Forum:I propose we stop the f***ing cussing!

Forums: Index > Village Dump > I propose we stop the f***ing cussing! (talk)

Note: This topic has been unedited for 6380 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over.

One of the things that strikes me most about this site is the amount of cussing and sexual jokes, both of which make an otherwise wonderful site painful to read. For the sake of making the site bearable for everyone, those jokes should be removed. It's win-win: those in Internet world who don't want to see these jokes don't have to censor them themselves, and everyone else won't miss them, at least not very much (maybe thiiiiiis much *holds up fingers*).

The cussing really does, believe it or not, hurt the site that much. For example, look at this article: Russian_Reversal_Warfare. I was reading it, expecting a slew of Soviet Russia jokes (which are the bomb, by the way), when I read this:

[22:36] <Dan> says:
I spray my a** with dog spray, o.O
[22:36]  <Matt> says:
in soviet russia, a** sprays you
[22:36] <<Mark>> says:
in soviet russia, ümläüts write YÖÜ!!
[22:37] <Dan> says:
In Soviet Russia, toilet s***s in your a**.
[22:37] <<Mark>> says:
in soviet russia, toilet s***s on YOU!!

While some of these are hilarious, other are uncalled for. This unnecessary interjection presented by Roversforthecup (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

To one who is conditioned against cussing, that is the equivalent (100% absolutely no exaggeration here) of this:

Russian Reversal jokes are stupid. Now, let's do some math. Let's discuss transcendental numbers.

A transcendental number is a (possibly complex) number that is not the root of any integer polynomial, meaning that it is not an
algebraic number of any degree. Every real transcendental number must also be irrational, since a rational number is, by definition,
an algebraic number of degree one.

A complex number z can be tested to see if it is transcendental using the Mathematica command Not[Element[x, Algebraics]].

Transcendental numbers are important in the history of mathematics because their investigation provided the first proof that circle
squaring, one of the geometric problems of antiquity that had baffled mathematicians for more than 2000 years was, in fact,
insoluble. Specifically, in order for a number to be produced by a geometric construction using the ancient Greek rules, it must be
either rational or a very special kind of algebraic number known as a Euclidean number. Because the number pi is transcendental, the
construction cannot be done according to the Greek rules.

Liouville showed how to construct special cases (such as Liouville's constant) using Liouville's approximation theorem. In
particular, he showed that any number that has a rapidly converging sequence of rational approximations must be transcendental. For
many years, it was only known how to determine if special classes of numbers were transcendental. The determination of the status
of more general numbers was considered an important enough unsolved problem that it was one of Hilbert's problems.

Great progress was subsequently made by Gelfond's theorem, which gives a general rule for determining if special cases of numbers of
the form alpha^beta are transcendental. Baker produced a further revolution by proving the transcendence of sums of numbers of the
form alphalnbeta for algebraic numbers alpha and beta...

Except it's even worse.

You can skip over absolute unfunnyness unscathed, but once you've read f***, you cannot unread f***, and f*** f***ing stays in you f***ing f***-up mind for the next two f***ing minutes. The same goes for sexual jokes.

Now, what good is an article without cussing or sexual jokes? Lots. There aren't any cuss words in this list of computer stories. The worst Demented Cartoon Movie ever says is "Hell." And Douglas Adams can be pretty dang clever without being dirty.

Yes, but those aren't Uncyclopedia articles, you might say. They aren't as funny. That's because there is enough cussing on this site that finding so much as one page with a faux pas is a serious (if not f***ing impossible) chore. Those are to show that cussing is not necessary to be funny.

So, in conclusion, there is no reason for the denizens of this site to continue cussing. The immaturity ruins its worth for many people and will not be missed. We need to get right to work cleaning up this crap.

...

Oh, dear. I said that. 0_0 The Pondermatic

(For the record: The math blurb was copied from Wolfram Mathworld:

Weisstein, Eric W. "Transcendental Number." From MathWorld--A Wolfram Web Resource.

http://mathworld.wolfram.com/TranscendentalNumber.html The Pondermatic 03:31, 26 May 2007 (UTC))

Nobody Cares, okay? --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 03:33, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Also, I read on your userpage you will "edit all cursing and sexual jokes." this will get you banned. People actually, as above, don't care. Furthermore, read this. --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 03:36, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

So far, I haven't actually edited anything out, but I really want to. XD part of this was to make sure that was ok. And it's not true that nobody cares - I do, and I wouldn't be surprise dif a lot of other potential members care as well. The Pondermatic 04:05, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

I agree there is too much, but not all of it is that bad, in articles like Crazy foreigner down the street, it adds to the humour of the article. Crazy Foreigner isn't a particularly funny article but you get the idea--FREDD 03:45, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

The thing that you fail to realize is that, even without cursing, the page that you mentioned would suck. Personally, I only swear when it's appropriate. It offends me when your offense at the use (and misuse) of language leads to you think that we should live in your prudish head, man. Harumph! Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 03:51, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

It's the person's choice whether to cuss or not

Stop trying to censor them. Moreover, don't attempt to censor us. This is a wiki, meaning that anyone can edit it, and if someone adds cursing, then cursing has been added. If you don't like it, go somewhere else. Or better yet, just click that red 'X' you see in the top right corner of the screen. It's just as easy. --General Insineratehymn 03:45, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Read HTBFANJS. It has a section on cussing. A bit is okish. Too much is horrible. Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me! 03:51, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Red X? I see a black one. I wonder if it does the same thing. Sir Modusoper

But it's not my choice whether or not I read the cussing. That should be considered as well. The Pondermatic 04:05, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Fine job edit-conflicting out other peoples' comments, by the way. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 04:11, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

I thought of a compromise!

WikiMedia has lots of extensions - is there one for an optional filter? That would get the best of both worlds. The Pondermatic 04:05, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Guess what? Nobody Cares. People cuss on Uncyclopedia, and it's life. THE ONLY WAY you will censor cursing is by being a sysop, which will never happen. --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 04:08, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

READ THIS. also, if we censor, we can't have the article Fisher Price! *GASP* --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 04:09, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

But, you see, people do care, or otherwise I wouldn't be here talking about it. And an optional filter would not ban cussing, it would only let those who don't want to see it ignore it much more easily. The Pondermatic 04:13, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

And stop with the [ [ woo-woo woo-woo woo-woo woo-woo crap crap shit|READ THIS ] ]. I'm not a n00b. =P The Pondermatic 04:13, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

You act like one. --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 04:16, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Ahem.

fizz!-- » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 04:18, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Tarnation! Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 04:19, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Shut the fizz up, n00b. And don't edit others comments or delete them just to censor, OK? --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 04:22, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

I'm assuming that he wasn't paying attention when the "warning, edit conflict" thingy popped up. To think otherwise is madness. Madness! Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 04:26, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Attention Uncyclopedians:

Testacles.

That is all. --Crazyswordsma n...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 04:22, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

What the hell are testacles? Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 04:26, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

I think he means "Testicles." --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 04:28, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Oh, those. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 04:34, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Testy icicles, indeed.

t o m p k i n s blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 04:50, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

attn: whoever made this

MARGARET THATCHER MARGARET THATCHER MARGARET THATCHER

--» >UF|TLK|▋» 04:31, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Also,
I maed a yuky doody

--General Insineratehymn 14:33, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
Don't forget this:

MARGARET THATCHER

--Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • FFS • WP) 19:47, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

I recently made one just like that!

FUCK SHIT PISS
FUCK SHIT PISS
FUCK SHIT PISS
FUCK SHIT PISS
FUCK SHIT PISS
FUCK SHIT PISS

--General Insineratehymn 19:54, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Calm down

Honestly, you only have to say the word "censor" and you guys are on a killing spree.

I think the latest compromise suggested by this person would actually be good, if it existed. They're not talking about censoring, they're talking about a filter for them so they can ignore the profanity. Although to be honest, Pondermatic, I think if you screen all pages with cursing you're not going to be left with much. We created Template:Safe to put on articles you'd like, but it hasn't been used much so far. Feel free to stick it on pages you come across that meet your standards, so others like you can enjoy the subset of articles that meet them. -- (but) ~~Untrue~~ Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 07:19, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Sure, the voluntary automatic filterification thingy is an okay idea, but the starter of this forum topic also said "...So, in conclusion, there is no reason for the denizens of this site to continue cussing.". That's bullhockey. Goldarned bullhockey. It gets our collective mother-tuckin', mellon-farming hackles up when people tell us how to write, I reckon. I can't speak for everyone else, but when I use a naughty word on a page (or in one memorable case, in the title), it's for a reason, dagnabit. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 07:39, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

PEOPLE, Listen!. He has come to save us from our wicked ways

Look at this snippet from his userpage, well, actually this is all of his userpage. This enlighten being is here to save us from enternal damnation and torure in hell

Look at this scripture that he has bestowed upon us.

I like all of the jokes except the religous and sexual ones and cussing, 
all of which shall be edit out by me whether you like it or not. 
I will, however, tolerate one-liners, funny quotes, blatant lies, cheese, 
Oscar Wilde, Sockfobbits, Russian Reversals, Oscar Wilde, 
entire articles, AAAAAAAAA!, you n00bs, Oscar Wilde, flamewars, 
flame throwers, fire flowers, flames in general, Oscar Wilde, 
the fact that Charles Darwin is Fidel Castro, and Oscar Wilde's mom.

And Oscar Wilde.

And I will also tolerate Oscar Wilde.

By grossly misinterpreting holy scripture ( and I am an expert on that matter ) we can gain an entire tailor made dogma all of our own, complete with weird nonsensical paradoxes ,gratuitous violent acts and fierce racist believes that are to be excused for cultural heritage.

Our new master teaches us that .

He frowns upon jokes on religion and he shall except blatant lies. That's realistically compatible .
We may use flame throwers on cussing people and people who believe in Darwinian principles.
See his forgiving nature for tolerating Oscar Wilde. A gesture most users will not even start to contemplate.
those are the guidelines as given to us by pondermatic. Amen.

Okay, Uncyclopedia will become a boring hellhole of unfunnyness and will probably die out within a week or two with our proper material, but I'm sure our new found faith will help us through these dark times..

So, people, what is is going to be ? The way of the enlightened prophet Pondermatic ? The way of light ? The way of unfunny niceness and only Oscar Wilde quotes ?

Or should we just ignore the silly woo-woo ? --Vosnul 10:03, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

As a user who never satirizes the darker aspects of religion, I can honestly say that I...can't keep a straight face while I'm typing this. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 10:21, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Actually, I was just trying make fun with inside jokes of Uncyclopedia and test out the rules of being funny offered in the Help scetion... That would be gross misinterpritation, though. XD The Pondermatic 00:28, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

I wrote Internet comedy: interview with Graham Chapman specifically as my take on the issue of sexually explicit humor. (/whoring) Humor has always had its earthy side. Always will. As Chaucer might have said, people who want only clean jokes can go get swived. ----OEJ 12:12, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Well, I wrote (mega whoring) Religious relic trading,Multi religion switching and HowTo:Find God to give religion the disrespect that it deserves and badly needs !. Also right now working on User:Vosnul/Rapefruit to add more sex. Explicit language itself just comes naturally to me and is put to good use across most of my works. I liked the Chapman article BTW, I reminded me of the xxth anniversary that Monty python did where somebody tells them they wish Chapman was here Cleese responds with "Well, the bugger is dead, Deceased, dead as a doornail, six feet under .. etc etc "--Vosnul 12:39, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

You should hear the eulogy he gave at the funeral. I seem to remember it got recorded and shown, although I forget the details. --

(but) ~~Untrue~~ Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 13:01, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the tip, Here is the YT link. [1] --Vosnul 13:24, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Yay! I don't think I'd seen all of it before actually, so thanks for that. --

(but) ~~Untrue~~ Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 15:08, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Transcendental numbers prove that circle squaring is insoluble?!

Aww man, now I'm really feeling down. Next thing you'll be telling me that it's impossible to trisect an angle or something. --L 13:53, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Am I the only one who is a little turned on right now? Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 14:15, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Next thing you know some infidel will start claiming that Bert and Ernie are Homosexual puppets and Kermit the frog his eye's are simply painted halves of pingpongballs. Do not worry L, All you really need if a bigger circle --Vosnul 14:46, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

The square of circle is circle times circle. It's easy once you know how. --

(but) ~~Untrue~~ Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 15:08, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Allow me to highlight all of the hypocrisies I have found in the blurb on your userpage

“

I like all of the jokes except the religous and sexual ones and cussing, all of which shall be edit out by me whether you like it or not. I will, however, tolerate one-liners, funny quotes, blatant lies, cheese, Oscar Wilde, Sockfobbits, Russian Reversals, Oscar Wilde, entire articles, AAAAAAAAA!, you n00bs, Oscar Wilde, flamewars, flame throwers, fire flowers, flames in general, Oscar Wilde, the fact that Charles Darwin is Fidel Castro, and Oscar Wilde's mom.

And Oscar Wilde.

And I will also tolerate Oscar Wilde.

”

That is all. --General Insineratehymn 15:26, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Ladies, ladies.....chill the fizz out. -- Sir Mhaille

(talk to me)

Sire! The citizens are revolting! Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 15:44, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

No kidding. Never have I seen so many cases of advanced psoriasis in one place. Ж Kalir _{nobody knows my gender} 16:45, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Cussing and sexual jokes aren't funny?

Who are you, Bill Cosby? Eddie Murphy and Richard Pryor beg to differ they made a living on cussing and telling sexual jokes. --Lt. Sir Orion Blastar (talk) 16:39, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

“The Pondermatic came up to me and accused me of being the "fizz You" guy, he can suck my dick!”
~ Eddie Murphy on The Pondermatic

“Tell The Pondermatic that he can suck my dick too!”
~ Richard Pryor on Cussing and Sexual Jokes

Priests, Chaplains, Imams, Vicars and those types make a living spreading religion , I'd rather fizz some shit up then be accountable for that --Vosnul 16:45, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Actually they take a vow of poverty and don't make that much of a living at it. The people who would rather fizz some shit up are the terrorists who don't really spread religion but spread fear instead, the religion in all of those cases is supposed to spread peace but the terrorists pervert it and spread fear instead and fizz some shit up. Hence that is the real problem with religion, in the way that it is managed, and not religion itself. --Lt. Sir Orion Blastar (talk) 17:24, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Good point, But it's not like those folks really starve to death whilst preaching. And the point whether it is people or religion that is the problem, that is up for debate, But first .. more sex and profanity !. --Vosnul 17:50, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

You have a point with the TV Evangelists who rake in the millions, but they never made a vow of poverty, and they don't exactly follow Jesus' teachings, and distort his teachings. I fault them for fooling the public into thinking that God is a genie and that prayers are wishes and if they send them a large sum of money God will grant their wishes. Again it is the management of religion at fault, as religion says to give money to the poor and these people are having the poor give money to them. Besides I sort of see TV Evangelists as entertainers pretending to be religious, and in a way hypocrites that Jesus didn't like in the first place. Perhaps that is why the "Oh God" movie had God opposed to a TV Evangelists who had perverted his teachings for financial gains. Still I agree, more sex and profanity, because I support free speech. --Lt. Sir Orion Blastar (talk) 18:30, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

I don't think Richard Pryor makes much of a living at it --Asahatter (annoy) 17:03, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Not after he died he doesn't. He got his start out in comedy cussing and making sexual jokes until they gave him some movie deals. --Lt. Sir Orion Blastar (talk) 17:24, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Um, yes, the being dead bit was what I was refering to. It does tend to harm one's career as a stand-up, although perhaps he's cussing still as a lie-down comedian --Asahatter (annoy) 17:52, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

hehe, I'm sure there is an article within that idea !. haaha -- Vosnul 18:02, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Honest response to the author

Hey, it's great that you dislike the bad words present in this here Uncyclopedia. The thing is, while a bunch of them don't fit (and when they don't, you can go ahead and take them out) a significant number of articles here require language that some audiences would find offensive. After all, if we had to take out anything offensive, we'd be without such jewels as Holocaust Tycoon, 9/11, and apparently the ever-adorable Puppy Luff. So, yeah, we can't really stop MARGARET THATCHER swearing ourselves, but I have an even better MARGARET THATCHER idea: ask Olipro to make you a MARGARET THATCHER {{expletive}} disabling device like the one for Template:USERNAME. If you compensate him for his time I'm sure you'll be on your way to a cleaner, happier Uncyclopedia in no time. Ж Kalir _{nobody knows my gender} 17:20, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Sort of a swear word filter or something. Could we write Javascript that puts in asterisks for the vowels or something if the user chooses it as an option? Then those who are ~~morons~~ ~~puritans~~ ~~grammar fascists~~ sensitive to the cussing can ~~censor~~ avoid it. --Lt. Sir Orion Blastar (talk) 17:31, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Or just nothing and ignore this nonsense. What if mister christian dog here thought it righteous of him to head off to the porn industry and exclaim that sentiment that he "does not like the assfizzing ,DPing, unsafe sexing, rimming and blowjobing, but does like the tight bikini's, medium sized breast, the in between dialog, and kissing parts". do you think Ron Jeremy would , for one single instance, ponder on the notion to start contemplating the idea of "Not ramming his giant cock up some 19 year old shitter again and again and again for sake of moral sense, dignity and the good name of the porn industry ?" or something?. ( I was not trying to make a point, just wanted to use loads and loads of profanity in a single post again ). --Vosnul 17:46, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, I could create that; how about we replace 'fizz' with 'fizz' and 'woo-woo' with 'woo-woo', and I'll think of other things for other crap. -- Prof. Olipro

KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 17:48, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Oh dear, he's serious folks... I think this could make some pages hilarious. Any more suggestions for the lexicon? --Asahatter (annoy) 17:54, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

You know the only result you would get would be transforming articles into bad mainstream censored rap lyrics . "Well can I some fizz, get some woo woo. ahu ahu . yeah" --Vosnul 17:59, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Only as a bit of user javascript that you can choose to insert yourself... or not. -- Prof. Olipro

KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 18:04, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Right!, But what is the point for mainsteam gansta rappers to censor there own lyrics on uncyclopedia ? You make complicated javascript man --Vosnul 18:12, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

A filter that transforms articles into nonsense would be good. At least my eyes won't burn when I look at a worthless page. =P I support this idea wholeheartedly. Remember that such a filter could be made optional and it wouldn't have an effect on readers who don't care. The Pondermatic 00:34, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

I'd serious vote to feature the javascript page that did this... it'd just be funny to see Uncyclopedia transformed into a sea of asterisks... --

(but) ~~Untrue~~ Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 11:12, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Well as a Christian I am not into porn, but I use critical thinking to understand that there are some people who are into porn. That while I don't use it and find it degrading and the lowest form of entertainment, that other people hold different opinions and views than I do. I am not going to ban porn, and I think if someone wants to watch it they can. So I just ignore it when it gets into the public. As a young man in my late teens to early twenties, I was agnostic and I did watch and read porn, so I understand the appeal of it. As I matured, I found I didn't need porn anymore and I found it degrading to human beings, etc and that I was foolish to watch and read it, though I didn't know any better at the time. Still I don't force my views and opinions on others. I usually don't even use cuss words, but for the sake of Uncyclopedia I use them sometimes to be funny. Sometimes I remove them, like from some UnNews articles that I tried to make funny that an anonymous IP asked for help, but used cuss words all over the page. I feel that it is alright for others, and just as my own views and opinions and culture and religion etc are important to me, someone else's views and opinions and culture and religion (or non-religion) are important to them as well. In the words of Judge Mills Lane "I'll allow it!" even though I am supposed to be opposed to it. But then not all Christians are as enlightened as I am. :) --Lt. Sir Orion Blastar (talk) 18:21, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

As a fierce militant atheist I myself am not into porn either. ( As a sex crazed young adult finding himself in the prime of his life unsatisfied with the fucked up world he sees around him , I kinda dig porn. But don't have any, cause I'm also lazy ) , But seriously , you stance is an example for tons of people. Good words, great attitude. You make it possible for people to disagree about religion ( and other retarded malevolent bullshit like that ) in a civilized and humorous way.--Vosnul 18:50, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Thank you, it helps for me to also be batfuck insane, which gives me this viewpoint and attitude. --Lt. Sir Orion Blastar (talk) 03:31, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

FU PONDERMATIC. FU

FU PONDERMATIC. --Crazyswordsma n...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 19:56, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

SECONDED. FU PONDERMATIC --General Insineratehymn 21:27, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

GOTO 10. --Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • FFS • WP) 00:39, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

FU pondermatic. i already did--FREDD 05:07, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Statement from the Community Argument Commission

It has been determined that this discussion is much too long and deals with an unresolvable issue. It has been classified as a Type 7 Flame War, meaning the participants have generally good intentions but are also inflexible in their opinions. The main constituents of the discussion are:

Prudish ninnies
Free-speech communist potheads
People who think cursing is inherently funny
Reasonable people, many of whom try to disarm the conversation by being silly

All participants in this discussion are hereby requested to give it a rest. Failure to comply will result in a time-out to think about what you've done. --The Acceptable Cainad (Fnord) 08:32, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

And a spanking? Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 08:38, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Maybe even a spell on the naughty step. And none of you want to sit on the naughty step, do you? • Spang • ☃ • talk • 08:58, 27 May 2007

And let me be the first to say in this topic...

FU SPANG. --AAA! (AAAA) 09:16, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
FU Spang? FU The Pondermatic! --Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • FFS • WP) 09:44, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Mhaille said it best, I think, when he said, "Ladies, ladies.....chill the fizz out.". Then he put his hand on my thigh. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 09:49, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

NO. FU PONDERMATIC. --Crazyswordsma n...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 01:04, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Ladies and motherfuckers, For your fucking entertainment right now

I thought after such a hevty debate we could do with some light entertainment. -- Vosnul 10:18, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Cool - I've never seen Pulp Fiction before. Quite a short film, isn't it? --

(but) ~~Untrue~~ Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 11:09, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Are there any other movies on YouTube that have been similarly edited? While I did find parts of Pulp Fiction that were edited out of this entertaining, I bet such a version would show all of the good parts of, say, Snakes on a Plane.--Naughtius Maximus

F@H Woof!

MeowMUN 17:20, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Ooo! My turn to make a header! Exciting!

Awwwww...

Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 10:52, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Hey, I thought Pondermatic told us not to use so much sexual innuendo ? --Vosnul 10:53, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Fuck him. We'll use as much sexual innuendo as we please! --General Insineratehymn 16:29, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

That's not sex. That's drugs. --Crazyswordsma n...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 22:00, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

MO, thats so cute XD I squeed!!! :) ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 10:53, 02 June 2007

NO0o000000000000OOOOOOOOOOOOOo!!!!!!!!!!!!

“My girlfriend's in the Olympics. She be running trackmeets.
I'm lying. She's a parapeligic. She eats with her feet. What the fuck you laughing at? She'll be here next week.
In a black Jeep, with two other handicapped freaks.”
~ Bizarre of D12 on Your Mom

In other words, FUCK YOU!FUCK YOU YOu FaggOt!

I gotta listen to people because of your fuckin' shit? You're ordering me out!?! You better get your own fuckin' army, pal! I'm what counts out here! Not your fuckin' country clubs or your fucking T.V. shows! Get this through your head you Jew motherfucker you! You only exist out here out here because of ME! Without me, you personally, every fuckin' wise-guy around would take fuckin' peice of your fucking bitch-ass! Then where you gonna go?!? You're warned. Don't ever fuckin' go my head you bitch! --Dexter111344 18:00, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

O_O I think I got a little bit dumber reading that. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 18:25, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Yes, you did. --Dexter111344 18:31, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

An interesting if egocentric point of view. Could you put it another way? --Pieface 04:59, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Another way, huh... Okay... Here's another way: The guy who created this shit topic sould be shot in the fucking head. --Dexter111344 16:25, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

See my previous comment. Yes, you disagree with him. No, it's not necessary to be a dickhead about it. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 16:39, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Clarification

Before I forget (which, at my age means immediately) -- is this a flame war? I always wanted to be a soldier in a flame war! --Pieface 05:01, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Indeed it is - to join, light yourself on fire. After that, it will suddenly become very obvious what you have to do. --

(but) ~~Untrue~~ Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 09:46, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Free speech

It's someone's choice to add curse words to their articals or not. Don't edit them, it will probably just piss someone off to the point of when they will start bitching at you for doing it. Just don't over-do it. If you must "cuss" then by all means, do it, just don't put in a constant stream of "Fuck, shit, Bitch, ass," over and over again. If you want someone to know that you need empasis, then either "cuss" or use italics. Simple as that. --Thenick606 14:40, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

That's the same thing I said a while back, but Pondermatic didn't bother to listen. --General Insineratehymn 19:55, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Pondermatic.. He's out hero.. Gonna take that cussing down to zero.., But suddenly our Hero Pondermatic was in serious trouble. It seemed that, ironically enough, he had been adopted against his own will by the cursed villain Vosnul who, by right of religion, stated that any form of adoption is a unbreakable bond not to be broken once forged. And strangely enough most people did not see a problem with that.. To be continued. --Vosnul 20:17, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Under what rock were you under/ What cave have you been in ?!

In today's world, you HAVE to use foul language, or people will think you're a retard or a idiot, baby, worse. This is the TRUTH, no more, no less. 65.163.112.102 22:24, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, you failed to use fucking foul language in your post. Therefore I reject your argument since I think you are a retard or a idiot, baby, worse. Fuck. --

(but) ~~Untrue~~ Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 00:55, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

WTF! Oh shit! Must be getting FUCKING OLD!!!! 65.163.113.169 06:00, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

What a shame...

It looks like you people frightened Mr. Pondermatic away from this website. You drove him away! The saint who was going to change this website into the next great place for family fun!I hope you guys are happy! Now we're all going to hell for tolerating cussing on our site! Fuck! --THE 12:11, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Thought we were there already. 65.163.112.167 01:55, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Aww, c'mon

Wow. Uncyclopedia's changed a lot... or perhaps I just don't remember it right. Be kind to noobs, guys. You were one once. --The Absent Admin (Who Has Forgotten Her Password)

Helpful and/or on-topic, not so much. But we are kind. I, for one, regularly give n00bs puppies. Well, it's just the one puppy, actually. I take it from the previous n00b and give it to the next on. It's the thought that counts, I think. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 23:31, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Some of us are trying FF :) MO for example is very trying. ;P ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 11:39, 03 June 2007

Swears should not be censored, as they are an essential part of Uncyclopedia if used well. Unfortunately, they are sometimes overused and can get obnoxious and unfunny. P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 02:48, 4 June 2007 (UTC)