From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
|
This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion.
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. I found this one from the talk page of Why?:Why? after previous VFD. Similar really. Sir Reverend P. Pennyfeather (fancy a chat?) CUN VFH PLS 23:20, July 5, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Yes, it's similar. On the off chance the reader types "Why? Why? Oh Why?" into the search bar, he retrieves not clever comedy writing but merely a retort. Spıke Ѧ 03:48 11-Jul-13
- Delete. Too unoriginal. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 06:38, July 11, 2013 (UTC)
- NO! --The Shield of Azunai DSA510My Edits! 19:21, July 17, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Well, yeah, that's it. Anton (talk) 14:37, July 29, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. Iron Man, though it merely redirects to Tony Stark, is at least about something; this one isn't, and apologizes for it via template at the end, if you get that far. Spıke Ѧ 16:06 20-Jul-13
- Delete. Agreed. Someone make it into an article about a man who's simply amazing with a clothes iron or a man who always remembers to eat his nuts and lettuce in order to avoid anemia and it might be funny, this is just random and lame. Videshi
- Is three votes enough for instant death? EpicAwesomeness (talk) 12:29, July 24, 2013 (UTC)
- No; it's slow, but we are able to muster the traditional quorum of 5 when necessary. If this were three Admins and if the issues were policy rather than just bad writing, I'd consider it. Spıke Ѧ 12:53 24-Jul-13
- Delete.Someone rid me of this wretched Iron priest! Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 13:27, July 24, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. This is bad. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 21:40, July 26, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. Not of interest to a general reader, only to the registered users who know Zim. Anton (talk) 09:48, July 16, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. As a registered user who knows Zim, I concur that this is not of interest to a general reader. Written for a competition in 2010 (in case anyone thinks the present competition got slim pickings!), it does showcase Zim's unique (until one visits Illogicopedia) sense of humor and his defiant use of typography. Possible arguments to Keep include that it is in the HowTo: space, in which we practice George W. Bush's "racism of low expectations," and that it was featured within that space. Out of deference to Zim, who still visits and even hits a few fungoes with his ban-stick, it should be moved to his userspace. Spıke Ѧ 11:54 16-Jul-13
- Delete. --The Shield of Azunai DSA510My Edits! 19:22, July 17, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Agree with Spike, delete from mainspace and move to sub page. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 20:29, July 22, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. I have to reluctantly agree here, this is not going to be of interest to anyone who doesn't know Zim. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 21:52, July 26, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. The usual unfunny crap. Sir Reverend P. Pennyfeather (fancy a chat?) CUN VFH PLS 21:53, July 18, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Author Thekrust477, who was an Uncyclopedian for a single day in 2007 and had no contributions other than this, uploads for this, and one edit to Molten Gay, looks for automatic humor by writing Randumbo, relating it all to gayness, and peppering it with Chuck Norris and Oscar Wilde. I have spent two minutes failing to discern any comedy strategy, and it does not deserve more. Spıke Ѧ 02:27 19-Jul-13
- Delete. Ye Olde Unfunnye still lurks around. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 20:36, July 22, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete.<british accent>Quite unfunny this one, what say you?</british accent>--The Shield of Azunai DSA510My Edits! 23:23, July 22, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete.<normal accent>I totally agree, sir. Quite awful.</normal accent>Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 13:29, July 24, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Deletion of bad articles on British cities and towns
See Forum:A big British clean-up for details.
Score: 2
|
Keep (1) |
- Keep. I actually thought this was alright, possibly in the territory of one of our other tags but certainly not in the dark and sticky realms of VFD. --ChiefjusticePS3 06:46, June 15, 2013 (UTC)
|
Delete (3) |
- Delete. Not funny. Pretty true. Makes me fall asleep.--Uncycloperson (talk) 20:23, June 11, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. The author of this article was trying to be funny, but is trying harder to evangelize than amuse. The humor is along the lines of, "Everybody look at how wacky we gamers are!" Spıke Ѧ 21:07 11-Jun-13
- Delete. Might as well get rid of it. Sir Reverend P. Pennyfeather (fancy a chat?) CUN VFH PLS 21:26, June 11, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Nominator got this in before Simsie slapped the {{Fix}} on the article. Spıke Ѧ 21:07 11-Jun-13
- Abstain.Hmm, I think this is another salvageable article, like spam, so if it is okay, I could move it to my userspace, and work on it a bit. As much as I dislike Adventure Quest, this is a perfectly valid article topic, but the writing needs work. --The Shield of Azunai DSA510My Edits! 18:18, June 12, 2013 (UTC)
- As this vote is not a slam-dunk, for now copy the code to a page in your userspace if you like. Spıke Ѧ 14:52 19-Jun-13
- If you can fix it, do it, but on the main wiki it does not belong. Quite boring until fixed.--Uncycloperson (talk) 00:06, June 13, 2013 (UTC)
- One thousand hours, no groundswell. The Chief wields a veto. Spıke Ѧ 14:30 24-Jul-13
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. Anon complains on the talk page that the article is "too factual." I complain that author thought he was writing a comic book, with his bickering quotations, not an encyclopedia article. Spıke Ѧ 16:43 18-Jul-13
- Delete. How did an article containing nothing but quotations not get put on QVFD the minute it was made? Sir Reverend P. Pennyfeather (fancy a chat?) CUN VFH PLS 17:25, July 18, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. This argument gets tiresome quickly, and doesn't contain enough humor. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 15:43, July 21, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 20:26, July 22, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete.No--The Shield of Azunai DSA510My Edits! 23:22, July 22, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. The "joke" is a made-up acronym that doesn't even fit. Sir Reverend P. Pennyfeather (fancy a chat?) CUN VFH PLS 11:16, July 18, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. "Shit Under Supply of Uranium Ingots...is an acronym which does not make sense." Exactly. Even if moved to HowTo:, this article is not funny. Spıke Ѧ 11:46 18-Jul-13
- Delete.-- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 15:40, July 21, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Poor grammar, meandering, uninteresting, unfunny. Videshi
- Delete. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 20:27, July 22, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: -2
|
Keep (3) |
- Keep. Love it. It cleverly tells you that editing Uncyclopedia is as easy as hell and that no one actually cares if you vandalise it because we can undo it but covers it over with sarcasm by making editing look like hacking and you are so clever that the FBI might even care. Truly a classic. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 18:02, July 10, 2013 (UTC)
- Dittos. This one is playful, not in earnest nor likely to incite actual vandalism, like the recent nomination on vandalizing Wikipedia. Spıke Ѧ 18:53 10-Jul-13
- Keep. I liked it, and I don't think it would incite vandalism. Sir Reverend P. Pennyfeather (fancy a chat?) CUN VFH PLS 10:19, July 16, 2013 (UTC)
- I did not say that. I said that it is not funny. Anton (talk) 10:31, July 16, 2013 (UTC)
- Well everybody above does think it's funny. It is funny in a sort of parody way. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 11:42, July 16, 2013 (UTC)
|
Delete (1) |
- Delete. I don't think it is funny at all. Anton (talk) 16:56, July 10, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Undecided on this one. It combines humor about using a beet for masturbation (that's gonna stain) with sarcastically suggesting that it is clever or funny to vandalize Uncyclopedia, in a sort of reverse psychology way.-- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 03:30, July 11, 2013 (UTC)
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
Keep. Simply change it back to "Because." Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 06:48, July 10, 2013 (UTC)
- I have now done so, which doesn't require a vote. It still has the author patting himself on the back for cuteness, rather than the reader laughing. Spıke Ѧ 09:46 17-Jul-13
- Yeah I suppose it fails on originality. Pity because the title of the article is a joke within itself and some clever content could be written. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 09:56, July 17, 2013 (UTC)
- The territory is now free to accommodate any inspiration you have. Spıke Ѧ 10:14 17-Jul-13
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. A stub that celebrates our former culture in which abusing the reader was a winning alternative to making him laugh. Spıke Ѧ 00:59 5-Jul-13
- Delete. Yes. Anton (talk) 20:28, July 5, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Agreed. Sir Reverend P. Pennyfeather (fancy a chat?) CUN VFH PLS 23:20, July 5, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Why? Because it sucks!-- Sir Sinner blah blah 23:25, July 5, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 09:56, July 17, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Comment. Some anon added the "You're a loser" part if you check the history. Although the original version by Magic Man was just one word... ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 23:34, July 5, 2013 (UTC)
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. I don't understand... Sir Reverend P. Pennyfeather (fancy a chat?) CUN VFH PLS 17:50, June 28, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. I think we need something about the real person and not the existing version even though it is better aft Spike's work. Anton (talk) 13:13, July 4, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Liked the cosplayer idea, but the article should be executed.-- Sir Sinner blah blah 23:24, July 5, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Still looks a bit pants despite Spike's work. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 08:57, July 10, 2013 (UTC)
- "Go commit seppuku!" Spıke Ѧ 09:48 17-Jul-13
|
Comments |
- If you don't understand, than you probably have to type this in the Interenet. Date was a legendary Japanese warrior. But the article is not particularly good. Anton (talk) 17:55, June 28, 2013 (UTC)
- I have reverted this to author Kamek98's last version (8-Dec-2012) before renouncing the website, undone unambiguous vandalism by fleeting Uncyclopedian Cragsterdragon, and deleted most of the lists and all of the initial quotations. The article is still a meme-heavy fanboy rant, but no longer thoroughly ugly. Spıke Ѧ 18:43,18:47 28-Jun-13
- User Mr-ex777 took a copy of this to his userspace (commenting, so bad that it is funny), which technically we are not permitted to count as a 6th vote to delete. Spıke Ѧ 09:54 17-Jul-13
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. I saw that it was nominated on the fork's VFD, searched for it here and found out that it still existed. Anton (talk) 20:24, July 5, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Count me in. Sir Reverend P. Pennyfeather (fancy a chat?) CUN VFH PLS 23:20, July 5, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. LISTCRUFT TO DA MAX. And this isn't even like List of real life hacks and cheat codes which had an unavoidable list format. --The Shield of Azunai DSA510My Edits! 23:32, July 7, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Listing to exit. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 08:59, July 10, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. This history-of-the-future works via giant listcruft, involving many editors who think you get more bonus points the more memes you tick off. Spıke Ѧ 18:55 10-Jul-13
|
Comments |
|
Score: 1
|
Keep (3) |
- Keep.It is one of Aleister's articles (?) Compared to the other dull memes, I would prefer to keep it if possible. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 09:19, July 5, 2013 (UTC)
- Keep. Reasons I will not mention...even under threat of ban --The Shield of Azunai DSA510My Edits! 23:30, July 7, 2013 (UTC)
- Keep.I see no reason to delete all past inside jokes and/or Uncyclopedia-originated memes. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 23:34, July 7, 2013 (UTC)
|
Delete (4) |
- Delete. Very very bad. It has been nominated for deletion once (see its talk page) and the result was to keep for several reasons. Amongst those was the fact that the article got six votes for on VFH and several users considered it to be great. It was a long time ago, so the ancient VFH does not matter anymore and people who still like this article are gone. Anton (talk) 13:08, July 4, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. As I voted before. The fact that the original authors have largely gone elsewhere is not a reason to delete, as this applies to most articles here. However, the article's talk page has the authors patting themselves on the back on their subtlety in inventing a new meme for the website, and in breaking the previous record for adding junk categories to an article. The result is not encyclopedic, funny, or a good read, but yet another page that pranks the reader for the amusement of the authors. Spıke Ѧ 13:51 4-Jul-13
- Delete. If one wants to create a new meme, I think reddit is a much better place than Uncyclopedia. V V I P ® 14:50, July 4, 2013 (UTC)V V I P
- Delete. There is an unhealthy obsession with memes here, sometimes. A purge is warranted. Sir Reverend P. Pennyfeather (fancy a chat?) CUN VFH PLS 00:35, July 5, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Comment. Checking on the voting page, I see I was against it as a feature. That still remains my view. Otherwise, I would prefer to let this sleeping monkey lie (or chimp). --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 09:25, July 5, 2013 (UTC)
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. (1) There is no such organization. (2) This article will only contain (a) real grievances against Britain (not funny) and (b) stereotypical grievances against Britain (that would be funny only through excellent writing, which there isn't). Oh, and (c) numb lists, which there is. When we get to the end, we see an external link to a blog that is trying to create this meme, and we realize that the only function of this article was to hump it. Spıke Ѧ 02:56 5-Jul-13
- Delete. Yeah, honestly, "Vatican't". At least there'll be one less target for our mutual friend Brit-Slayer. Sir Reverend P. Pennyfeather (fancy a chat?) CUN VFH PLS 23:20, July 5, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Because I love Britain (almost)!-- Sir Sinner blah blah 23:26, July 5, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Because. Anton (talk) 06:40, July 6, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. We have a slang name for this kind of article where I come from, "dead." Good idea, poorly written. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 16:51, July 6, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: -1
|
Keep (2) |
- Keep. I sort of quite liked the concept, mainly that German is the last, and smallest, of the languages. I accept it's likely to be a target for vandals, but if there were some way of forcing people looking for Berlin to go through the page it'd be quite good. Sir Reverend P. Pennyfeather (fancy a chat?) CUN VFH PLS 23:06, June 10, 2013 (UTC)
- Keep. I see where the Reverend's coming from it is an intended spoof of the sign and in my mind it works. Perhaps more paragraphs could be added like the history of the sign but at the moment it stands as one of those non-encyclopedic ones that can be accepted because as they are funny. Perhaps it some of the languages the words could actually read phrases that are stereotypical of that country's way of speaking or are that country's stereotype of Americans. For example as a joke add a British English language translation and an Aussie one. The joke works for people who know what Checkpoint Charlie is and a helpful wikipedia template has been provided by author. I do not think the picture is needed but instead a photoshopped version in which the writing on the page is put onto with the picture filling up the page. I will attempt to rewrite how I think the article could look better in my user space however for the moment it is funny. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 10:00, June 11, 2013 (UTC)
- I have begun working on a potential replacement (if wanted/necessary) here. Any comments on my talk page or the talk page of that article or below would be appreciated. Thanks. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 10:35, June 11, 2013 (UTC)
|
Delete (1) |
- Delete. It seems that, at one time, to reach the Uncyclopedia article Berlin, you had to pass through Checkpoint Charlie. This is no longer true. (There is no Checkpoint Charlie any more, nor East Berlin, nor East Berlin). All that is left is the same phrase translated into various languages including Cherokee. If there is clandestine humor, English speakers will never know. Spıke Ѧ 22:13 10-Jun-13
|
Comments |
- Vote closed. Pennyfeather got the joke though I didn't; and something good may come of ScottPat's rework. Spıke Ѧ 03:00 5-Jul-13
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Something about Dick Van Dyke, not a lot about anything use and no connection to Scotland. RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ®
- "What the fuck, man!" As this article careens from furries to taxidermy to mental illness, neither Dick Van Dyke nor Oscar Wilde saves it. Spıke Ѧ 17:13 24-Jun-13
- Delete. Redirect to The Last King of Scotland as they are on the same subject and the Jacobite Revolution is told in this article. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 18:54, June 24, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Redirecting seems fine to me. Sir Reverend P. Pennyfeather (fancy a chat?) CUN VFH PLS 00:51, June 28, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Crying out for a Romartus article to replace it. Sog1970 (talk) 19:05, July 3, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Spike, by doing this method we would have to wait for the page to be deleted and then I would need to re-create it to redirect, surely if we keep the page (as I voted) then we can just blank it and redirect. Less beaureacracy (ahhh! Spelling!) and less hassle for same outcome. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 19:19, June 24, 2013 (UTC)
- (As background, I changed your Keep to a Delete as you seem aligned with us to get rid of the original article; I explain in my Change Summary that it is essentially a Delete with instructions to the moderator.) No, having been nominated, we ought to wait, both for the authors to step forward (tumbleweed illustration here) and for the quorum of 5 votes. You set out the most efficient way to get this done; but when the question is deletion of an entire page, we should mix fairness/openness with efficiency. If we vote to keep the page, then you ought not subsequently blank it; Keep (or deadlock) preserves the original contents, which ought not be renominated for a month. Spıke Ѧ 20:25 24-Jun-13
- Oh I see, thanks, I'll stay on delete then. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 05:53, June 25, 2013 (UTC)
|
Score: 4
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (4) |
- Delete. As Reverend said, this is not a funny article about the French region and, in addition to this, exists under the French name, therefore making it almost completely unnoticeable for the audience. I admit that there are some good jokes and good humor points but I moved everything that I found funny to my article which is now in mainspace: Brittany. If you have any other suggestions, please, tell me and I can always incorporate more. Anton (talk) 20:13, June 22, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete in favor of Brittany. Thank goodness for pages with names in foreign languages! Spıke Ѧ 21:33 22-Jun-13
- Delete. Je pense que deleté et mon francais c'est trés mal. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 08:02, June 23, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Yeah, Anton's article is better. Trés mauvais indeed Scott, should've listened more in lessons! Sir Reverend P. Pennyfeather (fancy a chat?) CUN VFH PLS 00:51, June 28, 2013 (UTC)
- And this wraps it up Didn't like it. Anton did it better. --The Shield of Azunai DSA510My Edits! 05:02, June 28, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: -2
|
Keep (3) |
- Keep. I liked the concept, although it seriously needs cutting down. Sir Reverend P. Pennyfeather (fancy a chat?) CUN VFH PLS 00:51, June 28, 2013 (UTC)
- I have redone the intro and edited the first paragraph. What do you think? Any better? Sir Reverend P. Pennyfeather (fancy a chat?) CUN VFH PLS 01:53, June 28, 2013 (UTC)
- Keep (formerly Delete). My complaint is obsolete that this article is an attempt to document, not to amuse. The Reverend, who has confined himself to proofreading, has already earned a VFD Save for giving this article a comedy concept; my only quibble is that the concept is a pun on the article title, which I hardly think needs to be taken as a given. Spıke Ѧ 03:11 28-Jun-13
- Up Up Down Down... you get the idea Yep, after the improvements done by Reverend, and the fact that list format cannot be avoided... this gets a "pass" from me. --The Shield of Azunai DSA510My Edits! 05:04, June 28, 2013 (UTC)
|
Delete (1) |
Delete. Denza and I watched Anon blank sections and we discussed this ambiguously. I claim this is not an essential article of an encyclopedia but an effort by gamers to document and inform, not to amuse, even though there is some token wackiness thrown in. Spıke Ѧ 01:50 17-Jun-13
Delete.Per above. But some things are okay, so I may create a userspace bit for some of the content for later use. --The Shield of Azunai DSA510My Edits! 02:01, June 18, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. I haven't even finished the first section. Anton (talk) 16:51, June 24, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- After glancing at the page for a minute I thought that it had a nice concept and that the list form couldn't be avoided. I won't decide to vote keep until I have read it however I do not see much wrong with it. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 06:30, June 18, 2013 (UTC)
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. A wasteland of lists and of nonsense numbers, stopping briefly to rant about the victuals served at the SJHSM cafeteria. I bring this here hoping that one of Uncyclopedia's gourmands will step forward and save it. Spıke Ѧ 02:57 16-Jun-13
- Delete. Perhaps someone could make a How To: Cook Spahgetti. Right now there isn't much of an article, but lots of list. Needs (completely) rewritten or deleted in my opinion. --Uncycloperson (talk) 03:47, June 16, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Too listy, I thought that there would be much more humor on spaghetti. --The Shield of Azunai DSA510My Edits! 04:11, June 16, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Who knew it took 69.696969696969696969696969696961 whole seconds to marinate bagels? Sir Reverend P. Pennyfeather (fancy a chat?) CUN VFH PLS 18:34, June 20, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. And I don't think that it deserves saving. A new one would be better. Anton (talk) 16:53, June 24, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 1
|
Keep (2) |
- Keep. The reason why I did not put this article on VFD but just redirected it to another page is because I don't think this article is worth deleting and the new name is more suitable. Russian Czar is a comedy trio consisting of Tsar (???) and two other national stereotypes? Well, if Anna Pavlova is a mass-killer, than this one is actually worth VFH. Isn't it a specific type of humor? Of course, people who expect an article about Russian Czars, will be surprised to see this and this is why I have renamed it. The word Tsar (Czar) spelled differently is can also be a joke. All in all, I don't think the article is very bad, but even if it is, then it should not be deleted but improved.
- P.S.: If you want something about real Russian tsars, I will begin working on it, as soon as I sort out everything connected to Napoleonic wars, Brittany and Anna Pavlova. Anton (talk) 18:57, May 31, 2013 (UTC)
- Keep. Could be a lot worse. --ChiefjusticePS3 16:36, June 21, 2013 (UTC)
|
Delete (3) |
- Delete. Czar, you see, is a comedy trio consisting of Tsar (???) and two other national stereotypes. The article trafficks in stereotypes and ends up with history-of-the-future. Unfunny. Spıke Ѧ 19:08 29-May-13
- Delete. KKK? Just why? Tsar is spelt 3 different ways in this article (maybe the American way as I gather by Spike's above comment). In standard English "Tsar" is the English name for the Russian ruler. Czar is according to wikipedia (so not too trusty): "an informal title for certain high-level officials in the United States and United Kingdom." I am guessing that it is another English dialect's way of spelling Tsar possibly American. Spelling it Tzar is probably just a made up word joking about the fact Tsar can be spelt many different ways but not a funny joke. Seperately do we have a page on the actual Russian Tsar, as if we do then I think Anton was right in renaming it to show that we are talking about the English comedy group "The Russian Czar" (I have never heard of it and it is possibly made up). Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 19:28, May 29, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Terrible. Scott, both Tsar and Czar are equally acceptable, as they are transliterations from a language with a different alphabet, so there isn't a "correct" spelling, so long as you make the right sounds when speaking it. Using it as a government title is just stupid self-aggrandisement by useless, overpaid sods who can offer no proper contribution to society other than the collective pleasure of the nation on their eventual death. Twats. Sir Reverend P. Pennyfeather (fancy a chat?) CUN VFH PLS 23:27, May 29, 2013 (UTC)
- Tsar is a translation from a language with a different alphabet but so are many things in English. "Tsar" is the Standard English spelling however I am not annoyed about that. I am annoyed it was spelt three different ways in this article instead of one making the article look unencyclopedic and badly written. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 06:21, May 30, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Anton199, who has had bad luck in this forum recently, is warned elsewhere not to evade the voting here by simply moving the article to a name no one will ever type. Spıke Ѧ 19:08 29-May-13
- Kept - Over 500 hours on VFD and has failed to attain the requisite votes for deletion. --ChiefjusticePS3 16:36, June 21, 2013 (UTC)
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. This flagrantly ugly page may be amusing to fanboys of the said group; however, on Uncyclopedia, it will always be a moron magnet. Spıke Ѧ 23:01 13-Jun-13
- Delete. Ick. Baaad.--Uncycloperson (talk) 22:01, June 14, 2013 (UTC)
- Who loves bad articles? Encyclopedia Dramatica, maybe, but not I. --The Shield of Azunai DSA510My Edits! 04:08, June 16, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete.Rid us of this evil thing. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 06:04, June 18, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. --ChiefjusticePS3 16:34, June 21, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|