Uncyclopedia:VFH/Nigger Dogshit Sandwiches

Vote	Score: -3.5
Nominated by:	-- absorbent Ape (jump) (Riot Porn) 18:01, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
For: 5.5	Nom & For - this has not been featured yet, so far as I can tell. -- absorbent Ape (jump) (Riot Porn) 18:01, 6 August 2009 (UTC) For. 98.15.222.46 18:05, 6 August 2009 (UTC) For. S-9 8 4 18:06, 6 August 2009 (UTC) SelfFor. But it did win last month's Vote for Sandwiches, lol. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 18:07, 6 August 2009 (UTC) For. Pukey. Everyone should have to read this. *Style* *Guide* 18:32, 6 August 2009 (UTC) fo sho -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 03:21, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
Against: 9	Against Staircase CUN^t 18:04, 6 August 2009 (UTC) Definitely not. This is short, fairly random, and basically the kind of article you expect to read when you click "Random page". Not a feature. pillow talk 19:12, 6 August 2009 (UTC) But it's not bad, right? Right? —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 19:23, 6 August 2009 (UTC) Against. It's no Niggers. –Flashfreez 20:04, 6 August 2009 (UTC) Against as per Hyperbole. Sir Mac Mania GUN— 20:31, 6 August 2009 (UTC) No. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 21:00, Aug 6 Against. Spins an authentic enough yarn and has some good lines, but I'm not sure having "Nigger Dogshit Sandwich" on the front page would be a good advert for uncyc, perhaps better at ED -- El Sid, the lazy one • parlez-vous franglais? 21:40, 6 August 2009 (UTC) That's not really a reason for voting against. Plus, I think the idea of that being on the front page is fucking hilarious. -- absorbent Ape (jump) (Riot Porn) 03:38, 7 August 2009 (UTC) Against. too in-jokey, its more allong the lines of VFG Mn-z 04:42, 7 August 2009 (UTC) Against. Found it short and silly-slapsticky rather than humorous and witty Sir ACROLO KUN • FPW • AOTM • FA •(SPAM) 05:15, 7 August 2009 (UTC) Against. Reminds me of that other horror Niggerlodeon. --*RomArtusImperator ®** (Orate). 06:12, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
Comments: