From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
|
This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion.
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Ugghhh--» >ZEROTROUSERS!!! EAT ME!!!! CRAZY PERSON! SMELLY!!! ILLOGIC, BEHOLD!!!!~» 03:15, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
- Flush ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 03:23, 11 May 2007
- Delete Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 03:39, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
- Erase Crap. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 04:51, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
- Historize it! --Andorin Kato 05:26, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete I feel sick. And not in a good way. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 08:04, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
- Oy --THINKER 08:11, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
- flush, ED style --» >UF|TLK|▋» 12:19, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
- o____o -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 13:08, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
- Huff –—Hv (talk) 11/05 14:53
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete Fightcruft. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 23:43, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- Fightcruft? Never heard that one before. --General Insineratehymn 23:56, 10 May 2007
- Delete That's because the first rule of Fightcruft is "You do not talk about Fightcruft."Count of Monkey Crisco 00:04, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 00:22, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. So what about this Fightcruft, then? -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 01:05, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Dammit, someone beat me to the obvious First Rule of Fightcruft reply. ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 02:17, 11 May 2007
- RSt - not fightcruft. --» >UF|TLK|▋» 12:31, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete Offensive and lacking in humour. Needs either deletion of a massive overhaul. --Dork lord 21:17, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
for ( funniness = 0 ; stupidity > 0 ; crapiness++ ) { huff(); } --General Insineratehymn 23:34, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Tasteless, not funny. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 23:38, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 00:20, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - brutal for no good reason. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 01:03, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
- Heptacruft Yes I'm just making up words now, why not, everyone else does? ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 02:15, 11 May 2007
- Delete. Rogpyvbc 05:12, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
- Ur done. --Andorin Kato 05:27, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete Not often I'd nom something of length or Animeness, but somebody kept drawing my attention back to it's awfulness by moving it. It's still awful if you're a Poke-fan, right? -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 19:31, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Forkcruft (eg. "Pepci, not to be confused with Pepsi, is a drunk turned monster in 93482 AD after..." etc.) --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 23:35, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 00:19, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Yes Strange, it is still awful if you like Pokemon. ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 02:14, 11 May 2007
- Delete and redirect to Pikachu. --Andorin Kato 05:28, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete Somebody really doesn't like this guy. Poor guy. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 18:42, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- Blarch A heaping bowl of run-on sentences seasoned to perfection with random. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 23:31, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 00:18, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Sounds tasty Alksum! Someone went to a lot of effort here. Shame it was in vain. ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 02:11, 11 May 2007
- I know someone typed something, but all I see is "blah blah blah..." Axe. --Andorin Kato 05:29, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Keep. Not so bad. Rogpyvbc 19:10, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- R. Just plain R. The author won't stop removing the rewrite tag either. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 06:16, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- Can't tag with rewrite, so Blarch. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 06:51, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- RaR --» >UF|TLK|▋» 12:36, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 12:46, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- Can you hear me now? ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 11:26, 10 May 2007
|
Comments |
- The author only removed the tags after making edits, and hasn't removed them since being told to stop. Rogpyvbc 19:10, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- Gone. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 14:39, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
Delete Sexcruft. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 06:26, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
- Sounds like something Howard Stern would approve of.. --THINKER 06:33, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
- RRaS --» >UF|TLK|▋» 15:09, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
- Unknownfile, I refuse to go to another page just to find out what the fuck you're talking about... Even these pages deserve more than four fingers of typing time. Sorry to be rude. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 20:13, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Jesus Christ Almighty, what the fuck is this doing here? --General Insineratehymn 02:09, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- Dear God, NO! Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 02:13, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- Good grief someone went to waaaaay too much effort. Smacks of vanity also...check the 'cast' names. They read like forum usernames... ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 02:16, 10 May 2007
- Гнев - В советской России, Статья хочет удалить ВАС!! --Capercorn 03:02, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- Damn.. after a while I just hit the down arrow and watch lots of words fly on by.. --THINKER 03:04, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete as vanity. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 04:21, 10 May 2007 (UTC)a
- Article = Nagasaki. Huff = A bomb. -Han Solo (High Gen. Grue) Comlink Grueslayer
- Delete. -- Mitch 12:26, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
Executed; voting closed. —RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY)14:04, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
- Keep I dunno, I think its funny... --THINKER 01:35, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
I actually started off trying to sort this article out, but it's beyond help. RabbiTechno 15:44, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
Let's clear things up here.
- Do not add an article marked with {{construction}} to VFD.
- Do not ICU an article marked with {{construction}}.
- Do not add an article to VFD that is less than a week or two old.
- Do not forget to add {{VFD}} to pages nominated for VFD.
Are we all caught up? Good. Voting closed. —RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY)14:14, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- OK, my bad...the page annoyed me so much I didn't even notice the construction tag. Points taken and will be remembered. RabbiTechno 18:48, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
- I believe "Destroy" is supposed to come after "Crush" and "Kill". Someone please fix this. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 03:40, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
Article under the same name deleted April 13; new article begun a few days later. Perhaps this page should be blocked from future articles being created? Rogpyvbc 08:38, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
- OK, just to be clearer as to the problem - with the exception of the usual lame retard jokes in the quotes, the article is just someone's opinion, rather than being humourous. The author seems to be venting his (oops, I madly add "or her") frustration with PC attitudes. It's explanatory rather than funny. Plus the page will eventually become a magnet for slurs. Rogpyvbc 01:24, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah I agree, the concept could be good but the current version is just first person opinion cruft, not an article. I did like the TOC being all the same title though. But yeah, this version sucks. Could be hilarious, but isn't. ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 01:54, 10 May 2007
- Kept. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 02:28, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete More unfunny sexcruft that was never ICU'd. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 06:49, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
- Ugh Uncyclopedia Prepubescenta --THINKER 07:53, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
- kill code: RSSt --» >UF|TLK|▋» 15:01, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
- Definite Delete. It's beyond all hope of redemption. RabbiTechno 15:10, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
- It offends my nerdish sensibilities. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 20:21, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
- Absolute cra-um, cruft?--Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 20:36, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
- Гнев - В советской России, Статья хочет удалить ВАС!! --Capercorn 21:41, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
- Kill - with a big hammer -Asahatter (annoy) 21:48, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
- Ummmmmmmm... No Count of Monkey Crisco 23:34, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
- Article:Go Die In A Fire. -Han Solo (High Gen. Grue) Comlink Grueslayer
- I R HABS LOADS OF SEX, I R COOL ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 01:43, 10 May 2007
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete Random. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 06:40, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
- Definitely --THINKER 06:43, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Rogpyvbc 08:06, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
- Bye --Asahatter (annoy) 13:22, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
- kill code: RSt (random stubcruft) --» >UF|TLK|▋» 15:05, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. RabbiTechno 15:12, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete DNAcruft. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 20:15, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Too randon and insubstantial to be of use. Count of Monkey Crisco 23:36, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
- RStcruft. -Han Solo (High Gen. Grue) Comlink Grueslayer
- Plain ole no frills Cruft ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 01:23, 10 May 2007
- What the hell?-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 01:26, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
- On the fence... I did laugh at that second quote.. --THINKER 18:26, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
- The title comes from a Simpsons episode, but the text has nothing to do with it. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 19:05, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
- Too late for ICU, but there is some promise here - if it's not fixed up within a week then Delete --Asahatter (annoy) 21:51, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah, I'll go with that as well. --THINKER 01:38, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Unfunny off-shoot of David belle. --THINKER 06:25, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Rogpyvbc 06:27, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
- Slash this short, stupid sexcruft. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 06:43, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
- RSSt --» >UF|TLK|▋» 15:06, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
- Yuk we (hey, maybe even I) can do better than this --Asahatter (annoy) 21:53, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 00:53, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- Baleet Bleuch! ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 01:17, 10 May 2007
- Delete Because no movie (not even Manos: The Hands of Fate) deserves this treatment.--Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 01:27, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- It's a rip-off of Idiocracy. Where it deviates from the "real" Brawndo, it isn't funny. Lastly, it was whored on the forums. This, friends, makes it a triple threat. One or two I can forgive, but three is an outrageous affront to whatever it is that we stand for. --Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 03:39, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
- Damn straight Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 03:41, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
- Let justice be made. -- herr doktor needsAscalpel [scream!] 03:43, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
- Good clean huff! BOOBIES! ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 03:45, 09 May 2007
- Also boobies. --THINKER 03:46, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Rewrite reminds me of Line. Someone could make it cool. --THINKER 03:13, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Insinerate! All I see is randomness and lists. Also, most of the content is stolen. If you need proof, just look at the article's talk page. --General Insineratehymn 22:52, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- Behead! Jedibob5 23:12, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- De-1337. Seen it before. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 23:15, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- Blarch Some of the list items didn't search, but still, substantial plagiarism. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 23:35, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. There are clearly more than 8 things to do in that article. LIIIIAAAARRRSSSS! -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 23:55, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 00:33, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Rubbish. ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 12:39, 09 May 2007
- Yep --THINKER 02:15, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
- Kill* --Headofred 02:39, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
- Pestilence. User:High Gen. Gure/simplesig
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- listcruft=instahuff --» >UF|TLK|▋» 20:36, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- De-1337 --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 21:11, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- OK, I can vote to delete this one. Very listy and hard to follow. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 21:54, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- Insinerate! --General Insineratehymn 22:53, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 00:16, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
- Weak rip off of UCB's Thunderball. The gun circle is not for shooting! --THINKER 02:20, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Strong Keep This article parodies stupid immature humor. It rocks nads. Baggy's Revenge
- Surprisingly, keep. It's a parody of bullshit critics bullshit critiques. Y'know, those blowhards that see a lightswitch in a gallery and drone on about the "...play between shadow and light...", and "The switch itself is in the up position, indicating the joy of lightness...". I'd prefer a different title, but keep none the less. --Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 08:14, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- I hate the title, but on principle, I support this article. I also appreciate that its being discussed rather than some Admin just wiffing it on their own. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 11:52, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- Keep If we delete this, we might as well delete i maed a yuky doody --Kip the Dip 15:18, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- keep or die --» >UF|TLK|▋» 15:59, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- Cocks -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 22:41, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- *fixes edit conflict* Um, that was a keep vote, right? If so, I concur: Keep. At least there's an attempt at "literary analysis" here. This has potential for expansion (for inclusion in Category:AGH MY EYES or something similar?), so it is just worth keeping. Pentium5dot1 22:44, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- Keep or I'll put a crab down your pants. --General Insineratehymn 22:45, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- Keep ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 11:58, 08 May 2007
- Keep classic in-joke type stuff -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 02:18, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Delete - BAH! About time we got rid of this I think. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 04:27, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - indeed --Asahatter (annoy) 07:50, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- Doesn't go far enough to be a keepable parody par MO's comment, I feel. There are good parts though, which could be used in a better variation of the concept. --THINKER 11:25, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- Blargh I hate articles like this. Jedibob5 23:14, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- A year ago I created an article named CRAP which an admin zapped within seconds of it being posted. The explaination that I received was that it was too like AAA, even though CRAP was a bite more intricate (IMHO) and appropriate given the word CRAP. So while I support this article (as a parody of a parody), I'm a little PO'd that this article survived and at least was given an up or down vote while my article was trashed by an over zealous admin. That said, I feel better. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 11:52, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- Another example of this is Fisher Price. On what should have been a routine QVFD zap, Uncyclopedia came and made it a god. Jedibob5 23:14, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- Kept. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 03:08, 09 May 2007
- I guess I am learning to like this now, and I didn't quite understand the story behind it when I nominated this. I still hate the title though. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 00:58, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
- 'Keep NO ENCYCLOPEDIA ARTICLE IS COMPLETE WITH OUT JUSTICE KENNEDY Happy Weasel 20:53, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- 2005cruft. complete utter randomness. need I say more? --» >UF|TLK|▋» 16:06, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 16:10, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- Not some sort of motorbike. --THINKER 17:56, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Rogpyvbc 20:12, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- Blarch Too short. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 21:08, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- De-1337 --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 21:11, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- Die Stick it on the dark side of the Internet --Asahatter (annoy) 22:49, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- Torch it! --General Insineratehymn 22:54, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- Eh.-- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 23:58, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Has a good idea but poorly executed. ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 12:09, 09 May 2007
|
Comments |
Dead. Utter bollocks again... removed -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 02:19, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Nom and Delete - I just saw this created in Recent Changes. It sucks. It's not even completely random. It's self-reference though, and someone might get angry if I put it on QuickVFD. -- Pigeon 09:30, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- ick by definition, this doesn't really even qualify as "text" --THINKER 11:21, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete There is nothing random about this - its static. Now if it changed with each page refresh, then you'd be cooking with gas... Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 11:54, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Delorted. In future, though, be sure to use QVFD for this sort of stuff. Cheers. -- Hindleyite Converse 11:59, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete - I live near Bentley. It has a population of around 7500, and nobody outside Bentley really cares about it. I actually contributed to this article when I was a naive n00b. Oh yeah, and the whole Krobsta thing is vanity. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 04:27, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- Um okay then.. --THINKER 04:34, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 13:50, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- so crappy that not even a family circus fan would laugh at it --» >UF|TLK|▋» 16:02, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- Throw it in the furnace with the others. --General Insineratehymn 22:54, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- event. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 00:00, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
- Burn it!!! ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 12:07, 09 May 2007
|
Comments |
Deleted Like a hybrid cross between vanity and pure unadulterated shit, it's gone -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 02:21, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 04:27, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- Another inactive holdover.. --THINKER 04:38, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 06:23, 08 May 2007
- Delete. -- Mitch 13:45, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- 2005cruft. WRYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY --» >UF|TLK|▋» 16:01, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Sure, but it isn't actually about trench coats. --Silophant 21:04, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- Ah yes, more firewood! It was starting to get cold here in Uncyclopedia. --General Insineratehymn 22:55, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
Deleted Too short, and crap to boot -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 02:26, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- 2005cruft --General Insineratehymn 01:31, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 01:38, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- Eliminate All 2005cruft, bandcruft, listcruft, and whatever other cruft I forgot must DIE! Jedibob5 01:39, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- Blarch as stub. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 01:44, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- ibid. --THINKER 01:50, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- Baleet ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 01:52, 08 May 2007
- Delete. Rogpyvbc 02:21, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- only a person on crack - and a SHITLOAD of it - would find this funny. kill --» >UF|TLK|▋» 16:00, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
Deleted. Cruft again -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 02:27, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete - not funny.--Gilgal1(Talk to me bitch!!!)
- Delete Usual cruft. ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 11:23, 07 May 2007
- o___o -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 23:37, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Clichecruft. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 23:52, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- De-1337 --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 00:06, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- Hey man really not cool. --THINKER 00:33, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- WHAT --» >UF|TLK|▋» 01:16, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- Steve Vai deserves better than this. --General Insineratehymn 01:23, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- Agreed with the above. But, it sucks. Jedibob5 01:57, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Oh man this article blows. --Videshi 04:17, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Await enlightenment here - I might be waaaay too British to understand the potential, but my initial reaction is WTF?
Executed; voting closed. —RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY)12:03, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
- Eh.. If people have been working on it with a few days time I don't think its right to yank the rug on 'em. And I did laugh at one bit... --THINKER 00:41, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- Keep with {{WIP}} --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 01:44, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Delete - reeks of vanity, has been hanging awhile without any worthwhile edits --Asahatter (annoy) 11:13, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- any article that has "Image:Example.jpg" show n00bishness. this is true to my theory for this article --» >UF|TLK|▋» 13:28, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete anyway. WIP doesn't change that its vanity. :) ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 11:18, 07 May 2007
- CRAP! Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 00:45, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - who cares about the WIP. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 04:20, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- Who? --General Insineratehymn 22:58, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- {{WIP}} hasn't expired yet.... —Gnome …MUN F@H 16:49, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- You're right - {{WIP}} was added on May 2nd. I await this blossoming into a splendid article of which we can all be proud. --Asahatter (annoy) 21:23, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- It is odd that someone's user page redirects there though, no? --THINKER 00:41, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- Deleted. Total Crap if you ask me anyway -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 02:17, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
- Keep and fix - This is one of the kind of articles that is mostly retarded, but some people will find funny. For example, I found Keith Richards hilarious, even though it is so listy. Remove all of the crap from this and you have yourself a keepworthy article. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 05:10, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Cleaned up by Cs1987. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 06:55, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Just about. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 10:04, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Ceridwyntalk contribs arc2.0 09:51, 06 May 2007
- Kleep See Cs; Couldn't have said that one better. Lot of funny in there already (...the stupidest possible combination of sounds that were just barely within the parameters of what could be called music...). And just because I have to mention it every time I see or hear them: I fucking hate Linkin Park. Reflex, you know.. --THINKER 00:48, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Self-explanatory. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 01:21, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
- Definately Ceridwyntalk contribs arc2.0 01:34, 05 May 2007
- squiggle, pedo jokes can be funny, however this is just miserable rubbish --» >UF|TLK|▋» 02:36, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - We already have a good page like this. It is called One Rifle Per Child. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 13:39, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Pedophile jokes are good only if they're subtle. This article is just blatant and blunt in its delivery, and the jokes are in no way funny. --General Insineratehymn 17:17, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Would work better as an article on sex education in general, without the more blatent references to pedophelia.Rogpyvbc 22:15, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
- I'm sure its funny to someone, someplace, somewhere, but not me. Fix it or NUKE it. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 00:47, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- DELETE - If it's gonna be on a subject matter like this it's got to be way better. Matt lobster 22:45, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Keep Hmmm I'd say there is still redeemable bits in there, could definately be expanded to an article of funniness. At least its better than the usual crap we get on here. Ceridwyntalk contribs arc2.0 06:35, 04 May 2007
- Keep the defenseless science jokes. I laughed at "find the error on the previous calculation." --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 07:24, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
- Keep and tag with some kind of Maths-ish-ness tag that I really should know whether exists... Good pic and bits of funny. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 15:05, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. Yeah, this is a good concept and a decent start on an article. ----OEJ 16:50, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. –—Hv (talk) 4/05 21:44
- Keep. I've added a section on religious conversion, and changed a few other things. Perhaps worth keeping now. Rogpyvbc 21:45, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
- Keep there are worse pieces of CRAP on Uncyclopedia. This is savable. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 00:48, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - nice teamwork on the expansion. No way was I going to bother with this one. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 13:03, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Delete Inactive since 2005, links hardly anywhere, and didn't make me laugh once. --THINKER 04:28, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
*Stipud Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 05:01, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
- Kill I are a mathematician and it doesn't raise a titter --Asahatter (annoy) 21:25, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
- Weak delete. —Gnome …MUN F@H 00:41, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
- to all those voting keep, please reread. if it hasn't been expanded in ages and noone's bothered to rewrite it, it might as well go --» >UF|TLK|▋» 02:10, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
- I just don't agree that anything that stays still for a year or two has to be squashed. There are featured articles in the same position. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 09:09, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
- Thats "So good it doesn't need to be touched" vs. "Abandoned". Which is which? Only Thunderdome can say.. --THINKER 02:42, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Second Strange's math template if this is such a worthwhile article to y'alls.. I've now read this article 5 times, and still cannot find a lick of humor therein. --THINKER 16:57, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
- Some things are just a matter of taste too, of course. Hence why Mathematician person above doesn't like it either. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 09:44, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
- Can we have an automatic keep (or renom) based on significant improvement now? -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 00:01, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- I've diddled with it a bit. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 01:19, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- We've more than doubled it in size since it was nominated for deletion. Clearly we have converted it into a worthwhile article. Rogpyvbc 02:28, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- And the new editions are funny...yet too much of the original unfunny remains. Unless these elements are the subjective humor portions... --THINKER 17:55, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- Ok, you fine folks have whipped this into some sort of shape and whilst this may not be the best of the best, it is certainly worth keeping --Asahatter (annoy) 22:46, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- Sign not sine? or cosine? ...tangent? :) --THINKER 02:14, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
|