| Vote
|
Score: 10 wizards or something. OHHH MAGICAL!
|
| Nominated by:
|
 05:13, April 24, 2010 (UTC)
|
For: 19
|
- Nom and also for! Love, 05:15, April 24, 2010 (UTC)
- Self-for Cause I'm fucking great. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 05:18, April 24, 2010 (UTC)
- Brilliant. The figurative language of beautiful metaphors and similes, the use of in media res, the rapier wit...it is just so well-written. I bet this article's author has a large penis. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 05:19 Apr 24 2010
 --++ 09:48, April 25, 2010 (UTC) VERY FOR —Pelozurian (talk) 05:52, 24 April 2010 (UTC)- SIRE FREDDMOOSHA
 AMUSE ME 07:11, April 24, 2010 (UTC)
- Obvious For. —Sir Socky
   (talk) (stalk)  GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 12:34, 24 April 2010
- For. It looks like we have a bit of anarchy going on here, and who am I to miss that? Aleister in Chains 12:36 24 4 MMX (UTC)
 Oh Fuck Yes. It's Magically Fucking Delicious!!!  14:33,24April,2010- classic Staircase CUNt 21:22, April 24, 2010 (UTC)
- For. EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank) 02:43, Sunday 25 April 2010
- For. Besides Michael Clarke Duncan, this is the only injoke that I actually like, find amusing, and has some real value to the website (unlike almost every other injoke which skates by on the hyped-comedy that other users have made for it). In general though, I do agree with Romartus that we have had too many dumb nominations lately. --Matfen 19:15, April 25, 2010 (UTC)
- FUCKING MAGICAL!. Megaman126512 02:22, April 26, 2010 (UTC)
- Fucking Magical or something Mn-z 03:38, April 26, 2010 (UTC)
- A wiaard voted this article
 |Si Plebius Dato' (Sir) Joe ang Pinoy CUN|IC Kill  | 05:59, April 26, 2010 (UTC)
- Fuck it. Funnier than most of the stuff we feature anyway. Woody On Fire!
 Talking Woody Stalking Woody 08:43, April 26, 2010 (UTC)
- I changed my mind. For.--Sir ~HELPME~ Count! Awards! Pee! Help! 21:39, April 26, 2010 (UTC)
- For. 190.155.152.38 06:18, April 27, 2010 (UTC)
- I was gonna vote for anyway, meh. --
 TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK  10:00, April 27, 2010 (UTC)
- For. 80.99.11.132 19:21, April 27, 2010 (UTC)
|
Against: 9
|
- No. ~
 06:01, April 24, 2010 (UTC)
- Fuck you and the space that is always at the end of your sig. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 06:04, April 24, 2010 (UTC)
- Against. Another nonsense nomination. Get a grip!
 RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 20:24, April 24, 2010 (UTC)
- Against Fuck you, you've copied somebody else's joke. mAttlobster. (hello) 23:35, April 24, 2010 (UTC)
- Actually, ICP stole this from us. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 00:44, April 25, 2010 (UTC)
- Against. I doubt very much that a wizard, in fact, did it. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 18:52, April 25, 2010 (UTC)
 Against.--Sycamore (Talk) 18:57, April 25, 2010 (UTC)- Against. ChiefjusticePSX 18:58, April 25, 2010 (UTC)
- Against - It's no Lucky Charms. -- Kip > Talk • Works • •
   22:41, Apr. 25, 2010
- Epic against. I'm not here and I'm still voting against this. --UU - natter
 08:16, Apr 26
- fuck off --Under user's edit summary 23:08, April 26, 2010 (UTC)
|
| Comments:
|
 Abstain. A little too much sexual innuendo.--Sir ~HELPME~ Count! Awards! Pee! Help! 05:16, April 24, 2010 (UTC)
- Fuck you. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 05:34, April 24, 2010 (UTC)
- Abstain. OK insult, but too unoriginal for my taste.--Sir ~HELPME~ Count! Awards! Pee! Help! 14:34, April 24, 2010 (UTC)
- Hmm? That wasn't an insult. I was making a request. Your house. Tonight. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 15:53, April 24, 2010 (UTC)
- Abstain. Although I'm all for sex, you're just not hot enough. Sorry.--Sir ~HELPME~ Count! Awards! Pee! Help! 18:08, April 24, 2010 (UTC)
- Conditional For if everyone who voted "for" on this also votes "for" on Filial Piety TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 01:17, April 25, 2010 (UTC)
- I already did. It's Magically Fucking Delicious!!! 02:44,25April,2010
- No offence TKF, but please don't just vote for something because someone voted for your thing. VFH shouldn't work like that. Every article should be judged on it's own merits, not out of friendship or loyalties. So if you're going to vote for this, do it because you like it. Please. And sorry if I seem like I'm being an ass. I'm not trying to. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 03:38, April 25, 2010 (UTC)
- If I'm not mistaken, don't we have rules against openly voting based on friendship, loyalties, and whether or not somebody else voted for your article and the like? Although, I can sorta see the logic of TKF's conditional for, I do think it is too close to vote buying. --Mn-z 03:44, April 26, 2010 (UTC)
|
