Uncyclopedia:VFH/Humanity: A Retrospective

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

Humanity: A Retrospective (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Vote	Score: 23 excessively logical aliens
Nominated by:	Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 00:29, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
For: 23	Self Nom & For - I would like to see this featured. If any person wishes to abstain/vote against, some feedback would be very much appreciated. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 00:29, 27 December 2007 For It's improved from when I peed on it. People might say "Well it's not really super lol funny"... For me, this is exactly the sort of thing we should be featuring. MrN  Fork you! 02:24, Dec 28 For It's not laugh-out-loud hilarious, but it's a good read.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 28 / 03:23) For --Sir Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN) 09:45, Dec. 29, 2007 For--Æ 16:11, 29 December 2007 (UTC) For. Sir Groovester | Contributions | Talk Page 20:49, 29 December 2007 (UTC) For It's on the short side, but I don't give a damn, my dear.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 20:55, 29 December 2007 (UTC) For - Excellent idea. — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 04:22, 31 December 2007 (UTC) For. -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 09:42, Jan. 1, 2008 09:42, 1 January 2008 (UTC) For--Sir Shandon (Talk) (Trophy Room) 12:32, 1 January 2008 (UTC) For. Per Cajek. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 12:36, 1 January 2008 (UTC) Okay. I don't hate it. Ж Kalir, Awesome Author(alliteration affords additional awesome) 07:37, 2 January 2008 (UTC) For I hear people saying that this isn't funny, but on the contrary it really is. It's a nice social commentary for anybody intelligent enough to understand what the fuck is going on (which is probably surprisingly less people than you may think), but its overall satirical value is its strong point. That having been said, I'd like to see it featured, although I'd also like to see some more added to it. It has potential to be much better than it is now, and it's already pretty good. -RAHB 22:17, 2 January 2008 (UTC) For --Sir Xiao Li CUN VFH NS (Talk) 11:18, 6 January 2008 (UTC) For Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) For. good read, loved the pics.--Moneke 06:43, 9 January 2008 (UTC) What RAHB said. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 04:22, Jan 10 Strong For - I have to add this one to my Favorites it is awesome and it was a great read. I think I know what the 3rd Gender is. --—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sawblade5 (talk • contribs) 05:59, 12 January 2008 (UTC) For. Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) For. MrN  Fork you! 17:18, Jan 12 For--Lieutenant THEDUDEMAN Dude ... Totally UOTM KUN GotA F@H 07:30, 13 January 2008 (UTC) For - --Dr. Love 17:18, 13 January 2008 (UTC) For -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 22:22, 13 January 2008 (UTC) For Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me!
Against: 0
Comments:	Pee Review here. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 00:29, 27 December 2007 (UTC) Yeah, unfortunately you can't vote twice Sev. Thanks for trying though. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 12:17, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article