Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/archive53

This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion.

Keep
Delete	The name alone should qualify it for deletion, but then the article itself manages to be so mind-numbingly awful it transcends "bad", rockets past "so bad it's good" and lands arse-up in "Why the hell is this still here?" --El Zoof 06:23, 24 February 2007 (UTC) Ooh, a reductio ad absurdum of the Special Sauce joke. I've seen good r.a.a.'s, this ain't it. --Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 07:49, 24 February 2007 (UTC) Hits all the high points: grue, Jesus, pussy, and semen. Huff --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 07:56, 24 February 2007 (UTC) Delete. -- Mitch 13:55, 24 February 2007 (UTC) Kill. Redirects on this article are not needed because it sucks that bad. --» >UF\|TLK\|▋» 18:26, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Keep
Delete	Delete. It's a linked list of memes, not an article. --El Zoof 06:27, 24 February 2007 (UTC) AAAAA!. AAAAAAA! AAA! AAAAA. AAA!--» >ZEROTROUSERS!!! EAT ME!!!! CRAZY PERSON! SMELLY!!! ILLOGIC, BEHOLD!!!!~» 07:46, 24 February 2007 (UTC) Delete per title --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 08:15, 24 February 2007 (UTC) Delete. -- Mitch 13:55, 24 February 2007 (UTC) Lame Article Farce --» >UF\|TLK\|▋» 18:29, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Keep	"...That we, as a society do, in fact, judge people by the content of their character, not the color of their skin and that words, stupid, ancient, meaningless words, don't really have any power at all.". It's from the "origin" section. The, section that explains the page. Admittedly it could lose some of the songs (or explain them better. Or both), as proving that that word still has power by repeating it too much...still proves it has power. --Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 14:29, 24 February 2007 (UTC) Uh-huh. So basically, if we huff this article, the terrorists win. Right? --Medvedev ^(scream) 15:12, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
Delete	--~ Jacques Pirat, Esq. Converse : Benefactions : U.w.p. 17:42, 24 February 2007 (UTC) Delete - Blatant racism, not funny. --AAA! (AAAA) 13:52, 24 February 2007 (UTC) Delete. -- Mitch 13:59, 24 February 2007 (UTC) No fucking way. --» >UF\|TLK\|▋» 14:22, 24 February 2007 (UTC) Delete, ban, track down, tar, feather, burn, unperson. --Medvedev ^(scream) 15:12, 24 February 2007 (UTC) Delete --General Insineratehymn 15:14, 24 February 2007 (UTC) Delete - There's a right and wrong way to approach this subject. Nigger is the right way. This is the wrong one. Not because of racial content, just because it's not funny. - Sir Judgement F@H UmP VFH {talk} 16:18, 24 February 2007 (UTC) HUFF IT. This is just way to racist, nor is it funny. Capercorn Delete. This is critizicing Richards as if he were in a position of power or authority, instead of a lone asshole who has probably got too much attention as it is. There could definitely be a better, less Richards-oriented approach to the whole " 'nigger' doesn't mean anything because language is itself a construct" idea.-- Lenoxus 21:37, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Keep
Delete	Huff I like Sepultura, but this article does them no justice. --General Insineratehymn 22:31, 23 February 2007 (UTC) Delete - why was this article even thought of? Why does the author think they are funny? --Smrt-guy 23:45, 23 February 2007 (UTC) an offence against the band - jack mort \| cunt \| talk - 00:05, 24 February 2007 (UTC) *Admin rock, dude. Way harder than that pussy [insert the name of the guy who wrote this crap here].* --» >UF\|TLK\|▋» 03:34, 24 February 2007 (UTC) Delete. -- Mitch 05:41, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Keep
Delete	Delete. Nasty, brutish, and short. Previous versions were no better. ----OEJ 22:46, 23 February 2007 (UTC) Delete - unfunny, pointless and juvinile. Not that there's anything wrong with that. Except here. --Smrt-guy 23:47, 23 February 2007 (UTC) SHIT - jack mort \| cunt \| talk - 00:07, 24 February 2007 (UTC) An unfunny, short putdown, after which the article swerves onto a different topic. Blarch it. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 00:29, 24 February 2007 (UTC) This article is a vicious predator from the depths of hell. Kill it. --» >UF\|TLK\|▋» 03:36, 24 February 2007 (UTC) Delete - If I had caught this new, it would have been QVFD'ed. Sir Judgement F@H UmP VFH {talk} 04:59, 24 February 2007 (UTC) Delete. -- Mitch 05:42, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Keep
Delete	Nom and Delete - it's stupid, not funny, relatively random...and hasn't had an update since paisleys were cool. --Smrt-guy 00:00, 24 February 2007 (UTC) shitty - jack mort \| cunt \| talk - 00:08, 24 February 2007 (UTC) Delete. -- Mitch 05:43, 24 February 2007 (UTC) Uh, bestiality and grues? Blarch --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 08:26, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Keep
Delete	Delete - unless there are really funny jokes in here that I don't get...which I'd be surprised to hear about. --Smrt-guy 00:35, 24 February 2007 (UTC) Delete - He can't use punctuation worth a damn, just like he can't use humor worth a damn. --Sir Judgement F@H UmP VFH {talk} 05:14, 24 February 2007 (UTC) Delete. Copy-paste from Wikipedia with random crap. -- Mitch 05:48, 24 February 2007 (UTC) Delete as WP copy. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 08:24, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Keep
Delete	Delete Too horrendous to be described. --General Insineratehymn 22:13, 23 February 2007 (UTC) GAH, MY EYES! --Hotadmin4u69^[TALK] 22:17, 23 February 2007 (UTC) It's like a bad dream, where you kill something, and it keeps coming back, and you have to kill it again. We all have those dreams, right? Right? --Smrt-guy 23:44, 23 February 2007 (UTC) gah, enough pop-band gibberish - jack mort \| cunt \| talk - 00:04, 24 February 2007 (UTC) Delete vomits Roman Dog Bird 00:13, 24 February 2007 (UTC) It's full of quotes, lists, and arbitrary pop culture phrases. Blarch it. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 00:25, 24 February 2007 (UTC) POP CULTURE SUCKS ASS. --» >UF\|TLK\|▋» 03:32, 24 February 2007 (UTC) Delete. -- Mitch 05:41, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
Comments	Gone. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 08:24, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

Keep
Delete	Delete It harms my eyes just to glance at this. --General Insineratehymn 22:34, 23 February 2007 (UTC) Delete it's a waste of spaceElmis 22:47, 23 February 2007 (UTC) Delete. Never really gets to a point. ----OEJ 22:48, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
Comments	Huffed, voting closed. -- 23:38, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Keep
Delete	Delete The lord is the person who rules Quegy Quegy, you know! -- (but) ~~Untrue~~ Whhhy?Whut?How? Back from the dead 18:30, 23 February 2007 (UTC) WTF??? Is this some Aussie humor or something? Looks like Slandity to me. --Smrt-guy 20:13, 23 February 2007 (UTC) Delete. --Hotadmin4u69^[TALK] 22:18, 23 February 2007 (UTC) Delete. Nothing to see.----OEJ 22:53, 23 February 2007 (UTC) Sucks --» >UF\|TLK\|▋» 23:09, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
Comments	Huffed, voting closed. -- 23:39, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Keep	Weak keep - if only to uphold the fact that we don't delete stuff just because people are complaining. Oh, and as an afterthought, it has a few laughs in, too. -- (but) ~~Untrue~~ Whhhy?Whut?How? Back from the dead 01:19, 21 February 2007 (UTC) Keep I agree with strange, its not a blatent slur and it is funny, i've seen worse articles pass vfd. Comments: @Strange but untrue: Good point; I wholeheartedly agree, but has Uncyc ever had the equivalent of Wikipedia:WP:OFFICE? @other person: Please sign your comments by typing ~~~~. Pentium5dot1 09:12, 21 February 2007 (UTC) There's UN:OFFICE PARTY. But that's not quite the same thing. -- (but) ~~Untrue~~ Whhhy?Whut?How? Back from the dead 15:16, 21 February 2007 (UTC) we've featured worse - jack mort \| cunt \| talk - 19:24, 21 February 2007 (UTC) If we have, some of my articles might have a shot! More importantly, once you remove the vandalism, Enya is kind of funny! It needs a rewrite (changing hers to hims, etc) and someone to watch over it, but it should stay. --Smrt-guy 23:16, 21 February 2007 (UTC) My revert was already an attempt to remove the vandalism; what else needs to be fixed? Pentium5dot1 00:09, 22 February 2007 (UTC) Keep I like it, could use more Oyster card, but I am an Idiot.--Dantoller 12:40, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
Delete	Weak Delete as nominator. This is a complex case; the article was originally halfway-decent (but not great), but then people started to vandalize the article, and someone inserted a copyvio from Wikipedia afaict. Somewhere along the line, people from the official Enya forum (supposedly) complained, leading one user to near-blank the article. See the article's talk page; I'm putting this up on VFD in case a consensus builds to delete the article. --Pentium5dot1 00:41, 21 February 2007 (UTC) *Weak delete. If only to ANNIHILATE the spam link at the bottom. --Medvedev ^(scream) 07:24, 21 February 2007 (UTC) I have now removed the spam link. Would you like to change your vote? Pentium5dot1 08:04, 21 February 2007 (UTC) I'm not going to change my vote - the article isn't worth it - but I will remove it. Good luck. --Medvedev ^(scream) 10:08, 21 February 2007 (UTC) Delete Has little to do with music. Needs a complete rewrite. Notes can be taken from Pentium's copy. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 08:19, 21 February 2007 (UTC) Comments: The wikitext dump you linked to is now slightly out of date, since it predates the removal of the spam link (and I'm too lazy to fix it myself atm). Does that matter? Would you like a version without the pre tags? Also, in the actual article, I have replaced {{funny?}} with {{rewrite}} to better convey how the article needs to be fixed. Pentium5dot1 09:12, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
Comments	What I can discern of the consensus right now is that there really isn't one; the opinions are split as to whether to delete. Also, some people say that there is some worthwhile humor buried in the article, while others feel it needs to be totally rewritten. I guess a Pee Review is the solution? --Pentium5dot1 01:29, 23 February 2007 (UTC) Saved from the hufing bowl. -- 23:43, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Keep
Delete	Delete It was sited for ICU to be fixed within a week of the 14th, and that time has passed. Judgement 18:19, 22 February 2007 (UTC) d3l373 - It doesn't make any sense to me. Who's Aaron Lennon? Also, in the unlikely event that this isn't deleted, it needs to be speelchecked, and, Grammer Checked? --El Destructeso 23:08, 22 February 2007 (UTC) Delete Only one funny line; the rest is nonsense. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 23:30, 22 February 2007 (UTC) Fuck it its boring Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 00:43, 23 February 2007 (UTC) Chuck it - it wasn't written so much as vomited, and needs to be cleaned & disinfected. --Smrt-guy 01:22, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
Comments	Sikon did it. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 15:28, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Keep	k33p - I don't think you guys get it. He's king of the final frontier. I thought it was pretty funny, but there was too much red. --El Destructeso 02:03, 19 February 2007 (UTC) Comment Destructeso - Since you are the supporter of the article you could save it by 1) Cleaning it up, 2) Removing some of the nonsense to make it Funny, not stupid and 3) work someone to get a few relevant images you might be able to increase its chances for survival. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 15:54, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
Delete	I'm really torn on this one - this article is the poster child for Not being funny, just stupid. If we gave out CRAP Awards, this would be in the CRAP Hall of Fame. I just don't think that it can be it can be made to be worth anything of value. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 01:42, 18 February 2007 (UTC) I'm pretty sure CRAP awards would be a bad idea. We should just continue to laugh at the crap that shows up here at VFD. Delete --Smrt-guy 03:04, 18 February 2007 (UTC) Delete. -- Mitch 13:37, 18 February 2007 (UTC) Delete. Randomness without humor or satire. ----OEJ 18:56, 18 February 2007 (UTC) ! - jack mort \| cunt \| talk - 21:18, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
Comments	If he's the king of the final frontier then the authors should have shared the joke with the readers instead of keeping it to themselves. They wrote, "Davy 'Davy' Crockett (b. 50, 000 BC) King of the wild frontier". If they had written "born 3071 AD, known as the 'King of the Final Frontier', Davy 'Not Kirk Dammit' Crockett was a man who swore to boldly go where no man, ba'ar, Injun, or starship had gone before" then the article might have been off to a satirical start. ----OEJ 16:08, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Keep	Keep Uncyclopedia is not ED. I don't get why that has to do with this, but still. Mr. Briggs Inc. 16:38, 16 February 2007 (UTC) Eh? Keep It may have a gross topic, but it's fairly coherent. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 07:37, 17 February 2007 (UTC) Keep per above --» His Majesty King George VI (the boxes) 07:39, 17 February 2007 (UTC) Weak keep. Needs tightening, but despite the fact that I actually do like most of the bands in the article, I still got a chuckle or two. gosh zillacorrespondence 00:44, 18 February 2007 (UTC) Keep, but make it wear a Sombrero. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me) 12:36, 18 February 2007 (UTC) k33p - I honestly have no idea why you guys hate this article so much. This is really one of the funniest articles I have ever read. The medical part was pretty dumb, but the rest was really good. I wish there were more articles like this one. --El Destructeso 02:41, 19 February 2007 (UTC) Keep but it should be modified to sound less POV and more like an actual genre, like First Gradeism (which you'll notice never actually says "first grade art sucks"). Or if it stays POV, it should be modified to resemble the gag of this blog entry, gradually becoming so extensive that people start to realize that no genre is exempt — although it might be a good idea to get the permission of the author first. —Lenoxus 00:40, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
Delete	Delete with malice. Uncyclopedia is not ED. --General Insineratehymn 13:20, 16 February 2007 (UTC) Not ED content, but still sucks. Kill --» >UF\|TLK\|▋» 15:50, 16 February 2007 (UTC) It's almost reverse vanity. It is horribly written and really stupid. Delete --Smrt-guy 19:54, 16 February 2007 (UTC) --~ Jacques Pirat, Esq. Converse : Benefactions : U.w.p. 17:31, 17 February 2007 (UTC) Delete --Hotadmin4u69^[TALK] 05:28, 18 February 2007 (UTC) Delete - At least it's got the right name... --AAA! (AAAA) 05:48, 18 February 2007 (UTC) Delete --Señor DiZtheGreat CUN AOTM ( Worship me!) (Praise me!) (Join me!) AMEN! 14:09, 18 February 2007 (UTC) Delete - It's more of a rant, and not a very good one at that --(Elmis 10:05, 19 February 2007 (UTC)) FEEBLE - jack mort \| cunt \| talk - 21:02, 19 February 2007 (UTC) Nuke it Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 15:54, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
Comments	If its kept, it needs a good dose of fiber and to be cleaned up and made more concise. All those words getting at nothing hurt me! Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 16:24, 19 February 2007 (UTC) To all who vote keep, I just want to tell you that there was once an article on ED by this very name. I also don't understand how any of you can find this funny knowing that there was once an article on ED just like this. --General Insineratehymn 18:35, 19 February 2007 (UTC) Yay for reductio ad dramaticum. "It was on ED; it has to be evil!" —Major Sir Hinoa prepare for trouble • make it double? 01:29, 20 February 2007 (UTC) I can't vote to keep this. It's nothing but a ball of bandcruft with caked on bowel movements and randomness. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 21:44, 19 February 2007 (UTC) That's why it was on ED! You can change your vote to "Delete", you know. --AAA! (AAAA) 01:34, 20 February 2007 (UTC) I can see both a reason to delete it that isn't "OMG it was on ED," namely that it's, um, crap, and a reason to keep it, namely "we need to get people who hate Band X out of Band X's article." If this is kept (which looks less likely by the second), then I'd propose that we use it as a bit of a dumping ground for "Band X sucks"-type edits. At least, as long as we don't mention specific bands. —Major Sir Hinoa prepare for trouble • make it double? 17:48, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

Keep
Delete	I still need new eyes...--» >ZEROTROUSERS!!! EAT ME!!!! CRAZY PERSON! SMELLY!!! ILLOGIC, BEHOLD!!!!~» 10:06, 23 February 2007 (UTC) Yeah I don't like this one. At all. --» His Majesty King George VI (the boxes) 10:26, 23 February 2007 (UTC) shocker. most of the images on Mona Lisa could probably go - jack mort \| cunt \| talk - 13:32, 23 February 2007 (UTC) If you're gonna hack Mona Lisa, and least use a soft brush. --Smrt-guy 19:57, 23 February 2007 (UTC) yuck --» >UF\|TLK\|▋» 21:05, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
Comments	Huffed, voting closed. -- 23:40, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Keep	This can work as a piece on glass blowing. Keep, disambiguate, and expand --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 06:58, 23 February 2007 (UTC) Keep. Goddamit, what is it with this flood of destruction?! A perfectly good article. Hands off. --Medvedev ^(scream) 08:37, 23 February 2007 (UTC) Shy and unassuming Keep - it needs a lot of work, but it's a funny idea. --Smrt-guy 19:56, 23 February 2007 (UTC) Good stuff. Very informative. I don't understand that other article at all - what does it think a blow job is? -- (but) ~~Untrue~~ Whhhy?Whut?How? Back from the dead 23:01, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
Delete	When I saw the categories, I was going to huff it on sight, but I decided to give it a chance here. I think Blowjob is better, and they can't be merged. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 06:50, 23 February 2007 (UTC) - jack mort \| cunt \| talk - 13:29, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
Comments	Saved from the huffing bowl -- 23:41, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Keep
Delete	Delete It's been around since 2005, has no pictures, and probably hasn't been touched in at least a year by anyone. Also, it's not funny. --Sir Judgement F@H UmP VFH {talk} 04:39, 23 February 2007 (UTC) Delete. Not funny. --Medvedev ^(scream) 08:39, 23 February 2007 (UTC) - jack mort \| cunt \| talk - 13:26, 23 February 2007 (UTC) Delete Agreed. Not funny, just stupid random sexual crap. I'm sick of lame references to homosexuality, etc (it can be funny, but this is terrible). --Marto 85 13:50, 23 February 2007 (UTC) Delete it for having a good opportunity to be funny, and missing it completely. --Smrt-guy 19:55, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
Comments	Huffed, voting closed. -- 23:41, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Keep
Delete	Delete T'was probably made by someone who had just discovered that you can type in bold.--» >ZEROTROUSERS!!! EAT ME!!!! CRAZY PERSON! SMELLY!!! ILLOGIC, BEHOLD!!!!~» 07:22, 22 February 2007 (UTC) Delete. Despite inexplicable de-ja-vu I'm getting from reading it, this article is teh sukc. --Medvedev ^(scream) 07:28, 22 February 2007 (UTC) BOMBINATE- This article is itself.--Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 07:38, 22 February 2007 (UTC) The title is an accurate description. Maybe that's the joke. RIP --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 08:15, 22 February 2007 (UTC) d3l373 - What?? --El Destructeso 23:08, 22 February 2007 (UTC) What leads a mind to create such CRAP ? Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 00:44, 23 February 2007 (UTC) I pray to the god of Wiki to strike the author of this article down where he stands! --Smrt-guy 01:21, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
Comments	Sikon did it. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 15:28, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Keep	Keep. I do not see why everyone is so worked up about the article. --Medvedev ^(scream) 07:31, 22 February 2007 (UTC) Strong keep There are some OK jokes near the beginning about animation style and genres. An article like this is bound to get some cruft. Tag for cleanup. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 08:36, 22 February 2007 (UTC) Keep, but remove those ugly images. --AAA! (AAAA) 09:26, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
Delete	Horrid excuse for an article. Mostly just a list, with the most unimaginative descriptions. The only way this article can be saved is through a complete rewrite, or better yet, just a huff. --» >UF\|TLK\|▋» 21:43, 21 February 2007 (UTC) Put it out of its misery. I can only see that this article will get worse, and we need to prevent that from happening. --General Insineratehymn 21:48, 21 February 2007 (UTC) Huff It and let it be rewritten by a slightly more intelligent 12-year old. --Smrt-guy 23:31, 21 February 2007 (UTC) Delete with gusto, it's not funny in any way whatsoever, the only option, Total Recall, oh yeah. -- (Elmis 05:14, 22 February 2007 (UTC)) Poor hitlerbear!!!---» >ZEROTROUSERS!!! EAT ME!!!! CRAZY PERSON! SMELLY!!! ILLOGIC, BEHOLD!!!!~» 07:09, 22 February 2007 (UTC) Just say no to anime. --» His Majesty King George VI (the boxes) 07:28, 22 February 2007 (UTC) Delete and rewrite. This article is just awful, not funny at all. --TheSlyFox 10:21, 22 February 2007 (UTC) Delete because I hate anime!Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 00:45, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
Comments	Comment: The only thing this article attempts to be is a list of "this sucks, that sucks." We can do better. The whole thing needs a rewrite, IMO. --TheSlyFox 10:21, 22 February 2007 (UTC) Sikon did it. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 15:28, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Keep	sympathy-keep.the politik's samey but i like the random, there's something pleasing, stuff like math-magicians - jack mort \| cunt \| talk - 19:35, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
Delete	Lame, not funny, ugly. Delete. ~ 10:08, 21 February 2007 (UTC) Delete. Weird, box-shaped, piece of soap. --Medvedev ^(scream) 10:12, 21 February 2007 (UTC) Thinly veiled political screed, with some randomness thrown in. Blarch it. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 10:19, 21 February 2007 (UTC) jihad-blitzkrieg it --» >UF\|TLK\|▋» 21:29, 21 February 2007 (UTC) Delete - it's stupid & unfunny. And Random. --Smrt-guy 23:28, 21 February 2007 (UTC) It bashes both sides in a way that is offensive without being funny --» His Majesty King George VI (the boxes) 07:29, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
Comments	Sikon was sick on it, and it died. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 15:26, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Keep
Delete	Trite and rude subject matter. Blarch --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 09:06, 21 February 2007 (UTC) Delete. Rude doesn't bother me as much as lame does. --Medvedev ^(scream) 10:12, 21 February 2007 (UTC) Uh...--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 10:15, 21 February 2007 (UTC) a load of sexist shit.--» >ZEROTROUSERS!!! EAT ME!!!! CRAZY PERSON! SMELLY!!! ILLOGIC, BEHOLD!!!!~» 11:08, 21 February 2007 (UTC) dismal - jack mort \| cunt \| talk - 19:28, 21 February 2007 (UTC) Stupid, as opposed to funny. -- Hindleyite Converse 19:45, 21 February 2007 (UTC) Fucking awful. I hope the author of this article gets a toilet seat slammed down on his dick. --» >UF\|TLK\|▋» 21:31, 21 February 2007 (UTC) Lame and Deleteable. Who's up for some flogging? --Smrt-guy 23:22, 21 February 2007 (UTC) Inhume it with an axe. --El Zoof 01:25, 22 February 2007 (UTC) It's bare. That and stupid.--Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 07:44, 22 February 2007 (UTC) Fucked Up Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 00:46, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
Comments	Gone. —Braydie 01:41, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Keep
Delete	I NEED NEW EYES!!!--» >ZEROTROUSERS!!! EAT ME!!!! CRAZY PERSON! SMELLY!!! ILLOGIC, BEHOLD!!!!~» 11:07, 21 February 2007 (UTC) Delete. Nothing worse than a good photoshop gone bad. --Medvedev ^(scream) 12:04, 21 February 2007 (UTC) Blarch 10 sec in MS Paint. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 19:31, 21 February 2007 (UTC) Hahahaha! - jack mort \| cunt \| talk - 19:37, 21 February 2007 (UTC) AW FUCK NO --» >UF\|TLK\|▋» 21:29, 21 February 2007 (UTC)~ Shoddy excuse for an image job. Delete. --General Insineratehymn 21:50, 21 February 2007 (UTC) D E L E T E - we should not encourage crap like this. Even I could do better and I have no eyes. Any more. --Smrt-guy 23:29, 21 February 2007 (UTC) Get rid of it, not good, even by paint standards. --Elmis 05:16, 22 February 2007 (UTC) A 'chop of a 'chop, with no credit given to the original 'chopper. For shame...--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 05:40, 22 February 2007 (UTC) Buuuuur'em---Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 07:43, 22 February 2007 (UTC) PUKE! Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 00:45, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
Comments	I'm not sure whether its supposed to satirical of MS paint or not, but I doubt it.--» >ZEROTROUSERS!!! EAT ME!!!! CRAZY PERSON! SMELLY!!! ILLOGIC, BEHOLD!!!!~» 07:10, 22 February 2007 (UTC) Nah, it's a rip of the original image behind the paint, instead of being clever, the editor just painted over the good stuff for pie.--Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 07:43, 22 February 2007 (UTC) Gone. —Braydie 01:39, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Keep
Delete	Delete. Dump ×75. -- Mitch 08:02, 21 February 2007 (UTC) Delete. having the word 'dump' feature 100+ times doesn't make an article funny.--Parinoid 08:18, 21 February 2007 (UTC) Delete. It's just the WP article with some words replaced with "Dump." --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 08:22, 21 February 2007 (UTC) 'fly-tip' - jack mort \| cunt \| talk - 19:26, 21 February 2007 (UTC) Sucks. -- Hindleyite Converse 19:48, 21 February 2007 (UTC) Move to landfill -- » >UF\|TLK\|▋» 21:32, 21 February 2007 (UTC) What a pile of crap --Smrt-guy 23:20, 21 February 2007 (UTC) CRAP, CRAP, CRAP Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 00:46, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
Comments	Gone. —Braydie 01:23, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Keep
Delete	Think it may have been me that brought this one to popular attention...I feel sorry for it now :){{RabbiTechno 19:48, 21 February 2007 (UTC)}} Two words: Holy. Bum. I would ICU this if it weren't so frickin' old. As it stands, though, it is old enough to require democracy. It's incoherent, ugly, and most importantly, not funny. SMASHY with a hammer until there's nothing left but dust, and then smash it a bit more, just to be safe. —Major Sir Hinoa prepare for trouble • make it double? 19:31, 20 February 2007 (UTC) Short fightcruft. Rocket to Mars. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 19:38, 20 February 2007 (UTC) Badly, written, and, just, plain, stupid. Delete, --El Zoof 22:56, 20 February 2007 (UTC) Burninate! --» >UF\|TLK\|▋» 23:48, 20 February 2007 (UTC)~ A sad page on my favourite planet. Venus.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 23:50, 20 February 2007 (UTC) The reason why the death star might actually have been useful. Huff planet. -- (but) ~~Untrue~~ Whhhy?Whut?How? Back from the dead 00:47, 21 February 2007 (UTC) Delete. ----OEJ 02:04, 21 February 2007 (UTC) Delete Its poorly written, but it's not that old. I thought for a second it was from 2005.--Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 07:31, 21 February 2007 (UTC) - jack mort \| cunt \| talk - 19:19, 21 February 2007 (UTC) So poorly written that it makes me want to contract diarrhea instantaneously. Delete. --General Insineratehymn 21:52, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
Comments	Deleted. —Braydie 07:31, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/archive53

‎Lord of Quegy Quegy

Image:Bb11.gif, Image:Bb12.gif, Image:Bb7.gif, Image:Bb8.gif

Navigation menu

Search

Keep
Delete	Delete. Just not funny, but at least it's not longer. --El Zoof 03:01, 20 February 2007 (UTC) Delete - it's so sad, the poor level of education these days. Someone thought that was brilliant. -sigh- --Smrt-guy 04:20, 20 February 2007 (UTC) Delete maybe someday, someone will do something proper with it—Lenoxus 00:23, 21 February 2007 (UTC) Nothing special -- (but) ~~Untrue~~ Whhhy?Whut?How? Back from the dead 00:51, 21 February 2007 (UTC) Delete. Random, but short. ----OEJ 02:05, 21 February 2007 (UTC) Delete. I'm afraid the Bush wars did it in for me.--Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 07:33, 21 February 2007 (UTC) - jack mort \| cunt \| talk - 19:17, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
Comments	Deleted. —Braydie 07:30, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Keep
Delete	Delete - it's ugly, stupid and doubleplus unfunny. --Smrt-guy 00:06, 20 February 2007 (UTC) this is one of those articles that could be good if heavily rewritten, but that no one will ever ever bother to rewrite. so kill - jack mort \| cunt \| talk - 00:27, 20 February 2007 (UTC) Delete The article is actually nicer than the real life city itself. But even in Ohio, Massillon is one of those places that we would just assume didn't exist. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 15:44, 20 February 2007 (UTC) Delete —Lenoxus 00:57, 21 February 2007 (UTC) Lost its marbles. Delete -- (but) ~~Untrue~~ Whhhy?Whut?How? Back from the dead 01:03, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
Comments	Deleted. —Braydie 07:30, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Keep	*Keep and expand. If we do not mock Russian mail-order brides, who will? --Medvedev ^(scream) 11:53, 19 February 2007 (UTC) Vote withdrawn per OEJ. --Medvedev ^(scream) 21:06, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
Delete	Stupid and not funny. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 06:42, 19 February 2007 (UTC) Nuke it, Batman. - This one needs a rewrite from the top down. \o / 14:49, 19 February 2007 (UTC) Delete. See Mail-order bride. ----OEJ 16:19, 19 February 2007 (UTC) - jack mort \| cunt \| talk - 22:05, 19 February 2007 (UTC) This could have been so much funnier. -snif- Delete --Smrt-guy 00:11, 20 February 2007 (UTC) Delete —Lenoxus 00:44, 21 February 2007 (UTC) If you see anyone, even your best friend, voting keep, please report him to The Authorities. Together we can end this article. -- (but) ~~Untrue~~ Whhhy?Whut?How? Back from the dead 01:07, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Keep	Keep and fix --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 07:21, 17 February 2007 (UTC) Keep, though I doubt anyone will ever fix the random aspects. There's a WickedPedia article on Jean Baudrillard.----OEJ 19:06, 18 February 2007 (UTC) keep, not that awful - jack mort \| cunt \| talk - 21:12, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
Delete	Random. Very poor.---Asteroid B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 03:16, 17 February 2007 (UTC) Delete it, now... please? -This article is nonsense, and not the good kind -- (Elmis 10:09, 19 February 2007 (UTC)) Too damn random.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 23:52, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Keep	I like it, it just needs a bit of a touch up, IMO. --~ Jacques Pirat, Esq. Converse : Benefactions : U.w.p. 17:01, 18 February 2007 (UTC) Keep, as Jacques. -- (but) ~~Untrue~~ Whhhy?Whut?How? Back from the dead 17:08, 18 February 2007 (UTC) Keep and expand Has lots of potential. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 17:25, 18 February 2007 (UTC) Keep. ----OEJ 18:45, 18 February 2007 (UTC) k33p - It's okay. --El Destructeso 01:56, 19 February 2007 (UTC) Keep but it did naturally need an Orphan template. I'll get to work on that... —Lenoxus 06:33, 19 February 2007 (UTC) Keep and expand.--Andorin Kato 18:32, 19 February 2007 (UTC) ! - jack mort \| cunt \| talk - 21:18, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
Delete	Delete Down with this sort of thing. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 15:20, 18 February 2007 (UTC) Delete Oh this has many problems, it's got no direction at all. -- (Elmis 10:14, 19 February 2007 (UTC))
Comments	Don't feel bad if you lose this one, Prettiestpretty; I understand where you're coming from. At least I think I do...—Lenoxus 06:33, 19 February 2007 (UTC) Not a win/lose for me. I'd just like to see one of the Keep voters put some time and energy into the article. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 16:22, 19 February 2007 (UTC) Apparently "this sort of thing" does not include this article. Kept; voting closed. —RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY)01:23, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

Keep
Delete	Delete. The idea has possibilities, the article as it stands doesn't. --El Zoof 00:17, 19 February 2007 (UTC) d3l373 - I don't really get the joke. --El Destructeso 01:48, 19 February 2007 (UTC) The "joke", such that it is, is that Coca Cola used to be made with cocaine. Hilarious, no? No. --El Zoof 02:47, 19 February 2007 (UTC) Baleet. The idea has potential, but this article doesn't. -- \o / 02:49, 19 February 2007 (UTC) Delete - I get the joke, I don't get the poor & ugly way it was used here. --Smrt-guy 02:55, 19 February 2007 (UTC) pepsi sucks --» >UF\|TLK\|▋» 02:59, 19 February 2007 (UTC) Delete. ----OEJ 16:21, 19 February 2007 (UTC) I like Pepsi, but I hate this article. Delete. --General Insineratehymn 17:41, 19 February 2007 (UTC) - jack mort \| cunt \| talk - 21:22, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
Comments	Gone. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 00:18, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

Keep
Delete	Delete - moronic jabs at Starcraft. Probably unfunny even if you've played the damn game. --El Zoof 05:15, 19 February 2007 (UTC) Delete it, just delete it, and make sure the author gets an ass whuppin'-- (Elmis 11:39, 19 February 2007 (UTC)) Delete. N00bcruft. El Zoof is correct: it's not funny to insiders, either. --Medvedev ^(scream) 11:53, 19 February 2007 (UTC) Flogging. - I vote the author gets flogged for this. \o / 14:52, 19 February 2007 (UTC) Delete. Unreadable. ----OEJ 16:20, 19 February 2007 (UTC) - jack mort \| cunt \| talk - 21:25, 19 February 2007 (UTC) I'm with LordKaT - Delete the article and a few square feet of the author's flesh. --Smrt-guy 00:20, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
Comments	Gone. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 00:18, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

Keep
Delete	Delete. Slandanity directed against an online "Star Wars: Galaxies" gamer. See this blog. ----OEJ 17:43, 19 February 2007 (UTC) Die. --Andorin Kato 18:30, 19 February 2007 (UTC) Huff as unfunny & possible vanity. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 21:47, 19 February 2007 (UTC) - jack mort \| cunt \| talk - 22:06, 19 February 2007 (UTC) Delete Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 23:17, 19 February 2007 (UTC) Delete - tastes like unfunny slandity to me. --Smrt-guy 00:10, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
Comments	Gone. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 00:19, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

Keep
Delete	Delete. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 15:39, 18 February 2007 (UTC) Delete image and Oatabix article. Sins of the article include shortness, linklessness, and the most creative spelling of "skeptical" I have ever seen: "sceptacle". One can only say "uh, wow."----OEJ 18:42, 18 February 2007 (UTC) Delete Even if the article stays, the image can be redone. Right now, it sucks. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 20:56, 18 February 2007 (UTC) Delete on its own merits. It's ugly and, to me anyway, not funny. --Smrt-guy 02:50, 19 February 2007 (UTC) as soon as Oatibix is deleted kill this too. Oatibix are fucking grim - jack mort \| cunt \| talk - 21:21, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
Comments	I would say delete, but only if and when the article it's in gets huffed. And can we have a slow-down of new articles please? Like it says above, it's kind of hard to be bothered to vote when such a huge number are coming in... Merci buckets. -- (but) ~~Untrue~~ Whhhy?Whut?How? Back from the dead 17:02, 18 February 2007 (UTC) You should see the ones that I have NRV'd. But since you have indicated that you are overwhelmed, I'll stop. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 17:13, 18 February 2007 (UTC) If the VFD's slow down, where will I go for my Uncyc entertainment? :-) --Smrt-guy 02:50, 19 February 2007 (UTC) Gone. Along with its article. It would have been deleted along with Oatabix anyway, but you guys really didn't like it, eh? --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 00:15, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

Keep	Weak keep Slight chuckle from my direction. -- (but) ~~Untrue~~ Whhhy?Whut?How? Back from the dead 17:24, 18 February 2007 (UTC) k33p - Eh, whatever. --El Destructeso 02:05, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
Delete	Huff This article has been DOA for a long time. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 01:33, 18 February 2007 (UTC) obscure --» >UF\|TLK\|▋» 02:51, 18 February 2007 (UTC) What was the point of this thing? Delete --Smrt-guy 02:58, 18 February 2007 (UTC) Delete. -- Mitch 13:36, 18 February 2007 (UTC) Delete. The title may be a play on "honor among thieves" but there's no follow-through at all.----OEJ 18:57, 18 February 2007 (UTC) I coppied the content across to Sasquatch so this article's redundant now - jack mort \| cunt \| talk - 21:16, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
Comments	Gone, per Jack's good deeds. —Braydie 21:17, 19 February 2007 (UTC)