Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/archive13

Bad Day At The Office

Deleted --—rc (t) 06:34, 3 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Yet another copyright violation cut and pasted from [1], [2], [3], [4], and well the other 645 blogs. 205.188.117.69 06:53, 30 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Gone, copyright violations combined with the fact that its a common stupid thing on the internet make me feel this doesnt even need to be voted against. Any other admins who feel otherwise, feel free to unkill it --Maj Sir Insertwackynamehere CUN VFH VFP Bur. CMInsertwackynamehere | Talk 14:05, 1 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Sephiroth

If this is still only one line by the time you read it, I strongly recommend a course of deletion and bed rest. --Spintherism 04:57, 30 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Has been expanded --—rc (t) 01:45, 2 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Da bitch got pwned

Deleted --—rc (t) 06:34, 3 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Any point? 22:55, 27 Sep 2005 (UTC)

No. --Spintherism 02:40, 28 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Probably so, if you're the creator or the target of the joke. Otherwise, farm, immediately. -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] 15:18, 28 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Clock spider

MTUworthy if it didn't have the pic. As is is just annoying --Splaka 22:55, 27 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Made me laugh (once). The pic and the article go well together Wiki Tiki God 11:38, 28 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Keep. I kinda liked it. Which is strange, because usually I carry the axe and Splaka carries the feather. The pic needs to be thumbnailed, and of course someone will need to make out-of-context links to it from all peripherally related pages, but at the worst it should be kept until someone combines it with a larger article (doesn't bling deserve more than just an Undictionary article?). -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] 15:28, 28 Sep 2005 (UTC)

I vote Keep on the rationale that if I had been looking for a clock spider I would have been pleased to find one. --Spintherism 04:20, 30 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Kept, well even democracy can fail! Bah, heh. --Splaka 05:09, 30 Sep 2005 (UTC)

The Missing Link

MTUworthy if it didn't have the pic. As is is just annoying --Splaka 22:55, 27 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Yeah, I actually have to agree. It seemed a lot funnier when I wrote it. --shrugs-- Oh well. ~ Jared ~ 00:34, 28 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Why not remove the pic and move it to undic? --Splaka 00:40, 28 Sep 2005 (UTC)

I think it should be kept if only to prevent other similar pages from being made. Similar articles could all be merged/rerouted here. Wiki Tiki God 11:41, 28 Sep 2005 (UTC)

So, should we delete the image? ~ Jared ~ 02:33, 29 Sep 2005 (UTC)

If you want, it can be done. Thank you for your prompt attention by the way. Most people create a short page and never come back, leaving us to deal with it, not caring if it gets deleted or improved or whatnot. --Splaka 02:35, 29 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Thankyou, I hope to become a pretty active uncyclopedian, and I plan on keeping track of all the pages I make. I usually try to write about two a week, but it's been rather hard recently with school. I do think the image should be deleted, I don't see how it would be of much use contributing to another entry. ~ Jared ~ 01:56, 30 Sep 2005 (UTC)

I'm thinking it might be better as something along the lines of Missing Link: Last seen <somewhere> if found, please return to <someone somewhere> etc. etc. --Spintherism 04:28, 30 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Kept, rewriting suggested though. ^_^ --Splaka 04:54, 30 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Aarmadosimbadaspar Bartasalimondiofaspogandi

Deleted --—rc (t) 06:34, 3 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Buh. --Splaka 22:55, 27 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Hear hear. --Spintherism 02:43, 28 Sep 2005 (UTC)

It should be noted that this same article was on VFH. Praise it, or kill it? I lean toward keep, if only because its author is alive and kicking. -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] 15:33, 28 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Delete. There's such a thing as too much random humor, and this article just doesn't make any fucking sense. --Poofers 07:43, 2 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Bad Advice

Deleted --—rc (t) 06:34, 3 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Delete. The sole purpose of the article is to advertise a link. It has potential, though. Luffy 20:23, 27 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Domenic

Deleted --—rc (t) 06:34, 3 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Delete, because it seems to be an article with mal-intent towards a specific person who nobody knows (and/or most likely cares about). Filled mostly with homophobic insults, lack of being funny, and just general bashing. Luffy 19:57, 27 Sep 2005 (UTC)

LUe

Huffed --—rc (t) 06:34, 3 Oct 2005 (UTC)

I can't tell if the page has been subjected to vandalism, or if it had any meaningful content in the first place. It looks like it may have been a Vanity page for players of a private online game called "Life, Universe, and Everything" (sic), and the few history pages I looked at were about as Uncyclopedic as a bash.org conversation. Also, GameFAQs is mentioned, which appears to be a Bad Sign. -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] 14:17, 27 Sep 2005 (UTC)

If this article is deleted, then Lueshi should go with it. Created by same "LUesers". --theRewrittenSheep 16:21, 27 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Delete. All it really has is in-jokes, and as said before, it's pretty much a vanity page. Luffy 20:01, 27 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Delete If it had in-jokes that lots of members would get, it might be a keeper. This seems to be a more whiny page about disillusioned forum goers. And as noted, it's hard to tell if it's been vandalized or it was always just crap. Lueshi goes too. -- Sir Famine, Gun ♣ Petition » 23:07, 28 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Lennie

Ddelyted --—rc (t) 06:34, 3 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Could be either a payout page of someone, or just a Vanity page. UPDATE: DrunkGeala edited that stu-stu-stuttering bit back into it. Still isn't any funnier. Delete --Lemming2005 05:30, 28 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Terminate with extreme prejudice. The creator of the article has nothing but this article, the uploaded pix of his erstwhile friend, and a link from Lemmings to his credit. The only editor not in this room appears to be Lennie himself, 'cause all he did was remove an embarassing anecdote about his stu-stu-stuttering. Farm, immediately. -- Sir BobBobBob ! S ? [rox!|sux!] 17:52, 27 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Ddelyt --spinyherims

And by Ddelyt, I mean Delete, if perchance that wasn't clear. --Spintherism 04:36, 30 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Random Insanity

This article looks like it's not even trying to be funny, but given the track record of articles about GameFAQs boards, that might not be such a bad thing. Delete, and I also automatically vote Delete again when it inevitably gets recreated several times. --EvilZak 04:48, 27 Sep 2005 (UTC)

The article is quite a bit different than when I nominated it. Most obvious difference is that it now contains in-jokes as opposed to when it contained no jokes. Thus, I take back my vote and instead I vote for Ralph Nader. Damn those butterfly ballots, I meant to vote for I don't really care what happens to it. --EvilZak 22:56, 30 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Delete. It's full of tired jokes by GameFAQs users. Most board-related articles shouldn't even be on Undictionary, even if they are widely known. Also it appears to get edited several times every few minutes (depending on if it is advertised at GameFAQs), filling it with even more spam. Did I mention it contains racism (although minor)? Luffy 20:05, 27 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Do not delete does my opinion matter? Oh well, I'm talking anyways. This is Randomness and would be perfect for the uncyclopedia, everyone loves GameFAQs and the uses are having a lot of fun with it, is that so bad? ;_;

Randomness does not equal funny. Sometimes there's something I like to call Random Overload, which makes something too random become not funny anymore. I think the lack of maturity (Tone down on the word wang, please) in that 'randomness' makes it even worse. Uncyclopedia articles should not be based just on being random. Maybe if it focused more on trying to be funny, and less on trying to be random, I'd like it. Whoops, made an error. Hadn't logged in when I made this comment. Luffy 22:20, 27 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Rewrite Nothing a good edit can't fix. -- Nintendorulez 22:33, 27 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Comment Maybe the page could serve as a 1000 Uncyclopedians Typing Hamlet version of random nonsense ? 70.88.217.193 22:51, 27 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Hold off There's a lot of traffic going through that page now. I say give them a couple days to write up their stuff. If it's any good, move it to GameFAQs (no sense in spreading the vanity around more than necessary); if it's still garbage, nominate it for VFD again. --—rc (t) 23:08, 27 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Delete Although the title is pretty appropriate to the content, it's just one big inside joke. I can't imagine anyone over age 16 would want to read the whole thing. It made my eyes glaze over within 1.2 seconds. And what the hell is GameFAQs anyway? Yeah, I'm old. --Bouahat 05:21, 28 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Delete The article is getting worse with every edit. Recycle its electrons to 1000 Uncyclopedians Typing Hamlet. --KP CUN 22:19, 1 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Comment Now they're voting it for highlighting. I'm pretty sure this should be vetoed on the basis of appealing to almost nobody, regardless of whether the page itself is kept. --—rc (t) 00:30, 2 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Delete This is nothing but a shitty vanity page for a video game site's social board. --MrSwoon 02:51, 2 Oct 2005 (UTC)
While I may have rained on people's parade, after several days it was still devoid of anything I could reasonably assume was humor, and there were enough links to other (random) sites that death seemed fitting. And frankly, talking about raping 12 year olds doesn't make me laugh. Burninated. -- Sir Famine, Gun ♣ Petition » 14:20, 2 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Michael

Vanity. Needs to die. -- Sir Famine, Gun ♣ Petition » 15:32, 25 Sep 2005 (UTC)

I came to this page especially to nominate this. He should put this shit on his user page. Must be huffed. --Carlos the Mean 19:51, 25 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Userify --The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM F@H (Petition) 20:40, 25 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Moved to User:Angry_Jesus, and I left a note on his talk page. I think he deserves a warning, and if he doesnt try to move it back then it's all good. --Maj Sir Insertwackynamehere CUN VFH VFP Bur. CMInsertwackynamehere | Talk 20:51, 25 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Bar Mitzvah

Kept --—rc (t) 06:34, 3 Oct 2005 (UTC)

(Moved from Talk:Bar Mitzvah)

This article seems to take anti-semitism beyond humour or irony towards racism. I'm not Jewish, but reading this article I don't think it belongs on Uncyclopedia --81.1.82.134 09:15, 24 Sep 2005

hmm i dunno. I'm half-jewish on my dad's side, and I was never Bar Mitzvahed but various friend's and relatives have been, and the article did a great job of parodying it I thought. I guess I could see it as being construed as slightly racist if it was done in a serious light, but in a comedic light I think it's okay. And I've heard my share of anti-semetic stuff, from people making generalizations about jews, to people saying things in a joking/serious way about doing a second Kristalnacht (by joking/serious I mean they said it as a joke, but probably wouldn't have a problem doing it either). I guess I consider that to be more racist than an obviously sarcastic article. If the article started making Holocaust jokes or something, though, then I'd agree that it should be deleted. But for now I don't see a problem with it --Maj Sir Insertwackynamehere CUN VFH VFP Bur. CMInsertwackynamehere | Talk 20:36, 24 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Keep Specify which parts are anti-Semitic, please, because I don't see it. As IWNH said, this is a parody of Jewish tradition. It's not serious, it's not critical, it's not even satire - it doesn't attack any person or institution. At worst it's irreverent, but if irreverent humor isn't your thing, you're in the wrong place. I'm inclined to think this was a knee-jerk "religion isn't to be made fun of" complaint. --—rc (t) 00:30, 25 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Same here. What the fuck are you guys talking about? If we threw pictures of Hitler around then it'd be anti-semitic. Please whine to your mom --MonkeyGem 00:36, 25 Sep 2005 (UTC)

I don't want to mad at this guy, I appreciate him being worried about other races because its not a common trait these days, but I dont think this article is too bad. Most of YTMND's stuff makes me sick for example, but this is in good fun --Maj Sir Insertwackynamehere CUN VFH VFP Bur. CMInsertwackynamehere | Talk 01:20, 25 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Keep it looks more like a a Jewish writter taking the piss out of Judaism than anything more sinister.--The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM F@H (Petition) 12:33, 25 Sep 2005 (UTC)

I'm Jewish, I live in Israel and there is anti-semitic stuff in the world and not just Hitler-related, monkeybrain. but this ain't it - this is not anti-semitic, we jews can laugh at ourselves - enough time in western countries will do that to you. I'm willing to bet AnalAlien or whoever the writer is is Jewish, had a Bar Mitzvah in Tucson, and also wrote the Tucson article. Spasticfreak

Keep It's pretty good. A little dry. Could use a little sexing up and paring down but someone put a lot of effort into this. I don't think schmucks without accounts should be able to VFD. Brobably some humorless passerby who doesn't uderstand the tounge-in-cheek nature of this site.

Wiki Tiki God 11:57, 28 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Edit It's not funny! Anti-semitism aside (by the way, I'm not Jewish and don't have a lot of Jewish friends), it is in bad need of a proverbial haircut. It's too much of a risk to have something that could be that easily identified as offensive without it being more funny. --Joachim22 04:59, 30 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Judging by VFH, several people have thought it's funny enough for highlighting. If you can improve it, do so...but if someone actually finds it offensive, I really think that it's an instictive "OMG they're making fun of Judaism" reaction. This is obviously not the place for such reactionaries. Maybe it seems like I'm taking this too seriously, but I honestly don't see how this, of all the articles on Uncyclopedia, could be construed as offensive. --—rc (t) 05:14, 30 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Dollar store shotguns Formal thought disorder

Moved and kept --—rc (t) 06:34, 3 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Custom gibberish tag. Crazy. Crazy. Crazy.--Sir Flammable KUN 20:59, 22 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Delete/Rewrite I don't get it either... kill it before it spreads. Jordon - 21:03, 22 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Delete Its like random words strung together to make sentences --130.245.242.138 01:31, 23 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Move to Formal thought disorder (see Wikipedia article for more information). --KP CUN 02:32, 23 Sep 2005 (UTC)

I change my vote and second the Move to Formal Thought Disorder idea. The article aaaalmost has merit, if sent to a place where it might fit in better. Jordon - 21:26, 23 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Moved to Formal thought disorder. If anyone wants to delete it they still can, but there were two people who wanted it moved, so the deletion discussion can still continue if needed, just under a different name. Actually three people, I kinda liked the idea of it being named that too. --Maj Sir Insertwackynamehere CUN VFH VFP Bur. CMInsertwackynamehere 19:05, 23 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Keep --The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM F@H (Petition) 12:34, 25 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Jokes that Japanese People Don't Understand

It's just a bunch of Bash quotes translated through Babelfish. --EvilZak 03:04, 24 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Delete--Maj Sir Insertwackynamehere CUN VFH VFP Bur. CMInsertwackynamehere | Talk 03:32, 24 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Plagiarized and unfunny. To be explicit, Jaysus HATES it1!!!! --Jatopian 06:42, 24 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Delete - Bordering on the offensive, however not quite offensive enough to stay. Kill it. --81.179.239.124 16:16, 24 Sep 2005 (UTC)

And that's that. --Maj Sir Insertwackynamehere CUN VFH VFP Bur. CMInsertwackynamehere | Talk 20:21, 24 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Egelyn

Would have been QVFD, but people keep trying to save it. He's dead, Jim. --{{User:BobBobBob/sig} 23:16, 23 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Deleted, it is kinda pointless looking back --Maj Sir Insertwackynamehere CUN VFH VFP Bur. CMInsertwackynamehere | Talk 20:40, 24 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Completely pointless --brooza 10:10, 22 Sep 2005 (GMT)

Hormones

Copied from a recent news story on various pages such as [5] 152.163.101.10 06:25, 22 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Lift from a news site, and kinda factual seeing as how it really happened. Gone. --Maj Sir Insertwackynamehere CUN VFH VFP Bur. CMInsertwackynamehere | Talk 20:43, 24 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Arrrg

Useless crap, probobly made because of yesterday.--Foo21 19:48, 20 Sep 2005 (EDT)

Deaded - David Gerard 09:28, 21 Sep 2005 (EDT)

Things to do in an elevator

• Copied from well, almost any humor website such as [6] or [7], but more specificly from [8]. 70.88.218.145 17:04, 20 Sep 2005 (EDT)
• Keep, unless there is a copyright violation -Foo21 22:19, 20 Sep 2005 (UTC)

• Comment It certainly appears so, although it seems all these websites have a copyright and/or claim ownership. 205.188.117.69 01:27, 21 Sep 2005 (EDT)

• Delete' Copyright violation. No lifts allowed. --Chronarion 04:03, 22 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Alex Dewar

Seems like slandanity.. --Splaka 10:59, 19 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Chmorguphast Croboys

Obnoxious and unfunny. --Splaka 10:59, 19 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Iliveinyourbathroom

Is there a point? --Splaka 10:59, 19 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Its a work in progress. LEAVE IT ALONE Jack Cain 01:57, 21 Sep 2005 (EDT)

You should use {{WIP|~~~~~}} or {{construction}} or at least {{stub}} then.

WIP-ped. --Splaka 02:10, 21 Sep 2005 (EDT)

Libido

Just a hair above QVFD. Someone rewrite this before an Admin sees? --Splaka 10:59, 19 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Hoimeneach

Delete (dumbass link farm; why was this VFH'ed?) --DWIII 02:57, 19 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Rape and Pillage, Arr. I removed it from the VFH because it was added twice, annoyingly. 63.19.220.249 (Who put it on VFH) is somewhat of a vandal, having blanked Carlow Crab and done a few other annoying-looking things. Note that this IP isn't the OP of Hoimeneach (although the IPs are very similar). --Splaka 10:59, 19 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Delete its stupid and useless. User:SirElvisChrist/sig

I also changed it back from VFH just now, if it happens again, he gets a block (writer that is). I'll leave a message on his talk page. oh yeah Delete if for nothing else, that --Maj Sir Insertwackynamehere CUN VFH VFP Bur. CMInsertwackynamehere 21:18, 22 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Okkkaayy so it turns out this guy has been blocked once by EvilZak. and I had to block him through a few different IP addresses. multiple times. so on that note, I think this is deletable, especially since he wouldnt stop doing that stupid VFH thing, which coupled with some other things is why he is banned. --Maj Sir Insertwackynamehere CUN VFH VFP Bur. CMInsertwackynamehere 02:06, 23 Sep 2005 (UTC)

category:Sidekick

Please delete; content moved to category:Sidekicks. --DWIII 02:57, 19 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Date

Unfunny and factual. --AlexMW 00:04, 18 Sep 2005 (UTC)
Delete, or have a total rewrite (and I mean start from scratch) --Poofers 05:22, 19 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Re-written from scratch. (By me.) If the re-write is worthy, please remove the VFD. I agree, the original version was awful. --Bouahat 02:45, 21 Sep 2005 (EDT)

Keep rewrite Can I remove the template or does it have to be an admin or some such person? --AlexMW 13:57, 21 Sep 2005 (EDT)

Rewrite looks fine to me, no longer VFDed --Maj Sir Insertwackynamehere CUN VFH VFP Bur. CMInsertwackynamehere 11:57, 23 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Turks and Caicos Islands

This newly created page is copied straight from the corresponding wikipedia article at [9] with no (or virtually no) alterations.

--Ogopogo 00:04, 17 Sep 2005 (UTC)

I've just gone ahead and burned this, as it was a carbon copy of the WP article. This kind of thing can go in QVFD normally, unless it's in the process of being satirically sporked. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 00:23, 17 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Ludvig Borga

The newly created page Ludvig Borga is copied directly from [10]. There is nothing on the talk page or anywhere in the article which indicates its permission by the original author. 70.88.217.193 22:36, 16 Sep 2005 (UTC)

As above. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 00:27, 17 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Wombism

Vanity page, complete with the obligatory blog link. It looks halfway decent, but Google is not its friend - the only result is the Uncyclopedia Religion page. If Uncyclopedia Is Not An Expansion Pack For Your Blog, this one's gotta go. Besides, call me superficial, but I'd prever Vulvaism. --BobBobBob 18:43, 16 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Ryan adams

Redirected to Ryan Adams --—rc (t) 04:25, 25 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Vanity? lot of work put into it, but who/what is it about? --Splaka 22:13, 14 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Its not vanity, Ryan Adams is the lead for "Ryan Adams and the Cardinals" --Nytrospawn 23:02, 14 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Ok, my vote is move to Ryan Adams as well as linkify, format, and maybe add a reference to Wilde. --Splaka 23:06, 14 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Keep after wikification. - Guest 14:49, 15 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Joe Almeida

This is a very old vanity page, if it is infact a vanity page. The subject is a Non-Notable-Person according to google (even with Michael spelled thusly). I'd ignore it (as it has been here much longer than me) except 12.172.173.162 (not the original poster but the major contributor since almost the beginning) seems to be inserting links to it in a lot of pages quite randomly. Thoughts? --Splaka 22:13, 14 Sep 2005 (UTC)

I have no idea who this person is. Retroactive Query System doesnt show anything of this person --Nytrospawn 23:05, 14 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Delete --Spintherism 23:51, 14 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Delete The fact that Mr. or Mrs. 12.172.173.162 just came in here and demoted the header for this section to a non-header link (I restored the header format) cements my vote. Plus the article is not interesting. --Bouahat 16:53, 15 Sep 2005 (UTC)
I accidently deleted this. Sorry. Will happen again. -- Sir Famine, Gun ♣ Petition » 00:33, 17 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Cheers, I removed all the links to it I think. Plus I always forget my sig. See? --> --Splaka 00:50, 17 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Royal Society For Showering With Parents

Scrubbed --—rc (t) 04:25, 25 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Meh? --Splaka 22:13, 14 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Im not clicking on those links in there --Nytrospawn 23:07, 14 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Major Expansion or Delete The first link seems to be a very cleverly disturbing joke (I hope). It's plausible that something good could come of it. --Spintherism 00:00, 15 Sep 2005 (UTC)

custard blankets

Stupid and very poorly written. Delete. Dac1990 13 Sep 2005 22:25 (UTC)

I didn't read the article, but I vote to keep by merit of the name alone. --Spintherism 23:49, 13 Sep 2005 (UTC)

I've rewritten it but I'm not sure if it's any good. I vote to keep it because I am in love with myself and all that I do. --Carlos the Mean 12:54, 14 Sep 2005 (UTC)

The rewrite works for me. Nice job. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 00:33, 17 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Emerald city

Smooshed --—rc (t) 04:25, 25 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Contentless, pointless. AmyNelson 21:10, 13 Sep 2005 (BST)

• Demolish. - Guest 11:46, 14 Sep 2005 (UTC)

I have attempted to improve it slightly, in case it can be redeemed. Jackiespeel 12:45, 14 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Still delete Let it be started anew. --—rc (t) 04:25, 25 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Winston

Kept --—rc (t) 04:25, 25 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Too much of a rant about how the idiot smoker who wrote this page thinks Winston is better. --Cheeseboi 20:44, 12 Sep 2005 (UTC)

It's taking up space that could be used for something good. IT SHALL DIE, IT SHALL DIE --Tinned Stoat 09:31, 13 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Burn it AmyNelson 16:09, 13 Sep 2005 (BST)

The moment I read the word "Dumbfolded" I automagically thought Keeper --Nytrospawn 23:16, 14 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Keep or Rewrite/Expand --Spintherism 23:56, 14 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Keep I haven't been here all that long, but I don't see anything wrong with this article that isn't wrong with most of the other articles I've found while piercing my brain with thumbtacks. Example: Mode Class (wtf?) --BobBobBob 21:40, 15 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Keep/Expand -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 00:18, 17 Sep 2005 (UTC)

ZFGC

Retained --—rc (t) 04:25, 25 Sep 2005 (UTC)

By recent order of Assistant Deity Chron.--Sir Flammable KUN 08:01, 12 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Keep: If only because their spamm0rz list links only to usernamespace. I wuv them as an example of the least annoying way to run such a page, no propensity for vanity pages! Unlike like Irc users or Steam_Forums (the section there keeps coming back and disappearing). Icky. --Splaka 08:15, 12 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Huff: Just because it's a good example doesn't really mean it's a good page, I think. I feel that it qualifies both as an advert and vanity, to a reasonable degree. Plus, it is not notable or humorous to any real capacity. Let us leave material like that to the Other WIki That Must Not Be Named.--Sir Flammable KUN 15:47, 12 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Deletezorz I concur with Flammables sentiment --Nytrospawn 17:01, 12 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Keep per Splaka: I'm usually vehemently anti-vanity, but here the usernames aren't linked (except to actual Uncyc users) and there are quite a lot of ZFCGCZDwhatever people who would evidently find this funny. I've also been reading their forum thread related to this page, and they've been warning people not to stray outside of ZFGC itself - in other words, to keep their vanity to one page. I do think we need an expanded vanity template, though.

		This appears to be vanity. It does, however, have to potential to be funny. Please edit it until it is, or it shall die a terribly lonely death. If this page is not fixed in 30 days, it may become a candidate for deletion.

This page references a website. If you're not familiar with the website, you won't find the inside jokes here amusing. So go away.

--—rc (t) 23:36, 12 Sep 2005 (UTC)

KEEEL EEEET! It is a bad thing, tedious and unfunny. Much like me. --Tinned Stoat 09:29, 13 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Destroy If a joke requires going to a certain website to be funny, then the joke should be posted to that website, rather than to a website where nobody else will get it. --EvilZak 20:34, 13 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Wipe from all being. I didn't want to read it, so nobody does. *folds arms arrogantly*. I agree with Flammable that it's the sort of thing you'd expect from "Other WIki That Must Not Be Named". --Carlos the Mean 13:05, 14 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Keep I thought this already survived VFD?!?--The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM F@H (Petition) 13:12, 14 Sep 2005 (UTC)

I'm gonna give it another day. The current vote is 6-3 (including chron's "nomination")--Sir Flammable KUN 17:40, 14 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Just curious, what dies this Signify? --Splaka 20:25, 14 Sep 2005 (UTC)

My bad. My brain fails to work.--Sir Flammable KUN 03:21, 16 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Delete Yawn... the formatting alone makes my eyes glaze over. --Bouahat 16:13, 15 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Rayne Gone Wild.jpg

Copyrighted, so removed. --Chronarion 23:22, 21 Sep 2005 (UTC) Unnecessary nudity on an otherwise PG-13 page. Yup. Doesn't look like it could add much humour to the page itself, and the model looks nothing like Rayne. --stillwaters/Talk 05:14, 12 Sep 2005 (UTC)

It's not being used anywhere currently, Add to unused images--The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM F@H (Petition) 07:35, 12 Sep 2005 (UTC)

It was actually in use. I just removed it from the article (BloodRayne) as I didn't feel it contributed much to the article. --stillwaters/Talk 23:34, 12 Sep 2005 (UTC)

No reason to have that when one can use my far superior Rayne.jpg. --Spintherism 23:53, 13 Sep 2005 (UTC)

"Pwned!" - Lord "Still waiting for his fricken template" Byron on Rayne Gone Wilde

“Mmm..yes quite.”

~ Oscar Wilde on Rayne Gone Wilde

Mine's much better --Carlos the Mean 13:52, 14 Sep 2005 (UTC)

"ROTFL!" - Mark Twain



"Ahh so this explains it.." - Sigmund Freud



"Remarkable. There really no other word for it." - Winston Churchill



"I'll take care of this. (sneaks off with picture) All for Willy.. " - William Shakespeare



"I'm conflicted. At first I was going to excommunicate all of you. However, after viewing this masterpiece I shall grant Carlos a pass on all his past present, and future sins (limited to Uncyclopedia of course)." - The Freakin' Pope

The original image is copyrighted, I know because I saw the playboy issue with it in it. --Nytrospawn 23:10, 14 Sep 2005 (UTC)

ISUCF'V'MB

love it! Keep! --68.13.44.153 19:50, 12 Sep 2005 (UTC)Candy

Seems liek a vanity page. Lacking content, humor.--Sir Flammable KUN 04:35, 12 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Dull Delete--The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM F@H (Petition) 07:36, 12 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Delete--Nytrospawn 17:03, 12 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Delete (pointless carp) --DWIII 23:16, 12 Sep 2005 (UTC) CUN

Keep. I have no idea why, but I quite like it. It's random, but not in a boring 'endless randomly-generated text' way. --Carlos the Mean 11:57, 14 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Oops. Meesed up the comment.. Still, it's 4-1, as the IP above countsfor nmothing, seeing as it only posted here twice.

Gkhjkjwkkw

Custom crazy conspiracy theorist tag added. It seems really... bad.--Sir Flammable KUN 17:38, 11 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Delete. Article is more of a rant than it is funny. Luffy 21:19, 11 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Keep I like rants <InsertRantHere> --The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM F@H (Petition) 07:37, 12 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Delete (the title alone hurts my eyes) --DWIII 23:28, 12 Sep 2005 (UTC) CUN

Keep--Spintherism 23:56, 13 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Keep, it's an entertaining rant, if that's not an oxymoron. --Carlos the Mean 12:59, 14 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Rename into something less nonsensical. - Guest 14:51, 15 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Delete Unfunny, not to mention completely off the topic of actual gkhjkjwkkw (what do whole grains have to do with the price of gkhjkjwkkw in Africa?). --Bouahat 16:15, 15 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Dr. Von Leiderhosen

Huffed --—rc (t) 04:25, 25 Sep 2005 (UTC)

DELETE - this page has no redeeming value, and there's no point in trying to re-write it. --SOdhner 20:51, 10 Sep 2005 (UTC)

MTU --The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM F@H (Petition) 07:39, 12 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Keep & Expand --DWIII 23:41, 12 Sep 2005 (UTC) CUN

Delete --—rc (t) 04:25, 25 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Douchebags

Deleted --—rc (t) 04:25, 25 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Delete or maybe rewrite. Completely bad. --SOdhner 20:51, 10 Sep 2005 (UTC)

This article is so bad, it makes douchebags look good. Flush it away. AmyNelson 17:30, 11 Sep 2005 (BST)

Delete Considering the person tried to link to an image on his hard drive --Nytrospawn 19:39, 11 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Delete That's hilarious, though. Hahahahaha. --stillwaters/Talk 05:10, 12 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Delete close but no cigar --The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM F@H (Petition) 07:39, 12 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Internet commandments

Under construction (supposedly) --—rc (t) 04:25, 25 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Is Uncyclopedia a dumping grounds for things Wikipedia doesn't want? If it was original humorous content created on wiki it might be good, but since it was just copy/pasted from various sources on the internet, it seems pointless. --Splaka 21:40, 10 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Uncyclopedia is not a dumping ground, its a waste disposal facility. Thus, this article should be recycled --Nytrospawn 22:54, 10 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Rewrite. Looks like a worthy topic. --stillwaters/Talk 05:17, 12 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Keep unless copyvio, just because it originated over there shouldn't be grounds for it's deletion, and on it's own merits, it's (just) OK --The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM F@H (Petition) 07:43, 12 Sep 2005 (UTC)

I didn't nominate it for that, but because it is basically (from 2 min of google as research) a cut/paste from the internet, like that ASCII cows thing. (just FYI) -Spl

Delete Rewrite (it's a worthy topic) If it were funny, it might be relevant that it's not original. --Spintherism 00:02, 14 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Longhorn

Redirected to Windows Vista --—rc (t) 04:25, 25 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Way too factual and unfunny. Looks like a good candidate for a complete rewrite or delete. -- ERTW MUN 20:07, 10 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Rewrite I don't think being quite factual is in it self is a problem, not being overly funny is however. --The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM F@H (Petition) 07:48, 12 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Merge and redirect to Windows Vista. - Guest 13:41, 13 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Merged redeemable content with Windows Vista. What to do with the article is up to you. - Guest 11:46, 14 Sep 2005 (UTC)

I done did it -- swiped the remaining good parts from Longhorn and turned it into a redirect to Windows Vista. Thank goodness this isn't Wikipedia, or else I'd be worried 'cause I have no clue what I just did. Just kidding. Or am I? --BobBobBob 22:01, 15 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Told you I was clueless. There are no links besides this one to Longhorn. Well, there was one link, but I stabbed it in the effing heart: Jean Chrétien, to which I also assigned the {{incoherent}} template. May Sophia grant me forgiveness and/or long wet kisses, as appropriate. --BobBobBob 22:10, 15 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Steam Forums

Kleptomaniac --—rc (t) 04:25, 25 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Was on QVFD, but since a lot of work has been done on it, moved here. Looks like a fansite page á la ZFGC. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 19:27, 10 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Delete' everything except for the introduction. --Nytrospawn 00:31, 11 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Redirect to Forum, a somewhat-scathing article lampooning such sites. Sir Famine, Gun ♣ Petition » 00:51, 11 Sep 2005 (UTC)
Keep These are notable forums. I do not care if it's a fansite page, as long as it's funny to the forum users, and kept to one page. --Chronarion 00:48, 12 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Agreed It's come a long way since the first few hours it was posted here. Looks pretty good now. -- Sir Famine, Gun ♣ Petition » 01:14, 12 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Keep The CS forum is notable enough I think. --The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM F@H (Petition) 07:44, 12 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Premature ejaculation

Deleted --—rc (t) 04:25, 25 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Both it and the OW quote can go. It's sad enough that I can't even come up with something witty to say about it. Famine 23:28, 8 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Keep/Rewrite but huff the list of people "affected" as these are always pointlessly crap. --The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM F@H (Petition) 07:46, 12 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Delete --—rc (t) 04:25, 25 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Mackem, Geordie, Newcastle, and Sunderland

Kepten --—rc (t) 04:25, 25 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Hello! I'm the author of Newcastle, Geordie and Sunderland. I vote to KEEP all of these pages, but I think a flame war may be about to break out. I am asking for help - please keep the flaming nice and constructive, and best of all funny! I am big enough to take jokes about Geordies and Newcastle, but I realise that this could get extremely tiresome to anyone that's not from the North East of England. So, I hope we keep all these pages and spawn a load of spurious facts to support what promises to be a superbly infantile slanging match. I've not put a VFD tag on Mackem since I didn't write it. --86.133.156.32 20:43, 7 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Partial Whack I think Newcastle, and Sunderland are well worth keeping. Mackem and Geordie, however, fail to amuse me. If those could be done as well as the main articles, I think they might be worth keeping. However, I'd rather see that time spent on the two locations, as they could definitely benefit from that extra loving care. Sir Famine, Gun ♣ Petition » 21:38, 7 Sep 2005 (UTC)

I agree, the first two are less developed then the second 2 --Nytrospawn 22:22, 7 Sep 2005 (UTC)

I've done a bit of work on Geordie, further asistance would be welcomed --Tinned Stoat 06:24, 8 Sep 2005 (UTC)

It's better, but could still do with a bit more work. REWRITE for Mackem, RETOUCH for Geordie and KEEP Newcastle and Sunderland--138.253.24.213 07:37, 8 Sep 2005 (UTC)

I think all four are somewhat apt. This is a vote for keep. --Rollo75 23:13, 7 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Keep All 4 --The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM F@H (Petition) 09:05, 9 Sep 2005 (UTC)

I love them all, being from the NE. KEEP THEM! - Cookie Monster

Antimatter

Rewritten --—rc (t) 04:25, 25 Sep 2005 (UTC)

I'd like this article to matter. Or at least combine with. Sir Famine, Gun ♣ Petition » 00:04, 7 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Just a thought, but might it be funny to put the matter and antimatter articles on the same page, and redirect Antimatter to that page? --Spintherism 22:55, 7 Sep 2005 (UTC)

I've rewritten this page. Please DO NOT remove it.--SOdhner 16:41, 9 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Frankly, it still sucks.--Spintherism 23:27, 10 Sep 2005 (UTC)

I agree, but it sucks less. However not less enough that I don't still dream of one day freeing all those electrons from the page they are currently trapped in. Sir Famine, Gun ♣ Petition » 23:41, 10 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Ouch. Now you've gone and hurt my feelings. I'd still like to KEEP it. --SOdhner 22:58, 14 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Well, I took your good, although boring edit, and twisted it a little. I think it's closer to a keeper now because:

A) It's not nearly as factual.

B) It ties in with some of the other wackiness on this site - while this whole website is full of lies, we like consistency in our lies.

-- Sir Famine, Gun ♣ Petition » 13:23, 18 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Looks awesome. I just didn't want it removed entirely because I feel certain it would have just been replaced with something worse. A nice re-re-re-write did the trick. Thanks!--SOdhner 20:29, 18 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Donkey: Shrek's friend

Kept --—rc (t) 04:25, 25 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Apart from the basic nose job this requires, there's an idea worth saving here surely? --User:IMBJR/sig 15:41, 5 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Keep Could be worse. --Spintherism 21:34, 5 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Lemon

Kept --—rc (t) 04:25, 25 Sep 2005 (UTC)

A bit "wacky" at the moment, but if there's a good rewrite to be had, let's see it. -- Codeine OUN Bur. 13:03, 5 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Keep - Not funny, yet no worse than most PfD candidates. --Unissakävelijä 19:19, 5 Sep 2005 (UTC)

I like it, as wacky articles go, I'd say this one is no lemon! - LizardMan

Keep. But delete above joke ^^. --Spintherism 21:37, 5 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Gazmo

Deleted per Garby And I moved the contents to User:Garby in case you wanted to keep them. --—rc (t) 04:19, 14 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Bukkake Brigade seems to be the new ZFGC. The links should probably point to User: namespace to prevent random vanity like this, I think. --Splaka 07:52, 5 Sep 2005 (UTC)

If users with the same name exist then Be Italic--The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM F@H (Petition) 08:04, 5 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Only one of them exists so far (I checked the contributions on all the nicks, happy? MM says I ain't lazy enough, bah!). Relinkifiying. But that wasn't really the point of this vfd. Heh. --Splaka 08:22, 5 Sep 2005 (UTC) (italic)

I vote to delete it; after rereading the rules I realized that such a thing qualified as a vanity page, blah blah (I did, in fact, write this article in the first place). Regardless I didn't write any more such articles after seeing the VFD pasted upon it.--Garby 04:06, 14 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Y2K Bug

Retained --—rc (t) 04:25, 25 Sep 2005 (UTC)

I would've put this on qvfd, with all of its unfunny attempts at nonsense, but I decided to huff it here instead. --Cheeseboi 13:49, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)

• Weak Keep--The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM F@H (Petition) 19:06, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)
• Keep --Awshit 21:25, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)
• Let the beast live it has potential. AmyNelson 14:00, 5 Sep 2005 (BST)

Quake

Deleted --—rc (t) 04:25, 25 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Definition 1 is just the opposite of truth. Def 2 is factual. Overall doesn't qualify for either Things that are funny because they are false or Things that are funny because they are true. --Unissakävelijä 11:41, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Boring Delete or maybe transwiki to BJAODN just to realy fuck with their minds :-)--The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM F@H (Petition) 19:09, 4 Sep 2005 (UTC)

I really dont care--Ricky Horror 17:05, 5 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Delete this crap. --Evanfardreamer 17:12, 5 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Delete, not funny at all. Seems easier for someone to start over than try and salvage this. --Pietro 06:44, 6 Sep 2005 (UTC)