Talk:AAAAAAAAA!/archive1

AAAAAAAAAAA?

Assuming I wanted to change the logo (on an article) as has been done on the main AAAAAAAAA! page; how precisely does one acheive that with this here wonderful MediaWiki?

That is reserved for very special reskin pages (main page themes, and sometimes the featured article that goes with it, like this one (and ebay and Nihilism)). Doing it too much clutters up the site-wide javascript. So, basically, you can't do it here except with special Cabal permission. See MediaWiki:Uncyclopedia.js for the source though. --Splaka 05:42, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

Cheers, I wanted it for my own media wiki, I tried doing it with an extension, but the caching crapped all over that idea (I'm sure you've had the same) so cheers for that! --Olipro 20:54, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

Radiohead?

This page reminds me of radioheads website. In a sort of disturbing way.

No, that's just incoherent nonsense. 88.110.100.49 20:36, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

Is it funny?

Eh?--Vercalos 01:35, 22 Oct 2005 (UTC)

BBBBBBBBBB!

CCCCCCCCCC!

DDDDDDDDDD?

Shut up!

FFFFFFFFFF!

GGGGGGGGGG!

HHHHHHHHH! (Brilliant!)--Sir Flammable KUN 08:35, 17 Oct 2005 (UTC)

IIIIIIIII! -- Nintendorulez 11:47, 18 Oct 2005 (UTC)

SSSSSSSSSS!

ZZZZZZZZZZ!

How dare you people vandalize an "A"-related article's talk page with non-"A"-related talk? 3 year bans for everyone, because this is the worst damage ever done to this otherwise magnificent website. --EvilZak 04:52, 21 Oct 2005 (UTC) Aaa aaaa aaa aaaaaa aaaaaaaaa aa "A"-aaaaaaa aaaaaaa'a aaaa aaaa aaaa aaa-"A"-aaaaaaa aaaa? A aaaa aaaa aaa aaaaaaaa, aaaaaaa aaaa aa aaa aaaaa aaaaaa aaaa aaaa aa aaaa aaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaa. --AaaaAaa AA:AA, AA Aaa AAAA (AAA)

AAAA AA AAAAAAAAAA! This is hillarious! - Robby

Joining some a's?

What about that instead of A A A A A A A A A A A A inside the sections, there would be AAA AAAAA AAAA AA AAAAAAA AA or something like that. Ok maybe this was a stupid idea :-( . -some unknown person.

Actually, it used to be like that. We should go and fix it. AAAAAAAAAAA AAA AA, AAAAAA AA:AA

I agree. 60.224.48.152 03:46, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

What a piece of shit.

"This is stupid. Who the fuck voted for this atrocity to be a feature?"

Translation by Robby - Bitch bitch bitch I like little boys bitch bitch

This article is genius, if you can't see that, you're blind.

Nobody asked you for your opinion --Nytrospawn 21:41, 19 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Which is probably because it's a fucking stupid opinion--220.101.30.98 09:38, 22 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Sooooo stuuuuuuupid...... -Nik

Nobody asked you for yours, either. » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 15:49, 20 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Shut up. --Strong Rad 05:07, 21 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Shut up. --—rc (t) 05:08, 21 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Shut up. --Splaka 05:13, 21 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Make me. » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 05:53, 21 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Thank you. --—rc (t) 17:47, 21 Oct 2005 (UTC)

OMGSTFU n00b.--Sir Flammable KUN 17:48, 21 Oct 2005 (UTC)

AAAAAAAAAAAAA --Ribo 17:01, 31 Oct 2005 (UTC)

BBBBBBBBBBBBB --Nintendorulez 11:51, 1 Nov 2005 (UTC)

QQQQQQQQQQQQ--stringcheese 112:98.236, 2 Fpr 111 (CNTS)

Shut up.--Stalin 00:30, 7 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Shut up.--Xiao Li 10:06, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

Shut up.--Sir Xiao Li CUN VFH NS (Talk)

Shut up. --[[User:Nintendorulez|Nintendorulez | talk]] 23:40, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

Shut up.--Sir Xiao Li CUN VFH NS (Talk) 07:44, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

ARRRRRGGGGHHHH

The only possible response is AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA... AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA East AAnglia.

Shut up.--Sir Xiao Li CUN VFH NS (Talk)\

-No, you!

-No, you shut up! (Or in Klingon: bIjatlh 'e' yImev) --Sir Xiao Li CUN VFH NS (Talk)

-No! You do it first! Shut it up!

Shutteth thine cake-hole! Flameviper12 20:55, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAa!

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAa!

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAa!

Shut up. --User:Nintendorulez 20:59, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

Come on, get it to the right side of the page... --Lt. Clorox MUN Goatse Virgin ONS (talk/fortune cookie) 23:26, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

Ho my god...

I can't stop laughing when I watch that thing. Am I just an idiot or does it make you the same thing?

You're not an idiot. In fact, through complex statistical statistications, you are actually a genius if you laugh at this article--Nytrospawn 21:43, 21 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Yes, I believe that makes you an idiot.

It's stark-raving hilarious. If you don't see it, you're clearly blind. » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 22:53, 21 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Goddamn.

I read this article out loud, that is to say I screamed hysterically while scrolling through the text. It was great, especially on the parts where you can't help laugh. (Mostly the pictures.) Then I laughed and screamed hysterically at the same time. I'm still asphyxiated. xD User:Invisible Queen

If you laugh at articles like this one, you are Smart if not, you are Serious. --Lt. Sir Orion Blastar (talk) 04:33, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

"Ho my god"? Not even capitalising "God"? Also, you called God a ho! SRTEIGHT TO HELL!!! Flameviper12 20:59, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

BBBBBBBBB!

Talk about being "content-free" Nerd42 22:28, 21 Oct 2005 (UTC)

It says this is supposed to be an inside joke. Anyone care to explain it?

It isn't. Someone just added that.

Look at the page, man. Another page like this would be lame (it would spontaneously combust), while this one is great. Check out Morse Code and Binary for further information. » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 22:53, 21 Oct 2005 (UTC)

I still don't have any idea how this is supposed to be funny.

Me neither. I mean yeh - this is funny. I've found myself laughing out loud reading this page, yet I have no idea WHY this is funny. Kind of creepy, isn't it? --Snail of Doom 23:49, 22 Oct 2005 (UTC)

This is industrial-strength conceptual humour. A borderline work of genius. I laughed so hard I cried; I almost passed out. Why is it funny? Because it looks like an article. The pictures do wonders for it. It's all in perfect balance. OK, I'm'a stop analysing now and get back to laughing myself silly. --ettlz 15:48, 25 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Actually, it wasn't funny. Is there something I'm just not getting? It's in the "inside jokes" category, so there must be some hidden meaning or relevance, right? Or is this comment's creator just a dumb cunt?

Oscar Wilde enjoyed it

Its uncyclopedia. There is no point --Nytrospawn 02:18, 23 Oct 2005 (UTC)

It's the kind of thing that's so stupid it's funny, like Eskimo Bob. --Clorox MUN ONS (diskussion) ☃ 22:33, 11 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Wait a minute...

Hasn't this article already been featured? I remember seeing the Feature template in all A's in this article a while ago. --Nintendorulez 00:15, 22 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Before it had a Nominated template, now it has the (template:ArticleFH) Featured template. With the lovely Mr. Potato Head. --—rc (t) 00:21, 22 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Praise

Funny or not, this article is an excellent example of wiki-formatting.--Vercalos 15:54, 25 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Ha! -Fudgesickles!

Sad

I first viewed AAAAAAAAA a few days ago and came back for the talk page today, hoping it would be more of the same. 208.180.16.239 15:00, 27 Oct 2005 (UTC)

AA AAAA AAAAAA? A'A AAAA AA AAAAAAA AAAA AAAAAAAAAA :)

I have created a clone of this article

BBBBBBBBB!

Um. Yeah. If anyone likes the idea, (and someone with Photoshop and the original versions of the images found on this page) maybe I'll try to make one for each letter of the alphabet. --Nintendorulez 22:47, 31 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Um, no. The one is funny. A second is pointless crap. » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 19:10, 2 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Agreed. --Ianweller 20:13, 15 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Aww, which admin decided to delete my parody, despite the talk page having a handful of people who liked it? --Nintendorulez 03:15, 6 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Probably Dawg, because he talked about deleting it. --Clorox MUN ONS (diskussion) ☃ 22:38, 11 Nov 2005 (UTC)

I thought the admins could only delete withought using VFD or QVFD during forest fire week. >_> --[[User:Nintendorulez|Nintendorulez | talk]] 01:56, 12 Nov 2005 (UTC)

QVFD is not simply a fast version of VFD. QVFD pages are pages that should be deleted instantly, no vote needed. Users who cannot delete it themselves put stuff (like spam, crap, vanity, tests, redundancy, plagerism) on the QVFD. Admin only put stuff on the QVFD if they want a second opinion on stuff (rarely). As for forest fire week, we are still trying to stamp out all the little blazes going on. ^_^ --Splaka 02:05, 12 Nov 2005 (UTC)

And there weren't a handful of people on the talk page who liked it. There was one person. ;) --—rc (t) 02:20, 12 Nov 2005 (UTC)

And me. Don't I count? ;_; --[[User:Nintendorulez|Nintendorulez | talk]] 21:15, 12 Nov 2005 (UTC)

I was counting you... --—rc (t) 21:33, 12 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Take that --Clorox MUN ONS (diskussion) ☃00:53, 3 Dec 2005 (UTC)

GrAAAAAAAAAh

Tried to "A" the category list, but was unable to. I wonder if it's possible... 165.21.154.10 12:24, 24 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Tisn't, that I know of.

Uncyclopedia logo

Whoever made that logo change is god. --[[User:Nintendorulez|Nintendorulez | talk]] 00:49, 27 Nov 2005 (UTC)

• I will similarly admire someone who can edit the sidebar to AAAAAAAAA! Swordmaster 07:12, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

That would most likely require javascript to execute on the page, and we are hesitant to do that for the reskins like this. Nihilism came out much better and only needing css. So, no, not gonna happen, or else we'll be compelled to do it for every reskin. Rar. --Splaka 07:21, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

No way, that would be friggin awesome. Do it for all teh skins!

Guess what

HAPPY AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA DAY EVERYBODY!!!!!! --Clorox MUN ONS (diskussion) ☃ 00:51, 3 Dec 2005 (UTC)

AAAAAAAAA!!!!!!

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!

AAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAA AAAAAA AAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAA? AAAAAAAAAAA AAA AA:AA AAAAA AAA

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAASCI?

    AAAAAAAAAAA
   A           A
  A  AA     AA  A
 A   AA     AA   A
A        A        A
A  A           A  A
A   AAAAAAAAAAA   A
 A   AAAAAAAAA   A
  A             A
    AAAAAAAAAAAA

Translate it!!!!11111!!!!eleven!!!!1

No way. It's good enough as it is: a completely insane nonsense page. Swordmaster 22:47, 13 Jan 2006 (UTC)

A aaaaa aaa aaaaa aaaaa aa aaaa aaaaa aa aa aaaaaaaaaaa. -- Aaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaa 11:11, 1 Aaaaaaaa 1111 (AAA)

This is ridiculous

I can't believe somebody would actually stoop to this level.

Its great! :) lol

AAA AAA AAAAA AAA AAA AAA AAA AAAA AA AAA. AAAAA_A

Images

I think this one got far too many images. remove some!

Yeah, I agree. It used to be a paradigm of wiki formatting, and now it's just cluttered. --—rc (t) 02:35, 14 Dec 2005 (UTC)

look, yet more images. my eyes hurt. i think the Revision as of 07:59, 23 Oct 2005 was the best of all

Ok, it got out of hand. I removed 13 images leaving 5 (the original 4, and the bluescreen). I put 11 of the 13 back in a random rotation near the bottom of the page. If you must add more, put them there. NOT IN THE ARTICLE! Meh. --Splaka 23:59, 14 Dec 2005 (UTC)

I think the images just add to the lunacy.Swordmaster 17:53, 15 Dec 2005 (UTC)

I agree, it has its best effect first time you see it, and all the images made it a rollercoaster visual assault of A. Now it's a Merry-Go-Round with quite a lot of A. Boffy b

Looking at it again, there is more A than I remembered. Boffy b

Ummm, I say we should put the pictures back. The article sucks now IMO. User:t3h

Ok, at LEAST the picture of Steve Ballmer. That was the one I laughed at the most, by far. User:t3h

Ok, looking at the original article with the heaps of pictures. I disagree with the removal of the pictures. It's simply not funny any more. User:t3h

Ballmer should still be there, but only 1/11th of the time. The article just wasn't funny with 18 pics. --Splaka 10:39, 16 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Ballmer needs to stay!!!!!one!11!

Actually, I thought it was funniest with 18 pics. T3h 01:24, 18 Dec 2005 (UTC)

As did I. Try converting to AAAAAAAAA! formatting. It will make the page look even crazier. Swordmaster 17:26, 3 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Should this image be on the page? --Roger The Bum 00:48, 4 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Added to the random image display thing at the bottom. The page doesn't need a higher number of images. --Splaka 01:31, 4 Jan 2006 (UTC)

It's GreAAAAAAAAAAt!

Hey, anyone notice the uncyclopedia logo when you look at this page? I'm one of those sick bastards who loves this page...But, it's the pictures and other little details that makes this page great. - Revolution87

I check this page every day

This is what Dada is all about. --Lordwilliamwaygood 11:09, 20 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Category?

So, does anyone know what the category name at the bottom is? I checked the other pages, buyt they don't say either. Maybe I should check the code on the edit page....

WTF D:

I think my head just exploded.

It's "AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAASPLODED!", newbie. --Dac Vin 17:49, 3 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Funny

And it would be the same if it used another letter. Prettiestpretty 23:31, 8 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Someone should put a single different letter at the very bottom of the page.

Suggested external link

[1]

Whoa

How did Whoever get the Uncyclopedia logo to change to the "AaaaaaaaaA" logo for this page? ----Clorox MUN ONS (diskussion) ☃ 03:07, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

It must've been eiher an admin, or Chron, or someone else with control over the main server itself, or just the MediaWiki. Anyway, could whoever has the power to do crazy shit like that put this on the bottom of the page? Note: It'll only work if placed at the end. --[[User:Nintendorulez|Nintendorulez | talk]] 22:39, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

Not only that, how did they surpress the category section? I've been wanting to do that on Sdrawkcab --User:Keithhackworth/sig2

some suggestions

Please put the C++ program with //AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA comments back in.

And also link to the cartoon: http://www.tmcm.com/comics/webcomics/095_AAAAA

And blow up this page with apocalyptic fury.

Navigation box

Please add the following into the article (see source):

templaty thing goes here

Locked? Why?

If you're worried about vandals inserting other letters, that JS I made would automatically convert those to As when viewed on the page. Also, there's an error I need to fix, highlighted here in bold:

<center><div class="boilerplate metadata" id="stub"><table CELLPADDING=3 CELLSPACING=3 width=80% style="background-color: #99D099; color: #444444; border-top: 2px solid yellow; border-bottom: 2px solid blue; border-right: 2px solid yellow; border-left: 2px solid blue;"><tr><td>[[Image:Domokunyellownbackground.jpg|left|80px|AAA AAAAAAA one...]]
'''</td> <td align=center>AAAA AAAAAAA AA AAAAAA AA AA AAAAA AA A [[grue|AAAA]]. A AAAAAAA AAA [[run like hell|AAA AAAA AAAA]] aa [{{SERVER}}{{localurl:{{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}|action=edit}} AAA AAAAAAA AAAAAAA] AAAAAA AA AAAA [[you|AAA]] AAA.'''</td></tr></table></div></center>

--[[User:Nintendorulez|Nintendorulez | talk]] 16:55, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

• In fact, that entire message box should be rewritten in an XHTML-compliant way. - User:Guest/sig 17:13, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

<div align="center" class="boilerplate metadata"><table cellpadding="3" cellspacing="3" width="80%" style="background-color: #99D099; color: #444444; border-top: 2px solid yellow; border-bottom: 2px solid blue; border-right: 2px solid yellow; border-left: 2px solid blue;"><tr><td>[[Image:Domokunyellownbackground.jpg|left|80px|AAA AAAAAAA one...]]
'''</td> <td align="center">AAAA AAAAAAA AA AAAAAA AA AA AAAAA AA A [[grue|AAAA]]. A AAAAAAA AAA [[run like hell|AAA AAAA AAAA]] aa [{{SERVER}}{{localurl:{{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}|action=edit}} AAA AAAAAAA AAAAAAA] AAAAAA AA AAAA [[you|AAA]] AAA.'''</td></tr></table></div>

omfg

      A
     A A 
    A   A
   A     A
  A       A
   A     A
    A   A
     A A
      A

The awesome AAAAAA! diamond!

There are...

... at least three letters 'L' on that page.

I know Aaa Aaaa Aaaaa means Bat Fuck Insane...--Bilbobaggins 17:48, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

*!

This article is the shiznit.

Best of 2005!

Hey, how do we get this thing nominated for the best article of 2005? This is one of the best aricles on Uncyclopedia!

It's already been nominated, and it won with 24 votes. (Second place had 20 votes) --[[User:Nintendorulez|Nintendorulez | talk]] 17:37, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

BBBBB BBBBBBBB BBBBBB B BB

BBB BBBBB BBB BB BBBB BBBB...

Wait, am I doing this wrong? 81.159.130.237 22:12, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

AAAAAAAAAAA?

AAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAA AA AAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA? 62.66.194.63 13:55, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

AAAAAAAA music

Jchillerup 21:53, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

Haha, nice. Just change the C at the beginning. --[[User:Nintendorulez|Nintendorulez | talk]] 17:36, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

Yep.   t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 17:37, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

Ah, I see that. That's a problem. What speed would you like? And do you want any "parameters" added to the notes? Tremolo, for example. Jchillerup 11:45, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

Ok, did some tremolo magic, new tempo and lyrics.. I hope that this gets added to the page :-) Jchillerup 12:16, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

You know...maybe it's my astigmatism, but on my laptop LCD the notes seem to curve...like, I have to look closely to see that they are all As...am I just high? - Picklefork, 23:37, March 18 2006

Nope, I'm seeing that too, makes for a strange optical effect. --Sir gwax (talk) 07:39, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

how the hell?

How the hell did you do this. I SOOO gotta know. it's so fucking hilarious.--ThEBaGmAn 21:31, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

AAA AAA AAAA AAA AAA AA AAAA. A AAAA AAAAA AAAA. AA'A AA AAAAAAA AAAAAAAAA. --AAAAAAAAA AA:AA, AA AAAA AAAA (AAA)

Do what exactly? --Splaka 04:10, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

New "Aaaaaaa Innnn Spaaaace!" image

old and crappy

ok, still crappy, but new

I made the scream in space image a little better, being that AAAAAAAAA! seems to be in the 2005 Top 10.

Redone because I consider this the premier image of the article, even if it's not terribly clever compared to the others. -Fudgesickles! 01:01, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

For what it's worth, I like the new version better. --⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ign^STFU F@H|UotM|+S 01:13, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, this is sweet. A perfect way to celebrate #1 of 2005. :D --Kafeithekeaton 04:00, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

The Top!

I knew it, I knew it, I knew it, I knew it I knew it...

A AAAAAA AAA AAAAA AA FTW!--Kafeithekeaton 03:58, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

-Do you believe in miracles? NO! I believe in AAAAAAAAA! - Revolution87

Just out of curiosity

How much of this is just randomly pressing AAAAAAA and space, and how much is real(albeit nonsensical, doubtlessly)?

About 7 give or take 3. --Sir gwax (talk) 19:26, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

The AAAAAAA AAAAAAAA (Russian Reversal) section that I created used to be real and somewhat discernable (via links), but someone changed it around.

You guys must be really stoned!

I know I am. Laughing my ass off right now at the main page...

Orphaned AAAAAAAAA! pictures ?

Any more room to add these extra pictures ? I'm not sure if they would fit anywhere else. MadMax 02:56, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

Image:AAAAAAAAA.png 
Image:AAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHH! Album Cover.JPG 
Image:Aachartaa.jpg

Oh lordie those sucked so bad. Ok, I added the bottom one to rotation, it wasn't so bad. --Splaka 05:44, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

Since the article is locked, why not move all the AAA pics into a template? Just because a lot of vandals put B in doesn't mean this article shouldn't have some parts editable. --[[User:Nintendorulez|Nintendorulez | talk]] 19:40, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

AAAAAAA!!!!

AAAAA AAA A AAAAA AAA A AAAA A A A A AA A AAAA A A A A AAA A AAA A A A A AAA A A AAAAA AAAAA A A AA AAA AAA AA AAA AAAAA AAAA!!!!!

AAA "AAAA"-AAAAAA AA AAA "AAAAAAAA"-AAA ...

...AAAA AAA AAAA! AAA AAA AAA AAA AAAAAAA AAAA AAAA? --AA.AAA.AA.AAA AA:AA, AA AAAAA AAAA (AAA)

A AAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAA. AAAA AAAAAAA AAAAA AAA! --AAAAAAAAAAAAA (AAAA) AA:AA, A AAAAA AAAA (AAA)

AA, AAA AA AAAAAA AAAAA AA AA AAAAA AAAA AA AAAAAAA?! ~ AAAAAA^AAAA_AAAAAAAA AA:AA, AA AAAAA AAAA

AAAAAAAAA?!

AAA AAAAA AAAAA AAAA?! AA AAA AAA AA AAA AAAA AAAAAAAAA AAAA!!!!

AAAAAAAAAA AAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AA!

AAAAA A AAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAA AAAA -- AaaaAaaaaa AAaAAAaAAAaAAA 12:22, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

Why AAAAAAAAA! and not BBBBBBBBB!, and why we really need hate ZZZZZZZZZ!

Here is a table showing why it is AAAAAAAAA! and not BBBBBBBBB!, for those who have wished to create a clone of AAAAAAAAA! as BBBBBBBBB!:

Factors	AAAAAAAAA!	BBBBBBBBB!	ZZZZZZZZZ!
Originality	Original	Overdone	Opposite
Pronouncibility (?)	Pronouncable	Unpronouncable	Snoring talk
Order	1st letter of the alphabet	2nd letter of the alphabet	26th letter of the alphabet
Jokiness (?)	Good Joke	Bad Joke	Good Crap
{{{stuff}}}	AAAAAAAAA!	BBBBBBBBB!	ZZZZZZZZZ!
Expectinicity (?)	Unexpected	Expected	Expected
Humour	Funny	Unfunny	Weird

Add more if you wish. ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 11:47, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

Zzz zzzzzzz zzzzz z, zzz zzzzzzzz zz ZZZZZZZZZ! zzzzzzz zzz, z zzzz zzzz'z zzzzz zzzz. Zzz zzzzz zzz zzz zzzzzzz zz, zz z zzzzzzzzzz zzzzzz zz zzzzz:

1. Zzzzz zzzz zzzz zzzzzzz Zzzzz Zzzzz zzzz, "zzzzzzzzz z zzzz zz zz zzzz zzzz zzz zzzzzz z zzzzz!"
2. Z zzzzz zz zzzzzzz zz zzzzzz zz zzzzzzzz zzz zz z zzz zzzzzz. (Z zzzz zz zzzz Zzzzzzz z. Zzzzz zz Zzzzzzzz, 1977.)
3. Zzzz zzz zzz zz zzzz zz; zzzzz zzz zzzz z Z ♥ Zzzzzzzzz'z.
4. Zzz zzz zz zz zzzz zzz zzz zz z zzz zzzz zzzz.

Zz zzzzzz zz zzzzz z zzzz? Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz... Seahen 16:50, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

Zzzzzzzzz zz zzz zzzz zzzz zzzzzzz zz zz z zzzz zzzzzz zz zzzzzzzzz, zz zzzzzzzzz zz zzzz zz zzzzzz, zz Z zzzzz'z zzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzz zz zzzzzzz zz zzzzz zzzz Zzzzzz zzzz zzzzzzz zzzzzz zz, zzzz zzzz ZZZZZZZZZ! Zzz zzzzzzz zzz, ZZ'Z ZZZZ! ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 17:22, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

Zzz zzzzzzz Zzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzz, zzzzzzzz zzzz zzzzzz zzzzz zzzzzzz.

Z zzzzzzzz. Zzz zzzzzzz Zzzzzzzzzzzzz zzz zzz z zzzz zzzzz'z zzzzz zzzz zzzz zzzz zz zzz zzz zzz zzzzz zz zzzzzzz zzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzz. Zz zzzzzzz, zzzz, zzzz ZZZZZZZZZ! zz zzzzzzz zzzz Zzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzz. Z'zz zzzzz zzz zzzzzzz, zzz zz'zz zz zz Z-zzzz. Seahen 00:04, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

Zzz zzzz zzz'z zzz zz, zz zzz? ZZ ZZZ'Z ZZZZ! ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 09:11, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

I believe the original intent was an entire article made up of someone screaming. Maybe. B would be, what, buzzing? Beeping? --Splaka 04:20, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

Zzzzzzzzz is the sound of buzzing, Bbbbbbbbb, as placed above, is actually unpronouncable. ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 13:28, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

BBB was intended as a parody of AAA. --User:Nintendorulez 18:22, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

Piccy

Can I put this image on the page? - User:FMA

No. Pictures on AAAAAAAAA! must adhere to a certain quality standard, and beside, there are approximately $X^{X}$$^{x}$ pictures on there, when X=60. So... No. Unless an admin thinks it's good. ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 19:10, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

AAAAAAAAA! Day

When exactly is AAAAAAAAA! Day? --Sir Kaizer of Bjorn[CUN] [TALK] NS FP F@H 03:48, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

3rd December. Exactly, give or take 367 days but not into another year, suprisingly...~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 13:29, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

Translations

This is the section of the talk page for AAAAAAAAA! for discussing translations.

Since very few people seem to have complex Aaaaaaaaa-English translators, I thought I'd have a go with the first paragraph. The translation is not perfect, so if anyone can point out any problems with my translation, please tell me.

First Paragraph

==About an iPod yocto booklet==

Due to various problems with the fact that you are incredibly stupid, iPod yocti are in great demand nowadays, says Aaaaaaaaa magazine. in modern times people are re sorting to bying rockets instead which come fitted with iPods themselves,but these are in high demand yet, not surprisingly, out of stock. Aaaaaaaa magazine says that the reason that these are alsor are is because you are stupid.

A Rocket

the full text of the Aaaaaaaaa magazine booklet reads as such: "it is generally agreed that the reason that iPod yocti are in such short supply is that you are so staggeringly amazingly stupid that you don't even know that 2 + 2 = 4 - You stupid idiot! It then goes on to say: "Aaaaaaaaa!", but to be honest that is beside the point because this is exeptionally good evidence that you are incredibly stupid. Yipee! You are so stupid that you don't know even simple maths equations. Also: As B Asdfdj sjgb vv b dhfvbl kdj fv bl kds fjv LOL EEE AKDFVNFJDVNMJD EEEE B EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEBOOBOOBOOBOO GBDF V YOU SUCK LOL EEEEEEEEEEEEEEE BE DXFBVSDBSFGBSF A EE DFBD U R SO GHEYA EEEEE dfvnsjdsdik SDSFRHBDFVADSA E B EEEE AFGNBDSBGFSBSFGBA E ASFCDFV EEEEEEEE B F VBJMDFHVBJDXHFVBJMSDHVGBJSMHVBKJSH VBKSD EEEEEEE B LOL!

===Saxophone===

The use of saxophones in Aaaaaaaaa magazine with iPod yocti,especially in iPod yocti rocketsis strongly debated by all but the most proficient saxomophonists such as Lois Armstrong, a famous musician who is known for being able to play almost entirely in A flat middle, a feat that is considered impossible by experts in the music industry, but they all work for the Encyclop*dia Drammatica so they should not be trusted anyway. Lois Armstrong himself commented on the aggresiveness of the critics in Aaaaaaaaa magazine: "I can’t believe that those Encyclop*dia Drammaticans are criticising my unique and obvious talent, stating that it is false!"

Armstrong plays 'An Ada', her greatest.

Ultimately the Encyclop*dia Drammaticans will always criticise Armstrong, unphased by Mr. T, who quoted "I pity the fool who messes with Armstrong", Steve Ballmer who explained (quite thoroughly) that he was going to Fucking Kill™ anyone who criticised Armstrong, and Kanye West after he told them that George Bush doesn’t care about Encyclop*dia Drammaticans.It wasn’t until the death of Lois in the year 2010 that the Encyclop*dia Drammaticans stopped criticising Lois,as the last Encyclop*d ia Drammatican who had the powerof cognate thought died on the same day also.Rumours that the last cognatic Encyclop*dia Drammatican was infact Lois Armstrong are unfounded, and Aaaaaaaaa magazine vehemently denies them. Uncyclopedians also deny them because no E*D’n has had the power of cognate thought. Ever.

===Math===

Aaaaaaaaa magazine also uses mathematics to explain the properties of iPod yocti and iPod yocti rockets. Based on the name of the magazine, it always uses ‘A’ as it’s preliminary letter in algebra, followed by the other letters of the alphabet up to Ə. Often, fractional mathematic algebra is used to work out the scale of an iPod yocta to an iPod yocta rocket. The following show the ratio (A) of an iPod to an iPod rocket. See below:

$A={\frac {{\frac {B}{C}}(D_{E}+F_{G})^{H}}{I{\sqrt {J_{K}}}-L^{-M}}}*{\frac {{\,}^{N}O}{P}}Q-R_{S}$

Alternatively:

Failed to parse (syntax error): {\displaystyle A = \Lambda \int_T \left( U(V) - \frac{W}{\Lambda^X} \vert Y \vert^Z \right) \;\mbox{Þ}(Ə) }

When consanants equal the iPod yocta rocket, and vowels (excluding A) equal the iPod yocta, in a way. The truth is, only ignorant Wikipedians can make sense of these equations, but all agree that the latter is more correct. The first is probably way out because you are an idiot. Also it must be said that this is considered vandalism: B. B-b-b-b. B_B! LOLURSOGHEYLOL!1111!!!!!!1111!!1

Comments

Some of this doesn't actually make sense. I blame anonymous IPs for randomly inserting A's in without knowing that they actually translate into English. ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 15:22, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

Awesome, thanks for this translation, I hope the rest comes soon. Someone comb through the history and find the erroneous As that were added by idiots. I don't speak AAAAAAAAA!, so I can't help with the translating, but I've enrolled in a class to learn it this summer. ^_^ --User:Nintendorulez 20:53, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

Idea for main article once translation is finished

AAAA, AAA AAA AAAAAAAA AA AAA AAAA AAAAAAA AAAAA AAAAAAAAAA AAA AAAAAAA! AA'AA AAAA AAAA AA AAAAAAAAA AAA AAAAAAAA AA A AAAA AAAAAAA AAAA, AAA AA'AA AAAA AA AAA AAA AAAAAAAAA AA AAAAAA AA AAA AAAAAAA.

Anyone like the idea? --User:Nintendorulez 21:06, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, it's good, but... somebody please invent a word that describes the 'hardness' of having to click 'edit' at the top, and the fact that it will take up so many bytes, but it'll be good because it can go in the main article and... Someone help me out here!!! ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 07:59, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

Comments from the translators

I would've translated the picture, but I don't have photoshop so I can't, and if I had the complex Aaaaaaaaa-translating scripts probably wouldn't work on it anyway. ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 17:53, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

And yes, it is Lois, not Louis. No one knows why. ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 19:02, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

Oh, and for some reason the 'Þ' and the 'Ə' don't show up on the translation. The end of the equation in the first paragraph should look like this: Þ(Ə) ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 07:56, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA