From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Vote
|
Score: -2 bottles of rum
|
| Nominated by:
|
Teh Rote 23:46, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
|
For: 1
|
- Nom and for. Avast! Teh Rote 23:46, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
|
Against: 3
|
- lolpirates No. Just...no. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 00:39 Mar 29
- Would you mind not being a dick and give some constructive criticism? Teh Rote 01:10, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
-
- Ignore Zombiebaron, he's an insensitive ass. Just put the page on Pee Review and let's take a look at it. Le Cejak • <Mar 29, 2008 [1:38]>
- Yerr, if you want my comprehensive opinion of this article, seeing as how I'm one of the more active reviewers on this site, then by all means I'll do a full review for you. But this doesn't belong here. Take this article over to Pee Review and get it ready for VFH before posting it. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 23:37 Mar 29
- Against. Needs work, plenty of work. Start with the advice you've just got on review, and when you think it's improved, go for a second review rather than coming straight back here. Get it right, and then we'll see. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 09:17, Mar 30
- Against, because, apparantly, I'm an "insensitive ass". -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 16:35, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
- No, no, no - surely that's a possessive apostrophe, in which case it means you have an insensitive ass. Too much associating with Olipro will give you one of those, I hear... --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 19:07, Mar 30
- UnNews:Zombiebaron is insensitive But insensitive to what? Olipro, maybe. Le Cejak • <Mar 30, 2008 [19:10]>
|
| Comments:
|
 Abstain. It's just a list right now. An okay list, but still just a list. Le Cejak • <Mar 28, 2008 [15:08]>
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
