Uncyclopedia:VFH/Lego

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Lego (history, logs)

Score: -3 missing pieces

Nominated by:

Pup 11:14 06 Jan '12

For: 2
  1. Symbol for vote.svg For. I got tired of waiting for a decent Lego article, so I made one. Pup 11:14 06 Jan '12
  2. Symbol for vote.svg For. Sir SockySexy girls.jpg Mermaid with dolphin.jpg Tired Marilyn Monroe.jpg (talk) (stalk)Magnemite.gif Icons-flag-be.png GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 11:33, 6 January 2012
Against: 5
  1. Against. Feels more like a Lego advertisement. Let's have a talk. J.D. Soufi Why don't you take a seat? 16:25, January 6, 2012 (UTC)
  2. Against. Not because it's not funny, but because it would be a not incredibly funny stub were it not for the subpages, which play on the same joke. EpicAwesomeness (talk) 16:27, January 6, 2012 (UTC)
  3. Against Pretty short and repetitive. Perhaps I would change my vote if there were more than two of the subpages. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 19:53, January 6, 2012 (UTC)
  4. Per them. Also, squanders some chances at pretty hilarious exposition before dropping into the gallery/subpages. Turn this into something akin to an xkcd joint, if you can. --Littleboyonly.jpg TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly.jpg 22:50, January 6, 2012 (UTC)
  5. Against. I agree with what has been saiid. There is more room for parody given the subject matter. The rudiculousness of building impossible shapes is good, but the writing needs more meat. Nikau 23:26, January 6, 2012 (UTC)
Comments:
  • Good production and creative to boot, but the text is unreadable--can it be colourized to stand out--and the page could be framed better. The frame, I don't know, the frame seems crooked. Maybe more of a good thing. To be serious, when something is already this good it might as well be great. Aleister 16:44 6-1-'12
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Abstain. The pictures on the Belvedere cube page are very pixelated which is a turn-off. Also, as ZB said, it would be better with more subpages. Pretty good as is though. --Talk to me! Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:15, January 6, 2012 (UTC)

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH