Uncyclopedia:VFH/HowTo: Take a Dump

Vote	Score: 1.5 Shitloads
Nominated by:	64.105.80.78 17:01, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
For: 10.5	n+f 64.105.80.78 17:01, 14 March 2009 (UTC) For. Zana Dark's crap is definitely feature material. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 17:10, 14 March 2009 (UTC) For. This was actually written by a noob... :) StonedJeff, to be exact. I am so proud of him! – (ooh!) (aah!) ...·º•ø®@» LEG CUN GUN DUN 18:22, 14 March 2009 (UTC) For. I never woulda thought anyone would wana read my shit. --StonedJeff 19:24, 14 March 2009 (UTC) For. --Docile hippopotamus 23:27, 14 March 2009 (UTC) For I didn't wanna read it, it just popped up. I liked the part about the cold seat though for some reason. So for. And it was really funny I just like being negative. Congratz!~SirTags tit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 05:16, 15 March 2009 (UTC) For. I like it Fresh meat 07:50, 15 March 2009 (UTC) For. Simple butt effective. I don't see wipe knot. Codeye Codeye 03:27, 16 March 2009 (UTC) For. per above Mnb'z 03:37, 16 March 2009 (UTC) For. *Sir* Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN) 04:15, Mar. 17, 2009 'FOR For.' Kick ass, total lolzorz!--—The preceding signed comment was added by Projectmayhem666 (talk • contribs). 16:35, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
Against: 9	Not quite good enough for feature. --S0.S0S.0S.0S0 04:22, 17 March 2009 (UTC) Against. - Per So So, also articles which rest solely on vulgarity is not gonna float for me at least--Sycamore (Talk) 15:57, 17 March 2009 (UTC) Against. Meh. —Sir Guildensternenstein 17:28, 17 March 2009 (UTC) against. the funny/gross ratio was too low for me. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 14:48, 18 March 2009 (UTC) Against. Not feeling it. It has moments, but they are too few, and there's just not enough to it either. Shows promise, but not the done deal for me. --UU - natter 11:09, Mar 19 Against. Needs expansion on the idea . Too one tricky pony poo otherwise.--Romartus 19:21, 19 March 2009 (UTC) Poo poos? -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 19:51, 19 March 2009 (UTC) Against. Meh. Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me! 06:12, 22 March 2009 (UTC) Shit Article. I think it's about shit, too. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 22:29, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
Comments:	Abstain. on account of images. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 15:43, Mar 16 What do you mean??? – (ooh!) (aah!) ...·º•ø®@» LEG CUN GUN DUN 20:11, 16 March 2009 Yeah wats wrong with them? besides their hilarity if that is a word, which i just made it one-- - StonedJeff TALK talk to me 22:36, 16 March 2009 (UTC) I mean the images are too offensive to my sensitive moral sensibilities for me to even read the article. Heck, the article could be the funniest thing I've ever read, but the images don't make me want to read the article. Understand? • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 16:29, Mar 18 And here I thought the images were rather tasteful, considering it is an article on shitting. – (ooh!) (aah!) ...·º•ø®@» LEG CUN GUN DUN 16:34, 18 March 2009 Fair enough I mean the images are appropraite to the article, but if that's isn't you bag that's cool man.-- - StonedJeff TALK talk to me 00:24, 19 March 2009 (UTC) And that's why I'm abstaining instead of being arrogant and voting against. Thank you for understanding. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 15:38, Mar 20 Holy poop, this is the greatest VFH turnaround since Sauce. I have created a monster, an against monster!!! --S0.S0S.0S.0S0 02:06, 23 March 2009 (UTC)