, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
• Against I am outraged that I would be so callous as to nom me for a ban. I am very hurt by this nomination, and will never speak to myself again. -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 23:59, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

MEDIC!!!! MEDIC!!!! OFFICER DOWN!!! ~ 00:00, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

• For Per obsessive vote-zeroing principle. :p --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 00:02, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

• :p -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 00:30, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

• I'd vote for, just to allow her some time off, to have some baked beans on toast and to ponder...but...I...just...can't....so. Against. ~ 00:03, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
• For --General Insineratehymn 18:24, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

I'm quite disappointed you didn't call me a poopy-head, Ins. Mainly because I would really like to see you say "Poopy-head", because it would be so out of character! -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 10:45, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

• For - Seriously, she does so much for the website. She needs some forced time off. --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 01:22, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
• Against - While being untrue will mean she will break many hearts, strangely that's not a bannable offence. --BBBBBBBBB! 22:19, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
• Comment No need to give me time off any more guys - Famine already decided to give me a holiday, and I've been gone two days. I would have tried to have it overturned, but instead I sat back and wrote this: UnBooks:An Uncyc Ban Diary. FFS-ers and Ban-Patrollers may like to know what exactly it is they're voting for...! :-) -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 00:44, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
• Stronge Against If we ban such a wonderful user like Strange but untrue, whom cleans-up and helps out whenever she can, than Uncyclopedia is on the brink of losing it's heart. Never mine. I didn't notice she nominated herself. -- Kip > Talk • Works • •

• Aww, bless. -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 23:02, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

• Ban in the hopes of seeing a silly ban-comment.     EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)      23:10, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
• For - She's a poopy-head. Are you happy now Sbu? Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 12:48, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
• Jeez, she was so nice to me. I once even did stupid stuff to her talk page, asked her a n00bish question, and posted an unwanted comment on her current talk. Plus, she's always doing work for the site. How dare she be so presumptuous? FOR!-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 18:56, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
• Strange but untrue is a woman? -- The fatgoat Talk (to me, obviously) The Crap I've Done 05:31, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

• Really? That would explain the breasts I suppose. -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 22:55, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

• Cardinal mistake, mentioning breasts in Uncyclopedia. I personally am unaffected, but if I were you I'd run like the wind, bullseye.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 01:23, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

• I don't mind the mentioning of breasts, quite honestly. -- The fatgoat Talk (to me, obviously) The Crap I've Done 02:05, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

• You should see Tom mayfair right now.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 22:24, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

• Disqualify. SbU has been opped and therefore would be able to un-ban herself. --66.102.80.239 18:41, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Nobody cares —Hinoa talk.kun 18:49, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

• POOPYHEAD! POOPYHEAD! POOPYHEAD! POOPYHEAD! POOPYHEAD! —Hinoa talk.kun 18:49, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
• Against, only person capable of nullifying Bubs' superpowers. Ж Kalir, Crazy Indie Gamer _{(missile ponies for everyone!)} 01:04, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Kip the Dip (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +1 requests to be blocked

• Nom & For - Did anyone see User:Kip the Dip/Block Me! yet? He's defintley asking for it. --Sir Manforman 12:17, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
• For What a douchebag and attention whore. -- Kip > Talk • Works • •
• The icon of what the bottom of Uncyclopedia has to offer. A disgrace to Uncyclopedia, Wikia, the internet, his country of origin, and possibly the entire human race. I question many nights why the existence of such a sad and worthless user exists, only to be left without answers. This user's lack of morals, humanity, and logical judgment appall me continuously. I'd use bland insults like "douchebag", "asshat", and "fucktits" to insult this user, but he has probably heard them all before ad nauseum and is now numb to them, regardless of how true they are. Truly a despicable person. Against.

• Look I may not be the best writer here, but I'm definitely not a pimple on the ass of this site. I contribute a fair amount to Uncyclopedia. I've only been blocked twice, an they were 1) a one second ban by request, and 2) for helping out a noob the wrong way. I only made that Block Me! page as a joke to see if anyone would take it seriously. After this vote I'm have it deleted, as I now know it only ruins my integrity. -- Kip > Talk • Works • •

• Settle down, buddy, emc's just joking around. Notice that he ultimately voted against banning you. This is Uncyclopedia: don't take anything seriously. We all know you're a good writer and a very helpful user.-- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 16:46, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Thekillerfroggy (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +3 pointless self-nominations

• Nom + For, just 'cuz. I want that cool template, too. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 04:22, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
• For You dumbass. -- Kip > Talk • Works • •
• For. Agreed. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 19:12, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

Jimbo Wales (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +3 Foreign "Kings"

• Nom and For - Because he commands Wikipedia. --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 23:15, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
• Strong For - He's the Wikipedia Dictator. We need revenge on him, duh!--Sir Manforman 00:46, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
• Comment - Why can't they actually ban these idiots for long periods of times instead of 20 seconds?--Sir Manforman 12:57, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Because this is a joke. If someone's really a dick here, then we don't put them on FFS, we ask admins to ban them. That is all.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 20:19, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
• For - Ban the evil fascist! —Comrade Pongo (V2) GS Implementor (Talk | Contribs | Award) 19:18, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
• For-Why is he even here? Isn't this the same thing as Hitler walking down the streets of Washington?--Scott 04:21, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
  • I believe he got an account when Uncyclopedia was handed over to Wikia. He only has a five contributions, one in the article "Terrorist", three in Forum:Announcement: Wikia & Uncyclopedia and one on his talk page. —Comrade Pongo (V2) GS Implementor (Talk | Contribs | Award) 10:42, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

• Terrorist, eh? I always knew there was something suspicious about him. -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 22:43, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
• More like "walking down the streets of Paris". Germans prefer to march in the shade. Still, I'm hesitant to label Jumbo Whales a terrorist. After all, one can negotiate with terrorists. --66.102.80.239 18:24, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

• Actually, he has more contributions, he created User:Jimbo Wales which was deleted. But still, I urge all of you Americans to vote against the Germans (who are the same guys who sided with Hitler during WWII who are now siding with Jimbo Wales.)--Sir Manforman 20:52, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
• For. He makes controversey go round the clock. --Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 22:43, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
• NOOOOO He's too sexy to be banned!--SIR T H A T G U Y H U F F E D M E  throw a snowball  03:06, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
• For We are not a dumping ground for wikirejects from other projects. I am getting a little tired of learning of this user's antics by being informed by the whois server. --Carlb 12:03, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
• Against Do you know whom your dealing with? He most likely has power over us. -- Kip > Talk • Works • •
• Comment: He's never here. We could do revenge on him all we want. Also, he's not a sysop. Nothing will happen to you unless you message him at his Wikipedia where...--Sir Manforman 12:34, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment - He's Wikia Staff. He can do whatever he wants. He could rename you to s*itface if he so pleased. --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 16:10, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

Yellow 130 (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +3 Username template abuses

• Self Nom and for Because I made this. --The Great Yellow Crayon Get PWNED Yellow 130 is teh pwnz 22:05, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
• For - He needs to go. --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 23:15, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
• Ban --Ekashp 11:25, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
• Ban because he put an article on VFD when there were already 15 articles still being voted on, and he put Fisher Price on VFD, and he never puts the VFD template on the pages he puts on VFD. --Dexter111344 14:43, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
• Don't ban This guy's cool. -- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 18:14, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
• Against <insert name here> is a much better cannidate. -- Kip > Talk • Works • •

• Comment - He's gone for a month, and therefore disqualified. --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 20:42, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment - Spang unblocked him. --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 11:24, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

Erviltnec (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +3

• Nom and For He acted like a douche to me just because I quoticided one of his articles. Now I'm going to return the favor. --General Insineratehymn 17:48, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
• For Don't you wish you could get him a longer ban than that of FFS?-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 22:11, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

No, this is just payback for how he pissed me off. --General Insineratehymn 23:12, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

• Yeah this guy's a douche. -- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 21:38, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
• For I agree with Insineratehymn and Leoispotter...he is a douche. also take a look under the "How to: not be funny" section in his userpage. Moron -- (Bonner) (Talk). 22:43, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
• Don't ban Aww was he mean to you? Do you want me to call his mommy and have him put in time-out were he belongs?
  • Doesn't matter now, because I scared him off. --General Insineratehymn 16:56, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Tortilla The Hun (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +8 BENSON wannabes

• Nom and For - Come on, if you say against, you havent been on BENSON's House of Pancakes lately. --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 02:58, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
• FORE! --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 02:59, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
• For - He gives me bad memories of my past Uncyclopedia life. --AAA! (AAAA) 09:48, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
• For - Because BENSON is better than you. --The Great Yellow Crayon Get PWNED Yellow 130 is teh pwnz 22:01, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
• Against- because no one cares about Benson, or his House of Pancakes. -- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 02:01, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
• FOR - Because BENSON IS BETTER THAN YOU. --Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 01:58, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
• For. Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me!
• For --Scott 04:30, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
• For BENSON is better than Tortilla The Hun! -- Kip > Talk • Works • •
• For I thought this user was a woman. Mightywayne 13:58, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
• For Blanker. BENSON is better than blankers. Elassint 04:43, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

Nintendorulez (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +0 tricky scheme

• Nom and For Because, to ban him for a bit, the admins will have to unban him, and then he will be unbanned after his FFS ban. Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me!
• Comment....what?--Scott 08:00, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
• For! He'll probably never notice he's unbanned, and that's where all the joy comes in! -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 11:40, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
• For --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 19:44, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Against After seeing what he did. --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 19:02, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

• Conditional For Famine gets FSS too and UGOTM.--Scott 04:23, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
• Against. Bring back Nin! --Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 22:43, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
• Against - Nin is gone, Famine was correct in his decission, while he will be missed, it is best that he is gone. --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 23:42, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

• Ineligable - Already banned indefinitely. --AAA! (AAAA) 06:35, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
• Um, isn't the "can't have been banned for more than a day" restriction on UGotM, and not here?

Yes, but he's ban's never going to expire, so there's no point. --AAA! (AAAA) 02:06, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

Angela (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +3 conspirators

• Nom & For - She took over Uncyclopedia and used it to fuel her machine that she calls "Wikia". —Comrade Pongo (V2) GS Implementor (Talk | Contribs | Award) 19:34, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
• Against Cause she's staff. Like Sannse. They could rename you to "Fuckhead" if they wanted. --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 19:39, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment That Uncyclopedia is in a position where outsiders have taken full control and are free to rename you to "Fuckhead" at will is part of the problem. Egads! What on earth was Chron thinking? --User:Fuckhead 18:44, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
• Against Look at This instead.--Scott 04:25, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
• For! We don't need any outside "help." --Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 22:42, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
• For - Jimbo Wales is staff too. Too many outsiders being staff. Grrr. --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 23:45, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
• For - This speaks for itself. --BBBBBBBBB! 22:19, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
  • LOL I know it's fun, but be more creative with your reasons; if wikia didn't host us we'd have to pay ourselves. If you're willing to pay, contact me via email and I'll give you an address for you to send money to, then I won't have to get a job ^^ :P —Braydie 22:53, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Well just ship over a couple of high-end servers like the Brazilians have and, if we like them, maybe we'll buy them. We prefer to get our hands on the actual merchandise before completing offers or reffering friends to do the same. --BBBBBBBBB! 02:14, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
• For - She barely comes on anymore, which means all jobs are left to sannse now. Poor sannse... --AAA! (AAAA) 22:56, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
• A☭AINST, and my vote is infinite. 12:43, 26 July 2007
• Conditional Support only if she is nominated for UGotM as well--Sir Manforman 13:30, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

KaurJmeb (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +2 communist fellow travellers

• Nom. For being involved in any way with the whole http://uncyclopedia.wikiachina.cn debacle. Registering a domain to an oppressive communist country for a wiki that anyone can edit is beyond dumb, even compared to her previous infamous stunt of removing template links from en: to Taiwan. --Carlb 18:18, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
• For - wait, what? Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 12:51, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Qscgu9-bot (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Qscgu9-bot (approximation)

Why don't we get bots like this around here anymore?

Score: 2 illegal immigrant bots

• Nom & for: It's taking jobs away from middle-class Uncyclopedians! --Hotadmin4u69 ^[TALK] 21:42, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
• Against for two reasons. 1 - its a bot. As long as an admin makes his contributions stop taking up all of recent changes, I'm not gonna care what he does. 2 - he is only inter - wiking. I don't know how to do that, nor do i have the time, motivation or language skills to do that. Just leave the bot to do what it's made for.--General And Min. THEDUDEMAN 00:27, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment Individual admins on en: don't have the power to make his contributions stop taking up all of recent changes. Resistance is useless, capacitance is your only hope, you will be assimilated.
• For That damn bot detracted from finding vandalism. Who knows how much crap slipped through the cracks

today?-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 01:32, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

• Against - I like this guy. He won't respond to my comment on his talk page though. I even translated it into his language. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 01:48, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
• Ay ay ay! Ceta botta est une boota!! NO ES BUENO POR EL WIKI!! AY CARAMBAA!!!!!!!! -- Ludicolo 01:57, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
• Against He's only taking the jobs Uncyclopedians don't want. Stop being racist, emc. --General Insineratehymn 02:23, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
• For the day we let machines work for us, would be the end of us all. ~ 12:44, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
• For--Sir Manforman 00:07, 31 August 2007 (UTC)