From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
 |
This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:Pages for deletion.
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Awful, awful page. Nine unfunny "teh gheys" in an unfunny stub. Also, it's awful. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 00:39, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Gotta love the umlauts, though. --
 (but) Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 01:10, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Because he whored it on Russian reversal. --AAA! (AAAA) 01:39, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Only thing funny is the umlauts. --General Insineratehymn 01:41, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
- Short, random, possible vanity. Blarch it --
 Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 02:09, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
- Vanity, slandity, calamity, crap. --Smrt-guy 09:42, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete: "Also, it's awful". ~ QUILz ( talk | contrib ) 19:34, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete I really enjoyed it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Matt lobster (talk • contribs)
- Delete. -- Mitch
 23:35, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
Gone —Braydie 23:40, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete ugly unfunny slandity at its juvenile worst. Delete author too, if possible. --Smrt-guy 21:36, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete I read the first sentence. That is all. Roman Dog Bird 22:17, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete.--OEJ--
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
- Goes beyond awful and comes out the other side. Keep -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 14:52, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep per above. "I will call madder plant blood Alizarin." It's funny. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 19:40, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - I with I could think that clearly! This article is awesome! Too many like it would be annoying though. --Smrt-guy 21:07, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- Weak keep It's kind of funny. Roman Dog Bird 22:23, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Neuter - Uncool cats, daddy-o. Seriously, it's a rip-off & not funny. --Smrt-guy 02:01, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete
 Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 04:06, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- ...pushed to the brink of extinction by reductions in forestry and their preferential foodstuff, wild boar meat. Finish the job -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 14:45, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Roman Dog Bird 22:32, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete - Dis ron badry thot out...and ugly and not funny. --Smrt-guy 02:01, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 04:08, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Theres one mildly funny joke in it, relating to how flansisco changed from san to kun, but you'll only get that if you speak japanese.--
 » >ZEROTROUSERS!!! EAT ME!!!! CRAZY PERSON! SMELLY!!! ILLOGIC, BEHOLD!!!!~» 09:37, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Mmmm... flan... -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 14:13, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Roman Dog Bird 22:37, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- Um, yeah. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 23:42, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
- Keep - Meh. --AAA! (AAAA) 00:09, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep: Hilarious! --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 01:40, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep and VFH. It's the best of Uncyc!--Smrt-guy 02:02, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep not again. —Braydie 08:08, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Best page on Uncyclopedia. --General Insineratehymn 08:11, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- All my favourites are featured here eventually. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 17:20, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- The nominator didn't provide a link to the article in the heading, so I'll give it the benefit of the doubt and say keep. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 20:10, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
- Delete Not funny, lots of red links in archives. --
 » His Majesty King George VI (the boxes)     00:05, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- Kablammo! Nothing more than a bunch of lists about random articles, most of which seems to be commenting on how much they suck. This sucks. Really, really sucks. --El Zoof 01:52, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
Delete. As per Jimbo Wales
- Unsigned. —Braydie 14:16, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. I got banned last time i did this. Meh. BRING IT ON, FAMINE!--» >ZEROTROUSERS!!! EAT ME!!!! CRAZY PERSON! SMELLY!!! ILLOGIC, BEHOLD!!!!~» 09:35, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- DELETE This page is boring not funny and has no meaning, and it always requires editing. if it were good you wouldn't need to edit it daily.--Joseph5626 17:17, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- DeLeTeD This page is in good need of deletion why would you make a page that ultimatly has no humor, and the only kicks are when you see all the other things up for deletion, like this deletion right here! --ChrisK 17:22, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Huff - Very badly written, short, not edited in a while, and it has a (sortof) has a bad Nazi joke. Capercorn 22:57, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
- Kazapicate - smells like teen towncruft. --El Zoof 23:42, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Yay for Capercorn! --Smrt-guy 01:43, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete If only the phrase "2,300 semi-intelligent stuffed bunnies" had been on a better page... -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 14:02, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- Methinks that you may be interested that I have taken it upon myself to find tons of bad Nazi/Hitler articles and bring them here to Nuremburg to execu... I mean try them in a military tribunal (it's good to nominate articles for Huffage again...) Capercorn 22:57, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
- Deleted. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 00:18, 22 Mar 2007
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- 2005cruft --
 » >UF|TLK|▋» 22:56, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
- Huff - Wow, somehow I feel as though we huffed this article before... I'm Having Deja Vu All Over Again!! Capercorn 23:00, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - I like it. Matt lobster 23:01, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
- Deleticate. Unfunny and stupid, and so's the article. --El Zoof 23:47, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
- I can't believe he invented movable type. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 23:58, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
- Huh? Wha? Who? Heh? Deh? Lete? --Smrt-guy 01:43, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete As someone who's actually studied cosmology, I have to say: What?-- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 17:14, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. --OEJ--
- Delete - Brilliant
- Splatter. What exactly is the joke here? I'm guessing it has something to do with one MMORPG or another. --El Zoof 23:50, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
- delete As someone who once doodled in a Stephen Hawking book, I have to say: WTF? --Smrt-guy 01:42, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete And another "A" - make sure to check out the old version too before deciding. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 17:09, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete--both versions no good. --OEJ--
- Zap. --El Zoof 23:54, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
- Squarnch --Smrt-guy 01:38, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- A more worthwhile entry - I just don't understand what it's going on about, so either delete or explain it to me. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 17:03, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
- What? No. --El Zoof 23:40, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
- Uh, yeah. Splork!
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
|
| Comments |
- Shouldn't this just be QVFD? --El Zoof 23:55, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
- Again, I tried. I thought QVFD was for anything obviously instantly deletable, however old? I mean obviously it's mostly used for the brand new, but that's because most stuff gets caught early. Please clarify, somebody? -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 08:22, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
- Keep The page isn't that bad. I mean it isn't the best article in the world, but it does have comedy outside of nazi jokes.Just because I created the article doesn't mean i can't make a good point--Joseph5626 15:27, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- (Please note this vote comes from the article creator.) -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 16:03, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- keep but if it gets deleted you should move it to your userspace --» His Majesty King George VI (the boxes) 23:53, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- Week keep - As much as I hate Hitler (I aspire to be a Nazi hunter once I get out of High School, yet my motto is "Ein Volk, Ein Reich, Ein Uncyclopedia"), this article is really bad. I would recomend moving the article to Joseph's userspace until he adds more jokes and other cowbell. Capercorn 01:24, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
- Delete Yet another unfunny Nazi joke. ~
 15:11, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- As thoroughly constructed a mythology as it is, I'm afraid I have to say Delete -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 16:03, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. The picture is golden, the rest is junk. Sorry, Joseph! --Medvedev (scream)
 17:23, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- I agree with Medvedev - pic good, article about hopeless. Unless Joseph wants to take it into his Userpage space & rewrite, I have to say Delete. --Smrt-guy 18:34, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- Boring, Delete Roman Dog Bird 19:36, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - What? --AAA! (AAAA) 01:32, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete it could have been something but, eh, they should have just combined all of their pages together. ChrisK 12:19, 20 March 2007
- Delete if your going to delete all the animal armiies you might as well delete this one to, and it is kind of repetitive. Comm hamster March 20 2007
- Blam. --El Zoof 23:57, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
- No, thanks. -- herr doktor needsAsample
 [scream!] 04:53, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
Meh. Userspace. If not Joe's, mine. goshzillacorrespondence 00:52, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
If, and only if, it gets deleted you can send it to my userpage.--Joseph5626 01:13, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
I have added a little more if you want to check it out before you decide to delete it or keep it.--Joseph5626 04:38, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete I hate to bother VFD with this, but QVFD was being unusually uncooperative the day I put these on. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 16:18, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
- Second - What's going on with QVFD, I dunno... I second the Huff motion! Capercorn 22:51, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
Gone —Braydie 21:15, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete. Utterly stupid article. —Gnome
   …MUN F@H 22:13, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- fuck nrv removal, also fuck icu, nrv is much better, icu has nrv, oh wait, fuck it --» >UF|TLK|▋» 22:53, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- Worst. Grammar. Ever. ---General Insineratehymn 23:47, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- KILL - What. The. Fuck. --AAA! (AAAA) 23:52, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Stupidest god damn thing I've seen all day. Roman Dog Bird 00:07, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. ----OEJ 01:07, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
- Blarch it --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 01:08, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
- Huff - If some random n00b wants to get horny fine, keep your stupid fantasies on Wikipedia. Capercorn 01:19, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete and ban author, against the vague chance he ever comes back. Is it me, or are are vanity vandals called Ryan? -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 02:14, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
- Too Much Time On My Hands 70.105.76.59, I'm Have Vote for Huff Right Now! — Lenoxus 03:09, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- My guess is that the original writer natually assumed that such an article was needed based on a stupid redlink on JELLO. Not that that means the article should be saved, of course. — Lenoxus 03:09, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
- Deleted. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 06:01, 20 Mar 2007
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete - it's had an Ugly tag for a while, it was up for VFD at some point, and the ICU just expired. Huff this thang! --Smrt-guy 18:26, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - it's ugly as hell, not funny and near-impossible to read. RabbiTechno 18:28, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete It's just some stupid fucking song by some no talent chode. Roman Dog Bird 19:02, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Some song lyrics, it seems.... —Gnome …MUN F@H 21:23, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Crush it like an insignificant bug! Sir Judgement F@H UmP VFH {talk} 22:38, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. ----OEJ 01:14, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- If ICU expires, don't add stuff to the page or it'll go down the list of things to huff! Just leave it and it'll go - no need to clog up VFD. Try QVFDing it if it's been around unhuffed for a while. Probably no point voting on this one people... -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 18:49, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- Hmm... sorry if I seemed to get a little worked up there - I did the same thing myself a few days ago see...! -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 02:09, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
- Nah, the admins don't usually delete stuff on QVFD if it is more than a week old. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 03:14, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- While we're at it - this is from the same series (and set of people) as the Tigers below. Thought it was better to vote on this now, and if it gets deleted I hope we can put the whole animal armies thing behind us. Delete -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 16:14, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Cute, but not that funny. --Medvedev (scream) 17:23, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- The pics are cool-ish, but the article is not funny. --Smrt-guy 18:28, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Roman Dog Bird 19:07, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Wow, over a hundred edits and they still can't capitalize "France" or spell "their" correctly! Cruft.----OEJ 01:10, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
- Redirect to something appropriate to the title (such as Hamster, Army or Evil), given that it's linked to from the mildly amusing {{Comm hamster}} and wil only get re- and re-created as crap until someone thinks of something good to do with it. — Lenoxus 03:12, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete My latest find in my voyage down the Short Pages list. Short and not particularly sweet. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 11:57, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - a year of work for that? --Smrt-guy 18:35, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - One of the better video game articles.Matt lobster 19:05, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Roman Dog Bird 19:43, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. ----OEJ 01:11, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
- ICU was not followed up several weeks after the due date. Note well that this article actually predicted that some people would in real life claim paternity of Anna Nicole Smith's daughter even before they publically did so, e.g. O J Simpson. The fact that it is a long list is the nature of the joke. If anything it needs to be longer and have a greater and more inventive range of names in it. --Zonk69 19:04, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- Weak keep: It's a list, it uses memes, etc., but it made me laugh. Perhaps it can be saved. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 21:20, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep or redirect to List of people better than BENSON. goshzillacorrespondence 21:29, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep, actually, just because it is the uber-list and is so ridiculously long, pointless and full of stupid memes that it makes me laugh. Get rid of all the quotes though. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 02:02, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
- I have had it up to HERE with people removing the ICU from this. This page is a perfect example of how not to write an article. Delete. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 04:41, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete: Listcruft. Already-old joke. --CaptainSpam MUN PUTPBAA 04:59, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- HA! I was waiting for someone to put this up for deletion. Despite all of the edits I just did to it, it does suck ass, I was just bored. Delete Roman Dog Bird 05:06, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- A list of names. Blarch it --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 06:37, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
Don't you see, it's funny because it's false. Here, on a site that kinda looks like Wikipedia. Tell me that isn't funny in the slightest.-- Lenoxus 08:34, 19 March 2007 (UTC)- Delete if only to send a message. It's stupid & unfunny & listy. - Smrt-guy 18:38, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete It's even got a Russian Reversal on it. Does anyone find Russian Reversals funny?Matt lobster 19:05, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- I think it's time to say listcruft=instahuff --» >UF|TLK|▋» 21:04, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- List crew insta who? — Lenoxus 02:28, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- This page was rewritten after being MTUed. Short and unfunny. Delete --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 01:40, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 04:42, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Any page shorter than 100 words with Chuck Norris in it is asking for it. --Medvedev (scream) 17:23, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- Okay, so it's longer than 100 words. It still sucks. --Medvedev (scream) 17:25, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Short, looks in danger of becoming listy, and not funny in any nearby universe. --Smrt-guy 18:43, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Roman Dog Bird 00:11, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete "Since his birth, he has always had the sumo-Asian blood in him, resulting in his fatty fatness." -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 01:55, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Nom after discussion with Keitei. Now, let's all put our objective hats on, ignore the fact that he's a bad bad man, and decide if this is anything more than a hate-filled rant with bits of truth thrown in. Delete says I. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 21:14, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Not on any principle except HTBFANJS. goshzillacorrespondence 22:40, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 00:57, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- I've deleted this once already, but Wikipedia had an article on him. Now thats gone I think this should too. Delete. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me) 08:36, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - per Goshzilla. You said it. --Smrt-guy 18:44, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- So, um, out of curiosity… who is he? — Lenoxus 03:51, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- Some guy that got in trouble for doing something or other. —Braydie 07:45, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- Oh, him. Right.-- Lenoxus 08:31, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
- Keep Not the most funny thing in the world, and to some extent, blatantly offensive and almost supportive of stereotypes. All that said, we have plenty of offensive articles and we've fought multiple wars to "protect" articles perceived as damaging. I think the same applies here. Whomever wrote this obviously put a decent amount of time into it, size-wise. It needs plenty of work, but I don't think of it as kill worthy. If you delete this, delete beaner too. It's Mrthejazz... a case not yet solved. 21:23, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep per above. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 21:31, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep I'm afraid I just can't bring myself to get worked up about it, or distinguish it from the rest of the offensively funny pack. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 02:07, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
- Excellent point — getting worked up is a bit of an ish I have… Lenoxus 02:42, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
- Delete. — Lenoxus 04:35, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per below --» His Majesty King George VI (the boxes) 06:47, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. per Lenoxus. The only (sort of) acceptable part is the one about wiggers, but don't we already have a good article about those? --Medvedev (scream) 12:27, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Blatant racism that's not funny. --AAA! (AAAA) 02:48, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- Whereas an article like, say, Stereotype Reassignment Surgery is a brilliant satiric take on racism, this concept is nothing but the racism, and its title does not have redeeming potential. At the end of the day, it will always have to be about people who "act like a race they aren't", which is in turn saying nothing but "each race is supposed to act in certain ways and that's that." Perhaps the most offensive entry, which takes up a good portion of the article as it now exists, is the one on Wayne Brady, who apparently, along with all major black American leaders "thinks he's white," presumably because his image is "safe," which, of course, "real" black people never are. Kind of like how Jackie Robinson was fooling himself by playing baseball, like some kind of white guy. Hey, that gives me an idea… -- Lenoxus 04:35, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
- At the end of the day, it will always have to be about people who "act like a race they aren't", which is in turn saying nothing but "each race is supposed to act in certain ways and that's that." What about Suburban homeboy? That's nothing but a parody of people who act like a race they aren't. Should we VFD that too? --» His Majesty King George VI (the boxes) 05:21, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
- This is why I went into all that detail, because I knew this would be hard to explain. I'll try to do so anyway: Suburban Homeboy is just fine because it mimics the pheonomenon well, in stereotypical/parodic ways; it's not saying in literal terms that he is "acting black" or that to do so is somehow "incorrect." You could have an equally funny article written in the style of a hippie or skateboarder or whatever you like. This article, on the other hand, is only funny if you start out with the perspective whereby racial features truly exist. While I'm sure its writer didn't realize this, it basically goes beyond culture into the realm of biology. In reality, deep down, most whites have been "wiggers" since the 50's, and the same goes for all groups; the whole idea becomes nonsensical in an unfunny way. Of course, in truth, I'm almost tempted to throw in the towel here about this; it's not that big a deal.— Lenoxus 05:43, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah, I think it's perfectly fair to make fun of a culture associated with a race, or people who appropriate such a culture while being of a different race - this is why making fun of gangsta rap itself as well as white people who imitate it seems funny to me. That said, I agree about the biology vs culture point you made and this article isn't terribly funny and I tend to think we should kill it just to increase the average quality of our racist/racial pages. This is nothing compared to Suburban Homeboy, Holocaust Tycoon, or Nigger. Delete --» His Majesty King George VI (the boxes) 06:45, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
- It'd be all right, however, if this redirected to Stereotype Reassignment Surgery. But I'll leave that decision to future generations. — Lenoxus 04:35, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
- Kept. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 05:50, 20 Mar 2007
|
| Keep |
- KEEP and get someone to rewrite it into something. I would do it, but the week ahead is PMS High Tide and I'm not feeling "pretty" Dame
 GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 14:11, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - mainly because of Modus's edits (sorry to go against your self-loathing!) -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 14:39, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
- Weak keep. I just did a condensing incorporating the best bits (including a rewording of that of Modus), bit this should probably go into something like ICU, because I don't see it as having lasting value if it isn't seriuosly expanded. --Lenoxus 15:39, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
- It's too old for ICU. I reverted the condensing because it was too condensed, which kind of ruined Modus's wonderful sense of timing. It does need work though - I might have a look later when I've done some actual real-world work... -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 17:03, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
- Delete Rando-matic huffable poop. --Smrt-guy 03:58, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
- Even though the "...Pez is consumed primarily by people who get giddy at the taste of chalk. Most people buy Pez for the dispenser, which tastes slightly better." lines are mine, I'm voting to delete. I've got this self loathing thing happening. I cry at night, sometimes.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 04:02, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
- Keep. I'm not sure it even needs "adoption" necessarily, just some wording fixes and maybe a couple picture. I'll see what I can do. -- Lenoxus 15:56, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
- Weak Keep Try changing it so it's from a Dutch person's perspective (e.g. being irrationally proud of their national day) and see what happens? Just a thought. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 17:06, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
- Delete - calling for this VFD doesn't give me the same glee as the others. It's almost a good idea....if someone adopts it I'll change my vote. --Smrt-guy 00:27, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- They deserve a better article, or no article at all. --» His Majesty King George VI (the boxes) 03:06, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Though I don't know who they are, the article itself is unfunny, ugly & stupid. I think that's three good reasons. --Smrt-guy 00:37, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete--Rgsupergrover 00:41, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- Pretty old cruft. --» >UF|TLK|▋» 02:48, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. I used to think the phrase "boring toilet humor" was an oxymoron. --Medvedev (scream) 16:41, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Gosh, I hope this vote doesn't make me a "Poo Puritan." --Smrt-guy 22:23, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 23:08, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
|
| Comments |
Gone —Braydie 21:17, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Huff. At first I forgot about the rules and put an {{ICU}}, but it's too old for that. Basically, it's just the Scottish play with nonsensical replacements. -- Lenoxus 15:26, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
- Blarch Nothing but a dramatis personae. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 17:58, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
- More like, Macworst --» >UF|TLK|▋» 19:31, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
- I like Malcolm, of Middle. But since that's now on this page - Macbest shall sleep no more. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 21:09, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
- Drop the curse on it. Aha! I too can be witty! It's Mrthejazz... a case not yet solved. 21:11, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Roman Dog Bird 00:40, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 00:55, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --General Insineratehymn 01:02, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- Me Too! Though if the author had gone ahead and written the whole play... --Smrt-guy 18:47, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
Gone —Braydie 21:13, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
The reason we have this Vandalism/ stuff is because someone was too anal-retentive to have the Vandalism article get vandalized as self reference. Some guys (like me) think why stop at the red title. So thus, Vandalism/Example on wheels.--Witt,  of  UNion Entertain me* 05:07, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
- meh --» >UF|TLK|▋» 15:07, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
- FLANGE Bits of it are almost funny for their randomness, and it's probably a good place to find some crap pictures to delete. I think if someone can be bothered to archive it, let them do it. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 00:52, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep per Witt E. --General Insineratehymn 00:55, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep cause I made major contributions to at least two of them. --Dexter111344 10:56, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Because we don't want people putting up the same jokes over and over because thier favorites were delered.
Mr. Briggs Inc. 14:57, 18 March 2007 (UTC) Eh?
|
| Delete |
- They're enough of the same thing that I think one vote should cover them all. To me, there's no reason to archive that page like that, one can achieve exactly the same thing with the history. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 04:43, 17 Mar 2007
- Delete - Vandalism/example on wheels! is just our sandbox's bigger brother, and there's nothing worth archiving on that page. We can just clean it out once a month. --AAA! (AAAA) 04:59, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 05:01, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete never liked these pages --» His Majesty King George VI (the boxes) 21:26, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
Kept —Braydie 07:46, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
- Whaaaaatttt I LOVE this list! "Dog: Man's best friend, especially on a waffle cone." --» His Majesty King George VI (the boxes) 07:09, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Not much worse than your average 100 list. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 07:21, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
- Absolutely brilliant. --» >UF|TLK|▋» 15:09, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep... Maybe not "brilliant" in itself, but a fine linkfarm for lots of great articles. I could imagine a shorter (limited to, like, 20) version as ain infobox at the bottom of certain related pages. -- Lenoxus 21:53, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - "Soul Crushing Horror Ripple"!!! OMFGROTFLMAO! It does have a bit too many crap references, but hey...that's life! --Smrt-guy 00:30, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
- Very cool And would you believe it, I didn't know that was a pun until I typed it? -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 00:35, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
- Cool but it does a better "Look". It also needs some help between the 31 flavors that it talks about and the 100 flavors thing. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 14:14, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
- Depends on how you interpret the grammar -- is it simply "flavors not in the top 100" or "100 flavors" etc.? The mind boggles... --Lenoxus 15:59, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
- Huff - Somehow it just doesn't cut it for me. --AAA! (AAAA) 06:28, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
Kept —Braydie 07:46, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
- Comment ...but that's only because you wrote it --» >UF|TLK|▋» 02:48, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Keep keep keep... FUNNY!! OMG WAS!! ME RAUGH HARD!! HA ha HA ha! Plus, as a member of the otaku society i feel obligated to protect this article. The only reason you should delete it is if, conditionally, you or someone else makes a funnier one. VFD is serious and detrimental to the growth of uncyc. This article is funny, somewhat; and is properly formatted; hence, leave it be.
|
| Delete |
- If you think "OH MY GOD WHAT A SLUT" is funny, then you should vote keep. --» >UF|TLK|▋» 01:20, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 01:27, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
- Lewd imagery is seldom funny. Delete --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 07:33, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
- Zap. -- Lenoxus 21:57, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete It's just not funny. That's enough for me. --Smrt-guy 02:59, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- This would likely only be funny if she didn't (as far as I can tell) just plain already have this reputation. That is, if she either was known as prudish, or if she herself had said, "Yeah, I'm a whore, dxeal with it." But I get the sense she's just another equivalent to Paris Hilton. -- Lenoxus 21:57, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
Gone But barely. Although, the only signed keep was by the author. —Braydie 03:13, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
|
| Comments |
- If it's your own work you want rid of, I think you can QVFD it, as long as you make it clear that it's yours. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 13:55, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
- I'll do that next time. Or they could just make me an admin - to save time ; ). --Medvedev (scream) 15:15, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
Gone —Braydie 03:13, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- A scrawl. Delete --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 07:56, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 11:03, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete How on Earth do you find stuff like this? -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 13:48, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
- OK, what the fuck is this? --» >UF|TLK|▋» 16:45, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
- You know, this would have been perfect for the Uncyclopedia Hall of Shame emblem Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 01:15, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Can't think of a reason, but if I had a reason, it would be to delete this image. --General Insineratehymn 00:58, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete this crap now! And give Alksub a pooperscooper medal for digging it out. --Smrt-guy 01:27, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
Gone —Braydie 03:13, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
KEEP. It could be expanded, but keep. --Curious Larry 01:03, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
|
| Comments |
Gone —Braydie 03:13, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
|
