Uncyclopedia:VFH/Akira Kurosawa (2nd nomination)

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

Akira Kurosawa (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Vote	Score: 16.5 film critics
Nominated by:	—Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 23:10, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
For: 16.5	Self-Nom & For. I know I self-nominate a lot, but after the most positive Pee Review I ever got, it's warranted. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 23:10, 10 June 2009 (UTC) For. Jeez, this guy self-noms a lot! ...but the article's good. I enjoyed Dooty *giggle* more, but this is pretty good.   Le Cejak • <23:12 Jun 10, 2009> For. I found some of the critics' lines a bit forced, but the last line of this article is such an awesome payoff. IronLung 00:08, 11 June 2009 (UTC) For I was going to nom this, but then I thought, Cajek'll do it. How wrong I was. --Globaltourniquet - (was TPLN) 01:53, 11 June 2009 (UTC) For. I did make some suggestions for a change in structure but I see Guildy didn't go in that direction. Still, despite that the article is good enough for VFH. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 06:19, 11 June 2009 (UTC) Yup. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 10:55, 11 June 2009 (UTC) For. Uncyclopedia's filmmakers series is getting quite comprehensive! --Dame 12:18, 11 June 2009 (UTC) For. per above. Mnb'z 14:12, 11 June 2009 (UTC) Fur --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 14:54, 11 June 2009 (UTC) For. OK - I capitulate. Guildy you bastard you're a fucking android or something. Style  Guide 18:53, 11 June 2009 (UTC) For. T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 19:08, 11 June 2009 (UTC) For. ~ 21:47, 11 June 2009 (UTC) ' For.'. It's got a good beat and I can definitely dance to it!  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  05:19, 12 June 2009 (UTC) Fucking Genius Colour Sig For Make Mahm00shA Look Cool 12:16 June 12 '09 For -PET 15:05, 12 June 2009 (UTC) For. Needs moar Will Smith. --UU - natter 15:13, Jun 12
Against: 0	For. 117.192.102.94 21:38, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
Comments:	Comment. Yes, I do self-nominate a lot, but in my defense people rarely nominate for me, and when they do it's always (somehow) when my article isn't ready. Funny how stuff works like that. Though it's sort of funny, Cajek said that Duty was really good, and that is should be on VFH, but didn't nom it (even though every third article on here is nominated by Cajek, it seems), and then Globey gave me the best Pee Review I've ever had (46/50!), and didn't nominate said article either. It's like, dude, what's up with that? Not that I'm complaining--I suppose when things come down to it I'd rather have such things in my hands--but just saying. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 23:25, 10 June 2009 (UTC) Comment. I agree with Guildy. I should've nommed it.   Le Cejak • <0:43 Jun 11, 2009> Comment I agree with Cajek. He should have nommed it. --Globaltourniquet - (was TPLN) 01:53, 11 June 2009 (UTC) Comment I agree with GlobalTourniquet. I should've nommed it.   Le Cejak • <1:58 Jun 11, 2009> Comment. I agree with everyone, including myself. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 04:46, 11 June 2009 (UTC) Comment. I agree with myself, and that's about it. Thanks for listening. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 11:04, 11 June 2009 (UTC) Comment I just wanna say, Guildensternenstein got a 46/50 before- from Saberwolf, on MGS3. And let me say, you don't get a 46 from Saberwolf often. It's Me Bitches! Don't worry, I won't kill you. I don't agree with Socky, because he's a whore. Also, I forgot about that 46 on MGS3. I remember the 45 on MGS1, though. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 15:00, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article