Forum:We're in the papers again
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Forums: Index > Village Dump > We're in the papers again
Note: This topic has been unedited for 4201 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over.
The comments on the Sioux City Journal blog make the author look like an ass. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 14:38 Jul 9 2010
- Lulz. She didn't even quote Scott Winkler. Worst. Journalist. Ever. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 14:39, July 9, 2010 (UTC)
- Mission accomplished, eh e|m|c? --
TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 
18:48, July 9, 2010 (UTC)
- Why were we targeting Sioux City again?
Pirate Lord__Sonic80 (Yell • Latest literary excretion) __ 18:58, July 9, 2010 (UTC)
- Because it sucks. Clearly. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 19:33, July 9, 2010 (UTC)
- Because it clearly sucks. Obviously. ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*
(talk) (stalk) Π ~ 
~ 10 Jul 2010 ~ 01:41 (UTC)
- Time to make a satirical article lampooning this. Who's up for it?It's Mrthejazz... a case not yet solved. 01:50, July 10, 2010 (UTC)
- I'm up for it but I'm working on the PRA, Hershey's and Dragonair. Not to mention Vocaloid. It needs an article to make others seem shit. And Sioux City obviously sucks balls.
|Si Plebius Dato' (Sir) Joe ang Kemador CUN|IC Kill 
| 03:32, July 11, 2010 (UTC) - HAHAHAHAHA.
Jenny? 03:08,10July,2010
- I'm up for it but I'm working on the PRA, Hershey's and Dragonair. Not to mention Vocaloid. It needs an article to make others seem shit. And Sioux City obviously sucks balls.
- Time to make a satirical article lampooning this. Who's up for it?It's Mrthejazz... a case not yet solved. 01:50, July 10, 2010 (UTC)
- Why were we targeting Sioux City again?
- I don't think anyone wants to touch this website - not anyone that loves their community. Flaxmere councillor Keriana Poulain 03:53, July 10, 2010 (UTC)
- I don't like my community, so does that give me permission to touch you all inappropriately? —Pelozurian (talk) 06:28, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
- What if I like my community? Can I touch other ones anyways? Love,
- Yes, because you're a woman and most of us haven't been touched by one anyway. —Pelozurian (talk) 07:26, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
- How many times are you going to get tricked before you realize that there are no girls on the internet? Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 08:13, July 10, 2010 (UTC)
- Until you finally admit you're a man. —Pelozurian (talk) 08:21, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
- For the last time, I'm a pretty girl! *Pout!* Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 09:04, July 10, 2010 (UTC)
- Lies! There are no girls on the internet! —Pelozurian (talk) 09:09, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
- Oh. You've got me there. I bow to your superior logic. Curtsy, actually. Being a pretty girl is a tough habit to break. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 12:52, July 10, 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you thank you, I know the logic I stole from you is far superior coming from my mouth. Or keyboard. Or both. —Pelozurian (talk) 13:02, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
- Oh. You've got me there. I bow to your superior logic. Curtsy, actually. Being a pretty girl is a tough habit to break. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 12:52, July 10, 2010 (UTC)
- Lies! There are no girls on the internet! —Pelozurian (talk) 09:09, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
- For the last time, I'm a pretty girl! *Pout!* Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 09:04, July 10, 2010 (UTC)
- Until you finally admit you're a man. —Pelozurian (talk) 08:21, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
- How many times are you going to get tricked before you realize that there are no girls on the internet? Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 08:13, July 10, 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, because you're a woman and most of us haven't been touched by one anyway. —Pelozurian (talk) 07:26, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
- What if I like my community? Can I touch other ones anyways? Love,
- I don't like my community, so does that give me permission to touch you all inappropriately? —Pelozurian (talk) 06:28, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
We should have a new portal for city bashing-- 08:27, July 11, 2010 (UTC)
- Or at least rename our Cities category to Citycruft. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 15:26 Jul 11 2010
Much less than meets the eye! The Sioux City Journal said nothing about us; only a blogger did. And there are enough people in any city trying to improve the image of the city (or their own image of themselves) by proposing an orthodoxy, that Uncyclopedia is a natural enemy. About the blog, I agree with e|m|c's initial comment, the reaction casts him as an ass. Readers are much more comfortable with the parody, and a couple seem to think that the humor is on target, though we certainly have citycruft that isn't. Spıke Ѧ 02:05 12-Jul-10
- The blogger is probably the author of the article. He is, essentially, whoring his article on VFD.
pillow talk 15:38, July 14, 2010 (UTC) - The "blogger" is a reporter for the Sioux City Journal's The Weekender publication which was going to run a full-story on it, but probably decided to not run one after using this blog to determine whether it'd have been a newsy story or not (they do that at the Sioux City Journal a lot). --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 17:22 Jul 14 2010
- If they even thought that a story involving Uncyclopedia was somehow possibly news, he's not a journalist and his newspaper isn't a newspaper. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 19:59, July 14, 2010 (UTC)
- And I'm sure that he is also not a female despite having used a feminine name in the emails to me. Just saying cause we all know only a male can report the news. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 20:30, July 14, 2010 (UTC)
- First, unless we clicked on the profile for her, we'd never know ("Lowesays's Blog"?). Second, we aren't you, don't have access to your email and haven't received emails from her. Third, and most important, she can't be a she, because there are no girls on the internet. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 20:52, July 14, 2010 (UTC)
- You know, you would have almost made me look like an idiot if not for: 1. Me saying "she" right up at the top of the page, 2. You constantly reading my emails (Seriously, stop it. Or at least stop replying to the Nigerian princes...), and 3. You yourself being an 84 year old woman. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 11:35, July 15, 2010 (UTC)
- Stop trying to distract us with the facts! Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 13:02, July 15, 2010 (UTC)
- U mad? U mad coz im stylin' on u? MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 00:33, July 17, 2010 (UTC)
- Stop trying to distract us with the facts! Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 13:02, July 15, 2010 (UTC)
- You know, you would have almost made me look like an idiot if not for: 1. Me saying "she" right up at the top of the page, 2. You constantly reading my emails (Seriously, stop it. Or at least stop replying to the Nigerian princes...), and 3. You yourself being an 84 year old woman. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 11:35, July 15, 2010 (UTC)
- Women reporting the news?? Please. Women are only good for insane political commentary and reporting on Acai Berry cleanse. Oh, and doing the dishes. pillow talk 23:08, July 14, 2010 (UTC)
- First, unless we clicked on the profile for her, we'd never know ("Lowesays's Blog"?). Second, we aren't you, don't have access to your email and haven't received emails from her. Third, and most important, she can't be a she, because there are no girls on the internet. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 20:52, July 14, 2010 (UTC)
- And I'm sure that he is also not a female despite having used a feminine name in the emails to me. Just saying cause we all know only a male can report the news. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 20:30, July 14, 2010 (UTC)
- If they even thought that a story involving Uncyclopedia was somehow possibly news, he's not a journalist and his newspaper isn't a newspaper. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 19:59, July 14, 2010 (UTC)
They Siouxed us!
I'm serious. They threatened to Sioux us. 
|Si Plebius Dato' (Sir) Joe ang Kemador CUN|IC Kill 
| 11:12, July 15, 2010 (UTC)
- Thereis no information as to who the authoris... Nonsense. I can see who the authoris right here! • Puppy's talk page • 00:40, June 5, 2009 Friday, 03:26, Jul 16 2010 UTC
- If only User:Citikiwi knew one of his works would one day land us a spot in the papers. —fj0j3ddjoaw;rfjaew (r30qjd) 01:34, 17 July 2010 (UTC)