From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
 |
This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion.
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete - Pointless drivel. Believe it. --AAA! (AAAA) 09:14, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- -- Hindleyite Converse 12:51, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch
 13:51, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- nande! nande dattebayo! - jack mort | cunt | talk
 - 14:44, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- Kill and redirect to Naruto. --UNKNOWNFILE 15:27, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- Holy crap ~ QUILz ( talk | contrib ) 16:15, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- d3l373 - As was said above, "What?" --El Destructeso 20:02, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
Executed, voting closed. Believe it! —RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY)20:08, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Oh, the irony! --L 02:33, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- Whoa, that's an old page, created by Savethemooses no less. Oh well Delete --
 Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 04:04, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- Was good, now it sucks. Delete. --UNKNOWNFILE 08:32, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Complete crap. ~ QUILz ( talk | contrib ) 08:38, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 13:45, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- Huff - jack mort | cunt | talk - 14:39, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
Baleeted Delorted Deletard Thrown out, voting closed. —RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY)20:11, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
- Speedy keep. --UNKNOWNFILE 03:41, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
- Keep --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 04:41, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
- Keep --AhhDiddums 08:50, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. Needs coherency, editing, coherency, revision, and coherency, but is a necessary article.----OEJ 15:51, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
- Were this the actual Republican Party, I'd say delete, but... —Sir Major Hinoa [TALK] [KUN] [16:19, 5 January 2007 (UTC)]
- Keep. Needs coherency. This article needs to exist. Hhamdy283 16:55, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
- keep - jack mort | cunt | talk - 14:30, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
|
| Comments |
Kept; voting closed. —RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY)01:54, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete Recreation of a previously deleted article. --General Insineratehymn 01:36, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- Should be QVFD --Prolix 01:59, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- Redirect to CVP --AAA! (AAAA) 03:20, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- Trash --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 04:04, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- Instahuff and CVP. --UNKNOWNFILE 08:32, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. ~ QUILz ( talk | contrib ) 08:35, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- Tony Blair? Randumb. -- Hindleyite Converse 13:04, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete One of the hangers-on in Category:Forest Fire Week candidates. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 00:47, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
- Bajs, merde, kuso, shit, or whatever it is in your language. --UNKNOWNFILE 03:52, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 04:45, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete —Braydie at 13:01, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- huff - jack mort | cunt | talk - 13:49, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- Yawn. -- Hindleyite Converse 13:53, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete: This is either a brilliant work of prose or... something? Vanity? Nonsense? It's had the old-style Grue warning on it since time immemorial (November 2005), so my guess is it's huffable regardless. --CaptainSpam MUN PUTPBAA 00:39, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
- Wow, that sucks. --UNKNOWNFILE 03:53, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
- Die in a fire -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 04:28, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
- Dire pie of the Shire --Ж
 WHEEEEE! 04:35, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
- Fucking Kill --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 01:20, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
Executed; voting closed. —RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY)01:51, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete: A list article, a vanity article, AND a poorly-written article overall! The trifecta! --CaptainSpam MUN PUTPBAA 00:26, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
- Vanityshite + listcruft = instahuff --UNKNOWNFILE 03:37, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 04:22, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
- Huff --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 09:18, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
- Save from the crazy kitten addicts. --UNKNOWNFILE 03:35, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
- Keep -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 04:29, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
- Keep--AhhDiddums 08:57, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
- keep my image at least :*( Inerd
- Keep Now we're starting to delete good articles. Mr. Briggs Inc. 00:55, 6 January 2007 (UTC) Eh?
- keep. Not as good as it ought to be but not huffworthy - jack mort | cunt | talk - 13:46, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
- Delete. --Andorin Kato 04:15, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
- Surely more can be done with masturbation humour than this.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 04:32, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Such a hilarious title. Such a letdown. --//Dynamo// 06:47, 5 January 2007
|
| Comments |
- Was an abandoned WIP. It's done, but I don't get it. Leaving it to the masses. --KATIE!! 17:50, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete: If this is an attempt at satire, it fails miserably. It's stupid, not funny at all, and just comes across as bigoted.Rogpyvbc 07:01, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. ~ QUILz ( talk | contrib ) 07:31, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 14:10, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. --UNKNOWNFILE 17:08, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 04:18, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete--AhhDiddums 08:54, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Take it out behind the shed: Very random and completely unfunny. I started an attempt to do what I felt would improve it with making small edits, and the user who wrote it in its current form wont let the article budge. -AhhDiddums 04:06, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 13:49, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
- Merde-on-a-stick. --UNKNOWNFILE 03:49, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
- Fucking Kill --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 01:20, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete —Braydie at 12:57, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- (Shakes head) -- Hindleyite Converse 13:03, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- User:Manintheceiling Keeps taking the deletion tag off of the page, I don't know if its bad/against policy that he's doing that
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete: How do you fix a list article? Why, you just combine all the list items into one unbroken paragraph, of course! Plus, it reeks of middle school angst and the history shows ICU tags being yoinked at random. --CaptainSpam MUN PUTPBAA 21:26, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete:It will be way to hard to try to save. I do not think many editors will edit because it will take a lot of work and even if they put a lot of work into it still will probably be deleted.Sir james paul 22:40, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. ~ QUILz ( talk | contrib ) 23:51, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
- Not listcruft, but still sucks. Deletify. --UNKNOWNFILE 00:53, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
- Icky. Slay. I've seen this before and I wonder why I didn't VFD it... at least back then there was an actual list rather than a giant paragraph. --Andorin Kato 04:30, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Is this cack? Why, yes, it is.--Nydas 10:10, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 13:48, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
Looks dead to me... voting closed. --Andorin Kato 08:18, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
- Keep It needs a lot of editing but not so much a editor would not want to change it. Sir james paul 22:45, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
- keep - jack mort | cunt | talk - 13:41, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
- Huff. Someone flagged this with the FFW template on New Year's Eve, but taking a look at the history it seems the NRV tag was removed. So, what do you say? --UNKNOWNFILE 06:50, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
- Huff -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 04:27, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete —Braydie at 00:47, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
- Delete--Winston 14:58, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete Useless stub, not funny. --Prolix 06:03, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
- Burn More like an info-lacking wikipedia page.
I WAS HERE -kjhf!- 13:14, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
- Deletify The signature at the bottom is the clincher. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 20:46, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Ugh. ~ QUILz ( talk | contrib ) 20:54, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
- Smashy! --UNKNOWNFILE 06:54, 3 January 2007 (UTC) (I need community service hours.)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
- Keep - So good, it practically parodies itself! The Humbled Master 03:51, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
- We're off to a crappy start, but I say Keep and rewrite. --UNKNOWNFILE 06:55, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
- Keep - Funny and relivent, if you understand the geography of mid wales --Talkshowbob 15:15, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- Has potential. Keep and expand. --UNKNOWNFILE 17:06, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. There are lots of worse "I hate my hometown" articles; this one is not bad.----OEJ 17:20, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. Could be expanded; with luck someone funny will stumble upon this. It's not worth deleting.--Andorin Kato 23:45, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- Keep I think other people from Wales will find this amusing. Needs more contribs from others. --Deathmachine 01:17, 2 January 2007 (GMT)
- Keep borth is in wales and everything about wales is funny ---Penuple 01:35, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
- Rewrite Has potential. --General Insineratehymn 01:05, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
- Keep--Winston 15:02, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
- Rewrite' In its current state it is a piece of shit but can be made better. Sir james paul 23:10, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Tested on several known liberal and known conservative friends. Bipartisan consensus: Not funny. --
 » His Majesty King George VI (the boxes)     10:32, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- Die in a fire. I'm running out of comments to make. --UNKNOWNFILE 17:18, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Third parties also agree that this is not funny. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 21:44, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- Throw it in the fire with the rest of the crap. --General Insineratehymn 01:08, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
- Long, but still few hidden gems. Delete--Winston 15:04, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Shit, shit, shit, shit, shit, shit, shit. The article is SHIT plain and simple. No offense. Sir james paul 23:14, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
Some redeeming value - namely, The Necrophile Song. --UNKNOWNFILE 17:16, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
- Delete - It's not what I was hoping for... --AAA! (AAAA) 07:32, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Wow. ~ QUILz ( talk | contrib ) 07:52, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Will gross out normal people and the song is plagiarized. --General Insineratehymn 17:39, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- OK, now that I know the song has been plagiarized, I am forced to change my vote. Pwn. --UNKNOWNFILE 20:54, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- I couldn't help laughing, but it is gross as hell. --» His Majesty King George VI (the boxes) 08:35, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- Necrophile Song swiped from Oxford University Light Entertainment Society: see here.----OEJ 17:34, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete Zoophilia is just wrong. --AAA! (AAAA) 07:29, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete This article is not very funny. --» His Majesty King George VI (the boxes) 08:35, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- More listcruft. --UNKNOWNFILE 17:09, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. MMMMmmmmmm....zoophilia! Making lists instead of real article is bad and wrong, however. ----OEJ 17:25, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete "Mummy, I want blood!" That is probably more funny than the article. --
I WAS HERE -kjhf!- 17:29, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Lists. Boring lists. ~ QUILz ( talk | contrib ) 18:39, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Zorak would not appreciate being fucked. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 21:47, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- Fuck.--Andorin Kato 23:46, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - What sick fuck wrote those lists?! —Braydie at 23:47, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- Destroy any references to zoophilia. --General Insineratehymn 02:11, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
Friend's University Writing Center and get some help. Wikipedia has an article on FU, though. ----OEJ 23:22, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete --General Insineratehymn 00:33, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Not funny in the least bit.--Sir james paul 01:52, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- Le huffe. --UNKNOWNFILE 06:04, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Umm... what? --» His Majesty King George VI (the boxes) 11:22, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - Beastiality is usually considered a no-no. --AAA! (AAAA) 14:10, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. ~ QUILz ( talk | contrib ) 15:28, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Kids, just say "no" to zoophilia.
Necrophilia on the other hand... No necrophilia either. --General Insineratehymn 00:36, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete No. Get rid of it. --Sir james paul 01:55, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- Slap. --UNKNOWNFILE 06:03, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
- I love the memorable quotes. --» His Majesty King George VI (the boxes) 10:11, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
- Keep It can be fixed to be better. --Sir james paul 01:58, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. Give me two sodas, a dildo, some vaseline, and a lot of tissues, and I can probably have this one looking presentable to the British House of Lords within a week. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 21:46, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- Keep --Prolix 06:09, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
- No laughs here. --
 » >UF|TLK|▋» 02:54, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete. I don't usually VFD long articles that include pictures, but I think this one is very bad. The phrase "park whore" does not even appear in Urban Dictionary's listings of memes and trendy freakspeak.----OEJ 18:35, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- I think it's a local saying. Said by locals.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 18:59, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- Toss. --UNKNOWNFILE 20:40, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- Pwn!--Andorin Kato 00:29, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. ~ QUILz ( talk | contrib ) 15:50, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
|
| Comments |
- No, it isn't. -- Mitch 11:01, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Sucks. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 11:21, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- Agreed. --UNKNOWNFILE 15:08, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - Wow. —Braydie at 15:25, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- Yuck!. -- herr doktor needsAcell
 [scream!] 15:39, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete----OEJ 15:52, 30 December 2006 (UTC)Delete.
- Ahh, I get it now. Not any, I never get that. (I spent no time at all thinking that up, and it's still funnier than the page).--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 18:55, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 09:25, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Lightsaber it. Am I missing something or this is pure vanity shite? -- herr doktor needsAcell [scream!] 06:53, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- Killify. --UNKNOWNFILE 06:58, 30 December 2006 (UTC) (I need a new sig)
- Delete - Yeah, that is a complete waste of time. —Braydie at 15:20, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Not so much an article as vanity mixed with a regurgitation of anime and cartoon teenprop.----OEJ 15:58, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- I could have used the time that I spent reading that to do something else.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 18:53, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- Yeah, kill it. --Andorin Kato 03:41, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- L 06:13, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- Throw into the Deadly Abyss of Death. --UNKNOWNFILE 06:43, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - Lists make up more than half of the article. —Braydie at 15:14, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- No point in keeping. -- herr doktor needsAcell [scream!] 15:40, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Deeply confused, but shallow.----OEJ 15:51, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- The intro is an interesting (if poorly worded) start to a satire on Creationism vs Neodarwinism (the Hitler/Darwin argument comes up on occasion in that realm)...then it goes all listy. Too much work to fix; too little chance of funny even if I do.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 18:46, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Flagged this for a rewrite a week ago, and I can see that there hasn't been improvement. Kill. --UNKNOWNFILE 03:23, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- As a Zelda Classic fan I approve of the destruction of this page. --L 06:13, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - That is a lot of lists. —Braydie at 15:13, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- Random and listy and quotes...oh my!--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 15:59, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 09:27, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Throw to the lions. Just a stupid rant. --UNKNOWNFILE 03:14, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete —Braydie at 15:11, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- If you're going to write crap, at least format the damn thing.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 15:57, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Useless.----OEJ 15:59, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- WTH? Touch with a 10-foot pole. --Andorin Kato 03:42, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Whip. Little contributions, sucky, and hasn't been updated in months. --UNKNOWNFILE 03:10, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete it well --Alksub 07:46, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete —Braydie at 15:10, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- Um, yeh.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 15:55, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Short, unwitty, randumb.----OEJ 16:01, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- What's this? - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 12:44, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- Randumb shit, that's what. --UNKNOWNFILE 14:03, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - Aye —Braydie at 14:10, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Baddly splelling + more badder grammar + confused concept.----OEJ 15:22, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- Barf --General Insineratehymn 18:13, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- QVFD --AAA! (AAAA) 23:05, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Randumb. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 08:12, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- Huff. --UNKNOWNFILE 14:05, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete —Braydie at 14:13, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Relatively long, relatively decent history, has (unshopped) pic, but unltimately a failure.----OEJ 15:17, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- A couple of funny lines just aren't enough to overcome its whateverthisisness.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 15:54, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 09:29, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete A bit too much... --AAA! (AAAA) 06:33, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - The Bushes in a band is an OK idea, but it needs a complete rewrite. --Alksub 08:25, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- Sucks. I Think Satan Likes Your Mom is a better article involving George Bush. --UNKNOWNFILE 13:40, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - "da SPEECH" —Braydie at 14:25, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
I don't know how to vote on this article. The idea of the bushes in a band is good but the article in the current state, not so good. I believe that in most cases if the article can be salvaged then we should. This article would need to have a major amount of edits to make it good. It would take a lot of energy and time and I am not sure editors would put in the right amount of energy needed to put it up to standards. This is making me think deletion would be best. At the same time it can be fixed, this makes me want to keep it. I think that I will not vote to keep or delete it. I am fine with it either way. --Sir james paul 02:11, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
- Keep and re-write' Same reason as the above comment. --Sir james paul 02:13, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- Keep and rewrite Some of it may be salvageable. --Alksub 08:27, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
- I removed all of the vandalism pointing out how bad it was, but it's still bad.
  t o m p k i n s blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 00:02, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- I didn't much like the show. This isn't helping.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 08:54, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - I do think a page needs to be on here somewhere, but I'd rather have it deleted and started again. —Braydie at 14:23, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Die in a fire. Unfunny listcruft. --UNKNOWNFILE 22:48, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- Shite --Tt22 22:51, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- This article is just a list, therefore, it must die. --General Insineratehymn 23:58, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- Deleter and the magnets --Alksub 08:30, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- Nope.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 08:52, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete.----OEJ 20:13, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - The reason I hate this article is in the title. Also see Insineratehymn's reason for elaboration. —Braydie at 14:22, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Huff. If it's what I think it is, we've got a better article already. If it isn't what I think it is, we've got a million better articles already, most of them on QVFD. --
 20:15, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- Sucks. --UNKNOWNFILE 22:40, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - It's not funny, and the portions are terrible. --Alksub 08:22, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete —Braydie at 14:19, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Yep, it sure were. --General Insineratehymn 18:14, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete: Three short sentences and some lists. No solid content.----OEJ 18:50, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. ~ QUILz ( talk | contrib ) 19:10, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- Rejected! --UNKNOWNFILE 22:35, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- Hosers deserve better, eh.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 08:51, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - Just 2 lines and 3 lists. —Braydie at 14:18, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- Strong Delete Its a list! Not a article. --Sir james paul 02:14, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
- Keep. Needs cleanup, yes. Needs deletion? No. -- SonicChao Babbel!Contribs 20:11, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- Keep and de-list the article. Also add more humor. --UNKNOWNFILE 22:39, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- Keep --Alksub 08:33, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- Keep putting clean-up template on. --
I WAS HERE -kjhf!- 12:55, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
- Keep It is fixable. --Sir james paul 02:16, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
- Keep as it is very funny (in my eyes atleast). --UNKNOWNFILE 22:38, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- Keep Yeah it is pretty funny, but disgruntled bigots are writing those comments, it's not satire, so I can see how it could cause real offense. --Tt22 22:53, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- As long as morons are concentrating their bile on the talkpage, they aren't messing with the pagepage (or if they are, they're messing with the pagepage less, due to the distraction of very slowly filling up the talkpage with bile). Semiprotecting the pagepage just pushed them to the talkpage; semiprotecting the talkpage will just push them to mess with other Isrealated pages. Try adding an archive to the talkpage called "holocaust deniers" or something. Also, I've discovered that I enjoy using the term pagepage.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 23:07, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- Keep Its a tawk page, and its amusing (eyes famines comment with a smile)--Witt,
 of  UNion Entertain me* 06:17, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- Weak keepVery, very weak keep. --Sir james paul 02:22, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- Keepits a funny article. that zionist occupation offends me every day by killing innocent children which is not funny —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Penuple (talk • contribs)
|
| Delete |
- I know this is a bit unorthodox, but this is becoming an ugly political racial debate, and I just had about enough. This is the one place I don't need this. So please, delete and semi-protect. What say ye? Brigadier Sir Mordillo
 GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI3 AnotM VFH +S 12:03, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 12:27, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - I don't know what Policy would say on deleting talk pages if he were here. But this adds nothing to dialogue to counteract its vulgarity. --Alksub 08:44, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Goddamned Jews. On a serious note, while the bigotry is kinda funny, Uncyc isn't the place for racism. Or is it? BaCaRuDa 15:32, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Found this through Random Page. Not only does it suck, but it removed the ICU tag, and hasn't been edited by many people, which gives me a reason to list it here. Huff, but save me some of it. --UNKNOWNFILE 03:08, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- Not much content. -- Hindleyite Converse 11:30, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. ----OEJ 16:46, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. -- SonicChao Babbel!Contribs 20:13, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- Wow. That's a list, all right.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 04:16, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
|
| Comments |
- Moved to user subpage. No point continuing this. --AAA! (AAAA) 12:48, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Contrary to popular belief, an image is not worth a thousand words. Nor does it make it good. Huff. --UNKNOWNFILE 04:36, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
- Merge with something else I thought the 'Facts at a Glance' sheet was extremely funny.
--Prolix 07:27, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- Agree with Prolix. Facts at a glance had me laughing out loud! Rest could use work, of course. --» His Majesty King George VI (the boxes) 10:44, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. There is some decent material here. That horrible slander-sheet Wikipedia has a satirical article on Sacred Heart University claiming it's the "second largest Catholic university in New England" so the subject is slightly notable.----OEJ 15:32, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
- Is vanity, though it passes UN:CM, but is overall not funny. SMASH! --UNKNOWNFILE 04:09, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
- Crush. Unfunny - and how is there not a single Scrubs reference in this? - Lemon.
 05:16, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
- not completely without humour but certainly vanity - jack mort | cunt | talk - 17:57, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. At least the author knows his grammar- but the article itself makes no sense. --Andorin Kato 23:44, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- Abstain <sulk> you VFD'd the article on me home town.</sulk> Justly so, twerent funny. But still...What's next ey? VFD the article on Dutch ? -- di Mario 13:02, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Found guilty on one count of suckiness, and two for ICU/NRV removal. Also fails CM test on Google. --UNKNOWNFILE 04:04, 26 December 2006 (UTC) (PS: hooray for Special:Randompage.)
- Rid us of this junk. --fish 06:16, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Not funny (or am I still sulking ?) -- di Mario 13:04, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
- - jack mort | cunt | talk - 17:55, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
- "disese" --—Braydie 23:47, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
- The cure for insomnia. Now I'm going to take a nap. -- herr doktor needsAcell [scream!] 23:48, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 11:22, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- Cornripple... -- Hindleyite Converse 11:27, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- Um, yeh. It may in fact be a parody of an existing disease that sounds like "cornripple". Or not. Either way, it's not working for me. --Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 23:09, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete No subject, no clear humor, not even sure what it's trying to be about. Nullius in Verba 03:11, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
- All images, all ugly, not funny. Kick in the nuts. --UNKNOWNFILE 03:59, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
- Electrocute. Could be better developed. -- herr doktor needsAcell [scream!] 17:41, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
- i like the joke but it's too shoddily executed - jack mort | cunt | talk - 17:53, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
- Interesting concept, terrible execution.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 04:17, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- It looks like something that was supposed to be on a userpage --KWild 04:09, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
- Abstain -- di Mario 13:09, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
- Abstention I'm on da fence. --Alksub 08:48, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
|
