Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/archive39

This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:VFD.

Keep
Delete	This article has too many overused people. They didn't delete this when I listed it, probably because it was too long. --Sbluen 23:08, 9 July 2006 (UTC) Too many overused references to which either of the actual falcos have nothing in common. Nothing in the article resembles anything done by either of the actual falcos (the pop singer and the character in star fox). A good article would probably combine those two characters. -Drdisque 00:21, 10 July 2006 (UTC) Overused and cliche. BURNINATE. Sir C Holla \| CUN --00:41, 10 July 2006 (UTC) Jesus + Paris Hilton + Vin Diesel + Chuck Norris + not funny = Delete. -- Imrealized 03:23, 10 July 2006 (UTC) Don't forget about Adam West and God. --Sbluen 03:27, 10 July 2006 (UTC) Just flatten this piece of junk with a rolling stone. :) -- Colonel Swordman 13:48, 10 July 2006 (UTC) Chick Norris in an article not about Chuck Norris is Baaaaaaaaaaaaaaad. ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 14:53, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Keep
Delete	Very ugly and boring. --Sbluen 21:57, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
Comments	The tribunal is adjourned due to marital law, so I'll just go ahead and delete this. —RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY) I didn't list this because it was long and the other long ones that I listed didn't get deleted. --Sbluen 23:10, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

Keep	Could use some streamlining, but since when was randomness grounds for deletion? Sir Famine , Gun ♣ Petition » 18:26, 9 July 2006 (UTC) Keep per above... nice collection of refs. --George VI 19:01, 9 July 2006 (UTC) Keep.....in need of some TLC but not delete worthy... -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me) 23:16, 9 July 2006 (UTC) Keep, but needs work. Sir C Holla \| CUN --00:42, 10 July 2006 (UTC) As per above, keepsies. -- Imrealized 03:21, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
Delete	This is one big random country with kangaroos jumping all over it. Even if we don't nuke it and start over, it will die from cane toad infestation anyway. -- Colonel Swordman 11:34, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
Comments	On Sir Cornbread's vote - Yes, but the problem is: who is going to do the "work"? -- Colonel Swordman 13:45, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

Keep
Delete	My worst effort ever; somebody burn it already in celebration of Forest Fire Week. --DW^III 06:36, 9 July 2006 (UTC) If you want your article deleted, I see no shame in that (I've VFD'd at least 3 of my own before). ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 07:25, 9 July 2006 (UTC) As you wish! :) -- Colonel Swordman 11:06, 9 July 2006 (UTC) If you insist. -- Imrealized 14:32, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Keep
Delete	This article has too many typos and too much random humor. --Sbluen 01:51, 9 July 2006 (UTC) Agreed. -- Imrealized 05:13, 9 July 2006 (UTC) Agreed². ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 07:25, 9 July 2006 (UTC) Non-redeemable piece of trash, just like Jack Black. -- Colonel Swordman 11:08, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Keep
Delete	Boring and ugly. --Sbluen 22:24, 8 July 2006 (UTC) ZZZzzzzz...Hmm? Oh? Yes? Kill. Voter Cray Z. [MUN] [FUN!!]23:30, 8 July 2006 (UTC) Not this article, that's for sure. ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 07:24, 9 July 2006 (UTC) Answer: this vote. -- Colonel Swordman 11:10, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Keep
Delete	This article is short and not funny and it may be vanity. --Sbluen 21:31, 8 July 2006 (UTC) One word and one word only. Crappizombify/Delete. Voter Cray Z. [MUN] [FUN!!]22:34, 8 July 2006 (UTC) Stolen verbatim from An article about Winston Churchill with a music producer substituted for Churchill. Odd, the concept sounds hilarious... Modusoperandi 02:09, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Keep	I disagree, though it is annoyingly repetitive. —Sir Major Hinoa [TALK] [KUN] 18:46, 8 July 2006 (UTC) I too disagree, for its writer must have been the greatest genius that ever graced the Earth. -- DiZ 18:53, 8 July 2006 (UTC) Because I'm a jerk. t o m p k i n s blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 19:57, 8 July 2006 (UTC) Not great but not terrible.—Sir Mandaliet ♠ CUN PS VFH GN (talk) 21:15, 8 July 2006 (UTC) Made me laugh (a rare event), and the repetitivity seems to work in its favor; keepsies! --DW^III 02:10, 9 July 2006 (UTC) This is not bad. It's no VFH material, but if you made a pile of bad, this would not be there. Nor would it be in the good pile. Instead it would rest in the verdant forest of meh that rests between the piles good and bad. Modusoperandi 02:18, 9 July 2006 (UTC) Made me laugh as well. -- Imrealized 05:14, 9 July 2006 (UTC) Keep, for now, until our standards rise again. ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 07:23, 9 July 2006 (UTC) Too fishy for VFH, but too good to go onto the chopping board. -- Colonel Swordman 11:16, 9 July 2006 (UTC) Good enough, at least as a home for it's pretty decent images. -Drdisque 00:23, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
Delete	Insert title here at its finest. - User:Guest/sig 18:45, 8 July 2006 (UTC) This is to get back my last dignity from the Un-Bestiary, DiZ. Plus, it's bad.Uncyclopedian 19:42, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
Comments	DiZ is the writer. See Talk:Un-Bestiary to find out why people are trying to keep it. Uncyclopedian 19:48, 8 July 2006 (UTC) Junky junky junky junk. DiZ normally writes better articles than this. Uncyclopedian 19:55, 8 July 2006 (UTC) Ha, I laugh! Uncyclopedian is just mad cause I told him off. --DiZ 20:08, 8 July 2006 (UTC) <scowls at DiZ> It's bad. I WILL NEVER JOIN YOUR COMMITIEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Uncyclopedian 20:43, 8 July 2006 (UTC) Delete It Everyone! Uncyclopedian 20:52, 8 July 2006 (UTC) I won't sink to your level. DiZ 23:15, 8 July 2006 (UTC) Quiet back there! Don't make me this wiki around! Modusoperandi 02:18, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

Keep
Delete	Vanity, stupid, racist delete--Count of Monkey Crisco 09:30, 8 July 2006 (UTC) Yeah. Burn it. ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 09:31, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
Comments	Again, vanity and slander are unfit for regular VFD and NRV provision. We are not cyberbullies and we don't want others to call us so. Next time when you see something like this, just throw it in the bin. -- Colonel Swordman 14:23, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

Keep
Delete	This article is infested with typos and rodents. Exterminate them and huff this. --Sbluen 01:12, 8 July 2006 (UTC) Huff. Sir C Holla \| CUN --02:07, 8 July 2006 (UTC) The typos! The rodents! AAagheurghhhhh! Kill it! Now! Voter Cray Z. [MUN] [FUN!!]02:56, 8 July 2006 (UTC) Oh god... ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 07:17, 8 July 2006 (UTC) Wow... congratulations on completely missing the humour on another topic that could reap great comedic rewards. -- Imrealized 08:34, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Keep
Delete	It's so random, it makes Ultra Jesus envious. - User:Guest/sig 18:13, 7 July 2006 (UTC) Seems quite complex ;-) Needs completely rewriting TheRappingShoe 19:55, 7 July 2006 (UTC) Very hard to read, very complex -- King of Beer 20:05, 7 July 2006 (UTC) "Erik Estrada is an interstellar poo warrior who was aborted by his mother during the third week of pregnancy." If you need a translation, you should do some reading. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 20:13, 7 July 2006 (UTC) This article incited the ninja-privates to murder Keith Urban, rendering Nicole Kidman a widow and founder of the Fourth Reich. -- Colonel Swordman 20:31, 7 July 2006 (UTC) risable. - Jack Mort \| TALK \| MUN \| F@H - 22:39, 7 July 2006 (UTC) The first line's the only one near funny. ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 07:16, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Keep	But it subtly mixes Shakespear's King Lear with Porn. Whats not to love? -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me) 22:06, 7 July 2006 (UTC) As Mhaille said, it's subtle. Perhaps too high-brow, for the masses. Or maybe it's just porn. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 22:11, 7 July 2006 (UTC) Man! Up until now, I didn't know miss Banks was one of the Seven Uppers! I only knew her for her watersports activities previously. This Article certainly broadened my horizon! --di Mario 23:05, 7 July 2006 (UTC) Keep. 'Cause Mhaille told me to. --User:Anidnmeno/sig 00:05, 8 July 2006 (UTC) Weak keep. Needs expansion though, perhaps some refernce to the scene where king Lear runs naked into the storm, or the love affair between the two sisters and Edmond.---Asteroid B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 03:01, 8 July 2006 (UTC) If you expand it, I'll let you keep it. — Major Sir Hinoa (Plead) (KUN) 17:51, 8 July 2006 (UTC) Boobies and Shakespeare. Much better rightside up. -- Imrealized 05:17, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
Delete	Per Nytrospawn. Anyway, this thing just looks like the megatons of stuff we have got rid of here. -- Colonel Swordman 13:56, 7 July 2006 (UTC) I became aware of its sub-par-ness when I made the dn-L image, which, I reiterate, was totally Zombiebaron's idea!!!—Sir Mandaliet ♠ CUN PS VFH GN (talk) 14:22, 7 July 2006 (UTC) I didn't find it very interesting and it didn't make me laugh. Not once. -- King of Beer 20:08, 7 July 2006 (UTC) poor. - Jack Mort \| TALK \| MUN \| F@H - 22:39, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
Comments	I'm just gonna point out that you are linking to a redirect. The actual actical is at 7-Up. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 14:25, 7 July 2006 (UTC) Problem solved. -- Colonel Swordman 18:03, 7 July 2006 (UTC) With the wisdom of Solomon I say, "Kill 7up but keep 7-Up." There, now no one is happy, moo ha-ha! Modusoperandi 02:01, 9 July 2006 (UTC) Well, the current article is crap, but the title itself has a lot of potential. Something blending together 7-Up the drink, 1-Up and 7-Zip. - User:Guest/sig 18:05, 7 July 2006 (UTC) I challenge Mhaille's claim of subtlety: The article is titled "7-Up", and the reason for this is likely the starring of Brian Blessed in movie "Seven Swords of Wayland" as King Oswine. You may ask: what does King Oswine has to do with King Lear? The answer is "nothing". The whole article was pretty meant to be a joke on Brian Blessed's roles in both the said movie and King Lear in the first place, but for some freak reason, and as more content was added, the whole thing simply went off into a totally different direction. The "Film Overview" section was added to the article when Mhaille edited the article the third time. Note there is time difference of almost 1 day between the the first and the third version, with the second version lying right in between. Since both the 1st and the 2nd versions are what we usually consider "sub-stubs", it is obvious that Mhaille did not even have a plan for the article when he started it. Check this out. The Wickedpedia article outlines the the general plot of Shakespears' "King Lear". Mhaille had likely read it prior to his third edit. However, when he began expanding the article he decide to make King Lear a character starred by Bruce Willis instead of Brian Blessed. It was a flop, and by the time he finished his fourteenth edited there had already been at least 3 jokes mixing and matching in a highly incoherent manner - the Brian Blessed joke, the porn joke and King Lear joke. As a result, the article was doomed to be a piece of random humour - as you can see even today. (P.S. I am not here to discredit Mhaille as a person but simply trying to point out the 7-Up is nothing but a piece of random humour. Please don't take the whole thing the wrong way.) -- Colonel Swordman 15:38, 8 July 2006 (UTC) If I may address each point..... The title has nothing to do with Brian Blessed, its a not very subtle Pron reference, indeed the only two reference throughout the article are Shakespeare and Porn Films (if you look at a lot of my "work" you'll see a similar pattern of fusing two often conflicting subjects). The fact that there is a day between edits does not mean that I did not have a plan for the article, rather that I was busy. A check of my edit history will show you that I added a couple of lines to a few other articles around the same time before returning to 7-Up. I am in a full time job, as well as running my own business, so sometimes, sadly, work has to take precidence. I did not need to read the Wikipedia version of the story as I was already well aware of the plot, the characters and the sources that Shakespeare drew upon. As I have already stated there is only the two themes within the article. Its worth noting that at the time of the article's "birth" Uncyclopedia was in a transitional phase, between lots of very "stubby" articles to full blown encyclopedic masterworks. I appreciate that humour is often a subjective issue, but feel this article already has more than adequate foundations to grow into something very worthwhile. I refute the idea that it is random, as I have stated there are only two themes. Also, Colonel, (if indeed you are a Colonel) I won't take anything the wrong way. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me) Well, then, may Sophia have mercy on your article. -- Colonel Swordman 11:02, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

Keep
Delete	--Nytrospawn 00:34, 7 July 2006 (UTC) If it wasn't for that horrible, horrible list, I'd stay out of this. (too late, though) --⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ign^STFU F@H\|MDA\|+S 00:50, 7 July 2006 (UTC) This article wasn't improved much after its NRV tagging. --Sbluen 01:13, 7 July 2006 (UTC) Disappointing take on the subject matter, which should be a wealth of comedy gold. In the end, this comes up grasping a couple lumps of coal and respiratory trouble. -- Imrealized 05:01, 7 July 2006 (UTC) This is what happens when you keep your head totally in the box -- Colonel Swordman 05:32, 7 July 2006 (UTC) Kill the article, ban the author. Or vice versa. EX-TER-MI-NATE!!! --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 13:54, 7 July 2006 (UTC) Kill both... too many red links. ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 15:08, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Keep	btw it is the opposite of 7up, I wouldn't delete that.--Alexandrelol 21:49, 6 July 2006 (UTC) Comment How about 7up -> VFD also? One inane article + pic of a porn star aren't funny - they are just plain silliness. -- Colonel Swordman 22:10, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
Delete	An inane article upside down? With a picture of a porn star? In a png image? Nah - you didn't even try, buddy! -- Colonel Swordman 21:42, 6 July 2006 (UTC) Delete the article, keep the porn star. -- Imrealized 22:12, 6 July 2006 (UTC) Total crap. Also, 7up should be deleted too --Nytrospawn 00:35, 7 July 2006 (UTC) Reminds me of something kakun did once... And so that can't possibly be a good thing. --⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ign^STFU F@H\|MDA\|+S 00:52, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Keep
Delete	This was originally on the author's user page, but he has seen fit to move it into article territory in apparent violation of Uncyclopedia vanity policies. Delete. --DW^III 04:53, 8 July 2006 (UTC) Delete and warn the author. --Sbluen 06:10, 8 July 2006 (UTC) See above 2 comments. ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 07:17, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
Comments	Moved back by user; no prob. --DW^III 08:25, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

Keep	It seems to follow vanity rules. --Spin 05:24, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
Delete	This article wasn't funny, even before it was heavily vandalized. --Sbluen 04:30, 6 July 2006 (UTC) Not funny, and anything that smacks of vanity must go, IMHFO. EX-TER-MI-NATE. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 13:52, 6 July 2006 (UTC) The quotes had me warming up my delete, and the first paragraph confirmed it. Just crap. -- Imrealized 14:03, 6 July 2006 (UTC) — Major Sir Hinoa (Plead) (KUN) 18:00, 6 July 2006 (UTC) I can watch the desperate scrabbling of rats on this sinking ship for another day or so. Sir Famine , Gun ♣ Petition » 18:10, 6 July 2006 (UTC) Just send this dying cancer patient to its final resting place, will ya? -- Colonel Swordman 21:21, 6 July 2006 (UTC) Consider this crap deleted. --⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ign^STFU F@H\|MDA\|+S 00:43, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
Comments	Salvaged from the main article: "Someguy fucked up my page, i'm restoring, if you want to delete, it is his fault, so don't delete because i'm working on it yet." The message was left by User:Alexandrelol. –H . 18:00, 6 July 2006 (UTC) Funny...the edits after his first run didn't make the article any worse....I'm guessing that "Someguy" must have been him. Sir Famine , Gun ♣ Petition » 18:10, 6 July 2006 (UTC) This is from the same person that did the ABTART crap-wot-got-huffed? Or is there another "page-fucker-upper?" Meh, either way, it's vanity, and I'm in the Moose Party on this one. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 18:12, 6 July 2006 (UTC) No, I don't know who deleted the Abtart thing, anyway it was supposed to show what happens when you type with your elbow.--LOL!!!!! <3 Alexandre btw, i'm editing it, you guys should give me some tips of how to be funny --Alexandrelol 21:40, 6 July 2006 (UTC) SOMEBODY BLANKED MY PAGE!!!!!!!--Alexandrelol 22:23, 6 July 2006 (UTC)\|} Well, it's an improvement, but I still don't think that will save it. Sir Famine , Gun ♣ Petition » 22:58, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

Keep
Delete	I put this on QVFD to no avail, for some reason I cant comprehend, this actually needs to be voted on...And I say BURNINATE IT. Sir C Holla \| CUN-- 06:50, 4 July 2006 (UTC) Give it a thorough burnination. --Sbluen 12:45, 4 July 2006 (UTC) Just throw Molotov cocktail at it already! -- Colonel Swordman 13:28, 4 July 2006 (UTC) Sdoobid. ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 15:11, 4 July 2006 (UTC) Bye. -- Imrealized 23:41, 4 July 2006 (UTC) EX-TER-MI-NATE. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 13:50, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Keep
Delete	Another crappy article from the same user...KILL IT!! Sir C Holla \| CUN --23:59, 3 July 2006 (UTC) Vanity. Destroy. --Sbluen 00:02, 4 July 2006 (UTC) It's probably not vanity [1] but it sure ain't good. -- Imrealized 02:42, 4 July 2006 (UTC) DMCA violation!!! -- Colonel Swordman 13:31, 4 July 2006 (UTC) See my vote below. ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 15:11, 4 July 2006 (UTC) EX-TER-MI-NATE!!! --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 13:53, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Keep
Delete	This is really, really, really bad. BURNINATE! Sir C Holla \| CUN --23:30, 3 July 2006 (UTC) Huff the facts. --Sbluen 23:44, 3 July 2006 (UTC) This should not exist. -- Imrealized 02:39, 4 July 2006 (UTC) Total impotence. -- Colonel Swordman 13:25, 4 July 2006 (UTC) Hm. Unfunny. Short. Sdoobid. PWN! ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 15:10, 4 July 2006 (UTC) EX-TER-MI-NATE!!! --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 13:55, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
Comments	I didn't see a VFD tag on there.--Jtaylor1 05:50, 4 July 2006 (UTC) ...When you don't see one, you add it. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 15:45, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

Keep
Delete	Put this out of its misery. Sir C Holla \| CUN --23:26, 3 July 2006 (UTC) Goodbye, Chuck --Sbluen 23:32, 3 July 2006 (UTC) Grussian on outta here. -- Imrealized 02:37, 4 July 2006 (UTC) Chuck Norris thinks this is sissy. roundhouse kick -- Colonel Swordman 13:17, 4 July 2006 (UTC) Err... burn? ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 15:09, 4 July 2006 (UTC) EX-TER-MI-NATE!!! --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 13:55, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
Comments	Tompkins should have deleted this article also. It's too ugly. I can't bear to look at it much. All I could manage to do was find the references. --Sbluen 23:43, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

Keep
Delete	Vanity, just copied quotes related to an article that failed VFH miserably. Sir C Holla \| CUN --23:24, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
Comments	NRV'd by Famine. --Sbluen 23:31, 3 July 2006 (UTC) I dont think its worthy of NRV... Sir C Holla \| CUN --23:35, 3 July 2006 (UTC) Famine is an admin. He decides whether something is worthy of NRV. No excuses. --Sbluen 23:40, 3 July 2006 (UTC) Sir Cornbread, VFD IS NOT THE PLACE TO GET ARTICLES DELETED FASTER. If you add another article to VFD to get it deleted faster, you will be banned. —RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY) 19:35, 4 July 2006 (UTC) I threw this on QVFD when it was started, as it was nothing but whining. It has since expanded beyond QVFD boundaries, but still deserves death. NRV is a go. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 13:57, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

Keep
Delete	This article is ugly and it isn't funny. --Sbluen 23:14, 3 July 2006 (UTC) Sometimes an article is constructed around a unique and funny title. This is not one of those times. -- Imrealized 02:22, 4 July 2006 (UTC) Total undead garbage created by undead ulcers. -- Colonel Swordman 13:20, 4 July 2006 (UTC) Uh? ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 15:09, 4 July 2006 (UTC) DIE DIE DIE!!! Voter Cray Z. [MUN] [FUN!!]08:46, 5 July 2006 (UTC) EX-TER-MI-NATE!!! It's fucking "Deasdl the Sandcrab" all over again. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 13:57, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Keep	If only so there are still some very genuine "WTF" moments for people to have here. Sir Famine , Gun ♣ Petition » 13:20, 27 June 2006 (UTC) I agree with Famine. This is gonna scare the shit out of somebody if they ever come across it. t o m p k i n s blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 23:16, 27 June 2006 (UTC) I changed my mind after I added the vfd tag and forgot to remove it. Some parts are funny. This article just needs links. --Sbluen 23:59, 27 June 2006 (UTC) Yeah, I laughed. This is an example of good nonsense. Like seriously, what the fuck is it? We could use some of that. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 01:30, 28 June 2006 (UTC) /me agree's with the comments above ^ ~Caputosisthe Horrible14:18, 4 July 2006 (UTC) It's a keeper. This can be fixed up real nice like. Maybe I'll take another look when I'm not hammered. -- Imrealized 23:35, 4 July 2006 (UTC) keep, 2 photos and some expansion/formating and this could be a rhyming iliad. actually someone write homer and put this in it. - Jack Mort \| TALK \| MUN \| F@H - 19:20, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
Delete	Hack, Slach, and Burn. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 23:17, 26 June 2006 (UTC) L 02:41, 27 June 2006 (UTC) All hail the deleter of this page! --Sbluen 03:55, 27 June 2006 (UTC) Belongs in a 4-year-old's writing book. Burn. --Some crazy guy [MUN] [FUN!!]06:41, 27 June 2006 (UTC) Delete*. -- SonicChao ^Babbel!_Contribs 12:58, 27 June 2006 (UTC) KILL IT. ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 17:25, 27 June 2006 (UTC) Not funny. At all. User:Hinoa4/sigVFD 00:04, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
Comments	Comment -- I think my head just went "boink." What's the meter? Troachaic? Anapestic? Antipasto? Not sure whether this should be huffed, or polished. Famine's right, though, it's definitely got the WTF factor covered. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 13:24, 27 June 2006 (UTC) Should be a candidate to be moved to UnBooks... t o m p k i n s blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 23:17, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

Keep
Delete	I have no clue why this was around so long. Its pretty crappy. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 22:06, 25 June 2006 (UTC) Delete and just modify the system message.---Asteroid B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 22:39, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
Comments	If this page is deleted, it would leave a red link in the system message that appears when a normal user tries to edit a protected page. --Sbluen 04:13, 26 June 2006 (UTC) It could do with some nice expansion, that's all. Or it could be a general page for protected stuff-lots of opportunities there. And one more thing-why is it on this VFD page and it doesn't have a pleeping template.--Cray Z. 07:18, 26 June 2006 (UTC) I guess if y'all don't wanna delte it, you could rewrite so that it linked to a bunch of protected pages. The pages would have to be worked in to make a coherant article...but someone could do it! --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 19:42, 26 June 2006 (UTC) Yeah, if it needs to exist, then at least don't sentence it to an eternity of its currently mangled messiness. ~Caputosisthe Horrible14:21, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/archive39

Navigation menu

Search

Keep
Delete	A bunch of random, thrown together garbage. --Joe!&MUN&F@H&KIA&C^2&N^1 21:14, 3 July 2006 (UTC) Take out the trash. By the way, Slovakia isn't a girl. That country is actually a dirty man. --Sbluen 21:26, 3 July 2006 (UTC) KILL. Sir C Holla \| CUN --23:28, 3 July 2006 (UTC) Knock Thy Bloc Off. -- Imrealized 02:20, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
Comments

Keep
Delete	I don't like this article, and neither does Splaka and Nintendorulez, who added NRV tags. Unfortunately, this article is now too old for NRV. --Sbluen 19:55, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
Comments	Word for word copy of Kitten Huffing, improper NRV removal... DOA. t o m p k i n s blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 19:57, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

Keep
Delete	Stubby, unintelligent, and lacks funny. Needs funny, people. TD ^{Complain here} MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here) 19:26, 3 July 2006 (UTC) Feed it to the Huns. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 19:26, 3 July 2006 (UTC) Acronyms are BAD, Being All Deleted. --Sbluen 19:45, 3 July 2006 (UTC) QVFD. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 19:52, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
Comments	Gone now... t o m p k i n s blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 19:54, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

Keep
Delete	This article has too many misspellings and red links and I don't think it's funny. --Sbluen 08:57, 3 July 2006 (UTC) EX-TER-MI-NATE!!! Bad Viking reference vs. my bearded axe. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 13:26, 3 July 2006 (UTC) Kill. - User:Guest/sig 14:07, 3 July 2006 (UTC) DESTROY IT. Plus, it has that symbol. ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 15:24, 3 July 2006 (UTC) Nøt Funny. --Spin 17:26, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
Comments	Umm... I deleted it, on accident. t o m p k i n s blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 18:24, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

Keep
Delete	Junk. Fails QA.--Jtaylor1 08:02, 3 July 2006 (UTC) Goodbye, Chuck --Sbluen 08:58, 3 July 2006 (UTC) EX-TER-MI-NATE!!! Meh. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 13:27, 3 July 2006 (UTC) BVRN IT. ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 15:23, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
Comments	Bob's not your uncle anymore. --Spin 17:31, 3 July 2006 (UTC) You know, there's a pizza cafe called 'Bob's Your Uncle' about 15 miles from where I live... t o m p k i n s blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 18:23, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

Keep
Delete	Low quality, overstayed its welcome. Kick it out Way too random. --Sbluen 01:29, 3 July 2006 (UTC) As stupid as me. --Adventurer Cray Z.On a quest to kill the deadend.01:42, 3 July 2006 (UTC) Acid and article writing don't mix. -- Colonel Swordman 02:16, 3 July 2006 (UTC) If acid were involved, the article would be transcendent. This author used ether. -- Imrealized 03:12, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
Comments	Thar she blows! t o m p k i n s blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 04:32, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

Keep
Delete	Its new, but is long, so I'm not sure if it belongs here. Anyway, it sucks majorly. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 13:09, 2 July 2006 (UTC) This thing has got the word "vanity" written all over it and deserves a QVFD. -- Colonel Swordman 14:58, 2 July 2006 (UTC) Vanity. Destroy.--TKF 16:26, 2 July 2006 (UTC) Ugly. Demolish. --Sbluen 17:17, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
Comments	Despite the edit war in QVFD, the vanity page is now gone. Thank goodness! -- Colonel Swordman 18:01, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

Keep
Delete	This page is not funny. Put it out of its misery. --UNKNOWNFILE 00:46, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
Comments	Deleted Vanity like this can be qvfd'd. --Spin 00:49, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

Keep
Delete	This article isn't funny and most of it is just a badly formatted list. Tompkins should have deleted it instead of removing the NRV tag. --Sbluen 20:14, 1 July 2006 (UTC) Delete. --Spin 20:22, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
Comments	Yeah, well, just for that, I deleted it. t o m p k i n s blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 20:55, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

Keep
Delete	All right, this is my fault for tagging this Rewrite instead of NRV. The reason I tagged it rewrite is because there is a famous Matt Hopkins--a 16th century witch hunter, which is in itself a much richer subject for satire. I say we smash it flat, and I'll start with the replacement. User:Hinoa4/sigVFD 08:50, 1 July 2006 (UTC) I agree with your incredibly long and boring rant. ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 08:52, 1 July 2006 (UTC) That dude looks like Napolean Dynamite in an "after meth" picture. It's frightening. -- Imrealized 08:57, 1 July 2006 (UTC) Let it be rewritten after its deletion. --Sbluen 09:25, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
Comments