Forum:A Pure Straight Up Vote. Nothing Else

Forums: Index > Village Dump > A Pure Straight Up Vote. Nothing Else

Note: This topic has been unedited for 6173 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over.

Seeing as the other forum has descended into total madness, I have decided to start this so as to get a clear vote on the subject. Now firstly i'll state that if you want something voted on, just add another heading. Secondly this is for a pure for/against/abstain vote. No Comments. Any comments, arguments etc goes in the other forum, seeing as that's gone all nuts. (Bonner) (Talk) Jan 19, 18:43

Comment: Ha! I've beaten the system! I will not be silenced!! - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 17:24, Jan 20

Vote On Having Another Conservation Week Followed By Another Vigilance Week

Score: +2

• For. (Bonner) (Talk) Jan 19, 18:43
• For. -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 18:45, Jan. 19, 2008
• Dig --THINKER 18:46, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
• For --Dexter111344 18:48, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
• For--Æ 18:48, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
• Against. I'd be for a CW, not a VW. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 18:52, Jan 19
• I wuv flapjacks -- » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 18:57, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
• For CW, and For VW (as long as we only target real garbage and not just delete things that could be fixed) -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)
• A straight-up vote huh, I'll go get the "latest issue", ok Against., because I just don't like weeks in general. -- Kaizer the Bjorn takkun (nya nya) (1961 model!) Check out T61! 19:40, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
• Against.. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 20:02, 19 Jan 2008
• Double Against. There's too much going on at the site already. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 20:07, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
• For - But we're not doing it/them until PLS and January Vote Madness are over and done with. Which is what I think TKF is talking about. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 20:09, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
• For and odd idea What if we somehow combined them into one redicously sounding month?--General And Min. THEDUDEMAN 20:22, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
• Strong against as always. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • SU&W) 20:25 Jan 19, 2008
• For I think this would help improve crap, then kill the crap that doesn't get fixed. Although I think the CW part is more necessary. - UnIdiot | Talk? | Theme - 21:34, Jan 19
• Conditional For - Articles improved in Conservation Week should be immune to Vigilance Week's tagging. --Sir Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN) 22:40, Jan. 19, 2008
• Wait until after PLS. --THE 23:03, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
• Against. Relax, people. This is the internets. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 23:45, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
• Against the ruthless slaughter of wild articles. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 01:41, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
• Against this vote, and against euthanizing young articles.--<<>> 04:23, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
• Against. And FOR world hunger. ~ Mordillo where is my BALLS? 07:24, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
• For.     EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)   18:21, Sunday 20 January 2008  
• Pie. -->:( 20:10, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
• Against. Conservation week will start in March. It's a semi-annual competition, like Poo Lit Surprise. ~

  Jacques Pirat, Esq. Converse : Benefactions : U.w.p.

  20/01/2008 @ 22:09
  • We could still have a V-Week afterwards. --Æ 00:33, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
• Against For now anyway... But FOR more people actually bothering with VFD. MrN  Fork you! 23:44, Jan 20
• F♥r. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF (@ 20:31 21 Jan, 2008)
• Two hundred and sixty-fag ~Fag x FS 15:16, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Vote on whether we should pay more attention to discussions with reasoning and discussion than votes with votes and nothing else

Score: +/-0

• For.. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 20:02, 19 Jan 2008
• Yeah. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 20:07, Jan 19
• Against - I don't understand what we're voting about. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 20:10, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
• Against vote now, worry about consequences later. -- Kaizer the Bjorn takkun (nya nya) (1961 model!) Check out T61! 20:39, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
• (Sarcastic) For - Democracy would so work if there was no debates or campaigning or "putting your policies before the people". Just vote for a name you like and everything will be fine. -- nude Ape (quantify) (Riot Porn) 23:00, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
• For. voting down straight party lines, without discussion, reason, or waffles.--<<>> 04:26, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
• Against Cause logic is for squares.--General And Min. THEDUDEMAN 06:26, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
• Votes Which way do we increment the thingy, anyway?     EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)   18:21, Sunday 20 January 2008  
• For. I didn't even make it through the title of this section. This is a vote for more votes, right? —rc (t) 04:04, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Vote On Having Another Conservatory Built Behind the Kitchen

Score: 1

• For.. It'll be lovely in the afternoons when the sun hits the garden. Plus we can get some of those strangely uncomfortable wicker chairs with ugly cushions that you only ever seem to see in peoples' conservatories. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 01:10, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
• Against, I thought we were building a meat locker behind the kitchen. I even bought all of these hooks and ice. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 01:14, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

I'm sure Ljlego's family can find a use for them. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 01:16, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Well, they actaully sold them to me. Something about moving into the "shoe and concrete business". I'm not sure what that means though. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 01:21, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

If we have two Conservatories, we'll never figure out where Mr. Boddy died! --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 02:47, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

That didn't stop you from getting that second candlestick, did it? Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 04:11, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

• For., but only if I get to see Modus performing a belly dance. ~ Mordillo where is my BALLS? 07:24, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

  /me wiggles it, just a little bit. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 09:33, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

• Against I wanted an incinerator installed.     EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)   18:21, Sunday 20 January 2008  
• For My family could find a use for them. Thanks, Codeine!

Flapjacks: Wuv or No Wuv?

• WUV -- » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 06:24, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
• WUV For obvious reasons.--General And Min. THEDUDEMAN 06:27, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
• Hate Haet Hat -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 13:00, Jan. 20, 2008
• Chocolate or no chocolate? -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)
• I haz a hat     EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)   18:21, Sunday 20 January 2008  
• SYRUP IS A MUST! -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 22:50, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
• PANCAKE BUNNY IS NOT AMUSED--<<>> 01:51, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
• Waffles Ж WHEEEEE! 06:01, 24 January 2008 (UTC)