From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
 |
This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion.
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Crap One more braindump attack article on liberals, that isn't funny, even in bizarro world. MaxMangel 04:36, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete anyway. Pee Review or not, this sucks. ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 05:15, 13 May 2007
- I don't care if it's on Pee Review, this is atrocious. --General Insineratehymn 05:45, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
- weakCount of Monkey Crisco 08:01, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- I think the Pee Review entry renders it ineligable for VFD --THINKER 04:49, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
Memo to MaxMangel: If you find that your article sucks and want it gone, use QVFD. Deleted per user request, voting closed. —RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY)08:19, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Abort –
   (ooh!) (aah!) ...·º•ø®@» LEG CUN GUN DUN 19:59, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 01:21, 13 May 2007
- Flush. -- herr doktor needsAbeam
 [scream!] 01:25, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
- Wow, that's crap. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 01:38, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete: A complete shit load. --CaptainSpam MUN PUTPBAA 01:49, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
- Shithouse
 Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 02:55, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
- Scrap --
 TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK  03:01, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
- Poink --
 Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 03:18, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
- Flushable Do I even have to explain why? Count of Monkey Crisco 08:03, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
This is better articulated here. I vote to redirect. – (ooh!) (aah!) ...·º•ø®@» LEG CUN GUN DUN 19:59, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
- Serious? Do you really think we need an article on this subject? -- herr doktor needsAbeam [scream!] 01:25, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
- Coming from the guy who voted to keep Royal Pointless Military Things Tournament??? :) – (ooh!) (aah!) ...·º•ø®@» LEG CUN GUN DUN 01:37, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
- Sheesh. You're like an old married couple. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 01:39, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
- Keep It's funny. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 18:34, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
- Let it live'. hmm... yeah, a medium rewrite for this one. -- herr doktor needsAbeam [scream!] 18:37, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
- Keep I like it. Doesn't need a rewrite. Maybe a little expansion? --
 (but) Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 19:44, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
- What Strange said ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 01:18, 13 May 2007
- Keep: A little bit of rewrite here, some expansion there, make it more deadpan, and honestly, I think this one could be something. --CaptainSpam MUN PUTPBAA 01:51, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
- I've done some of the things in the "events" section. They make even less sense when you're involved in them. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 01:53, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
- Screep! -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 03:04, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Mildly amusing Count of Monkey Crisco 08:16, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Reminds one of Monty Python's "Marching up and down the square." I had a dream about Monty Python last night; just shows where my mind has been lately. Rogpyvbc 17:25, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
|
| Comments |
- Comment: If I were to go out on a limb — a really, really fragile limb I have no desire to remain on — I would guess the author might have wanted this to have something to do with the works of directorial auteur Ed Wood. Of course, I only say this from the perspective of the title being "Glenda" and the article referencing Plan 9 From Outer Space. There's no accompanying "Glen" article, though (Glen or Glenda), and there's not much more Ed Woodish in there, so bang goes that theory. --CaptainSpam MUN PUTPBAA 02:01, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
- I'd be willing to rewrite this. Not today though. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 03:11, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Randomcruft --General Insineratehymn 17:56, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
- ☺-cruft Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 17:58, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
- Down the hammer of justice. -- herr doktor needsAbeam [scream!] 18:06, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
- Great, more robot wars. De-1337 --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 18:49, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - more random than a swallowed icicle. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 19:25, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 11:13, 12 May 2007
- Focus, damnit! Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 03:06, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete* Count of Monkey Crisco 08:10, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch
 15:58, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
- Keep. It's on a guy's userpage, damnit. It's not clogging up teh internets... Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 01:45, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
- Do I go around VFDing images that only appear on your userpage? —Hinoa KUN (talk) 08:16, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
- Oh yeah - didn't see that. Thought it was just another badly made template. Well it clearly is, but it's been cleaned off all pages, so it's harmless now. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 09:14, 13 May 2007
(UTC)
- Keep what MO said (and because my {{ajax}} got deleted without trial). --THINKER 09:59, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry didn't see it was on someones userpage. The spelling mistake still makes me cry. ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 10:50, 13 May 2007
|
| Delete |
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
- Keep Uhhh....these are my templates...so no. Give feed back and notice, not deletion. This is like the fourth attack on my work and I am glad that people are finally standing up for my stuff. I am just gonna save the codes with my "Final Attack+Revive"(after a few days or weeks so I don't get kicked off) on these bastards until I get more cooperation in terms of notice(especially with me moving and my exams I just finished), help and Pees that are more than just flames (though I salute those like Herr Doktor, who though disapprove of my articles are constructive) Happy Weasel 05:18, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Why delete? Ethereal 10:52, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. Maybe alter a little? Rogpyvbc 00:28, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
- Keep! Not sure about alteration. There are many other articles that make "claims" about the author, so what? Are you going to vote to remove the WIP template? The Communist template(s)? MrMetalFLower 05:15, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
- Keep'. But make them prettier. What about the elephant and the donkey for illustration. -- herr doktor needsAbeam [scream!] 18:42, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - If you can't make fun of yourself... Mr. Briggs Inc. 02:08, 13 May 2007 (UTC) Eh?
|
| Delete |
- Delete I find these particularly irritating, maybe because they use dark colours and make claims about the authors of the article. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 21:02, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delort. I hate these kinds of templates. Political humo(u)r shouldn't be flagged with a big notice announcing it to the world, it should be subtle. Plus, it reminds me of the damn "* Approved" templates. —Hinoa KUN (talk) 00:07, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete I hate political jokes in general. Mostly because I have no idea what they mean. ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 05:37, 12 May 2007
- Delete Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 18:10, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
- If it takes a political template to tell you on what side of the political spectrum a political page skews, the page needs a rewrite. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 03:05, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- Ooh, I think I'd better abstain from this one. Before these appeared the author and I had just had what he called "creative differences" over his right to spam previous templates over loads of pages. So just in case I still bear a grudge, I'm not voting. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 22:29, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
- Side note with VFD Maintenance hat on: Normally I'd say "one article per entry," but in the interest of fairness, if one goes, so does the other. —RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY)00:07, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
- Kept, closed closed closed. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 23:02, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
- Keep - Humour is hard to judge, asahatter, as you're not Canadian. This parodies a Canadian institution. --Ogopogo - May 10, 2007
- Keep as per Ogopogo. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 14:48, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
- Keep/Expand —Hinoa KUN (talk) 23:56, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
- Delete - Unfunny stub --Asahatter (annoy) 14:40, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- me being canadian and never heard of it, and also due to the fact that it is 2005cruft, it's outta here. --
 » >UF|TLK|▋» 21:12, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- Shave the stubbly thing please! ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 02:08, 11 May 2007
- No way can we keep it in this state Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 03:40, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete But it doesn't parody a Canadian institution well. Rogpyvbc 00:44, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
- I spent time in a Canadian institution. For breakfast we got waffles. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 03:03, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- I did check the Plate exists before VFD, and if folk find the article funny then by all means keep - could do with expansion though -Asahatter (annoy) 17:51, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- Goneish. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 22:56, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
- Mediocre It's not good, but it's not unforgivably bad either. ----Count of Monkey Crisco 23:21, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
- Rewrite Eh... This needs a rewrite. It has a wonderful idea, but lousy writing. --• • • Necropaxx (T) {~}
Keep --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 23:30, 9 May 2007 (UTC)- Keep Humorous concept with sub-par execution. Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 01:28, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Not great, but not quite bad enough to delete. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 17:38, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- Держать - Это - своего рода забавное TRANSLATION: It's just OK to keep. Capercorn 22:41, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- keep and give it a "rewrite" tag. the idea is funny, it just needs better treatment. --THE 12:03, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
|
| Comments |
- Won't vote against, but the only way I'd vote to keep is if this page gains a (funny) picture. --THINKER 01:31, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- All the keep votes seem to not like this article. While I see the points being made, can't we just keep it simple in the fact that if the general concensous is that the article is shit it gets deleted. Let's worry about a rewrite, reincarnation, robotic-dance tribute at a later date. The Oblong Lobster 00:44, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
- Abstain --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 22:10, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
- Gone. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 22:53, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Ouch, my conventions! Poleaxe this krap.--Andorin Kato 02:20, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Long and boring. And long. Rogpyvbc 04:26, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
- Blarch Appears to be recreated. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 05:10, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete didn't we just huff this? ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 05:42, 12 May 2007
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Getting in before there's 15. Anyway, random stub 2005cruft. Huff. –—Hv (talk) 11/05 21:39
- Blarch Random. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 21:50, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Cliche meets cliche, and has lots of little cliche children. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 22:33, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Rogpyvbc 00:23, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
- DElete Notice how the 'e' is a capital. Unecessary. The Oblong Lobster 00:32, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
- Randumb --General Insineratehymn 01:59, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
- Noof --THINKER 02:01, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
- Rid Mine Offended Eyes Ohwow, a stupid article mentioning many things from Star Wars. MrMetalFLower 05:17, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
- Randacruft ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 05:39, 12 May 2007
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete Stubby 2005cruft. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 20:08, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Pretty much the epitome of what we delete here. Rogpyvbc 00:30, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete This isn't good enough to be featured on this page. This is a dead cat, a rubbish mug, a miss-alligned hole-punch. The Oblong Lobster 00:36, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --General Insineratehymn 02:01, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 02:03, 12 May 2007
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
|
| Comments |
I'm just noming this, because it could be hilarious and I'm just not seeing it. There's lots of stuff on the page, none of which makes a lick of sense to me. --THINKER 17:42, 11 May 2007 (UTC)- Gone. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 08:19, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Didn't get QVFD'd, even though its a direct copy of Wikipedia's Superman 64 article. Nothing would lead me to believe its going to receive any legitimate work. --THINKER 17:36, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
- believe me, if I had sysop powers, I'd instahuff this right now, but for now, this is the best I can do --» >UF|TLK|▋» 18:28, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Spork. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 18:58, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Either that or delete Wikipedia article so we're not the same any more. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 22:19, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Its not even a spork, its just a cut and paste. ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 11:23, 11 May 2007
|
| Comments |
(sigh) Pay attention, everyone:
- Do not forget to add {{VFD}} to pages that are nominated for deletion.
- Do not VFD pages that are less than one or two weeks old.
- Do not VFD pages that are blatant copypasta*. QVFD them instead.
Comprenden ustedes? Bueno. Voting closed. —RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY)00:03, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
* I use this term to refer to anything that is copy-pasted from anywhere. I know it's a 4chan term; I just don't care. It's as good a term as any. –H.
- I did use QVFD here...
- I even tried to add to that entry to get it gone, to no avail. --THINKER 01:38, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
- Keep Deal with the n00bs, not the template. This can be useful elsewhere to show that someone's expressed dissatisfaction with an article. But I will admit it gets annoying sometimes even then... Hmm, I dunno, persuade me to change my mind! -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 18:45, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- Kepp- Get a brain. Witt,
 of  UNion Entertain me*}
- Keep but maybe change the wording? ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 02:09, 11 May 2007
- Keep Rogpyvbc 05:11, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
- Keep If the author of the page puts this little puppy on their page then delete the page. It's the best way to hold up the white flag. The Oblong Lobster 00:39, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
- Keep unless you wanna volunteer yourself to remove it from every page it's on, no goddamn way. -- Prof. Olipro
 KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 04:53, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
- This template is encouraging people - specially IPs and N00bs - to create self-complacent lazy entries and sticking it at the top as if saying "please, I know, it's bad, but let it live!". Better place ICU or rewrite instead. -- herr doktor needsAbeam [scream!] 18:40, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- Murder -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 13:17, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
- Weak redirect to rewrite You've got to admit, this is annoying. And if we change the wording to encompass addition by editors other than the author, it just becomes a tool for destructive criticism. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 21:10, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- If we delete it, we lose tagging utility and the existing stash of tagged pages. However, too often users who haven't worked on a page tag with this, in flagrant violation of, "The author(s) acknowledge this." Argh. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 23:29, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- We could simply turn it into a redirect to rewrite template. By the way, let's consider "delete" as votes for this action. -- herr doktor needsAbeam [scream!] 23:32, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- See, Ceridwyn, you're not the only one who inadvertidly nominates popular stuff to VFD... -- herr doktor needsAbeam [scream!] 05:13, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
- I never pay attention to this template when I make my rounds, anyway. I could care less whether it stays or goes. Abstain (just because I think that's necessary). —Hinoa KUN (talk) 23:58, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
- Kept, voting closed. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 08:16, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- even braindead people wouldn't find this funny --» >UF|TLK|▋» 00:34, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
- Correct I'm brain dead and I didn't laugh once. Oh excuse me, I appear to be drooling. ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 12:40, 14 May 2007
- I'm getting my mortar... -Han Solo (High Gen. Grue) Comlink Grueslayer
- Delete. -- Mitch 00:42, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete--Scott 02:14, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 03:38, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete though I wan't aware brain-dead people could find anything funny. Rogpyvbc 05:02, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete These people are clearly too wise for the likes of Uncyclopedia. They should go start a religion or summat. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 09:37, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Not funny even if you're called Brian or Mike --Asahatter (annoy) 09:53, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
- Free this article from its mortal coil. --General Insineratehymn 23:26, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
DELETED. Voting Closed -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 02:53, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Erase this ancient substub. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 00:09, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 00:32, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
- Dee-ee-elle-ee-tee-ee ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 12:39, 14 May 2007
- I'm getting my mortar... -Han Solo (High Gen. Grue) Comlink Grueslayer
- Delete Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 03:39, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
- Dee-dee, Egg, Elle, Egg, Tea, Egg. Rogpyvbc 05:04, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
- Elf off --Asahatter (annoy) 09:54, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
- Ugg-ugg-ugg-ugg-ugg-ugg-ugg-ugg-bleck. --General Insineratehymn 23:27, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
DELETED. Voting Closed. -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 02:52, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Murderlirize -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 23:38, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Short. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 23:45, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
- Hufferific ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 11:51, 13 May 2007
- Delete Bandcruft, when what we actually need here is an article about the pagan festival it's named after. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 00:19, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
- Ugh just like SRV: good music, terrible page. :( --THINKER 00:21, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 00:30, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
- I'm getting my mortar... -Han Solo (High Gen. Grue) Comlink Grueslayer
- Delete Rogpyvbc 05:07, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
- Arghhhh --Asahatter (annoy) 09:55, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
- Excuse me while I bring out my shredder. --General Insineratehymn 23:24, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
DELETED. Voting Closed. -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 02:50, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
|
| Comments |
- In the last 10 hours, Insineratehymn has flooded VFD with 10 articles, and Modus and emc have added articles to an already overfull list, both of which usually result in 1 day bans. What the hell is going on? Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 02:55, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
- Wups. My bad. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 03:00, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
- Ban Modus!! BanModusbanModusbanModus! Oops, I mean: I'm sure it was an accident and no-one needs to get banned at all. :-P -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 09:38, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
I'm torn. This one is a hell of a lot better than Turd burger but still kinda obvious humo(u)r. Can't decide. ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 04:27, 13 May 2007
- 1) shit
- 2) sandwich Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 05:19, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
DELETED Voting Closed. -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 02:47, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
|
