Forum:June sysop election?

Forums: Index > Village Dump > June sysop election?

Note: This topic has been unedited for 6424 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over.

Even with several active admins, mainly Olipro, Braydie, and Zombiebaron, there is still a huge load of cruft in Uncyclopedia's database, a continuous stream of vandals, and many articles in dire need of attention. The best solution, other than to wipe out the whole database and disable IP editing and account creation, seems to be electing another admin.

Vote: Should we have another sysop election in June?

Score: -2 pointless political ideas

• Nom and For - We need more admins! --Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • FFS • WP) 04:10, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
• Against. We're not in that much of a dire need for more admins. We're moreso in a dire need of people that can report crap so the admins can delete it. We need a few more people that will volunteer to find the worst pages in this wiki and VFD, ICU, and QVFD them daily. --~

  Jacques Pirat, Esq. Converse : Benefactions : U.w.p.

  04:23, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
• Sorry. We just HAD a sysop election. Also, the sysops are only human robotic huff-machines and steam banhammers. They can't get everything. The sysops actually, do a good job. And also, I don't want to be nommed and get lots of against votes think we have enough admins. Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines
• Conditional For - Only if I'm elected. --AAA! (AAAA) 04:46, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
• Comment The reason stated at the top of this page makes no sense, and fails to mention me. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 04:50, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
• Comment - I reckon being an admin is not that, hmm, enjoyable. Like, who wants to click delete every second while you can watch porn. Right, admins?? It's gneomI 06:18, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
• Against As per Jacques. Regular users can list crap on QVFD, VFD etc (and VOTE on VFD), as well as reverting vandalism and reporting them on Ban Patrol. As for rewriting hopeless articles, pretty sure thats everyones job too. The admins do a great job around here, and as High Gen said, we just HAD an election. ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 09:42, 20 May 2007
• For - I've personally never understood what is wrong with having more admins than we really need. If a person would make a good admin, I think they should be opped ASAP. In fact, I get the feeling that certain users (and possibly more) are getting more and more homicidal/suicidal with every month they have to wait to become an admin. Or, at least, I'm pretty certain about that last one I linked to. Anyway, somehow I think the admins themselves are supposed to decide whether or not to have an election. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 12:22, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
• our admins are doing a good enough job at the moment, so against --» >UF|TLK|▋» 14:27, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
• For. We're not in dire need, but there's no such thing as having too many admins, as Cs said. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 15:46, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

• Yes, there is. It's happened before. —rc (t) 19:49, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

• Against. We're fine as it is. --officer designate Lugiatm MUN NS CM ZM WH 18:19, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
• Comment. The site seems to be doing fine with the number of admins we have, in my opinion. Hrodulf 18:19, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
• Against - I'd understand an admin making this topic, because they can see if there is a problem with a certain part of the site - be it watching recent changes, new pages or maintenance. But because every time this comes up it's a non-sysop requesting it, it kinda points towards them wanting to be one. This of course breaks both rules you must follow to even be considered as an admin. —Braydie 21:15, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
• For! We need more admins! especcially me Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me!
• Comment I've just been sitting back amusing myself at the comments people are making here... and compiling a list of dissidents who need to be banned for the common good -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 22:08, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
• Strong For. Because. goshzillacorrespondence 19:24, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
• Comment. That's what I've been doing, Jaques. Recent Changes, VFD and QVFD are my friends. ^_^ --Andorin Kato 22:41, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
• Against. Do we need one at the moment? No. Also, those canvassing whoring for it on here, please note. - Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 22:53, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Anonymous Poll

Should we have this election?

You are not entitled to vote.
You are not entitled to view results of this poll.

1 Yes

2 No

3 Abstain

4 Pie

There were 0 votes since the poll was created on 03:29, 4 June 2021.

poll-id 61237933C0C216B5822D4AD5A50550AD