Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/archive162

This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion.

Buickman

Keep
Delete	Delete. Crap. Lucario! 20:15, 8 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 20:16, 8 November 2008 (UTC) Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 21:57, 8 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. Garbage from 2006.--Mnbvcxz 01:03, 9 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. I am the real BuickMan and this article stinks. We need a good article on the LaCrosse (and the literal meaning of it XD per Wikipedia: la crosse means masturbation or swindling in Québecois slang). ----Pleb- Sawblade5 ^{[citation needed]}⁽ ^yell ^\| ^FAQ ^\| ^{I did this} ⁾ 07:35, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
Comments

Doctor Who - The Force Unleashed

Keep	Strong keep - incorrectly formatted, pushed VFD above 20 - Some one else can re nominate this correctly--Sycamore (Talk) 21:56, 8 November 2008 (UTC) Strong keep -following sycamore--Mnbvcxz 01:11, 9 November 2008 (UTC) Strong keep - I spent hours making this. If it isn't very funny why not edit it yourself and make it more funny, there are worse articles worthy of deletion than this one. --The Imperial Judge EvilCecil4th 04:23, 9 November 2008 (UTC) Weak keep. Excuse my french, but holy shit is that ever a listy page. Needs a good delisting. In general, lists of more than six things have too many things on their lists. After a certain point, more is not better. Instead, it's worse. Worse is worser, or less better, than good. Worse is bad. Bad things make me sad. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 04:30, 9 November 2008 (UTC) Slightly more than Weak, but not quite medium Keep Mr N Fork you! 04:54, Nov 9
Delete	Delete. - I'm all for randomness, but it seems like this is an in-joke someone cooked up while off their Ritalin. The entire thing was done by one person, and it just isn't very funny. ShadowMan 21:18, 8 November 2008 (UTC) D1337 To quote the gawd-awful Captain Picard page, What the fuck is this shit?!? Colin ALL YOUR BASEHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 21:36, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
Comments	Comment of some kind. At the time that this was nom'd there were 20 articles here, but one had been huffed, leaving 19. Also, I had four apples, then James took two apples. This means that I have two apples, and James is a dirty apple stealer! Damn you, James! Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 03:06, 9 November 2008 (UTC) Keept -RA HB 05:39, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

Odd

Keep	Weak keep. Odd is what it is. I dunno, I can't think of anything better for an Odd page than nonsensical and colourful writing... --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 22:26, 4 November 2008 (UTC) Keep. Wasn't sold on the colourful writing and eyesore template overload, but a reversion to the version that's been around for longer and I think it's OK. --UU - natter 22:36, Nov 4 Weak Keep Needs a rewrite, or at least an expansion. The title is appropriate for a nonsense article.--Mnbvcxz 03:31, 5 November 2008 (UTC) Keep.--Sycamore (Talk) 15:10, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
Delete	Delete. - Colorful, but completely incoherent. pillow talk 15:31, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
Comments	Kept -RA HB 02:56, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

Template:AOC

Keep	Strong Speedy Keep This template serves iots own purpose of warning users that may not understand what the artcle is about that they need to know more about to get the joke. This one has the redlink has already been fixed by an IP, so I see no reason for delete here and the rational is invalid. Anyway I don't think this template is ugly at all. ----Pleb- Sawblade5 ^{[citation needed]}⁽ ^yell ^\| ^FAQ ^\| ^{I did this} ⁾ 10:53, 4 November 2008 (UTC) Keep Very strong keep. Cunts. --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 21:51, 5 November 2008 (UTC) Keep it serves a purpose, as its an actual warning sign.--Mnbvcxz 23:03, 5 November 2008 (UTC) Keep Not pointless. Mr N Fork you! 20:41, Nov 7 Keep It's kinda funny. Keep it around. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 01:00, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
Delete	Delete. - A big ugly brick that sits at the top of an article. This one even comes with its own redlink. pillow talk 21:52, 2 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. Happy to see the back of pointless templates. --UU - natter 10:35, Nov 3 Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 14:16, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
Comments	Comment. AAAAAAAAA! This template really did confuse me when I placed my rational for keep above. It is indeed serving its purpose to me. ----Pleb- Sawblade5 ^{[citation needed]}⁽ ^yell ^\| ^FAQ ^\| ^{I did this} ⁾ 10:56, 4 November 2008 (UTC) Kept -RA HB 02:58, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

Ussher

Keep	Keep - The concept might be redeemable, but it needs a major rewrite.--Mnbvcxz 21:05, 2 November 2008 (UTC) Keep - It's coherent, non-random, and seems like a good starting point. pillow talk 02:25, 3 November 2008 (UTC) Keep He's right you know. This is actually good satire. I added two pics and had a little fiddle, and well. OK, the fiddle had nothing to do with the article, but it's actually not bad. Unlike me. I'm BAD. MJ style. What? Mr N Fork you! 21:35, Nov 7 Keep. Eh. --UU - natter 08:48, Nov 8
Delete	Delete. - Awful Religion bio, poor throughout little progress since 2006--Sycamore (Talk) 20:23, 1 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. What Syc said. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 02:41, 2 November 2008 (UTC) ~~Delete. Crap throughout. --UU - natter 09:40, Nov 2~~ Kerkill I see nothing worth keeping. --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 21:42, 5 November 2008 (UTC) Delete Well, I must have missed what the 'concept' was. Also, I don't see anyone other than the author fixing it. Mr N Fork you! 20:40, Nov 7 -- Balls. Mr N Fork you! 21:35, Nov 7 Well, you're aware that the article is 100% true, only told in a sarcastic way, right? pillow talk 21:11, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
Comments	Kept -RA HB 02:58, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

Category:Digimon

Keep	Keep. - this should be kept - only categories which are utterly useless and irrelevent to the topic should be deleted--Sycamore (Talk) 19:18, 7 November 2008 (UTC) Keep, I guess. Sycamore is kind of the category guy around here. He knows better than me. Although, for some reason, he has included in, creating a recursive loop when you try to expand the category. Which means that it seems like an infinite number of pages called Category:My sojourn are contained within. This is the result of a rogue template that infects anything with the {{random}} template with the Random category. Arguably, that template should be subst'ed in, and the cat removed manually. In fact, I should do that right now instead of typing about it. pillow talk 19:46, 7 November 2008 (UTC) Keep Mr N Fork you! 20:35, Nov 7 keep Many of the categories are joke categories created for a specific page, and this is far from the worst one. See Category:Useless Category for some that are much worse.--Mnbvcxz 00:16, 8 November 2008 (UTC) Keep. --UU - natter 09:00, Nov 8
Delete	Delete. Overly narrow category. Unless we get an article on the popular porn star Renamon, I doubt this will ever be expanded. (Actually, the Digimon article sucks too, but that's another story.) Lucario! 19:10, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
Comments	Kept -RA HB 02:55, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

Template:Bored

Keep	Weak keep. It's kinda cute, and since it's mostly just on userpages, may as well leave it around for their own entertainment. It's like deleting an unfunny userbox: it's funny to somebody, and that's all that really matters for them. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 00:11, 7 November 2008 (UTC) Keep. ~ 00:11, 7 November 2008 (UTC) Keep. - reasonable, I also think its alright on any pages thats its been left on--Sycamore (Talk) 13:58, 7 November 2008 (UTC) Keep. Eh. --UU - natter 08:57, Nov 8 Keep. Per above, come on leave templates that are used on userspaces alone. This is not Wikipedia. ----Pleb- Sawblade5 ^{[citation needed]}⁽ ^yell ^\| ^FAQ ^\| ^{I did this} ⁾ 11:34, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
Delete	Delete. - Completely pointless. pillow talk 22:09, 6 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. ~~- useless and unfunny.--Mnbvcxz 23:27, 6 November 2008 (UTC)~~ changed to keep, per the policy against deleting user page templates.--Mnbvcxz 00:21, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
Comments	Unless anyone objects, if this is kept based on Monkey's reasoning, I'm thinking about taking it off every page it's on that isn't a userpage. pillow talk 01:41, 7 November 2008 (UTC) Hm. I also fiddled around with it a bit to make it a little funnier, and I think it helps. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 22:18, 7 November 2008 (UTC) I would object to that, because by doing that you're circumventing VFD. It this is kept, let it stay in its articles. ~ 11:47, 8 November 2008 (UTC) Well, I would argue that I'm not circumventing VFD, because I'm bringing it up right here on VFD. Besides, doesn't anyone, at any time, have the right to remove a template from a page if they don't find it funny on that page? pillow talk 18:51, 8 November 2008 (UTC) For example - do you honestly think that Template:Bored has any place being at the top of Airport security? pillow talk 18:58, 8 November 2008 (UTC) Feel free to do so on individual pages, not as a policy. ~ 21:59, 8 November 2008 (UTC) What if it's not funny anywhere?--Mnbvcxz 00:21, 9 November 2008 (UTC) Kept -RA HB 02:55, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

Salvia

Keep	Weak keep. I rewrote it. I don't think I did a great job on this one, though. Still, I think it rises above VFD quality. pillow talk 19:40, 6 November 2008 (UTC) Keep. - Also, I refuse to vote on anyone who flood VFD above twenty, please read the instructions in future Lucario!, thanks--Sycamore (Talk) 19:43, 6 November 2008 (UTC) Keep. Following Sycamore's opinion.--Mnbvcxz 23:12, 6 November 2008 (UTC) Keep. All it needed was some spit and polish. Mr N Fork you! 21:03, Nov 7 Keep. Fine. --UU - natter 08:56, Nov 8
Delete	Delete. Written by unfunny monkeys who don't know what a shift key is. Full of typoawesoiptruaweoithasdkjfhalksdfhjlkweahrleiafhkajldsghkjls and whatnot. Lucario! 18:47, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
Comments	How is this funny in any way? I still don't get it. Lucario! 20:27, 6 November 2008 (UTC) You're not liking my rewrite too much, huh? pillow talk 20:30, 6 November 2008 (UTC) It's a start, but I still don't see potential here. Lucario! 21:48, 6 November 2008 (UTC) Well, fair enough. So this is about your fourth day here, huh? Hope you're liking it. pillow talk 22:07, 6 November 2008 (UTC) Kept -RA HB 02:55, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

A UTP: Link Gets Pregnant and Dies

Keep	Keep.--Sycamore (Talk) 19:43, 6 November 2008 (UTC) What the living hell is this? Shoot, I don't like it, but it doesn't quite feel delete-worthy, either. Weak keep. pillow talk 19:57, 6 November 2008 (UTC) Keep. Link getting pregnant: check. Link dying: check. Yep, this has got everything promised. So no, it's not fantabulous, but it's mildly amusing. I enjoyed reading it. Once. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 22:21, 7 November 2008 (UTC) Weak Keep. OK, I guess. --UU - natter 08:55, Nov 8
Delete	Delete. Please keep the YouTube poops on YouTube where they belong. Actually, scratch that, all YTP's should burn in hell. Lucario! 18:42, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
Comments	That article is a rip off of YouTube Poops. I really don't see how its delete worthy, its coherent, and its original (i.e. we don't have other YTP ripoffs floating on the site.) Also, there are article that are much worse than this one on floating around.--Mnbvcxz 23:02, 6 November 2008 (UTC) BTW, does anyone know hot to format it so the DYK templates won't off-center the images?--Mnbvcxz 00:42, 8 November 2008 (UTC) Kept -RA HB 02:55, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

Partial differential equation

Keep	Keep.--Sycamore (Talk) 19:44, 6 November 2008 (UTC) Strong keep. You kidding? This is fucking awesome. A real diamond in the rough. pillow talk 19:59, 6 November 2008 (UTC) Keep. What they said.--Mnbvcxz 23:19, 6 November 2008 (UTC) Keep. Not funny at all?Ethereal 04:57, 8 November 2008 (UTC) Keep. Eh. --UU - natter 08:53, Nov 8 Keep. It's funny to them's as understand it. Honest. Asahatter (annoy) 00:31, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
Delete	Delete. Utter crap, not funny at all. Doesn't even freaking make sense. Lucario! 18:11, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
Comments	Kept -RA HB 02:55, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

Australian soap opera

Keep
Delete	Delete. - Poor 2005 stub, unfunny and pointless, there has been little progress either--Sycamore (Talk) 14:02, 6 November 2008 (UTC) Delete Crappy stub. Lucario! 18:13, 6 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. Clearly not worth keeping. pillow talk 20:01, 6 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. Pants, stub. Mr N Fork you! 05:02, Nov 8 Delete. Short 'n' shit. --UU - natter 08:52, Nov 8
Comments

Wag

Keep	Keep. It reminds me a lot of Cheapinitreal's Kitty Porn. The Photoshops are, you know, better than I can do, and the writing is competent if not entirely inspired. It needs work, but it doesn't really necessitate deletion. pillow talk 22:04, 5 November 2008 (UTC) Keep. It needs a serious red link purgeage, which I might just do, but otherwise, it's decent. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 22:25, 5 November 2008 (UTC) Strong Keep This article is safely above average for this wiki. I don't see what's wrong with it, granted, I'm looking at it after the red purge.--Mnbvcxz 00:49, 7 November 2008 (UTC) Keep'. Eh. --UU - natter 08:51, Nov 8
Delete	Delete. - Disturbing Canine erotica, poor and random throughout. I also think the autheor should be sectioned and not allowed to keep animals.--Sycamore (Talk) 15:09, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
Comments	Kept -RA HB 02:56, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

Astro Boy

Keep	Weak Keep Its not too mind-numbingly awful, and the subject is fairly well known. It could stand a rewrite though.--Mnbvcxz 02:20, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
Delete	Delete. - Awful. Just awful. pillow talk 22:08, 2 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. Barely more than a listy stub, and I didn't see any decent ideas hiding within. --UU - natter 11:00, Nov 3 Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 14:16, 3 November 2008 (UTC) Delete.--Asahatter (annoy) 10:01, 6 November 2008 (UTC) Delete.--If you want it, userspace it. It's gone nowhere in a while... Mr N Fork you! 20:43, Nov 7
Comments

Template:Bzt

Keep
Delete	Delete. - So lame. pillow talk 22:09, 6 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. - In addition, it is included in a grand total of zero articles, and is linked to only once, and that is from this VFD page.--Mnbvcxz 23:24, 6 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. - No use, no purpose. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 00:09, 7 November 2008 (UTC) Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 13:59, 7 November 2008 (UTC) Bzt Delete, not funny. Lucario! 19:04, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
Comments

Template:Black humor

Keep
Delete	Delete. - Always nice to start off articles with a big red link, no? No. pillow talk 22:09, 6 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. - Doesn't serve a purpose, unlike some warning templates--Mnbvcxz 23:21, 6 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. Black people! --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 00:05, 7 November 2008 (UTC) Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 13:57, 7 November 2008 (UTC) Delete Unfunny, contains a red link. Lucario! 19:06, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
Comments

Scytho-Siberian man

Keep	Keep. It's papers like this that flunked me out of college. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 09:59, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
Delete	Delete. - Not the least bit funny or good. pillow talk 15:31, 4 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 22:29, 4 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. Odd, random and... actually, it's just odd and random. --UU - natter 22:39, Nov 4 Delete what they said.--Mnbvcxz 03:21, 5 November 2008 (UTC) Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 09:47, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
Comments

Black Sabbath

Keep
Delete	Nom and delete. A big wall of unreadably bad text. The Holy Ghost 15:34, 4 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. Yup, block o' text bandcruft. Couldn't see any ideas worth keeping. A Sabbath page would be a good thing, but only if it's wayyyy better than this. --UU - natter 22:17, Nov 4 Delete This article is such an eyesore in terms of concept, execution, grammar, formatting and humour that it seems hopeless to even try to edit it. --Mattfca 12:13, 4 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. All kinds of awful. The closer you look, the worse it gets.--Mnbvcxz 23:11, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
Comments	Errr...Did you nom it? Or was is nommed by the holy ghost? ~ 15:34, 4 November 2008 (UTC) I nommed it. -- Mattfca 23:47, 4 November 2008 (UTC) What he means is that, generally, you put your nomination in the "delete" column as "nom and delete", so that you're also voting delete. Because, if you don't want it deleted, why nominate it? pillow talk 00:38, 5 November 2008 (UTC) Oh, thanks. Mattfca 02:03, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

NME

Keep	Keep.- I thought it was pretty funny... especially the "regular columns" Weak keep. This is the kind of article that's going to keep getting edited by IPs and recreated after deletion unless an editor takes a concerted effort to be the gatekeeper. (I know: I somehow ended up the gatekeeper of both Solid Snake and Barney.) So the question is: is this incarnation any worse than what they'd put up in a week? And the answer is: No... no, probably not. pillow talk 21:24, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
Delete	Delete. - Although the topic is "accociated" with coolness due to Indie Rock intviews etc, its a poor topic and the article is poor throughout. Its mostly the work of IPs and it shows listy and incoherent.--Sycamore (Talk) 16:41, 23 October 2008 (UTC) Delete. Ranty as well. --UU - natter 12:23, Oct 24 Huff! Judge Adriano "Legal" Zarbi Talk! 17:49, 24 October 2008 (UTC) Hipsters making fun of other hipsters? Yeah, no thanks. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 19:04, 26 October 2008 (UTC) Delete. ^^agreed PaddyAtkinson 01:47, 1 November 2008 (UTC) Kerkill I had never even heard of NME before. All that is currently there is right now is "Arctic Monkeys, blah, blah, blah, Arctic Monkeys jumping on my cock, blah, blah, blah..." Arctic Monkeys suck, by the way. --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 21:46, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
Comments

Leicester City FC

Keep
Delete	Delete. Footiecruft. It's crap, it's the usual bile and vitriol from supporters of rival teams, and none of it is funny. It's also not linked from anywhere else on the site, and basically it needs to go. --UU - natter 11:03, Nov 5 Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 15:10, 5 November 2008 (UTC) No one will miss it. (One of my favorite justifications for murder!) pillow talk 22:00, 5 November 2008 (UTC) He's big, fat, gay, Serbian, a terrorist, a pedophile and lives in a cardboard box. Comedy gold! --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 22:24, 5 November 2008 (UTC) Delete Total crap. Lucario! 18:27, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
Comments

Gilded Monk

Keep
Delete	Delete. - Someone seems to have been using this article as a sandbox. Or a litter box. pillow talk 15:31, 4 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. I read it twice. It made no sense both times. --UU - natter 22:20, Nov 4 Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 09:47, 5 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. What they said.--Mnbvcxz 23:27, 5 November 2008 (UTC) Delete.'Asahatter' (annoy) 09:54, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
Comments

Thunder

Keep
Delete	Delete. - This article has a "soft rewrite" tag on it. I think that's far too charitable. pillow talk 23:16, 3 November 2008 (UTC) Weak Delete - The article is basically a snub with lots of headers and lists to make it look longer. However, the subject matter might be savable as a re-write.--Mnbvcxz 23:29, 3 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. Might as well leave a blank canvas, nothing to work from here that I can see. --UU - natter 10:17, Nov 4 Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 15:13, 5 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. We need an article on thunder. This isn't it. Asahatter (annoy) 10:02, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
Comments

Jacoby Shaddix

Keep
Delete	Delete. - Poor music themed article, unfunny and messy throughout--Sycamore (Talk) 15:54, 2 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. - Article needs more red-links, out of the blue gay references, and should use the word "douchebag" at least 3 more times.--Mnbvcxz 21:01, 2 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. Short, unfunny, redlinky, infinitely forgettable crap. --UU - natter 10:32, Nov 3 Delete. This page bleeds. And sucks. Like your sister. pillow talk 23:20, 3 November 2008 (UTC) Kerkill More like my mommy. --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 21:50, 5 November 2008 (UTC) Die Nothing redeemable here Asahatter (annoy) 10:00, 6 November 2008 (UTC) Kill it with fire Unsalvageable crap. Even Encyclopedia Dramatica wouldn't take this. Lucario! 18:36, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
Comments

Fiat punto

Keep
Delete	Delete. Short, random, unfunny, badly written ICU escapist. Get rid. --UU - natter 09:47, Nov 2 Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 15:55, 2 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. beyond redemption, obscure subject, dates contract each other.--Mnbvcxz 20:57, 2 November 2008 (UTC) Bleah. pillow talk 23:19, 3 November 2008 (UTC) Kerkill --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 21:49, 5 November 2008 (UTC) Yuck Asahatter (annoy) 09:59, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
Comments

Heat Magazine

Keep	Keep. You should have seen the state of it before I tidied it up. How about some practical suggestions before whining and sending it into oblivion? Would a Pee Review help here? -- Guybles _CUN 14:15, 28 October 2008 (UTC) *Weak keep - The article is listy and unfunny. But if Guybles wants more time with it, I say we give it to him. The guy has written an FA, after all. pillow talk 21:29, 28 October 2008 (UTC) Keep - it's much better now, not perfect, but not huffable Asahatter (annoy) 09:58, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
Delete	Delete. - Poor magazine article, intially it seems alright, but its just junk, and its a poor concept that isn't really a great place for satire or parody.--Sycamore (Talk) 16:35, 23 October 2008 (UTC) Delete. The idea is kind of alright, but as Syc says, the further you go, the more it stinks. --UU - natter 12:19, Oct 24 Huff! Judge Adriano "Legal" Zarbi Talk! 17:49, 24 October 2008 (UTC) Delete. Sycamore's right: now that Guybles has a copy of the article to work on, we can safely get rid of this until he's done. pillow talk 01:45, 3 November 2008 (UTC) Kerkill --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 21:40, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
Comments	Comment - Guybles, this article is awful - I doubt any amount of piss will help - maybe create a new version in you userspace and rewrite it (you can copy the old version over)?--Sycamore (Talk) 20:00, 28 October 2008 (UTC) Thanks; that was a little more sporting than just taking an axe to it. I'll take it back to userspace and reinvent it someday soon. -- Guybles _CUN 13:38, 29 October 2008 (UTC) That still means that this should be huffed, you've made a handful of edits in the past while - I've seen that you have a verison in your userspace now, that (when finished) should be moved over.--Sycamore (Talk) 17:11, 1 November 2008 (UTC) No clear decision after a week and a bit (2:5). Also, Guybles, don't take the VFD template off until the page is done here, even if you rewrite the whole page. Keep'd. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 19:01, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

UnNews:Mickey Mouse inexplicably wins 2008 election

Keep
Delete	Ix-nay for several reasons. Terrible images, poor formatting, too many templates, and I believe that we already have an article that has some random loon beating Obama. sir sysrq @ 02:38 Nov 6 Sadly, I really, really did not enjoy this UnNews. pillow talk 05:28, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
Comments	Invalid. It's less than a day old. ~ 10:12, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

Peter André

Keep
Delete	Delete. - Words fail me. pillow talk 15:31, 4 November 2008 (UTC) I got one for you: IAZCRMTOFHDDDAAKTLGMOOHBDGMOOHBINSEFMFC. Seriously, what the hell? --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 22:27, 4 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. Seems fairly coherent, for your average Peter Andre/Jordan fan. --UU - natter 22:38, Nov 4 Delete random babbling.--Mnbvcxz 03:26, 5 November 2008 (UTC) Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 15:10, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
Comments

The Space Pope

Keep
Delete	Delete. - Extremely unfunny. Listy. Too many templates. Full of tired memes. Too many leading quotes. Basically, everything most of our bad articles are. pillow talk 23:16, 3 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. Inconsistent, crap. No humor whatsoever, and meme laden--Mnbvcxz 23:25, 3 November 2008 (UTC) God damn it. -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 00:31, 4 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. Per Hype. --UU - natter 10:14, Nov 4 Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 15:13, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
Comments

Template:Bat Fuck Insane

Keep	Keep, for all the reasons that Hyperbole listed. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 22:22, 2 November 2008 (UTC) Keep. - Useful, funny, and popular. --iseditor.user ^Comments/_Criticism 22:25, 2 November 2008 (UTC) Keep. because it makes Uncyclopedia that much more, well, you know... Bat Fuck Insane. And about what Hyperbole says, Bat Fuck Insanity is funny and not just stupid! WackoMcGoose 23:19, 2 November 2008 (UTC) Keep. - Sometimes, I want to read something that's crazy and nonsensical, as long as it's still funny. This template has become sort of a beacon: this article may not make any damn sense, but it's funny. Read it, enjoy it, and then never ever feature it. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 00:07, 3 November 2008 (UTC) Keep. Its a warning template for nonsense. Nonsense can be funny on occasion, and sometimes, some people are in the mood for nonsense. You don't want to fall in the "this idea has been overused, therefore, its banned for ever and ever amen" error.--Mnbvcxz 02:00, 3 November 2008 (UTC) Keep. Hate it, but it serves a point. --UU - natter 10:59, Nov 3 Keep. ~ 00:33, 4 November 2008 (UTC) Keep. Don't dare delete Admin made templates. ----Pleb- Sawblade5 ^{[citation needed]}⁽ ^yell ^\| ^FAQ ^\| ^{I did this} ⁾ 10:44, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
Delete	Delete. - Okay, before you kick my ass over this, yes: I know this is Famine's template. Yes: I know it's an Uncyclopedia institution. Yes: I know it's linked to hundreds and hundreds of articles. But I hate the fucking thing. It's like an announcement: "This article fails UN:HTBFANJS and generally sucks, and this template exists to brag about that. Well... let's just see how everyone else feels about this one. Maybe I'm out of line on this one. We'll see. pillow talk 22:15, 2 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. Yeah, terrible. Le Cejak • <0:11 Nov 03, 2008> Delete. - Utter crap--Sycamore (Talk) 08:58, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
Comments	Keep'd. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 09:57, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

Template:Anarchists

Keep
Delete	Delete. - There is no conceivable way this could enhance the humor value of an article. Instead, it sits at the top of shitty articles like Death Cab for Cutie and says, "Hey, there will be a two-second delay before you read this shitty article." pillow talk 22:09, 2 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. - Obvious spam template. --iseditor.user ^Comments/_Criticism 00:55, 3 November 2008 (UTC) Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 08:58, 3 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. Happy to see the back of pointless templates. --UU - natter 10:54, Nov 3 Delete. What a POS template. ----Pleb- Sawblade5 ^{[citation needed]}⁽ ^yell ^\| ^FAQ ^\| ^{I did this} ⁾ 10:45, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
Comments

Hobo-gravity

Keep
Delete	Delete. Another friendless article, no links, no edits in over a year. I did briefly think about trying to fix it up, but when I looked closer, couldn't really find a coherent concept worth fixing. --UU - natter 14:02, Nov 3 Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 14:13, 3 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. Unsalvageable. pillow talk 15:56, 3 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. Seems like it could be a decent idea for a stub, but the execution is too terrible, and a stub is all it could ever be. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 22:06, 3 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. what they said. It almost approaches a potential good snub, but falls short.--Mnbvcxz 23:09, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
Comments

Haxsword

Keep
Delete	Delete. 2006cruft. Unfunny stub. Not linked from anywhere, not got any better in the last couple of years, won't be missed, get rid. --UU - natter 13:43, Nov 3 Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 14:14, 3 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. I fail to see the humor in someone coming here to whine that he lost a game because he didn't have the best weapon. pillow talk 15:57, 3 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 22:04, 3 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. Doesn't even make sense. A nOOb is by definition not smart enough to use a hax.--Mnbvcxz 23:13, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
Comments

Harbinger

Keep
Delete	Delete. Seriously, what the fuck? --UU - natter 13:40, Nov 3 Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 14:14, 3 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. I've never heard of PoxNora, which apparently is some kind of Magic:The Gathering/ Civ 4 hybrid that's mostly played by Linux geeks - but I have a hard time believing I'd find this funny even if I had. pillow talk 16:01, 3 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. I was expecting the HARBINGERS OF DOOM and was fully prepared to vote for, but I was disappointed. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 22:03, 3 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. Utter unfunny nonsense.--Mnbvcxz 23:19, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
Comments

Grizzlybearwood

Keep
Delete	Delete. Towncruft. Really bad towncruft. I was going to remove the vanity from it, but then I realised that 1: all the rest of it was crap, and 2: it's had no edits since creation, it's not linked to, no-one gives a fuck about it, and it would be better if it just died a quick death. --UU - natter 13:37, Nov 3 Delete. - There is some funny moments there, I don' think this will be imrpoved though--Sycamore (Talk) 14:15, 3 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. Very strange. Didn't make me laugh. pillow talk 16:02, 3 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. Cool town name, though. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 22:01, 3 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. -see above.--Mnbvcxz 23:36, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
Comments

Template:Black Jesus

Keep	Fuck yo shit. This is one of the few templates I like. I will fuck yo shit up if you delete it. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 00:15, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
Delete	Delete. - Litters the top of Jesus Christ. We can do so much better. pillow talk 22:19, 2 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. Genocide to article templates! Le Cejak • <0:10 Nov 03, 2008> Delete - Black people talkin' ain't always funny, dawg. Yo, word. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 00:11, 3 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. - If nobady minds I could QVFD the lot of these and save some time? --Sycamore (Talk) 08:57, 3 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. Happy to see the back of pointless templates. (/me hides my shit from TKF). --UU - natter 11:01, Nov 3 ~~Lynch~~ Delete. -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 00:21, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
Comments

Template:BigChicken

Keep
Delete	Delete. - Why would we possibly need so many templates about "the author of this article"? We certainly don't need one that's a bad dick pun. (MrN, don't get any ideas.) pillow talk 22:17, 2 November 2008 (UTC) Delete - Yeah. It's kinda funny, but templates are really just kind of annoying when it gets down to it. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 00:09, 3 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. -Pointless. It might work good as a pseudo-template in one or two articles, but not as a template.--Mnbvcxz 02:09, 3 November 2008 (UTC) Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 08:57, 3 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. Happy to see the back of pointless templates. Mind you, bad dick puns: the article... /me gets any ideas... --UU - natter 10:58, Nov 3
Comments

Template:Banana republic

Keep
Delete	Delete. - Does not enhance the funniness of any of the articles onto which it is transcluded. pillow talk 22:10, 2 November 2008 (UTC) Delete - I don't get it. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 00:08, 3 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. serves no real purpose.--Mnbvcxz 02:04, 3 November 2008 (UTC) Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 08:58, 3 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. Happy to see the back of pointless templates. --UU - natter 10:56, Nov 3
Comments

Template:Ad hominem parody

Keep
Delete	Delete. - Whatever the hell this is, it isn't funny. pillow talk 21:54, 2 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. Unfunny and spam template. --iseditor.user ^Comments/_Criticism Delete. what they said.--Mnbvcxz 02:27, 3 November 2008 (UTC) Delete.--Sycamore (Talk) 08:59, 3 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. Happy to see the back of pointless templates. --UU - natter 10:52, Nov 3
Comments

Template:9000

Keep
Delete	Delete. - Worthless advisory template referencing tired meme. Poorly formatted, to boot. pillow talk 21:50, 2 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. - This shows a perfect example of overusing an overused meme. --iseditor.user ^Comments/_Criticism Delete. agreed. Le Cejak • <0:13 Nov 03, 2008> Delete. What they said, and, it only appears in two articles.--Mnbvcxz 02:29, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
Comments

Template:Blastphemy

Keep
Delete	Delete. - Utter crap, spammed across several religion articles--Sycamore (Talk) 20:27, 1 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 01:49, 2 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. Happy to see the back of another pointless and unfunny template. --UU - natter 09:41, Nov 2 Delete. - Spam to the ∞th power. --iseditor.user ^Comments/_Criticism 22:04, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
Comments

Hope, British Columbia

Keep
Delete	Delete. - Poor 2006 Yank towncruft, poor throughut, and litle progress made.--Sycamore (Talk) 17:08, 1 November 2008 (UTC) THIS TOWN IS TEH SUKKZZ LOL --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 18:22, 1 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. I stopped for gas in Hope, once, so I think I know a little about it. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 20:40, 1 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. Short, shit, towncruft. --UU - natter 09:38, Nov 2
Comments

Taurus Bulba

Keep
Delete	Delete. - The Woodburninator (woodtalk) (woodstalk) 08:52, 1 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. Chuck Norris? Yep. Microsoft? Yep. Viagra? Yep. Darkwing Duck? This article has it all. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 18:24, 1 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. Short 'n' shit. Easy call. --UU - natter 09:34, Nov 2 Delete. Random meme-laden crap.--Mnbvcxz 21:12, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
Comments	Comment: Don't go forgetting your {{VFD}} tags now, Woody. --UU - natter 09:36, Nov 2 P'shaw. I don't need no stinkin' VFD tags....Unless you're really angry, cuz then I'll remember them. The Woodburninator (woodtalk) (woodstalk) 19:26, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Psilocybin

Keep
Delete	Delete. - Random 2005 junk. Unfunny, little progress made and poor throughout.--Sycamore (Talk) 16:40, 31 October 2008 (UTC) Delete. - The concept has some potential, but the content deserves a complete delete PaddyAtkinson 01:35, 1 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 18:35, 1 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. Nothing coherent in place. --UU - natter 09:34, Nov 2 Delete what they said--Mnbvcxz 21:14, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
Comments

Sophisticated Complicated Underwater Breathing Apparatus

Keep
Delete	Delete. - 2005 stub, intailly I thought it looked alright - upon closer reading its just a load of bollocks--Sycamore (Talk) 16:38, 31 October 2008 (UTC) Delete. PaddyAtkinson 01:37, 1 November 2008 (UTC) Delete - Yeah, lame. --Mr. Monkey Pant-hoot here. 18:38, 1 November 2008 (UTC) Delete. Short and unfunny. --UU - natter 09:31, Nov 2 'Delete Short, lame, and incoherent.--Mnbvcxz 21:18, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
Comments

Jingle All The Way

Keep
Delete	Delete. - Poor 2006 Christmas themed movie article, poor and random throughout.--Sycamore (Talk) 17:33, 28 October 2008 (UTC) Weak delete. Thing is, I really like the lede. I think it's ideal for the article. Hell, it could be lede to a feature. Then the first section break happens, and everything goes to shit. pillow talk 20:01, 28 October 2008 (UTC) Delete. Per the above. Again. --UU - natter 10:54, Oct 29 'Delete Goes nowhere. It doesn't even rise to the level of slightly funny nonsense, its more unfunny filibustering after the first paragraph.--Mnbvcxz 21:22, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
Comments