Talk:You

		This article was nominated for deletion on April 9, 2013. The result of the discussion was Keep.

An archive of old discussions can be found here.

Lol :P

This article made me ROFL.. But since when am I a guy...? --FluffyIsDead 15:24, September 8, 2009 (UTC)

Oh, yes, by the way YOU have a username of <insert name here> Ping -t you You have been destroyed.

No u_u_u_u_u_u

Hey...

Didn't this article used to be one huge article just to insult <insert name here>? --Bhop 03:26, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

Yes, but now it is about the lack of awesomeness in IP.

From IC

Okay, lobsterbacks, time to get to another colonization!! Let's do the ideas thing first, as this week's article has plenty of opportunity to stray from the typical encyclopedic tone that some of you seem unsatisfied with. Let's have some fun! SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 15:46, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

<insert name here> is teh suxxorz!lolz! Colour Sig For Make Mahm00shA Look Cool 15:51 June 15 '09

Yeah. That's the way we won't be doing it. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 15:54, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Wrong, the username template will be used, but not overused.. It just needs an experienced writer to take its maximum effect.. Or something.Colour Sig For Make Mahm00shA Look Cool 16:08 June 15 '09

Whoa, calm down, <insert name here>, there's no need to get angry. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 16:24, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Maybe using the username template sparingly, but none of that "suxxorz" stuff. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 16:35, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Of course not! Who said that we would use that 10-year-old suxxor shit? I was just kidding.. And yes, I mean we use the template sparingly. Also, hi, Gerry, I really missed you. *hetero manhug* Colour Sig For Make Mahm00shA Look Cool 16:47 June 15 '09

Aw, I missed you too much, man of many signatures. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 17:00, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Please tell me that by "10-year-old 'suxxor' shit," you're referring to the fact that the phrase itself is 10 years old, and not that only 10-year-olds use it.

<indignant>I thought the idea was mine... (At least, I had it before you. see here and here..</indignant> —The Zhel 07:42, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

I mean the many signature thing. —The Zhel 07:42, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

Exactly. That was <insert name here>'s idea. You rock, dude!

Official idea proposals

Me idea

How about an article where the narrator (is that the right name?) is trying to explain to reader about "you" but keeps on getting sidetracked into talking about himself. A lot?? Nameable • mumble? 18:29, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Actually, that's a great idea. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 19:00, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

We can let the narrator attempt to analyze the "you" person multiple times, but ending each attempt with "Oh wait. That's me." —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 19:03, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

I like this idea.--You know what the music means... Our time is up. 19:05, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Erm, for? is that how you agree or something? I agree anyway. —The Zhel 07:40, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

Wait, wasn't that <insert name here>'s idea? For.  –      (ooh!) (aah!) ...·º•ø®@» LEG CUN GUN DUN 15:51, 16 June 2009

You are really naughty. Oh wait, That's me. —The Zhel 08:00, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Exactly. Maybe we could make it part of me.

It's your fault

How about we write it as if "You" was a specific person responsible for all the things wrong with your life. We could also throw in some stuff about how "You" will <insert motherly advice cliche>. E.G. "You'll" put your eye out. "You" have to wait 30 minutes after eating before swimming or "You" will drown. Things like that. -OptyC Sucks! CUN16:27, 16 Jun

I was thinking something like that, but with it being nagging to the person reading it from a wife/girlfriend or mother. Colin ALL YOUR BASEHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 16:32, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

I think the current page is good. Just expand it. —The Zhel 09:01, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Hang on, let's replace "You" and use the <insert name here> template.

We should remove the insults. I kinda hate the insults, and it contradicts our civility policy. Did you know that AYB is a stupid expression? |Si Plebius Dato' (Sir) Joe ang Pinoy CUN|IC Kill | 09:32, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

AYB? —The Zhel 10:05, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

We should use the current page. Mr Zhe-mel-talki-signe-singaporel-bling ^Brute! 12:57, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

WTF? AYB is not stupider than goatse. Both are memes anyways... And what does that have to do with <insert name here>?  –      (ooh!) (aah!) ...·º•ø®@» LEG CUN GUN DUN 06:05, 23 June 2009

Indeed, it pertains. :O Colin ALL YOUR BASEHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 02:34, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

But what is AYB? Mr Zhe-mel-talki-signe-singaporel-bling ^Brute! 08:48, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

All thy base belongeth to ye LORD Colour Sig For Make Mahm00shA Look Cool 08:54 June 25 '09</re>

Oh. Not belong to me? Never mind. But I was thinking of a yew. Mr Zhe-mel-talki-signe-singaporel-bling ^Brute! 08:56, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Civility policy? Ok, so Uncyclopedia is not Wikipedia. Uncyclopedia insults <insert name here>, <insert name here>, and especially <insert name here> all the time.

Working on it, you <insert name here>I did the first paragraph, not finished yet.

Yeah, no. That completely fucks up the article. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 21:48, 15 March 2012

Ha ha, reverted it! And <insert name here> completely f**ks up the entirety of Uncyclopedia!

Fucks up the article? What are you talking about? That was the way it was before! The article was born insulting <insert name here>, amd it shall die insulting <insert name here>.

<insert name here> 23:09, March 16, 2012 (UTC)

Suggestion

Just an idea, but maybe the project could get together once a month to collaberate on creating a new article from scratch? There's plenty to choose from on Uncyclopedia:Incomplete List of Basic Articles, Uncyclopedia:Requested Articles and Special:Wantedpages. MadMax 09:18, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

And there is the timeline thing.. Also, most colonizations take us at least two weeks, sometimes three or even four weeks, so the once a month isn't practical. Also also, creating new article is the job of the nazi bastards. But thanks for your suggestions, Mr. Admin Colour Sig For Make Mahm00shA Look Cool 09:26 June 25 '09

Wait... We should use {{USERNAME|SOME RANDOM NAME}} instead of plain {{USERNAME}}. For the IPS's sake. Mr Zhe-mel-talki-signe-singaporel-bling ^Brute! 04:34, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Laugh out loud

I see you guys took my Craptacular intro and ran with it. I only put that up there to get something on the page to get us going, but now that I think about it, I kinda like this angle. I'm thinking maybe we could turn it into a sort of "Shut the fuck up and write an article" page instead of the tired old {{USERNAME}} page. Sort of like UN:N except it'll be for drama, do you know what I mean? Or maybe this whole idea is stupid. What do you think? -OptyC Sucks! CUN14:41, 26 Jun

I think we trim down the USERNAME section and keep it the last section. Believe me, it KILLS noobs from fear. That was why I started this section in the first place. And I wrote an HTML comment of it, too :) Colour Sig For Make Mahm00shA Look Cool 14:46 June 26 '09

It's replacing every single "you" with <insert name here> that ticks me off. I thought we could have just a section dedicated to <insert name here>

Maybe, but I like the first part better. It's got that "NO U" feel that kinda tickles me. I'm thinking the whole thing could be a back and forth between two "yous" (I just invented the pluralization of you!) about how you should get to work. In my mind it'd be ironic that way when somebody uses it against drama whores. I.E. "My article is blah blah blah and it's not fair!" "You should shut up." See what I'm getting at? -OptyC Sucks! CUN15:03, 26 Jun

A dialogue, you say? Colour Sig For Make Mahm00shA Look Cool 15:09 June 26 '09

Hello! My name is Zheliel and I have just joined Uncyclopedia! Mr Zhe-mel-talki-signe-singaporel-bling ^Brute! 15:14, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Welcome to Uncyclopedia, Zheliel! I'm Mahm00shA, they call me God around here, I founded this wiki.. I founded the universe, too Colour Sig For Make Mahm00shA Look Cool 15:20 June 26 '09

Yeah, a dialogue. Good idea or crap idea? -OptyC Sucks! CUN15:22, 26 Jun

I love God! Mr Zhe-mel-talki-signe-singaporel-bling ^Brute! 15:28, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

And whatta bout in-jokes? Sannse, Flammable, Famine, baseball bat Mr Zhe-mel-talki-signe-singaporel-bling ^Brute! 15:30, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Oh, and what about our SIngapore Points? I deserve some. Mr Zhe-mel-talki-signe-singaporel-bling ^Brute! 15:34, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Score: +5

Good idea

• I'm so drunk right now. -OptyC Sucks! CUN15:22, 26 Jun
• Shut the fuck up, Opty. good idea, nevertheless Colour Sig For Make Mahm00shA Look Cool 15:27 June 26 '09
• Hello! My name is Zheliel and I have just joined Uncyclopedia! I know your god and you must be jealous! Mr Zhe-mel-talki-signe-singaporel-bling ^Brute!

15:27, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

• Dialogue. Like it. Kind of like what I did in italics at the beginning, is that what you are suggesting? Nice. Nameable • mumble? 19:49, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
• Yeah sure. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 09:25, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Shut the fuck up, Opty

• Uncyclopedia. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 15:33, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

  Invalid. Someone stole my sig. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 09:24, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

What exactly the hell is this "Shut the fuck up, Opty," business. I know that Opty was saying something about how he was so drunk, but I thought it was a joke and I thought Socky's response was a joke. What I didn't realize was that some douchebag would create a "Shut the fuck up, Opty" forum to flame a perfectly innocent page. In fact, thos should definitely just becaume a general Uncyclopedia forum because this is now the hot-spot to start random flame wars that don't even make sense.

Wrap-up

OK, fellas, I'm real sorry about letting this one run for so long (much like the last ten or so colonizations), but I'm turning over a new leaf as your official leader with sys gone again, so expect much stricter monitoring of all aspects of colonization. Anyway, I like much of what we have here, but we need to wrap up everything nicely in the next day or so. I will therefore react to the article as it stands now, and try to think of some things we need to knock off before we move onto our next glorious victory.

So...I like the first part of the article very much, what with the arguing with itself and the general idea of two editors telling each other to go and write an article. I think the normal text / italic text to differentiate between arguers works well in the beginning, but the line begins to blur after a while. i think to make that line sharp and defined, we should give both characters an equal amount of dialogue, and try to use different tones for each (kind of aggressive and overbearing for the plain text guy, kind of defensive and pithy for the italic guy, maybe).

I think the first two sections are strong, but the content after that seems to slip into a bit of randomness, what with the being ice cream and kissing trees. i I think we should stick with a straight-up argument as an essay. Also, the references to famine and whatnot need to go, as it's pretty severely frowned upon to toss user names into an article.

Another problem was the arguing over features, and the constant urging of the reader to go feature this article. that's a good way to assure this article won't get featured. If, instead of 'I have 99 features', we used something less specific like 'My writings have earned over 87% approval by the uncyclopedia board of humor and tourism', this essay would seem much less feature-centric and more focused on good writing, which is the message we should be trying to express.

As far as things we need to add, i can think of two. 1)images. We need more images! Should we use the time magazine one as the main image? Please bring images here before adding them. 2)links. We have basically no links in this article. Let's link to some awesome articles!

Alright, let's polish this one off, and hopefully we can get started on kicking ideas around for our next colonization by midweek. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 16:47, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

Can I throw a little something something into the mix? No. Oh, all right then... Pup 22:46, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

This could be you after you complete that Pulitzer prize winning article.

This is what could be yours if only you would finish writing that wonderful witty article.

What, you mean you were joking? Because of the whole anybody can edit this kind of thing I can make an edit here. Wow! Okay, what is the motivation for writing well if we cull the feature worthy thing from the mix? Okay, the main motivations to becoming a successful writer are:

1. Writer groupie sex
2. Ummm.... nope, that's about drained me on that one.nc

So why don't we have the images what you won't be getting if you fail to be a wonderful successful writer type person. As well as the stereotype tweed jacket pipe smoking writer type. Much like the examples I've already stuck here.

As for links, this is all centred around writing the ego-inflating concept of winning that wonderful feeling of respect and admiration that people who get featured article status apparently get. I wouldn't know about that. so why not have this flick back to the Bible of all writing on Uncyclopedia, HTBFANJS, as well as the potential objection "What can I write about?" being answered by this, this and that. Also throw in the ego stroking WotM, BEST, and whatever else you can think of.

The other minor thing that I would suggest, which would probably end up being so bloody subtle that no-body gets it, but have the italicised voice speaking in UK English and the main voice speaking in American English. Pup 23:15, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Agreeing with Gerry, I think I'm going to nuke the baseball bat and branding sections. Also, I think having the italicized sections in UK english and the main voice Proper English (=P) is a fantastic idea. Maybe we could have the colonizers from the UK write the appropriate sections while the US colonizers write the others? -OptyC Sucks! CUN14:55, 16 Jul

That is the most retarded thing I have ever heard. Yes, they can be douchebags sometimes, but if AdolfGerry Hitler is going to come along with bad grammar and some midweek imperial colonisarion saying we need to wrap our stuff up, WE NEED SYS BACK!!! Actually, I have bad news for you, Gerry. We have sys with us, even Socky himself! And we will push you off of Uncyclopedia, Gary. So let the flaming begin!

Listen, Gerry, I flamed this forum und my IP address. That was a few hours ago, beofre I got an account. I then found out what Imperial Colonization was. I'm sorry I was attacking and spamming.

On other note, as you know, I'm still newbie here. Plus I'm entering the Noob Contest. So I was wondering...can I enroll for the Imperial Colonization?

YOU SUCK IMPERIAL COLONISATION!

Come on Socky, you're coming with me! To Der Unwehr! |Si Plebius Dato' (Sir) Joe ang Pinoy CUN|IC Kill | 05:56, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

I believe everybody has a right to a voice, despite their race, creed, colour or mental capacity. However I also believe that an opinion, unless it is backed by reasoning, logic, or fact, is only a small step away from stupidity. So for an opinion of "YOU SUCK IMPERIAL COLONISATION!" it might be advisable to give a reason. Or stay looking like a nonce. Pup TIME 06:04, 16/07/2009

Are tou fucking kidding me? Somebody would be out of their mind support imperial colonisarion and "wrap up" Uncyclopedia. Gerry is retarded. We need to flame this forum, then tell Gerry that we still have sys and get the douchebag off of Uncyclopedia! Just stay off our site if you're going to fuck it up. I'll start new forums flaming the idiot. Tons of them. Join the army!!!

...is this a resignation? SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 12:17, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

Actually the lack of a comma has left me wondering how you would get the entire Imperial Colonisation in your mouth all at once Pup TIME 21:05, 16/07/2009

We actually fold up into quite a compact form for easy storage. -OptyC Sucks! CUN21:09, 16 Jul

Sannse?

This is where you can help out by adding in your original and witty caption for this yew tree.

I don't get that reference. It looks to me as though it relates to a misspelling in a previous version. Can we nix it? Pup TIME 04:03, 17/07/2009

And I'm more than happy for somebody else to work out a caption for this image. It fits in with the "Yew" tree, and the idea that this is your wife somehow works with the shape, but I can't quite get the right caption in my head. Pup TIME 10:44, 17/07/2009

Yew tree. I get it. Laugh out loud. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 12:29, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

How about

This is your wife. Note her shape, the kind your mom always told you you would get.

Okay, this is done. Nail in the coffin.

I'm gonna be moving this to the mainspace. The rest of you guys get the bureaucratic shit with ranks done then start on the new one. This has been over a month. It's over. If you have anything else to add, do it in the mainspace. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 12:29, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

I wish I had two more hands so I could give this new page four thumbs down. --Hotadmin4u69 ^[TALK] 02:45, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

Wouldn't that require removing at least one from your ass? -OptyC Sucks! CUN20:53, 28 Jul

No, just your mom's ass. --Hotadmin4u69 ^[TALK] 13:56, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

That's why she sits so funny! -OptyC Sucks! CUN19:22, 29 Jul

I'm glad to have a pre-made userpage

That I am. YOU 16:15, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

You two?

I now want to do a sequel just because of the crappy pun, but can't think of any content... damn! Pup t 09:08, 23/07/2009

The hell no. Magic My Mom 09:04, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

Funny is I'd already decided not to, but given that support I'm going to have to do it now. Pup t 09:08, 26/07/2009

Who can edit this?

This article is protected. Who said to edit it? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 75.36.182.70 (talk • contribs)

Its been locked, if you wish to edit it, make an account - Frosty dah snowguy contribs KUN PLEB 21:28, April 10, 2011 (UTC)

I said to edit it. Edit it now! Aleister 22:30 9-4-'11

(System Maneger) I just edited this, <insert name here>. >:(

Maybe this isn't funny, but...

You guys should put something like this at the top of the page:

“I hope he fails.”

~ Rush Limbaugh on Your father's attempts at mating

--69.209.114.55 14:50, December 30, 2011 (UTC)

By the gods

What in God's name? I have my own article about me.--UNmarine777 21:55, January 8, 2012 (UTC)

Not sure if trolling, or just extremely nooby. It's hard to pinpoint exactly when the <insert name here> template was used vs, the word "you", but I can identify that you posted this in January 2012. I'm posting this from April 2013, (that's right, coming from the future!) and the article currently says the word you. As it should stay. You see, there's a template called {{username}}, which makes it so the reader sees his own username. That may have been what you were seeing, but it could have been a joke eve if it said you or <insert name here>. If your on an IP, then you see <insert name here>. AlexJabei (talk) 13:21, April 21, 2013 (UTC)

You Count

I just used Ctrl+F and the word you appears exactly 100 times on this article as of this timeRedradishthesecond (talk) 10:21, August 9, 2012 (UTC)

As of April 2023, there are 255 instances of YOU. 2605:A601:ACEB:2E00:CDE7:3C5E:D6A5:5C22 14:48, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Sorry, history...

I completely derped and pressed the save button every time I was supposed to press the "Preview" button. Sorry! --MrRatermat2 (talk) 14:35, December 9, 2012 (UTC)

This is a bad article.

This should be deleted for two reasons:

1. It used to mock British people at the start of the article. While I have no problem with this usually, this has no explanation for why British people are mocked.
2. It now mocks American people at the start of the article. I do not have a problem with this as it is justified by the above sentence.
3. It is offensive, rude, non-encyclopedic and claims that I (otherwise known as you) have never written an article which is false.

Therefore I am going to add this to the VFD page. Sir ScottPat UnS CUN VFH (talk) 11:51, April 9, 2013 (UTC)

It's an old IC article - about 2009(?) - but not one of the best.                                • Puppy's talk page • 01:03 09 Apr 2013

SPIKE disagrees that it should be deleted. He's given me an explanation I struggle to understand. I think its either that he thinks the rant is funny as he probably agrees with its point of view or its an uncyclopedia in-joke I don't really get. Sir ScottPat UnS CUN VFH (talk) 13:10, April 9, 2013 (UTC)

Check out IC. It's no longer an active user group, but we try to keep in place what they have done in the past.                                • Puppy's talk page • 01:13 09 Apr 2013

Well, you can tweak it and polish it a bit so your concerns are met and overmet. If this page were deleated we'd have red links on hundreds of pages, hundreds!!! You know how ugly that would look??? Me 13:13 9-4-'13

Should this article stay?

If this article is to stay on (which the person above made a clear case against), it needs more. If we are to mock the reader, may be suggest that he has a sexy wife—who constantly commits adultery. Maybe it's hinted the narrator has shagged her. It has a rubber band effect: there is an lift suggesting the reader has a sexy wife, which falls when it's stated she's being f*cked by every Tom, Dick, and Harry, and it might be even funnier if it's suggested the reader has a small knob which doesn't satify her, while the men who get to have sex with her are muscular and hung. Maybe that's a bad idea, because I just pulled it out of my ass, but I'm not hearing any better ideas.--50.187.202.167 02:51, May 8, 2015 (UTC)

I Fucking Love This

Thank you for making my day 1,000,000 more insane than it was before, <insert name here>. Legendary Legacy (talk) 16:16, March 29, 2018 (UTC)

You don't have to accept this if you dont want to.

This edit request has been answered.

Request: You are a stupid dipshit. You need to be more like my cat. He doesn't even like you. Infact, you're so ugly and useless, that my cat is scared of you and really doesn't want to see you.

HJJEduyfyhj (talk) 17:20, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

As I replied on your talk page (and you seemed to accept), a rant is not the best way forward even for an article that is already ranty. Spıke 🎙️01:10 7-Sep-21