From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
 |
This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion.
|
| Keep |
- Very weak keep that's almost an abstain The odd laugh here is balanced out by semi-unsubtle ranting. --
 (but) Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 09:34, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Good. Some of them were getting a bit too disturbing. Concentrate on why the article sucks instead. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 09:50, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
2007 (UTC)
- Burninate - Funny? No. Delete it immediately. I find it pointless, and a waste of server space. --Hdgcfcf 01:13, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
- Feed it to a Wood Choper it was not funny at all. --General And Min. THEDUDEMAN
 04:29, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
- -L 04:49, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Who? --General Insineratehymn 02:01, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- Charmingly Germanic, but underdeveloped to the point of oblivion. ----OEJ 02:03, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
- Keep Under construction - hands off. If this continues, we're going to need a rule against VFDing pages that have been properly WIP-tagged. --
 Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 23:06, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
- considering that construction tag has been on there for two weeks and hasn't been removed I'd say that it's clearly using the construction tag to avoid deletion... but just my thought --
 » >UF|TLK|▋» 23:36, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, and there's been some rather bumpish edits to it for the past few weeks - it rather looks like someone's taking advantage of our good nature... I think there is a rule against construction tagged pages (at least an unwritten one), but in this case I think this is valid VFD material. Now can I be bothered to read it and vote...? -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 23:52, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
- alright, two weeks is more than enough time for construction so I'm removing the tag, you may go about your business voting --» >UF|TLK|▋» 00:03, 6 June 2007 (UTC)~
- Weak keep - I would've abstained, but I'm just counterbalancing the anime-hatred that always happens around these things. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 18:09, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
- this article is on my sniping list... probably due to otakus coming along and using it as a dumping ground for pure unfunniness, and this article's been under construction a bit too long, so i say steamroller it unless someone comes up with a good idea for it --» >UF|TLK|▋» 21:58, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
- One Piece of dog shit is what this article is. --General Insineratehymn 22:12, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
- Smash into more than one piece. –—Hv (talk) 6/06 18:17
- Delete Jesus H. Christ, this is worse than the first one. Roman Dog Bird 19:13, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete as per rant below. ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 09:58, 07 June 2007
|
| Comments |
- I don't have the energy to read it. The Oblong Lobster 23:20, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
- <rant>I agree with what UF and SBU are saying, the construction tags FREQUENTLY get abused in my opinion as something to hide behind while the article is clearly rubbish. Its the first thing most new users creating new pages slap on their shite articles and when we quite rightly QVFD/VFD them they cry "But it was construction tagged! I'm working on it!" When 9 times out of 10 we know that if we left the article and didn't delete it they wouldn't ever work on it again, all they do is bring the page up to stroke their epeens or show their little friends how cool they are. Those kinds of pages are not contributing to our uncyclopedic efforts here. >.< </rant> ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 09:58, 07 June 2007
- article struck by famine, and now goes to cvp --» >UF|TLK|▋» 00:59, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
Has many cool functions such as virtually surf the net and make a uncyclopedia myspace i have worked hard on this game instead of suggesting delete give me suggestions for the game also the name is similar to Game:Grueslayer but that is a coincidence i will rename it also i made this less than a week ago-—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Java7837 (talk • contribs) , Also I have spent a few hours into it to try to make it more funny then before and I think you should give us suggestions rather than sending it to be deleted. --Starflame 14:39, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
- Delete, with all subpages. Unambitious, uninspired, unfunny, and vaguely ripoffish. This one can't even get the Zork Narrator-player structure right. All in all a bad game. --
 TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK  01:02, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
- Blatant rip-off of Grue Slayer. --General Insineratehymn 01:04, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
- Ditto, and STRONG FOR. I WILL SUE!!!!!!!!! And sign your comments, Java. --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 02:04, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
- Bad Rip-off of Grueslayer I HATE HATE HAT THIS!!!
- Keep I had fun, a bit. --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 12:23, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
- Über Delete. –—Hv (talk) 5/06 14:34
- it's like grueslayer...just as bad too --» >UF|TLK|▋» 22:05, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- 1. We already voted keeping/deletion for most of the games. If you find one that you think sucks, nominate it here.
- 2. There are NO RULES about what articles should and shouldn't be nominated for VFD. If you read the final section of the deletion policy, you should realise this.
 Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 03:53, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
- Games should only be allowed on Uncyclopedia if they are funny - and more than a one-liner with every page. Sir Roger 06:54, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
- Move to namespace if you must, including all associated templates and such (it's gonna be trickier than deleting though!). I know you've put a lot of work into it Java, I just don't think this is the medium for it. For example, there is no way to make the logon name persist for all moves, and no way to make anything you do persist either, without creating absolutely obscene numbers of pages. I'd recommend letting it be deleted and moving on to something else. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 10:28, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
- Update: Java has moved the main page of the game to his namespace but the rest of it is still out there... It all needs moving if you really want to keep it Java. And then all the links will need fixing to point into your namespace - that's why I said it'd be trickier than a straight deletion. I know it hurts to lose work, but just pretend your computer crashed... -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 00:50, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
I've left him a message. Tomorrow, it dies, unless he takes it all in.  Sir Famine, Gun ♣ Petition » 06/6 20:50
- Update: Various people seem to be making an effort, but half of it is still out there... -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 07:45, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
- i've moved a couple pages, but it's internal server error this and internal server error that... --» >UF|TLK|▋» 13:09, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
- it's all moved to userspace, now have a nice day --» >UF|TLK|▋» 15:05, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete: This seems awfully like a blatant ad for a website. The links on the bottom of the page (one of which goes to an IP address without a domain name), coupled with the lack of formatting, make it more suspicious. --CaptainSpam MUN PUTPBAA 23:44, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
- Kill Spam or fact-aspiring essay. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 00:09, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Spam that seems to be designed for Wikipedia instead of us. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 00:18, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 04:54, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch
 13:52, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. –—Hv (talk) 7/06 14:44
- Delete ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 11:05, 07 June 2007
- Ugh I still wonder why people think this works...Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 23:43, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
- Huff - As per CaptainSpam. --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 00:06, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete What Strange said. Fresh Stain Serq Fet of Pokemon (At your service) Serq fet 13:15, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Scrap! -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 22:10, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
- --General Insineratehymn 22:57, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete WTF? --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 23:14, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
- Biggest WTF ever Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 04:51, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 13:43, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
- WTF‽ –—Hv (talk) 7/06 15:29
- Delete Nothing to do with 2080, unless maybe 20:80 is the margin that S-Club's manager is splitting the profits with them. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 17:47, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete /me sobs quietly in the corner. The page needs a Hanson warning!!! I didn't want to see that!!! ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 10:18, 07 June 2007
- Place In a Vat of Hydrochloric Acid-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 23:38, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
- Just make it go away! Fresh Stain Serq Fet of Pokemon (At your service) Serq fet 13:19, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
Give it some credit. This article is soo horrible that I found it rather amusing. The author actually spelled the word "trying" - "tring." Isn't that some kind of linguistic irony in of itself; he actually tried and failed at spelling "trying". WOW... --AmericanBastard 05:56, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
- Delete QVFD-level crap, ICUed, then rewritten. The rewrite is also crap. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 22:27, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
- Holy uck -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 22:42, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - probably could have got away with re-ICUing, since it's a new article on the back of an ICUed one. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 23:04, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
- UGH!!! ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 11:15, 07 June 2007
- Devour it --General Insineratehymn 23:39, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
- .....What?-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 23:47, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
- Huff - As per UN:WTF. --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 00:00, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 05:17, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
- Hillarious, great article! I, the author, worked on the article for days. It is clever and hilarious. If you don't think it is funny, put whatever you have in your mind that would improve the article. Otherwise, it is like any other page where anyone can edit! The Cookie Monster
 [Spam Me]
|
| Delete |
- Needs to be erased. Now.--Andorin Kato 15:29, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete- Just plain stupid. Tlim7882 16:00, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
- Strong for. This article is dumb, and the creator is dumb. --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 22:38, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
- i second hansolo --» >UF|TLK|▋» 22:39, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete
Pee Review overrated it. This article makes no sense, and doesn't appear to be about a real person. The fart jokes are unfunny. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 23:02, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
- OK, "Fart jokes #1" has got to be sarcastic. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 23:05, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- Andorin Kato, the nominator, wasted time putting the article up for deletion because of the Random/killed template. The nominator must give a good reason why the article should be deleted or else he's vandalizing the page. Therefore, it does not meet deletion criteria and should be taken off Votes for deletion or the aritcle should be kept. The Cookie Monster [Spam Me]
- Actually, nowhere in VFD criteria does it say that a comment has to be made. --Andorin Kato 22:54, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- I nominate this article for deletion based upon the following criteria:
- Excessive use of categories.
- Playing out one dumb joke in an even dumber way.
- Speeling misteaks.
- The penis image is just... no.
- One Piece was kept, so there's room for this one.
- Join the fight! Burninate Dickhead now! --Andorin Kato 04:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete But I added NSFW to the link, because of the prominent penis picture at the top. I usually browse this from school, might want to give us a lil warning eh? ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 04:54, 08 June 2007
- Delete. -- Mitch 05:21, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete Can't decide whether it's vanity or what it is, but it's not very hot, anyway. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 00:06, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
- Boom. --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 01:25, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Sir Roger 04:53, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 15:17, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. –—Hv (talk) 6/06 18:14
- Spluh -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 19:16, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
- WE'RE NOT WIKIPEDIA!-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 00:15, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete Random forum/fancruft. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 23:13, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete An old scone in a forgotten part of your Grandma's fridge. The Oblong Lobster 23:18, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
- I don't understand. Therefore, to protect me from accusations of stupidity, delete. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 23:55, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
- De-1337 --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 00:05, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
- Myth Busted. --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 01:25, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Ugh. –—Hv (talk) 6/06 18:15
- Spluh -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 19:16, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
- Eat. But say Grace first.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 00:14, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- DeleteOh dear gods this is crap. Did this guy ever read the bit in HowTo:Be funny and not just stupid on famous people? This entire article reeks of that crap! --{Thanq eeew}
- DeleteI love the whole Chuck Norris thing so much and this is some of 72.139.151.165's best work. The Oblong Lobster 21:48, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
- how about... NO --» >UF|TLK|▋» 22:01, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
- Fuck Chuck Norris --General Insineratehymn 22:13, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
- Bruce Lee + Chuck Norris + Anus + Pope = Delete --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 23:08, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per exactly what Alksub said. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 00:01, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
- Myth Busted. --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 01:25, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
- Worst...D&D reference...ever. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 04:58, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per Alksub. –—Hv (talk) 6/06 18:18
- Spluh. I was going to nom this myself. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 19:16, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete I don't even need to look at this to know that it sucks. Roman Dog Bird 19:18, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
|
| Comments |
- NeoEva88, you broke the rule written above in red. Don't be surprised if you get a 1 day ban. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 16:02, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete A listless list. Count of Monkey Crisco 21:36, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. The most listiest article I've ever seen in my whole life. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 01:07, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
- TOO MANY LISTS --General Insineratehymn 01:08, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
- Blast it. -- herr doktor needsAgear
 [scream!] 01:11, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
- Most of it is on the Frank Zappa article anyway; this isn't needed --THINKER 01:13, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
- Introduce to the Filial Piety Grandfather-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 02:20, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
- Huff - Bye Bye. --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 03:06, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Bad idea. Bad execution. ----OEJ 04:22, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
- My guitar wants to kill this article-Retrofuture42 15:21, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
- Pointless Roman Dog Bird 21:03, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
- Myth busted. --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 01:25, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
- Goodbye. –—Hv (talk) 6/06 18:21
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete More acronym crap. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 01:04, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
- Who wrote this? a crack-addicted monkey? --General Insineratehymn 01:08, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
- Blast it. -- herr doktor needsAgear [scream!] 01:11, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
- Send to See Dane Cook Stand-up-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 02:16, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
- Destroy In A Blowing Long Oat! Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me!
- Delete. Kid stuff, and bad kid stuff at that. ----OEJ 04:28, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
- Defenestrate If A Boy Loves Oranges -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 10:32, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete In name of All Loser Ouns - Not, just delete. --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 12:22, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
- Death Imminent Now. Only All Loonies vote to keep. Yeah, I ran out of room. –—Hv (talk) 5/06 15:06
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete. -- neoEva88 MUN F@H PS CM NS (talk.to-do)
- Junky junky junk. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 00:53, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
- Blast it. -- herr doktor needsAgear [scream!] 01:11, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
- Uncyclopedia is the best. Not England. --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 02:05, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
- Throw-in. OF DOOM! Boy am I running out of ideas...Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 02:15, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. I dunno what kind of cruft this is, but it's cruft. ----OEJ 04:26, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
- If this is the best that England has to offer... Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 06:09, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
- Huff - If that's all England has to offer, then America is way better. GO USA! --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 12:24, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - No, it is not. –—Hv (talk) 5/06 15:00
- 2005cruft --General Insineratehymn 20:21, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete A little hopeless puddle. The Oblong Lobster 21:11, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
- Weak keep I did laugh at the supervillain with his hands in inappropriate places. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 00:54, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. It appeals to the nerd in me. He was tasty, if a bit overcooked. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 06:07, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
- Keep with
{{expand}}. –—Hv (talk) 5/06 14:57
|
| Delete |
- 2005cruft --General Insineratehymn 19:03, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
- Huff - Pocket Protectors are indeed quite sexy, this article, is however, not. --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 19:21, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
- Splat -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 21:06, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
- Blast it. -- herr doktor needsAgear [scream!] 01:11, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
- Put Hands in Inappropriate Places. OF DOOM!-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 02:10, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
- Unless someone plans to fix it very soon, Delete. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 03:31, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Initiating mass execution of the Uncyclopedia Power Structure. Also, it's 2005cruft. --General Insineratehymn 18:19, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
- Huff. –—Hv (talk) 4/06 18:27
- Huff - As per Secretary. --Capercorn 19:24, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
- No -The Oblong Lobster 20:31, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
- Splat -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 21:06, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
- Blast it. -- herr doktor needsAgear [scream!] 01:11, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
- Yes? The idio- er... President wants this huffed. --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 02:06, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
- Sodomize and Send to Mental Hospital-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 02:08, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Initiating mass execution of the Uncyclopedia Power Structure. Also, it's 2005cruft. --General Insineratehymn 18:19, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
- Huff. –—Hv (talk) 4/06 18:27
- Huff - As per Secretary. --Capercorn 19:25, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
- NO The Oblong Lobster 20:32, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
- Splat -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 21:06, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
- Blast it. -- herr doktor needsAgear [scream!] 01:11, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
- Whip It Good! Yeah, we should make it listen to that song. It'll do the trick.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 02:06, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
- Proton Torpedo into the article! --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 02:07, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
- Keep Aww - I knew it would come to this... I vote move to Uncyclopedia space where the pyramidalness can be out of your way. They don't stand as articles, but as a group they're good. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 00:50, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
- Keep As per SBU ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 06:33, 05 June 2007
- Keep and Expand Think about it: "Undersecretary to the Secretary to the Sectarian Secretary to the Secret Sectarian Sects to the Secreting Secretary...to the Secretary in Charge of Secretarian Affairs" And more! Sir Roger 07:04, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
|
| Comments |
- How about merging them all into one article? Sir Roger 07:05, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- tripe --» >UF|TLK|▋» 18:10, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
- Huff. I can't for the life of me actually see any content. –—Hv (talk) 4/06 18:13
- Huff - Not funny, more hat crime. --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 19:20, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
- Blast it. -- herr doktor needsAgear [scream!] 01:11, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
- Make Drink Vitamin Water. Watch it Die.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 02:03, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
- Extreme WTF Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 03:36, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Even if vaguely intriguing it is short, underdeveloped, stubby, picless, and all like that. ----OEJ 04:34, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 06:00, 05 June 2007
- Delete Conspire to censor this illiberal page! Sir Roger 07:08, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Utter drivel--Back Door 11:45, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
- Fucking Republican IPs--SIR T H A T G U Y H U F F E D M E
 throw a snowball 20:56, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
- Liberals can kiss my ass --General Insineratehymn 22:11, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
- Keep Aww - I knew it would come to this... I vote move to Uncyclopedia space where the pyramidalness can be out of your way. They don't stand as articles, but as a group they're good. I don't think we should rule out groups of articles altogether. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 00:51, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
|
| Comments |
- Put them all together, they don't make sense separately. -- herr doktor needsAgear [scream!] 18:23, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
- I agree: if such a Power Structure is to be retained, it should be a single article with headings for each position and a coherent description of the overall structure. ----OEJ 20:52, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
|
| Comments |
- Putting some of the article in Gibberish/example would be possible. On the other hand, it would be just as easy to create an all-new "example" for Gibberish by hitting a keyboard randomly with spoons, toads, your neighbor's toddler, or any other object. So why bother moving the existing random stuff? ----OEJ 20:55, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete. Short and incoherent. ----OEJ 14:22, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
- Huff - As above. --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 16:16, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
- Huff - However, after it gets deleted, I reckon I might be able to do something with it in userspace when I have the time. –—Hv (talk) 4/06 17:06
- as lame as the idiot who stuck me on ugotm --» >UF|TLK|▋» 18:05, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
- MOW hahahahahahah The Oblong Lobster 20:59, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
- Splat Nice one, Lobster -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 21:06, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete. Town(s) in the Netherlands, but article is short, foolish, and without images. ----OEJ 14:19, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
- Huff - As above. Wow OEJ, you are on the ball today! --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 16:17, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
- congratulations for finding this crap, can we just kill it now --» >UF|TLK|▋» 18:07, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
- Eye-damaging Listcruft --General Insineratehymn 18:14, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete I don't see how it's listcruft, but it sucks nonetheless. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 20:59, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
- Splat -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 21:06, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
- Keep I support taking it off nearly all (if not all) the pages it's put on, but as an article by itself I find it quite a good satire on the useless template (whether or not it was meant to be), and I think it should be treated as such. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 10:12, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - As above. --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 16:21, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - As above and as above the above. --Dexter111344 17:31, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
|
| Comments |
|
