From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
|
This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at VFD.
|
Score: 6
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (6) |
- Wait... what? -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 06:15, June 3, 2011 (UTC)
- Yes.
1234 ~ 06:21, 3 June 2011
- Delete MrN Fork you! 11:50, Jun 3
- Delete. (talk) 19:36, 3 June 2011
- Delete (For Now). I'm just going to hide a version in my userspace for now. I'm going to add a few images, and update it to coincide with modern events. Ironically, Boe is funding educational indie games. Weird? --Gamma287 00:56, June 4, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. per above. --Mn-z 04:08, June 4, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (1) |
- weak keep Not a gem, but not that bad. Mattsnow 22:11, June 2, 2011 (UTC)
|
Delete (6) |
- Looks like meme-cruft to me cap. (talk) 23:45, 1 June 2011
- "Fire will burn it." Indeed. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 03:07 June 2, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Unfunnier than the tiresome original. And that's a crime. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 18:34, June 2, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Who? -- >> Hello, my name is Sir Lollipop, and I am Canadian! 19:22, 3 June 2011
- Blah.
1234 ~ 22:02, 3 June 2011
- Yuk. Let's delete the images too. They don't serve a purpose. --Gamma287 00:58, June 4, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 6
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (6) |
- Vanity, namedropping, stupid, and general badness.
1234 ~ 08:35, 3 June 2011
- Pants MrN Fork you! 11:53, Jun 3
- Delete. (talk) 19:35, 3 June 2011
- Should've been QVFD'd. --Gamma287 01:03, June 4, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. per above. --Mn-z 04:03, June 4, 2011 (UTC)
- Eh?? What the hell is this? It should never have been allowed to live. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 05:02 June 4, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- This not-so-good old UnNews surprised me. From the title, it that sounds like it should be making a lot of easy, unfunny jokes. However, it didn't make any jokes at all. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 16:43, June 2, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. In the spirit of the jokeless joke, this makes No Soap Radio! seem like the Guess what? Chicken butt of all time. Back to you Gene --K evillips эвилипс MUN,CM,NS,3of7 16:47, June 2, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. MrN Fork you! 22:00, Jun 2
- Yuk. This was made even funnier by the fact that Dick Cheney isn't in office any more. --Gamma287 22:20, June 2, 2011 (UTC)
- Yes.
1234 ~ 06:23, 3 June 2011
|
Comments |
|
Score: 4
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (4) |
- Delete Short, and not good. Unlike like my... MrN Fork you! 12:43, Jun 2
- Delete Like my penis, this article has a controversy section. mAttlobster. (hello) 17:24, June 2, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Stumpy, underdeveloped. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 18:29, June 2, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Like your mom, this sucks my penis -- Frosty dah snowguy contribs KUN PLEB 11:25, June 3, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 6
|
Keep (1) |
- I really like this page, my friend and I have shared so many laughs over this page. Please don't delete it. User:Mathnerd93/sig June 1, 2011 20:45
- If you really want to save this one, you can copy it to this page in your userspace. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 03:00 June 2, 2011 (UTC)
- He/she did copy it, User:Mathnerd93/I want Wibbly pig on. So it's ready to huff I guess. Mattsnow 22:04, June 2, 2011 (UTC)
|
Delete (7) |
- Another beast I hunted. If there is something funny about repeating over and over the sentence "I want Wibbly pig on", I sure didn't know. Mattsnow 23:48, June 1, 2011 (UTC)
- Been done better. In every way. (talk) 00:28, 2 June 2011
- Delete. Repetitive page is repetitive. --Count of Monkey Crisco 02:15, June 2, 2011 (UTC)
- AAAAAAAAA! A AAAA AAAAAA AAA AA! -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 03:05 June 2, 2011 (UTC)
- Yawn I want a Wibbly pig on the deletion log. -- Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! - 03:31, 2 June 2011
- Delete. The sooner this is bacon the better. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 18:32, June 2, 2011 (UTC)
- I don't want Wibbly pig on Uncyclopedia anymore. -- 22:08, June 2, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: -2
|
Keep (3) |
- Doesn't seem that bad. (talk) 18:21, 1 June 2011
- Perhaps because it isn't. Random does not always mean awful. Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 03:21, June 2, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. I want one in green --K evillips эвилипс MUN,CM,NS,3of7 03:28, June 2, 2011 (UTC)
|
Delete (1) |
- Delete. Somewhere somebody though lemon + antelope = comedy gold. That somewhere is planet 2006 in the Cruft-o dimension. --Count of Monkey Crisco 15:30, June 1, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Kept MrN Fork you! 17:37, Jun 2
|
Score: -1
|
Keep (4) |
- Keep. It's dumb, yes. However, I don't like the idea of deleting anything that already happens to be in use on some userpages. It might be better to send it to the author's userspace and redirect. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 22:35 June 1, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. per being a user-page box. --Mn-z 01:44, June 2, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep Per abovewards. mAttlobster. (hello) 17:26, June 2, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. CTF was the best game I ever played from age 8-10. I think now they call it paint ball. --K evillips эвилипс MUN,CM,NS,3of7 17:39, June 2, 2011 (UTC)
|
Delete (3) |
- Delete. Unneeded userbox for a nonexistent game. -- 15:26, June 1, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Yeah, okay. --Count of Monkey Crisco 15:32, June 1, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. So how do I tell the world that I like capture the flag? (talk) 18:24, 1 June 2011
|
Comments |
- Kept MrN Fork you! 17:41, Jun 2
|
Score: 0
|
Keep (3) |
- Keep. Spoofs a slightly overplayed horror movie plot. With some trimming it'll be okay. In other words, this article (takes off sunglasses) is salvageable. --Count of Monkey Crisco 13:49, June 1, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. it was sloppy and quickly made, but with a little TLC and formatting, I made it look better, but still needs a hot beef injection of humor--K evillips эвилипс MUN,CM,NS,3of7 03:17, June 2, 2011 (UTC)
- Abandoned Ships. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 15:49, June 2, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep Apparently 'it's a known scientific fact'. mAttlobster. (hello) 17:27, June 2, 2011 (UTC)
|
Delete (3) |
- Delete. ABANDON SHIP, MORE CRUFT! -- Frosty dah snowguy contribs KUN PLEB 10:55, June 1, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Walk the plank. The huffing plank that is. Just to be sure you knew what I meant when I was talking about the plank. MrN Fork you! 12:11, Jun 1
- Delete. (talk) 18:25, 1 June 2011
|
Comments |
- Froggy, you did not adjust the count with your vote, and I cannot quite tell your intent as yea or nay, section yes keep, but wording makes me wonder.--K evillips эвилипс MUN,CM,NS,3of7 16:23, June 2, 2011 (UTC)
- Kept MrN Fork you! 17:38, Jun 2
|
Score: -1
|
Keep (3) |
- Keep "sneek previews of the next days rations and home videos of cooking creations sent in by Iraqi housewives.". OK concept, enough good to be worth saving, and not offensive enough to want it to die. MrN Fork you! 12:14, Jun 1
- Per above. (talk) 18:29, 1 June 2011
- Keep. -- >> Hello, my name is Sir Lollipop, and I am Canadian! 18:12, 2 June 2011
|
Delete (2) |
- Delete. 2005 cruft -- Frosty dah snowguy contribs KUN PLEB 10:39, June 1, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Every sentence has the potential to make the reader smile. Never has potential appeared so inadequate. mAttlobster. (hello) 11:51, June 1, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Not quite. --Count of Monkey Crisco 13:25, June 1, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Kept MrN Fork you! 21:56, Jun 2
|
Score: 6
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (6) |
- Delete. Part Ramble, part random,
all cop no redeeming value. --Count of Monkey Crisco 22:58, May 31, 2011 (UTC)
- Yuk. --Gamma287 01:35, June 1, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Mop and bucket required. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:52, June 1, 2011 (UTC)
- Burninate! C*R*A*P indeed. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 09:22 June 1, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. (talk) 18:30, 1 June 2011
- Delete Jesus is generally crap. mAttlobster. (hello) 19:21, June 1, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 6
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (6) |
- Delete. Obviously written by members of their message board for members of their message board. Actually names individual members of the message board "community" making for jokes which only a few dozen people could ever get. Most of the article is borderline vanity and lists. --Count of Monkey Crisco 22:40, May 31, 2011 (UTC)
- Word Of The Day: Vomit. --Gamma287 01:33, June 1, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Vanity vomit. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:51, June 1, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Per Romartus. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 09:22 June 1, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. (talk) 18:42, 1 June 2011
- Burninate! and sets Tardis ahead for 2 hours so someone can do it to it now --K evillips эвилипс MUN,CM,NS,3of7 21:02, June 1, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 4
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (4) |
- Delete. Started in 2006 by an IP and largely unchanged since this article suffers from a very weak theme and a lack of funny ideas. To pad out it's length it goes off on needless tangents and uses short bursts of randumbo. --Count of Monkey Crisco 12:47, May 31, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. I would call this a "Frog with 7 Butts" type-article, i.e. the author makes up a funny random creature, then produces pointless facts, listcruft, and/or randumbo about the subject, since there really isn't humor besides the title and possibly a photoshopped pic. --Mn-z 20:39, May 31, 2011 (UTC)
- Radioactive! Yet again, another rare appearance of Gamma287 has come about, and this time it's to delete an article (again). This article is too bad to even have a corny joke about the title. This makes me sick... --Gamma287 01:26, June 1, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. An article that wears its stupidity with pride. Remove. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:49, June 1, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 0
|
Keep (3) |
- Actually IS based in reality, though reality from 2006. And also not that bad. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 22:51, May 31, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 11:13, June 1, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep I would almost seem pointless to nominate old UnNews articles. mAttlobster. (hello) 11:46, June 1, 2011 (UTC)
|
Delete (3) |
- Delete. another unNews that does not appear to be funny or related to reality. --Mn-z 01:36, May 30, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. (talk) 22:24, 30 May 2011
- NEIN!!! --Gamma287 01:28, June 1, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Kept MrN Fork you! 11:47, Jun 1
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- There's really not much here, and what there is is just... bad.
1234 ~ 06:57, 30 May 2011
- Hilariously bad. This really belongs in somebody's userspace; like mine! Now I can send noobs who didn't read HTBFANJS to our very own house of horrors. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 10:40 May 30, 2011 (UTC)
- EXTERMINATE! (talk) 22:24, 30 May 2011
- Delete. Those lists suck. Mattsnow 22:43, May 30, 2011 (UTC)
- TheSlyFox is true.YEAH.--Fcukman 04:09, May 31, 2011 (UTC)
- bye-bye-- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 05:17, May 31, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 4
|
Keep (1) |
- Keep. -- Frosty dah snowguy contribs KUN PLEB 04:53, May 30, 2011 (UTC)
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. per my new quest to clean up category:Pregnancy and its sub-cats. This is old unfunny vanity that no-one cares about anymore, and probably should have in the UnSignPost if it existed back then. --Mn-z 12:47, May 29, 2011 (UTC)
- Agreed. --Black Flamingo 18:19, May 29, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. (talk) 21:46, 29 May 2011
- Aye... could have been good, but isn't.
1234 ~ 04:21, 31 May 2011
- Delete.--Count of Monkey Crisco 12:40, May 31, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 0
|
Keep (2) |
- Weak KeepIt looks pretty bad at first glance, but the writing is actually not quite so terrible. It could use some minor touching up, but I don't see it as deletion-worthy. I'll see what I can do with it. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 04:07 May 29, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. Per above -- Frosty dah snowguy contribs KUN PLEB 10:22, May 29, 2011 (UTC)
|
Delete (2) |
- Just random...
1234 ~ 04:00, 29 May 2011
- CRAP Not much worth saving, and not much will be missed. --Scofield & Dudes 12:10, May 30, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Kept MrN Fork you! 15:08, May 31
|
Score: -2
|
Keep (5) |
- Keep. I can only judge by my bodies reaction. I lollollolol at this. Couldn't help it, must be something wrong with me. Aleister 3:42 29-5-'11
- What's come over me? Here it comes againnnnnnnnnn Keep. --K evillips эвилипс MUN,CM,NS,3of7 03:50, May 29, 2011 (UTC)
- I watched that movie. Simba kills Scar. This is happening here. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 03:53, May 29, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. -- Frosty dah snowguy contribs KUN PLEB 10:22, May 29, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep mAttlobster. (hello) 15:04, May 29, 2011 (UTC)
|
Delete (3) |
- Delete. Good God! What was that? --Scofield & Dudes 17:32, May 28, 2011 (UTC)
- Indeed (talk) 21:30, 28 May 2011
- ..'random chathedral'...noooooo..take the bad article away nurse! --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 10:45, May 29, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Three Keep votes? Something is definitely wrong with you people! --Scofield & Dudes 07:06, May 29, 2011 (UTC)
- It's funny! And a truz story, I actually met Matthew Broderick once, and he's about the palest person I've ever met. He was white, like a sheet, well, not quite that white, but pretty white. He probably scares Sarah Jessica every morning just after she scares him. Aleister 13:10 29-5-'11
- That "jornalist" should have thought of this. Bad spelling, bad grammar, and it basically reduces a famous actor's career to a single role for the sole purpose of going on and on about sex. I don't know that the article needs to be deleted, but right now there's practically nothing except hormonal "humor". --Sloublues 13:18, May 29, 2011 (UTC)
- I completely fail to understand how this article has any redeeming value. If this is kept, and radical changes aren't made within the coming month, I'm definitely renominating it. --Scofield & Dudes 12:07, May 30, 2011 (UTC)#
- Kept -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 21:42, May 30, 2011 (UTC)
|
Score: 3
|
Keep (2) |
- Keep. Although this is utter shite I believe it has to be archived as old UnNews -- Frosty dah snowguy contribs KUN PLEB 10:25, May 29, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep UnNews. mAttlobster. (hello) 16:43, May 29, 2011 (UTC)
|
Delete (5) |
- We're nominating crappy old UnNews articles for deletion? Yippy! --Scofield & Dudes 08:58, May 28, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. I've always believed UnNews articles to have greater merit than we credit them for. I think they're worthy of categorization and linkage to mainspace articles. They frequently get featured. Their only bad turn was being badly organized. Just as UnNews articles are worthy of getting the feature nod so should the worst of them qualify for VFD nomination. --Count of Monkey Crisco 10:08, May 28, 2011 (UTC)
- Not nearly as bad as the UnNews I've been looking at of late, but still bad enough.
1234 ~ 22:54, 28 May 2011
- Delete. --Black Flamingo 18:22, May 29, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. (talk) 21:37, 29 May 2011
|
Comments |
|
Score: -1
|
Keep (3) |
- Keep. Iz removed the UnNews and just mainspaced it. Bad in parts, good in parts, probably not VFD candidate material imnho. Maybe we can slow down on UnNews VFD's and let people catch up, it takes time to go thru so many articles. And maybe just nom the "for sure" delete ones for awhile, until they are used up. Aleister 3:32 28-5-'11
- Keep. It's not that bad at all. Mattsnow 08:46, May 28, 2011 (UTC)
- LOL -- Frosty dah snowguy contribs KUN PLEB 10:26, May 29, 2011 (UTC)
|
Delete (2) |
- I'm really not sure why this was moved to UnNews. Also, it seems bad.
1234 ~ 03:25, 28 May 2011
- Oh it's one of those articles. (talk) 08:09, 28 May 2011
|
Comments |
1234 ~ 05:16, 31 May 2011
|
Score: -2
|
Keep (8) |
- Keep. magical or something. --Mn-z 00:15, May 28, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep Might as well keep or summin. mAttlobster. (hello) 00:18, May 28, 2011 (UTC)
- Weak Keep. It leads to that other article which is strangely appealing. I want to know what happened when she gave birth..... -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 00:32 May 28, 2011 (UTC)
- The lizard is standing on its hind legs inside a woman's womb while wielding a wizard's wand. The woman apparantly is just standing there. What's not to like? Aleister 1:26-28-5-'11
- Keep. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 03:21, 28 May 2011
- because it's fucking retarded or something --Roman Dog Bird 03:23, May 28, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. It's Mrthejazz... a case not yet solved. 06:37, May 28, 2011 (UTC)
- FEATURE -- Frosty dah snowguy contribs KUN PLEB 10:27, May 29, 2011 (UTC)
|
Delete (6) |
- Since we're nominating old UnNews, we might as well nominate in-jokes too... except this isn't an in-joke, as it claims to be. It's a rehash of another in-joke that is, as it admits, fucking retarded. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by thekillerfroggy (talk • contribs)
- Delete You know, despite my comments on the nom below I have to side with deleting this one. I did think this was funny when first created, but now I feel that its time has come. Sorry Mnbvcxz. MrN Fork you! 00:29, May 28
- It is what it is, and I've never been a fan of these things even in their first iterations.
1234 ~ 01:46, 28 May 2011
- Not funny Mattsnow 03:51, May 28, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. WE have these three lousy articles, iCarly, the sojourn to iCarly and this supporting eachother but none of them are supported by a solid foundation of good writing. I can get behind a bad article that only exists to support a decent one but this Borromean ring of bad articles has no special merit in my eyes. --Count of Monkey Crisco 07:46, May 28, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. I go along with the Count here - and also for introducing me to Borromean as a new mathematically-based criticism for an unworthy article. Who said you don't learn anything on Uncyclopedia?. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 09:13, May 28, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
1234 ~ 05:16, 31 May 2011
|
Score: 4
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (4) |
- Delete. Running out of witty remarks, just bad ok? -- Frosty dah snowguy contribs KUN PLEB 08:03, May 29, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Shame it just isn't funny. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 10:34, May 29, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. per above. --Mn-z 18:30, May 29, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. (talk) 21:42, 29 May 2011
|
Comments |
Comment. Going to the page I see it links off to a huge pile of articles all with the same structure! Perhaps all should be brought here and culled. Leave just one alive, chained in the Uncyclopedia dungeon as eternal punishment. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 10:34, May 29, 2011 (UTC)
|
Score: 6
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (6) |
- This is bad.
1234 ~ 09:03, 28 May 2011
- Delete. Its only virtue is brevity. --Count of Monkey Crisco 10:03, May 28, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. (talk) 21:31, 28 May 2011
- Delete.per above. --Mn-z 03:59, May 29, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. While I won't be the one to dredge through UnNews, I don't mind voting on such articles here. If it's bad, it's bad, regardless of namespace; and this is very bad. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 04:01 May 29, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. This is really bad -- Frosty dah snowguy contribs KUN PLEB 10:23, May 29, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Deleting UnNews articles seems pointless to me. No harm in it if they're crap, but still pointless. mAttlobster. (hello) 10:12, May 28, 2011 (UTC)
- What Matt said. They're basically equivalent to archived Forum Talk pages. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 13:52, May 28, 2011 (UTC)
- Except where they can be categorized, nominated for feature and linked to mainspace pages. --Count of Monkey Crisco 16:02, May 28, 2011 (UTC)
|
Score: 6
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (6) |
- This is bad.
1234 ~ 08:59, 28 May 2011
- Delete. Very bad. --Scofield & Dudes 09:01, May 28, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Very, very bad. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 03:50 May 29, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. insufficiently magical or something!! --Mn-z 03:55, May 29, 2011 (UTC)
- Please, asplode! Mattsnow 08:12, May 29, 2011 (UTC)
- I don't think so. -- Frosty dah snowguy contribs KUN PLEB 10:24, May 29, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 6
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (6) |
- Unused navigation template with horrible colors. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 04:29, May 28, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete.--Count of Monkey Crisco 07:51, May 28, 2011 (UTC)
- Not exactly horrible, but I see your point. (talk) 08:11, 28 May 2011
- Delete. Nobody is going to use that. Mattsnow 08:42, May 28, 2011 (UTC)
- Yes.
1234 ~ 09:02, 28 May 2011
- Delete. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 11:17, May 28, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: -6
|
Keep (7) |
- Keep UnNews mAttlobster. (hello) 23:50, May 27, 2011 (UTC)
- Oughta auto-keep this. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 23:56, May 27, 2011 (UTC)
- I lollollollolollol five times, starting from the first pic. Feature. Aleister 1:24 28-5-'11
- I lollollollolollol fifty times, starting from the first word. Feature. --Roman Dog Bird 03:25, May 28, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 04:19, May 28, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. IMHO, this kind of bizarro stuff is really what Uncyc is all about. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 03:54 May 29, 2011 (UTC)
- bandwagon keep there appears to be a strong consensus for keeping this article. --Mn-z 03:59, May 29, 2011 (UTC)
|
Delete (1) |
# Delete. Since user:Dr. Skullthumper suggested that UnNews be subject to the same QA standards as the rest of the site, I've decided to nominate old unNews for deletion. This one is basically a rouge punchline, and the topic of animal impregnation has been done better in other articles. --Mn-z 23:47, May 27, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. When it comes to pregnancy, giving birth, or generally icky baby related issues everyone knows that they can rely on Mnbvcxz to be our yardstick for quality. MrN Fork you! 23:52, May 27
|
Comments |
1234 ~ 04:02, 29 May 2011
|