From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Vote
|
Score: 13 people concerned about the Silence of the Moon Rocks
|
| Nominated by:
|
—Sir Socky   (talk) (stalk)  GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 10:34, 21 January 2011
|
For: 13
|
 Nom+For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 10:34, 21 January 2011- For. Great metaphor, touches all the right history. Aleister 11:14 21-1-'11
- For. This is essentially a redoing of an article I wrote back in 2009 as a satire of a very low key NASA event. It now has a fitting conclusion and contains a lot more content. Glad you all like it! -- Sir SF13 (Talk)
 GUN WotM RotM FBotM VFH SK Maj. ΥΣΣ 0804 EST 21 JAN 2011
- For. This has front page written all over it. Dr. Fenwick 17:28, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
- For. this is absolutely brilliant, amazing, helarious, subtle and awsome Shabidoo 02:20, January 26, 2011 (UTC)
- For. The madness.
1234 ~  17:52, 29 January 2011
- For. yeah ~
   20:30, January 29, 2011 (UTC)
- For. Brilliantly written. This article looks and sounds realistic, and is consistantly funny without the use of sexuality. I can see some UN in-jokes coming from this. —DCCLXXVII (complaints • resume •
 •  •  • WP • UMF • GoogHelp • AWA • WA) 22:30, February 4, 2011 (UTC)
- For. Took me a some time to get round to reading this but it is an unusual article, more subtle satire than the easy-laugh humour that normally gets nominated here. Should be encouraged and I will by voting in favour.
 RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 14:13, February 6, 2011 (UTC)
- What Romartus said. --Black Flamingo 21:49, February 8, 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah
 TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK  22:07, February 8, 2011 (UTC)
- Also yeah --Sog1970 21:34, February 11, 2011 (UTC)
- For. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 12:18, 16 Feb 2011
|
Against: 0
|
|
| Comments:
|
- P.S. Kudos on the colaboration job. It was brought together really well :) --Shabidoo 03:25, January 26, 2011 (UTC)
 Abstain. I don't see how this works, I mean that the parody is surely of the previous reign of terror by Bush Corp, Obama simply has not indulged in the hysteria and over-cooked rhetoric. At worst he simply maintained things like Guantanamo and continued Bush stratagy in Iraq. Also the concpet of the imagnary enemy has more to do with companies than governments - or put another the corporate element in Governments today.--Sycamore (Talk) 13:46, January 26, 2011 (UTC)
- That wasn't really the point of the article. This is an apolitical (or rather a libertarian) critique of government in general. -- Sf13 1522 EST 29 JAN 2011
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
16:49, February 17, 2011 (UTC)