From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
|
This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at VFD.
|
Techneta
Remiel
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. An article about a non major character in Tales of Symphonia, not under their name. Getting started goes off on a new tangent, there's a lot of dry plot summary and hotness. Irritable of contents (talk) 18:29, July 28, 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Uncyclopedia ought not be a place where anime fans can go to talk back to characters they are infatuated with. Any reader who is not one of these will not be interested in the page. Spıke 🎙️03:48 29-Jul-16
- Delete. --Moonhead42 (talk) 07:26, July 29, 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. EStop ⚓ 07:23, July 30, 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Seems to have gone through Google Translate from something else. An ugly mess of an article. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 21:39, July 31, 2016 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
|
Mithos Yggdrasill
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. Just a bare plot summary with funk and dancing occasionally substituted, which is funny enough, but not for how long the article is. What's good here can just be folded into the Tales of Symphonia article; character is not notable enough for their own wikipedia page. Irritable of contents (talk) 20:00, July 28, 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Enough Symphonia! This page is amateurish and unfunny fan-fiction. Spıke 🎙️03:54 29-Jul-16
- Delete. --Moonhead42 (talk) 07:21, July 29, 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. As encyclopedic as hot chocolate. EStop ⚓ 07:27, July 30, 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. An article without any background and then goes into the 'cast' list. Humour?? --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 21:42, July 31, 2016 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
|
Score: -2 • voting closed
|
Delete (0) |
Delete. Editing stopped in 2009 with about a dozen edits. A lot of bad quotes, focus shifts to Tom Cruise, rather listy and anti anti depressants is navelist. Irritable of contents (talk) 23:51, July 29, 2016 (UTC)
|
Keep (2) |
- Keep. A real article with a real comedy strategy: map mood drugs to a military force. It will be easy to remove some of the cruft. Spıke 🎙️13:55 1-Aug-16
- Keep. Irritable of contents (talk) 17:29, August 1, 2016 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: -2 • voting closed
|
Delete (0) |
Delete. Title isn't a parody, nor the actual title; lots of parenthesis and incomplete sentences, a specific time code also shows up for screen capping along. "I-have-no-nuts", "except the Mormons who was" "his index finger pointing at the black colored pawn that looked like a penis", "Trouble with the Man" section should be about Fox not Disney, as they bought Marvel 4 years after this film. Unlike Star Wars, the X-Men movies aren't notable or terrible enough to get their own individual or collective pages; most of the major criticisms are just that hardly anyone gets any screen time because there's like 2 dozen characters, and that the movies fail to faithfully adapt elements from the comics, like Phoenix (3), Stryker (2), and their more recognizable classic costumes (1). That and I guess Wolverine and Storm switched height. Irritable of contents (talk) 22:33, July 21, 2016 (UTC)
|
Keep (2) |
- Keep. Adequate. Spıke 🎙️02:01 1-Aug-16
- Keep. Good enough now. Irritable of contents (talk) 20:56, August 4, 2016 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- From 216.16.232.98, editing stopped 4 years ago, and theirs only 21 total edits. Irritable of contents (talk) 22:33, July 21, 2016 (UTC)
- No, Wikipedia says X-Men: The Last Stand is also known as X3. This article's Intro is self-congratulatory, the humor is cheap, undeveloped toilet humor with no real-world point, and there are no pix, but I'm not sure it's loathsome. Will delete the two one-sentence sections (one offering nothing but a nonsense number on box-office take). Spıke 🎙️03:29 26-Jul-16
|
Score: -2 • voting closed
|
Delete (0) |
Delete. Although the joke from Happy Gilmore that Bob Barker is a bad ass was funny, this is an extremely listy entry. The sole contribution in 2007 from Madonna that halted construction in 2012. Irritable of contents (talk) 20:07, August 1, 2016 (UTC)
|
Keep (2) |
- Keep. Extremely playful despite overreliance on the list format. Was thoroughly vandalized with Jack-off Humor by AlmightyGameDude in 2011, now undone. Spıke 🎙️20:44 1-Aug-16
- Keep. Considering how much repetitive grinding there is in sandbox games like GTA a list makes sense. Gangster Bob Barker is funny unlike Nick Cage in Grand Theft Cosmo; Tranquility Base. Irritable of contents (talk) 20:56, August 4, 2016 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Count Dooku
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. NAMBLA, Faggotmatch.com, Assrape. Emperor Palpatine isn't important enough for a page so I don't know why this is a page, and he's already has an entry on CIS. Irritable of contents (talk) 18:39, June 19, 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Crufty and pointless. Spıke 🎙️02:13 20-Jun-16
- Delete. EStop ⚓ 11:22, June 21, 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. I have a pet hate for articles that acknowledge the reader. SIR MAC BOSWELL [†] 22:21, July 31, 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Seems to be just shoving as many random, crufty jokes as possible into a page rather than blending them together to form a good article. ConCass2 (talk) 20:09, August 10, 2016 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
|
Score: 0 • voting closed
|
Delete (1) |
- Delete. "They're gay!!" and a list. Irritable of contents (talk) 19:34, July 26, 2016 (UTC)
|
Keep (1) |
- Keep. An article about a character from an anime, worked on almost entirely by IPs, is likely to be fanfiction without a comedy theme. But if I delete the list (Interesting Facts) and the parenthetical wisecracks, it is not horrible. Spıke 🎙️14:14 27-Jul-16
|
Comments |
|
Emo Teenager
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. Wacky war stub, "sucks cock". Irritable of contents (talk) 23:32, July 29, 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. A "Random" template at the beginning of the article rarely bodes well. Hardly an Emo or Goth joke or pun in sight. EStop ⚓ 07:33, July 30, 2016 (UTC)
- So I removed the template, and also the vandalism such as "Your gay" at the end of several sections. Spıke 🎙️13:52 1-Aug-16
- Delete. Author aware of the historic goths but then goes nowhere with this article. Burn. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 09:24, August 1, 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Starting with nonsense year numbers turns out not to be nonsense, part of an incomprehensible effort to link emos with early history. A rewritten history through the eyes of the navel-gazing generation would be funny, but you'd have to start over and give it a better title. Spıke 🎙️13:51 1-Aug-16
- Delete. Kinda thought it was a good premise though.--Moonhead42 (talk) 04:54, August 14, 2016 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
|
Together We Can Beat Dr Who Syndrome
Score: 6 • voting closed
|
Delete (6) |
- Delete. There's no explanation provided for what causes the disease other than a show being in it's fifth season; as any explanation would be specific to Dr. Who. Irritable of contents (talk) 20:58, July 31, 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. 2009 contribution of My Tree!. Page title is extremely unlikely to be typed. Article resembles a public-awareness appeal and not an encyclopedia article. Comedy genre is Wacky Disease; tactic is a variation of Johnny Carson "How bad is it???" Is "adverturous" a Freudian slip? Spıke 🎙️01:52 1-Aug-16
- Delete. EStop ⚓ 15:55, August 5, 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Doesn't say what this 'syndrome' actually is. Coming out in rash when you see a Dalek?? --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 12:21, August 12, 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. It's not at all clear what the title means from reading, but my informed guess is it means "jumping the shark". An article with that title could be done better than this; ranty and badly done. ConCass2 (talk) 21:18, August 13, 2016 (UTC)
- Let's balance the ratio of headers to actual content. Let's remove the stock photo with watermark in place. Let's remove the random inclusion of teletubbies. Let's remove all the unfunny statements in the content. With all that ignored, we have this, and I'm still not sold on the donation joke. The previous edit was by PuppyOnTheRadio (Talk). 23:46, August 13, 2016 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
|
Fisher-Price (company)
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. A pretty poor article, desperately begging for the SPIKE rewrite. Also, maybe I'm alone, but I think we need to ditch the "Go eat shit fuckers" in-joke, as it's too random to be funny. Focus on something that's based in real life and is actually funny, like them having to recall lead paint-based toys.--HolUp (talk) 00:19, August 10, 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. The back story is that some Anon told Kip the Dip or Uncyclopedia in general to "Go eat shit fuckers" in a way having something to do with this article, and Kip's incessant desire to dominate an adversary, plus his incessant desire to write about bowel movements, led to trying to turn this into a website meme even as the company threatened legal action. It was never funny and I would be happy to see it go, whether or not it is an inherent part of our history. Spıke 🎙️03:27 10-Aug-16
- Delete. There's also way too much listing, it's like reading a toy catalog with out the pictures. Needs a rewrite. Irritable of contents (talk) 20:15, August 10, 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. The Fisher Price meme has spawned truly amazing articles like Fisher Price: A Retrospective. This is not one of them. Ugly formatting and not particularly funny. ConCass2 (talk) 10:01, August 11, 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Comments below The previous edit was by PuppyOnTheRadio (Talk). 23:03, August 13, 2016 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
- The Fisher Price in joke significantly predates Kip the Dip, and is one of the earliest in jokes in Uncyclopedia's history. While that is not sufficient to warrant it's continued inclusion, Fisher Price: A Retrospective is one of our 2006 Top Ten, and is a fantastic article IMO. The retrospective works as it relates back to the original anon edit. (There are also a few jokes that link back to IP 4.252.99.182 floating about).
- This article, though, was a creation of DJ Mixerr, and it was reviewed and given an average score, but comments like "it's funny enough" show that the reviewer didn't think it was great, and was probably being generous. (Reviewed version). It received an UN:REQ award, but that's purely as it was a requested article that passed the delete on site metric. The previous edit was by PuppyOnTheRadio (Talk). 23:03, August 13, 2016 (UTC)
|
Emo bashing
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. "Getting drenched in Emo cum is NOT your objective, if it is, then you should be looking at the article Emo Rape", "emo/scenekid/whateverthefuckyouwwanttocallthesefaggots", "Bashing a weak, skinny person can sometimes be harder than bashing a bigger, stronger person. If you are actually going to do this, don't be a fucking dipshit and prance around with him. Just be confident and punch his stupid black face in. One good solid hit is all you need to knock this transexual out.", "If this is repeated you might just get lucky and the emo will cut a little too deep and finally kill itself.", "taste like pussy", "Quote from emo pussy", and two lists. Irritable of contents (talk) 00:19, July 30, 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Unclever insults against a person or class of people are not clever comedy; nor is advocacy of violence (nor even merely bullying, when that is what the article means by "bashing"). Spıke 🎙️18:20 1-Aug-16
- Delete. Puerile dreadfulness. EStop ⚓ 15:52, August 5, 2016 (UTC)
- Agreed The previous edit was by PuppyOnTheRadio (Talk). 23:48, August 13, 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Pants. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 17:06, August 16, 2016 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
|
Score: -1 • voting closed
|
Delete (1) |
- Delete. Mostly Listcruft and Randumbo. NRV. The previous edit was by PuppyOnTheRadio (Talk). 22:22, August 13, 2016 (UTC)
|
Keep (2) |
- Keep. The concept is brilliant, and since the intro made me laugh, I'll have to vote keep. The article is a bit small, but it's far from the worst. ConCass2 (talk) 13:58, August 16, 2016 (UTC)
- Keep. Nominator himself now seems to be toying with saving this page. Spıke 🎙️17:39 16-Aug-16
|
Comments |
- I removed most of the listcruft. The Intro amused me, as Mother Fucker as the mother of a convent was an unexpected twist. Unfortunately, the page title is a blank check to type "mother fucker" to strangers without adding humor, also to channel Samuel Jackson. Spıke 🎙️02:36 14-Aug-16
- {{VFD}} applied and clock reset.
- Kept. Substantially improved; could use more. Spıke 🎙️00:22 18-Aug-16
|
Alderaan
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
Delete (6) |
- Preferably just a stub I think that a planet given 5 seconds of screen time should take 5 seconds to read about. The decoy earth bit needs more explanation, and I think a photo of a pile of rocks or an asteroid field would look funnier. Irritable of contents (talk) 19:50, July 26, 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Three paragraphs that seem to start in the middle of a story could be appropriate for a movie franchise that started with Episode IV. It is hard to read and I didn't detect any comedy. Spıke 🎙️14:16 27-Jul-16
- Delete. No real comedy strategy other than to mash with planet Earth and confusing Star Wars characters. EStop ⚓
- Delete. It reads like you've just stepped in on someone else's conversation. It has no context. SIR MAC BOSWELL [†]
- Delete. I think Irritable's idea had enough merit that I made the change. Still not salvageable. The previous edit was by PuppyOnTheRadio (Talk). 23:27, August 13, 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. If it can be replaced with an image without any objection, that's a sign we don't need it. Previous comments are accurate; it is simply the middle chunk of a story without the context. ConCass2 (talk) 19:45, August 18, 2016 (UTC)
|
Keep (1) |
- Keep. Can be improved on but i liked it. --Moonhead42 (talk) 13:33, July 27, 2016 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Gothemo
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. Listy, "I saw an elderly pensioner being raped by ten chavs, until I realised their ultimate idiocy", "here is no attrative Gothemo in the world. Except for me. And me. Me too.", " "I'll take on all six of you, even fucking Freddy Kruger over there!" Ingredients: Chuck Norris, Ninja. Irritable of contents (talk) 00:07, July 30, 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. A 2006 effort of Ourdearmoshe to mock specific individuals in his own city. Spıke 🎙️14:06 1-Aug-16
- Delete. The third sentence of the first paragraph was the highlight. EStop ⚓ 15:47, August 5, 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. (Last best version). If it were an article that related to something that some - anyone - would ever read, it might have survivability. Given any improvement on this is unlikely to get past the "meh, okay" rating, it doesn't have enough to warrant it's continued existence. The previous edit was by PuppyOnTheRadio (Talk). 23:35, August 13, 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. The "Allies and Enemies" section suggests that a real-life "gothemo" crew were insulted by a group of "chavs", and are using Uncyclopedia as a way to fantasise about toughly battering said chavs. Good for them, but it's not funny for anyone else to read. ConCass2 (talk) 19:56, August 18, 2016 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
|
Score: -1 • voting closed
|
Delete (1) |
- Delete. This is terrible.--HolUp (talk) 05:06, August 16, 2016 (UTC)
|
Keep (2) |
- Virtuoso at work. Since he is editing in-place rather than devising a replacement article, I'll help by voting Keep. Spıke 🎙️15:53 18-Aug-16
- Rewritten by Sog and Spike. This ballot has fulfilled its purpose. ConCass2 (talk) 19:41, August 18, 2016 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Not terrible, just inept. A real article about someone real, with a real comedy strategy: Play off the song titles. Full of red-links and makes a predictable turn downward toward pimps and whores. (Correction: A tour through the History suggests it started with that, though it was later crufted up with an endless list of song-title puns and bickering quotations.) Spıke 🎙️11:50 16-Aug-16
|
Church Burnings
Score: 0 • voting closed
|
Delete (3) |
- Delete. Mostly ranting without humor. Can someone perhaps salvage this article?--HolUp (talk) 01:56, August 3, 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Cartoon Network is similarly structured along eras of shows, but contains comedy and not just comments; though those sections can just be copied into a new article. Irritable of contents (talk) 20:56, August 4, 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Very opinionated, subjective.--Equalrights4animals (talk) 04:23, August 18, 2016 (UTC)
|
Keep (3) |
- Keep. Irritable has rendered it more than "ranting without humor." Spıke 🎙️03:29 21-Aug-16
- Keep. Is able to be fixed with some editing. Jade9001 (talk) 23:20, August 21, 2016 (UTC)
- Keep. Not the funniest thing ever, but reasonably so. --Moonhead42 (talk) 05:37, August 22, 2016 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Damn Fundamentalist Christians
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. The fundament standing for buttocks is amusing, but overall breaking apart syllables and giving them their own section is a bit convuluted and listy; and it ends up worse than a forced acronym. Fun, lists, christ, dament and mental are a bit of a stretch though and the list of Ians is followed by another random list of celebrities. Editing ceased in 2008. Irritable of contents (talk) 20:15, August 10, 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. After the dumb caricature in the Intro that fails Poe's Law, the page's first serious comedy strategy is lexical deconstruction, yawn. Spıke 🎙️04:02 11-Aug-16
- Delete. --Moonhead42 (talk) 03:38, August 12, 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Any article that devolves into lexical deconstruction is terrible. The previous edit was by PuppyOnTheRadio (Talk). 23:19, August 13, 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Be damned, be gone. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 08:25, August 22, 2016 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
|