From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
|
This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion.
|
Keep |
- Keep. - This was protected some time ago, I don't think the cabal approve its demise.--Sycamore (Talk) 17:27, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
- No no. We're not starting this again. ~ 18:07, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
- K33P Aren't we NOT supposed to delete in-jokes? Colin ALL YOUR BASEHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 18:21, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
- No MrN Fork you! 19:47, Nov 13
- Thank God, I was starting to worry that we might never have another bout of Winkler drama. Keep. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 19:54, Nov 13
- Keep. it was kept 3 times before, its one of those protected crap in-joke articles.--Mnbvcxz 21:48, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
- Kept by vote count and also Invalid for lack of a VFD template. lol -RAHB 22:37, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
|
Jacko
Davetopia
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete.. It's vanity disguised as a small armadillo. --Asahatter (annoy) 22:19, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. I thought this was a new article but no its crap from 2005 that managed to survive 3 years of hell here. Those Crappy Orphan Articles are he reason why they have the Random Page Link. ----Pleb- Sawblade5 [citation needed] ( yell | FAQ | I did this ) 08:01, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. -- How do these things last so long? BlueYonder - CONTACT
- Delete. Crap. --UU - natter 16:43, Nov 13
- Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 17:00, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 17:17, Nov 13
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Keep Too new for me to vote anything other than keep. It's got a {{fix}} on it. That means that if it's not fixed after 30 days it may be deleted anyway. No need to bring things like this to VFD. MrN Fork you! 20:13, Nov 12
- Also keep. Plus, you just reviewed it. It's at least common courtesy to let people have a little time after a review to see if they do anything about it. It's better to watchlist it for a while and see if it gets made betterer, then bring it here if it doesn't. Except, in this case, it's best to leave it to the fix template as MrN says. --UU - natter 20:25, Nov 12
- Speedy Keep per not signing the nom vote Read rule #3 above. ----Pleb- Sawblade5 [citation needed] ( yell | FAQ | I did this ) 07:59, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
- Keep.--Sycamore (Talk) 17:01, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
Kept......FOR NOW. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 19:56, Nov 13
|
Keep |
- Keep This stays. MrN Fork you! 20:15, Nov 12
- Keep. Absolutely not random. When I first joined here, the whole Euroipods Crusade bit was one of the funniest arguments I'd ever read, and it made me stick around. Keep it for the memories of those long since past, however unpleasant said memories may be. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 21:37, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep This article is not eligible for VFD per the page being placed in the In Jokes Category by an Admin. See the line on the top section of the VFD page: "This also applies to Uncyclopedia In jokes (see: In-Jokes)." Also the article is preaty funny and very well worth keeping. ----Pleb- Sawblade5 [citation needed] ( yell | FAQ | I did this ) 07:56, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. While I've never really found this funny, it is undeniably an important piece of Uncyclopedia history. pillow talk 09:47, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
- Kelp If you delete this, UNCYCLOPEDIA DIES. Or dies more than it usually does. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 09:52, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
Keep'd. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 09:57, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
|
Straight Into Compton
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. Essentially, it's a list. It's about a fictional Weird Al album, it's random and it just gets crapper as it goes on. An hangover from 2006, not really edited much, and not linked from anywhere so won't be missed. --UU - natter 16:04, Nov 12
- Delete. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 16:21, Nov 12
- Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 17:11, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. MrN Fork you! 20:10, Nov 12
- Delete. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 21:34, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Emoticonia
Sergei Dragunov
Rakiah
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. Patent bollocks/vanity (as suggested by Hindleyite on the talk page) originally created at WP by some bored teenagers, and then brought here. No funny, no point, no links to it, no reason to keep. --UU - natter 11:33, Nov 12
- Delete. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 16:14, Nov 12
- Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 17:13, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. - Prof. Ahh(to the)Diddums[FUCK-A-DOODLE-DOO!] 19:49, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Who? What? MrN Fork you! 20:02, Nov 12
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. Another one from 2005 with elements of random, a strong suspicion of vanity, and nothing worthwhile that I can see. --UU - natter 11:27, Nov 12
- Vanity • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 16:11, Nov 12
- Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 17:13, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. MrN Fork you! 20:04, Nov 12
- Delete. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 21:32, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Invalid No VFD template. Better luck next time. -RAHB 21:59, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
|
PCMCIA
Governor general
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. Hasn't been edited in over a year, and while creative, contains no humor - Prof. Ahh(to the)Diddums[FUCK-A-DOODLE-DOO!] 03:23, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Further proof of the rule that inordinately long numbers are a sure sign of a crap article. --UU - natter 11:10, Nov 12
- Delete • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 16:08, Nov 12
- Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 17:14, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. MrN Fork you! 20:05, Nov 12
|
Comments |
|
Boston Red Sox
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. Its incredibly random, and therefore, completely unfunny. - Prof. Ahh(to the)Diddums[FUCK-A-DOODLE-DOO!] 03:23, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Also redlinky and listy, but yeah, it's crap. --UU - natter 11:05, Nov 12
- Delete. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 16:08, Nov 12
- Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 17:14, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. We need an article about Boston Red Sox, but this article is not about Boston Red Sox. MrN Fork you! 20:00, Nov 12
|
Comments |
|
Gheb
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. Copy/paste of an old version of a WP page, apparently. Random, sexcruft, unfunny as well. --UU - natter 14:57, Nov 12
- Sexcruft. Nasty and unfunny. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 16:20, Nov 12
- Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 17:12, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
- Not much to say, really. -- Hindleyite Converse 17:17, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. MrN Fork you! 20:08, Nov 12
|
Comments |
|
Official iPod Clone
Soma Cruz
Scandenopia
The Bright And Shiny Cult
Slut Brigade
Smithtown
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. Short, odd, kinda random and unfunny towncrufty thing from 2006. Get rid. --UU - natter 08:28, Nov 11
- Delete -- Indeed; the lack of pictures and poor grammar do nothing for its random nature. BlueYonder - CONTACT
- Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 14:20, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 22:09, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
- Delete.--Asahatter (annoy) 23:33, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Template:Cold
- I like it. Don't ask me why. ~ 17:10, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
- Is this like a Super Keep, where your vote goes even higher than the keep box? pillow talk 17:13, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
- Gives me five extra points. ~ 17:25, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. - Unfunny. Does not improve articles that it is transcluded into. At all. pillow talk 17:06, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. I give this one a frosty reception. I look at the articles it's on and I think... "Yea, someone slapped that on there cos they thought it was the right thing to do, but it's making the article look bad" so it gets the cold shoulder from me. MrN Fork you! 17:58, Nov 9
- Delete • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 17:36, Nov 10
- Delete. Happy to see the back of pointless templates. --UU - natter 11:34, Nov 10
- Delete Only on one user page, and that page is a template whore, and its stupid and unfunny.--Mnbvcxz 01:54, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
- Delete -- I agree, it's basic, unfunny and redundant. And by the way, this is my first vote here. Yaaay! BlueYonder - CONTACT
|
Comments |
|
Friki
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. - Do I need to explain why? Asahatter (annoy) 22:33, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
- Delete -RAHB 23:02, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
- Delete MrN Fork you! 02:08, Nov 11
- Delete article needs to be about something fewer English speaking persons would be aware of, and shorter too.--Mnbvcxz 02:10, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Crap. --UU - natter 08:24, Nov 11
|
Comments |
|
Seductive space boob
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. - This was just a bad idea from the start. pillow talk 15:31, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Grues, Norris, randomity... This would, I submit, be a great entry for ?pedia. But here? Nah. --UU - natter 22:42, Nov 4
- Delete. - Gratuitous boobage, Norris, Wilde, the Great Dildo Faggins, random dates, Microsoft, and a title that just screams "Do I really need to read the article to know its VFD?"--Mnbvcxz 03:18, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
- Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 09:46, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Nice try, but still epic fail. Lucario! 18:28, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Er, what?Asahatter (annoy) 12:46, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 17:31, Nov 10
|
Comments |
|
Love Possibly
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. OK, this has been here since 2006, it seems, and I'm at a loss to understand why. I'm gonna go out on a limb and say it's vanity, the content, plus an edit made today and the talk page comment, plus a few googles, seem to bear this out. And it's not funny. And I'd like to see this go, but I place it before the community to see if you disagree, or if someone knows something I don't. --UU - natter 15:52, Nov 10
- Delete. - I thought the same thing--Sycamore (Talk) 15:54, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. - yep, it's vanity. A quick Google or 2
makes you go blind brings up the "stars'" Fecebook profiles etc. Asahatter (annoy) 16:53, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 17:41, Nov 10
- Delete. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 22:06, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Bean Machine
O:
Microsoftland
Keep |
- Keep. I kinda like it, in an odd way. I certainly like the idea. If it goes, I'll have a copy in my userspace please. I may have a tinker if I get time. --UU - natter 11:48, Nov 10
- Keep • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 17:39, Nov 10
- Strong keep. Despite the awful formatting, I think this is funnier than at least two-thirds of the stuff on the site. With a little cleanup and expansion, I bet UU could turn this around into a feature. pillow talk 17:56, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. To tell you the truth, I kind of like it as is. Though a picture would be nice. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 22:00, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Delete. - Poor IP article little progress, crap writing, lame concept and nothing that seems worthwhile to keep.--Sycamore (Talk) 18:04, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
- Delete.MrN Fork you! 18:34, Nov 9
|
Comments |
Keept -RAHB 22:26, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
|
Keep |
- Weak keep Its in reference to the warning labels on some products, which state "This product is known by the state of California to cause cancer, ect" Basically, its a weaselly warning label due to different regulations between states.--Mnbvcxz 19:11, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 19:38, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
- Very Strong Keep For Fucks Sake I use that template on my page. Also this template makes fun of a Law that requires stuff that contains certain chemicals to stat its known to cause cancer in California. ----Pleb- Sawblade5 [citation needed] ( yell | FAQ | I did this ) 23:09, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
- Vague keep. Eh. At least it's not big and massively ugly. --UU - natter 11:26, Nov 10
- Keep.. Funny but true, my mobile home park has a plaque with the gist of this template written on it. I've now lost both my prostates to cancer. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 17:34, Nov 10
|
Delete |
- Delete. - I'm guessing this is a reference to something in California politics in late 2005. It isn't funny now. Let's lose it. pillow talk 18:54, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Naa. MrN Fork you! 20:10, Nov 8
- Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 21:58, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
|
Comments |
Keept -RAHB 22:26, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
|
Grand Theft Auto: London
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. - desperatly bad game cruft, never good and shows no promise of ever improving.--Sycamore (Talk) 18:40, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. MrN Fork you! 18:43, Nov 9'
- Delete. Terrible. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 02:01, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. As bad a GTA article as I've seen, which says it all. --UU - natter 11:50, Nov 10
- Delete Asahatter (annoy) 12:44, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 17:40, Nov 10
|
Comments |
|
Natalya Ivanova
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. - Calling this one a "mess" would be charitable. pillow talk 15:31, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
- Delete, with an explanation. Alright, mate, Hype and I are both assholes. Problem is, there's no redeeming bit of this article. It's senseless and random. I mean, do you really like it? Reading over it, do you think it's super funny? I'm not sure what you're talking about half the time. You can do better. I had articles deleted too, and looking back, it was for excellent reasons. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 22:23, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Or shift into SWJS's userspace, where he can improve it at his leisure. It's massively random, needs a lot of the pointless sexcruft removing, and generally needs a lot of attention. SWJS: you can try putting it up for pee review, and see what advice you get, but I doubt you'll get much help fixing it up unless you find another DAH nerd who doubles as a decent writer. That said, good luck with it! --UU - natter 22:31, Nov 4
- Delete - per the others--Sycamore (Talk) 10:37, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 17:31, Nov 10
|
Comments |
- Comment. - This was my first article. Yes I know it sucks. Hell I suck. But the other article I created, which was BETTER than this one, and got a higher review score than this one, was deleted first. Instead of being an asshole and placing it under VFD, maybe you can try and help fix it up? --SWJS: The All Knowing Destroy All Humans! Nerd(Cortex Scan) 21:53, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
- I'd be more than happy to help you with this if you want, but there's a procedure. First, put a copy in your userspace, or, if it's already deleted, you mention - here or on an admin's talkpage - that you'd like an admin to put a copy in your userspace. They always do. Then, you work on it. If you want help, you submit it to Pee Review. If you want me personally to go help with it, you leave a message on my talk page. Finally, when it's lookin' good, you move it back into mainspace. It will probably get deleted in the meantime, but if it's out of commission for a week or two, who cares? It'll be around for years after that. Of course, only take the time to do all this if you're really committed to this subject. Otherwise, it might be a better idea just to write another article. Good luck! pillow talk 22:34, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
|
Conan O'Brien
Keep |
- Very Weak Keep I suggest leaving the article up until some one can do a complete re-write, sense its a biography of a well known person.--Mnbvcxz 23:22, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Delete. - This is some absolutely unredeemable shit. pillow talk 15:31, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Ah jeez - that's random. I can see the need for a Conan article. But a blank canvas is probably a better starting point than this wall o' crap. --UU - natter 22:18, Nov 4
- Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 15:11, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
- Delete MrN Fork you! 00:27, Nov 8
- Delete. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 17:30, Nov 10
|
Comments |
- Abstain. I would say delete but it appears that someone would love to rewrite this. If the page is deleted it would create soo much red tape when tring to recreate it as it would end up on QVFD no matter how good it is, due to the VFD. ----Pleb- Sawblade5 [citation needed] ( yell | FAQ | I did this ) 04:50, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
- I really don't think it would create too much red tape. Solid Snake was deleted about 50 times and finally the page was protected. I wrote an article in userspace and asked an admin to unprotect the page, and that was pretty much all the red tape involved... pillow talk 17:10, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
|
Generic war
Template:Conspiracy/Biblecode
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. - Appears on only one page; it's the same as the pointless Template:Conspiracy, except it says "OSCAR WILDE HEADS" in red letters, which is only semi-coherent (I guess he "heads" the conspiracy?). Let's get rid of it. pillow talk 17:06, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. - Unfunny and spam, with a little "???" on top. --iseditor.user Comments/Criticism 17:57, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Was only on one page, so I paste the code in, and now it's on none. We can delete this now. MrN Fork you! 18:39, Nov 9
- Delete. Happy to see the back of pointless templates. --UU - natter 11:45, Nov 10
- Delete. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 17:38, Nov 10
|
Comments |
|
Template:Confusing
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. - Not funny, and hardly used at all. pillow talk 17:06, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. -MrN Fork you! 18:31, Nov 9
- Delete. Happy to see the back of pointless templates. --UU - natter 11:37, Nov 10
- Delete Asahatter (annoy) 12:45, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 17:37, Nov 10
|
Comments |
|
Template:Chickenhead
Template:Capitalists
Keep |
- KEEP ON USERPAGES. Just as a side note: as we do this for templates, VFD should serve as a way of cleaning up our mainspace articles. The "No Tampering With Userpages" should always apply here, and I'd just like to state that right now: I'll probably say it again in the HyperVFD forum topic, as well. Otherwise, delete. I'm just making sure that this is noticeable. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 23:22, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Delete. - Ugly clutter. It certainly looks terrible on United States of America. pillow talk 18:54, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
- Delete.
- An advisory template should actually warn the reader, not clutter up space.--Mnbvcxz 19:09, 8 November 2008 (UTC) keep changed per rule against deleting userspace templates.
- Dé¬é†é Nöt funny. Lucario! 20:02, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. MrN Fork you! 20:11, Nov 8
- Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 21:58, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. It's teh ugherlee. But keep in userspace by pasting in code per Modus's comment in the forum. (Even though that sounds like a lot of work - fire up MrN's bot!) --UU - natter 11:28, Nov 10
- Delete • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 17:35, Nov 10
|
Comments |
- Abstain. Meh it looks bad on the mainspace pages just remove them from their but keep them on the user pages and user space this template. ----Pleb- Sawblade5 [citation needed] ( yell | FAQ | I did this ) 23:15, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
- I'll just subst the templates on the userpages, as I normally do. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 19:55, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
|
Horiemon
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. - 2005 stub, little progress and poor throughout. Random also--Sycamore (Talk) 18:53, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
- Delete - per above, random topic, gratuitous unfunny pr0n references.--Mnbvcxz 19:18, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
- Delete - Yep, this is not good. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 19:37, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. MrN Fork you! 20:13, Nov 8
- Delete. what they say Asahatter (annoy) 08:07, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Very Strong Keep as I still stand on my rationale from the previous VFD on this article. per Uncyclopedia:Pages for deletion/archive93#Mai.E2.88.A9_Page ----Pleb- Sawblade5 [citation needed] ( yell | FAQ | I did this ) 11:30, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. I think we're fishing here for things to delete. Delete this, and you might as well start cleaning out the various babel versions. If we're so disturbed about this, I'll move it to babel. But seriously, I think we should concentrate on bad articles rather than those random bits that are present all throughout the site which contributes so much to its wackiness. ~ 11:45, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. There is much worse stuff on the wiki. Like Mordillo, it looks like some of this is fishing for deletion. You could probably find 3 articles worse than this by hitting the random page button 10 times.--Mnbvcxz 00:25, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
- Keep, for the sense of history. I was there, man. I was there. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 04:32, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
- K∑∑p - I like this page. --iseditor.user Comments/Criticism 18:00, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Delete. - This was created a few years back by Nintendorulez - It was also on VFD before. A bit pointless and unfunny, not something thats needed.--Sycamore (Talk) 14:24, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
- |)∑Ł∑†∑ – ∩ø† ƒüññÿ. Lucario! 19:21, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
- Pointless Pants Oh yea baby. Guess who's back, MrN's back, MrN's back, MrN's back. ummmm - "Shut the fuck up MrN". Oh. Yea, OK then... MrN Fork you! 20:38, Nov 7
- Pointless... Shirts. See what I just did there? Yeah, I'm witty. I know. You don't have to tell me. Really, you don't. You're sweet for saying it, though. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 00:57, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Pointless whatever. --UU - natter 08:59, Nov 8
- |)∑Ł∑†∑ Replacing letters with symbols is so hilarious, especially when you don't change anything else --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 03:33, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
|
Comments |
No clear winner. Keep'd. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 01:59, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
|
Do Not Read
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. - Can't see the humor in this. pillow talk 23:16, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. - Its just not funny.--Mnbvcxz 23:34, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
- Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 15:12, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Unfunny. Lucario! 19:16, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. - Correct. Don't read it. --Simon Brown (Talk) 20:13, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Meta articles need to be done well. This isn't. —–Sir Heerenveen, KUN UotM RotM VFH (talk), 9/11 21:41
|
Comments |
- Comment.I went ahead and removed some of the excessive templates on the page that I felt ruined the quality of the page per the edit at [1]. The excessive template spam was probably a reason for VFD here. ----Pleb- Sawblade5 [citation needed] ( yell | FAQ | I did this ) 10:42, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
|