Talk:The word parakeet written exactly two hundred and forty-two times

Deluxe Version Available This page is now offered in a Deluxe Version with extra added spam vandalism bugs features!

		This article was nominated for deletion on August 7, 2007. The result of the discussion was 'Parakeep'.

VFD

So sue me. It'll be huffed soon, but at least the CORRECT page will be huffed.     EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)      05:55, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

Um, I love this page. It won't get huffed. -- » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 05:55, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

Damn. Oh well, I guess it's not the end of the world. Could someone at least chuck a {{deadend2}} tag on it? It makes my job of checking deadends significantly easier. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 05:58, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

Hahah, this article is great, seeing it back from the dead pleases me greatly. Though wasn't it always two hundred and fourty-three times? Ah well. Maybe one died. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 08:07, 07 Aug 2007

Damn. And here I was, expecting a ban. Though I think it needs a [[Category:Uncyclopedia In-Jokes]] as well.     EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)      15:03, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

Spoiler alert: One of the parakeets died. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 02:52, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

I've actually already claimed the copyright to that joke. Don't make me DMCA you! • Spang • ☃ • talk • 03:08, 08 Aug 2007

Something tells me wise-ass vandals will add "parrot" or add another parrakeet to this article. --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 05:58, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Pee Review

This page has managed to become Pee reviewed. It only got a 38, but, then again, it's not the best article in the world.     EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)      17:01, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Protect Request

Can we get this page protected as it is? (Parakeet links, pictures, box, etc) ?     EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)      03:27, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

for --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 03:30, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

4 – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • SU&W) 08:26 Dec 22, 2024 03:30, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

4 P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 03:31, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

Not this version! The cooler one! With the edit links and the box and the quotes and the stuff! – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • SU&W) 08:26 Dec 22, 2024 03:38, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

For I like the one with the edit links, quotes and template boxes, categories as "parakeet" as per Binary etc. If its gonna be in Category:Pages that look like the things they're about then its only right. ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 03:51, 09 August 2007

Actually, abstain. I like the plain version of "parakeet parakeet" etc too, because the title is "The word parakeet written exactly two hundred and forty-two times" not "The word parakeet featured exactly two hundred and forty-two times in captions and edit links" Perhaps we could have a separate article and merge with Parakeet (which sucks incidently)? ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 03:53, 09 August 2007

For what Ceridwyn said. The current article does suck; it links parakeets to sex. Imagine that! vyvyan 04:01, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

For WHATEVER so long as it has 242 parakeets, I don't care. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • SU&W) 08:26 Dec 22, 2024 04:03, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

I don't like this new version. It's basically just like any other "nonsense" article you could care to name now. The good thing about it before was the fact that it was nothing more than the word parakeet 242 times. This is just a short AAAAAAAAA! with parakeet instead. Against this version, for protecting, and perhaps this version should be moved to parakeet. As an in-joke about an in-joke. Or something. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 04:17, 09 Aug 2007

Yeah I think thats what I was trying to say :) Revert to plain version but preserve this one somewhere. Then protect both. ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 10:07, 09 August 2007

parakeet

Parakeet parakeet parakeet parakeet parakeet parakeet. Parakeet, parakeet parakeet, parakeet parakeet parakeet --Parakeet PARAKEET! parakeet? PARAKEET PARAKEET 01:47, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

parakeet parakeet PARAKEET PARAKEET parakeet parakeet parakeet parakeet parakeet parakeet parakeet parakeet parakeet parakeet parakeet.....     Parakeet parakeet parakeet (parakeet) 16:47, 16 Parakeet 2007 (UTC)  

I counted parakeet 247 times on the page

Even though the page is about parakeet 242 times I decied to run a word count and came up with the word parakeet 247 times counting the subsections and title. The count didn't include the photos which would have brought the count to 249. Anyway should we delete 5 intances of the word parakeet on the page and count the title and subsection titles as a part of the 242 or not? Parakeet ^{(Parakeet | Parakeet)} 01:59, 20 Parakeet 2007 (UTC)

The only pages which count are the main text body & the section headers. The pictures, title, etc do not count. Doing a copy-paste of the whole page will introduce parakeets from the images, so re-count. I jusst did it, and it came out to 242. I've been watching this page, and it's fine. Please, nobody edit it.     EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)   02:08, 20 September 2007 (UTC)  

Yea the headers were removed now and it's back to 242. Thank You. Parakeet ^{(Parakeet | Parakeet)} 15:06, 20 Parakeet 2007 (UTC)

Best random page result ever

nt

w/k -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 04:57, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

No one will type this in

Please change title to simply "Parakeet." Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 21:51, October 21, 2013 (UTC)