Uncyclopedia:VFH/Prime Directive

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

Prime Directive (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Vote	Score: 10.5 space-farers just eager to coexist
Nominated by:	Spıke Ѧ 03:55 2-Jul-12 03:55, July 2, 2012 (UTC)
For: 12.5	Self-nom and For. The absurdities of the Star Trek non-interference mandate. Spıke Ѧ 03:55 2-Jul-12 For. Funnybony  14:43, Jul 2 For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 15:25, 2 July 2012 For. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 00:05, July 3, 2012 (UTC) For. T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 00:21, July 3, 2012 (UTC) For. Mattsnow 07:38, July 3, 2012 (UTC) For. 98.221.158.104 04:13, July 4, 2012 (UTC) For. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 11:29, July 4, 2012 (UTC) Very For. Sycamore (Talk) 10:07, July 5, 2012 (UTC) For. Uncyclopedia's Prime Directive is to make this article by Spike a feature. RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 17:25, July 5, 2012 (UTC) For. MAT​THL​OCK 20:18, July 5, 2012 (UTC) For. Works very well. mAttlobster. (hello) 13:53, July 7, 2012 (UTC) I like it well enough. The Woodburninator Minimal Effort ™ 21:54, July 14, 2012 (UTC)
Against: 2	Nah. --QZEKЯOM Proud sponsor of Team Zombiebaron Tw$*ty Tw%#ve G*me$ FTW! Let's go for the g^@d! 22:09, July 6, 2012 (UTC) Boner. Nothing particularly wrong with it, but it's pretty low on funny to me. Perhaps more absurdity would work, seeing as we're talking about the absurdities of the whatever SPIKE said up there. -RAHB 04:45, July 12, 2012 (UTC)
Comments:	Ran it by Mattsnow; he gave me a passing grade for composition, but pleaded unfamiliarity with the TV series. Spıke Ѧ 03:55 2-Jul-12

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article