From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
|
This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at VFD.
|
Score: 4
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (4) |
- Eh, this one's not that bad... just unfinished. Very unfinished. Hasn't been touched since 2008, by user who was also last seen in 2008. The thing doesn't have anything linking to it, either... so I guess this is a 'delete unless someone will adopt it' vote. As it is, it is simply going nowhere and doesn't have much point in existing. Cruel? Perhaps, but it doesn't look like anyone will miss it. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) • (stalk) -- 20101204 - 07:45 (UTC)
- Delete. It can go.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 22:00, December 4, 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. --Roman Dog Bird 05:18, December 6, 2010 (UTC)
- Delete.--Count of Monkey Crisco 07:52, December 6, 2010 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 6
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (6) |
- Delete. Let's keep going then, shall we? --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 20:03, December 5, 2010 (UTC)
- crap--Poiz,Teh zork master!!! 20:19, December 5, 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. Just like the last one, only a little different. Spıke Ѧ 21:10 5-Dec-10
- Delete. Bot really seeing much of an article here. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) • (stalk) -- 20101206 - 00:16 (UTC)
- Delete.--Count of Monkey Crisco 04:59, December 6, 2010 (UTC)
- Lvl. 9479028375489324: Ima firin mah lazar! --Roman Dog Bird 05:02, December 6, 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. --AwesomeName 11:53, December 6, 2010 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 6
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (6) |
- Delete. This one's bad too. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 19:39, December 5, 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. Spıke Ѧ 19:53 5-Dec-10
- crap--Poiz,Teh zork master!!! 20:19, December 5, 2010 (UTC)
- Actually, some of the sentences seemed like they could be part of a decent article... thats just not enough, though. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) • (stalk) -- 20101206 - 00:44 (UTC)
- --Roman Dog Bird 05:07, December 6, 2010 (UTC)
- Delete.--Count of Monkey Crisco 22:09, December 6, 2010 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Rectal bleeding. So Roman Dog Bird declares jihad on Pokémon pages? Throw this one in. A promising concept of crossing Pikachu with Bin Laden is ruined by horrible, horrible writing. Owned by I.P.Anon and friends since 2007. Spıke Ѧ 19:12 5-Dec-10
- As a terrorist, I am deeply offended by this. --Roman Dog Bird 19:19, December 5, 2010 (UTC)
- crap--Poiz,Teh zork master!!! 20:19, December 5, 2010 (UTC)
- I double down on your crap, and call Bin Laden's bluff. Aleister 00:24 6 12
- I think what it is says it all. Rare circumstances do not apply. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) • (stalk) -- 20101206 - 02:20 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 4
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (4) |
- Plagiarized. During my merge of Kurvatia (on VFD) into Croatia, Aleister suggested that this part be moved into UnPoetia. He did some clerical editing of it but gobs of it are in a foreign language. It had been added to Croatia on 17-Mar-07 as the final act of Nemesis. Aleister now says that Google finds identical text on Facebook as of Dec-06. Spıke Ѧ 13:38 5-Dec-10
- Delete. It's still a funny read, have a look at it before it goes. But stolen like I steal the orphan's Christmas presents every year about this time. It doesn't make uncy look very good when we dress up sporks with some tinsel, and I should have checked this page long ago before I put the tinsel on. Aleister 14:14 5 12
- Per above. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) • (stalk) -- 20101206 - 00:14 (UTC)
- Delete. --Roman Dog Bird 05:11, December 6, 2010 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Comment. - Facebook, you say? Hypothetically, if Nemesis were the original author, or a close friend of the original, would it matter if it were "published" elsewhere first? -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 15:32, Dec. 5, 2010
- Speaking of which, deja vu, amirite? -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 15:35, Dec. 5, 2010
- Ize would have doubts that Nemesis was the author, mainly because when it was posted here it was in a prose layout, not a poetry or song layout, just the words laying there. Someone else spent the time to make it look like a poem, then SPIKE moved it and I worked on it some more to make it presentable. You'd think the original author would have dressed it up in poem clothes before laying it on the page. But that is all theory, of course, without knowing the facts. If the guy comes back and asks "Hey, WTF, where is my original poem?" then we can raise it from the River Styx. Aleister 00:20 6 12
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Obliterate. per below, though this one may be worse. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 05:06, December 5, 2010 (UTC)
- the first quote is all you need to look at really --Roman Dog Bird 19:21, December 5, 2010 (UTC)
- crap--Poiz,Teh zork master!!! 20:19, December 5, 2010 (UTC)
- Mummy, it said gay. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) • (stalk) -- 20101206 - 02:25 (UTC)
- Delete. Completely incomprehensible to anyone who doesn't mainline this stuff. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 15:57, December 6, 2010 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Obliterate. I think this mess has been around long enough. It's not funny, it's got a shit-load of red links, and it's a huge target for vandalism being a Pokemon article. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 04:54, December 5, 2010 (UTC)
- delete every pokemon article --Roman Dog Bird 04:57, December 5, 2010 (UTC)
- crap--Poiz,Teh zork master!!! 20:19, December 5, 2010 (UTC)
- It is indeed quite a mess. As I see no real need for such an article nor any framework from which an actually decent one might be scrounged amid this... ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) • (stalk) -- 20101206 - 00:18 (UTC)
- Delete.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 15:50, December 6, 2010 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 1
|
Keep (1) |
- Keep. Towncruft, but decently written. I'll clean it up a little bit and delete the meandering first-person start of Section 1, but won't add {{VFD}}, as the vote seems to be moot. Spıke Ѧ 14:12 3-Dec-10 PS--Clean-up done; have also contacted the author explaining the risks that townie articles face here. Spıke Ѧ 14:39 3-Dec-10
|
Delete (2) |
- Delete. Maybe just expanded, but I saw nothing in it Gen. Fudgem0bile Eat urinal cakes. 03:48, December 3, 2010 (UTC)
Delete... I think? I started typing something in here a few hours ago, but then I apparently wandered off. I'm sure I had a reason, though. Something about made-up stuff and repetition, perhaps? ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) • (stalk) -- 20101203 - 06:42 (UTC)
- Delete. It is very bad. No reason to keep it. Also I don't see any vfd template but no one says anything to Fudgemobile. I am not the only one who makes mistakes. --M&M (also known as Mimo&maxus) What do you want? Wanna see my balls? 13:55, December 3, 2010 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Comment. Not old enough. Use the ICU tag instead. --Count of Monkey Crisco 06:22, December 3, 2010 (UTC)
- Ghah, that'll teach me to trust my past self... ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) • (stalk) -- 20101203 - 06:44 (UTC)
- Invalid on two accounts, too young and no VFD tag. Fudgemobile, spend some time to read the VFD rules please. ~ 22:26, December 4, 2010 (UTC)
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. This entire section was also extremely pointless as it contains only one (make that two) sentences. --Count of Monkey Crisco 23:50, December 2, 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. As well as the bit of stage direction that Count quotes which slipped onto the page, the article starts out on the wrong foot by telling us how crazy (or how funny) it is. I mean "Krazy," because this job on the eminently ridiculous Canadian military is a big acronym designed to evoke the not-Canadian Ku Klux Klan, a propos of nothing. So we are down to ridiculing Canadians (and George Bush), without specifying anything. And without pix. Spıke Ѧ 00:33 3-Dec-10
- Delete. 2006-cruft. The concept might work on illogicopedia if it had pics, and didn't have the work krazy in the title. --Mn-z 00:56, December 3, 2010 (UTC)
- "and your mom" --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 17:24, December 3, 2010 (UTC)
- How strange... kind of fails in the funny department. And the people caring about it department, for that matter. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) • (stalk) -- 20101203 - 17:32 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. Like the concept, but the execution is terrible. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 21:07, December 2, 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. OH GOD WHY MY POOR SKULL!!! STOP DESTROYING IT WITH AN INDUSTRIAL SIZED HEAVY OBJECT!!!!!!!!!!!--Count of Monkey Crisco 21:14, December 2, 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. Wily, what is "the concept"?--to name a thing (which Section 2 finally tells us is a state) "On the Map" and then discover that it is not on the map? Ho ho ho! This is one of the 58 states in The United Play Land Toy, which (below) we are very close to huffing, one of the few non-red links in that list. The article is not about anything. Section 3 is witty dialogue. Section 4 is nagging to the reader. Yikes. Spıke Ѧ 21:18 2-Dec-10
- An article? Where? ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) • (stalk) -- 20101203 - 17:28 (UTC)
- Delete. --Roman Dog Bird 20:55, December 3, 2010 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 6
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (6) |
- Delete. Not an UnNews and not a good article either. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 15:25, 2 December 2010
- Delete. No, neither. If this were not an article from 2008, I would follow UnNews custom in the case of incomplete and awful articles planted on the Front Page, and "mercy move" it to userspace for both reasons. Unfortunately, Anon has no userspace. Spıke Ѧ 16:54 2-Dec-10
- Delete, for precisely what Socky said. I mean, how did this even survive? ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) • (stalk) -- 20101202 - 17:42 (UTC)
- Delete. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 17:57, December 2, 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. This is why deleting UnNews should be an acceptable, even common practice. No respite for the cruftheads. --Count of Monkey Crisco 21:12, December 2, 2010 (UTC)
- Delete.. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 21:58, December 2, 2010 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. Just plain crap. --Count of Monkey Crisco 22:15, December 1, 2010 (UTC)
- A list and some dookage. --Roman Dog Bird 22:50, December 1, 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. Imagine if the author had stayed long enough to flesh out all those red-links. Spıke Ѧ 22:54 1-Dec-10
- Oh, gods... that's just awful. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) • (stalk) -- 20101202 - 18:14 (UTC)
- Ugh. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 21:05, December 2, 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. the only thing that could be worse than this article's big-assed list o' red links would be the same list, but with blue links. --Mn-z 01:00, December 3, 2010 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Every paragraph is a whole new hell of cruft. I'd rather read a phone book where every name had been tippexed out and replaced with 'Chuck Norris' because that's hilarious. Myocardialinfarction 17:27, December 1, 2010 (UTC)
- Mabey not. Intro claims Officer Dave is a school web filter, but the sections instantly turn it into a character about which we need (yawn!) a made-up bio and made-up history, involving Satan. Spıke Ѧ 17:57 1-Dec-10
- Delete. --Count of Monkey Crisco 21:00, December 1, 2010 (UTC)
- poop poop poop pooop --Roman Dog Bird 22:50, December 1, 2010 (UTC)
- What Roman Dog Bird said. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) • (stalk) -- 20101202 - 18:12 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 7
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (7) |
- Article about a completely fictional band that contains four random paragraphs and a bunch of discography listcruft--—John Lydon 12:50, December 1, 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. I don't know that the band is fictional; it might just be hopelessly obscure. At any rate, the prose is not going to be funny to anyone other than the tiny group in the know; and the listcruft that follows--one liners that give potty-mouthed puns to song titles--is something I'll always vote against unless paired with really clever prose. Spıke Ѧ 17:35 1-Dec-10
- Delete. Discographies usually lead to unfunny listcruft. --Count of Monkey Crisco 20:51, December 1, 2010 (UTC)
- poooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooopppoooooooooooopppoopopopooop cfcdcxufyryutdytudydrudtdr --Roman Dog Bird 22:52, December 1, 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. And in real life too, please. And I wish - oh, how I wish - they were just hopelessly obscure over here. Fuckers. --UU - natter 10:48, Dec 2
- Delete. For heaven's sake, can't you people spoof a real Christian band? --Scofield 14:31, December 2, 2010 (UTC)
- What's a 'band'? I do know that's just bad writing, though... ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) • (stalk) -- 20101202 - 18:10 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 4
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (4) |
- Delete. Pure, relentless cruft. --Count of Monkey Crisco 22:30, December 1, 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. --Roman Dog Bird 22:33, December 1, 2010 (UTC)
- sick up acidic crap out of their ears Really dumb. Spıke Ѧ 22:59 1-Dec-10
- Was something slighted by someone named Gareth in a past life? ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) • (stalk) -- 20101202 - 18:16 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 4
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (4) |
- It makes me think someone neglected to read HTBFANJS. Mind, I didn't get very far through it, but usually such things get worse, not better, as they go, and this certainly was... ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) • (stalk) -- 20101202 - 08:02 (UTC)
- Delete. GEORGIEGIBBONS talk contributions 08:05, December 2, 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. Pwndumbo. --Count of Monkey Crisco 20:58, December 2, 2010 (UTC)
- Delete.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 00:06, December 3, 2010 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- 1. This sucks. 2. This subject already has an article. 3. *I GUESS this is only a minor complaint and a petty one at that but* That fucking Nostalgia Critic quote (the fact that nobody besides me seems to know who this dude is here might be a good sign that he isn't as popular as I thought. I advise you all to continue avoiding him and to never check out his shit website which is filled to the brim with (mostly) untalented, money grubbing hacks and one of the most severely retarded fan bases that I have ever seen). 4. There is nothing worth keeping here, thus nothing worth saving and adding to the other article. 5. The AVGN sucks. He hardly even deserves one article. --Roman Dog Bird 00:09, December 1, 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. I endorse #1 above and have no comment on the others. If this is not cyber-bullying, it is a gratuitous duplicate article with no value added. Spıke Ѧ 00:46 1-Dec-10
- Delete. tl;dr version: this sucks. --UU - natter 09:57, Dec 1
- Delete. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 21:08, December 1, 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. Shitty article that sucks ass. --Count of Monkey Crisco 22:34, December 1, 2010 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: -4
|
Keep (5) |
- Are you kidding??? Despite its use of {{Facts}} (which I have replaced with {{VFD}} as a favor to you), this is not factual at all, but an obviously crazed misstatement of a foreign-language opera, complete with foreign-language song titles. Even its use of memes is not as tiresome as usual, as the concept that an opera would be built around these memes is hilarious. Needs photos and other graphics. Spıke Ѧ 17:04 30-Nov-10
- Keep. I must admit I'm not an opera fan, so I'll trust SPIKE on this one. SPIKE has written many operas, and has performed at least one in the park while drunk and mistaking a rabbit for an Italian tenor and singing to it. So, yeah. Aleister 19:40 30 11
- I am not an opera lover and do not claim it skewers Carmen in a particularly clever way. I claim it is funny regardless of whether it does. Spıke Ѧ 19:45 30-Nov-10
- I rather like it. Not the best, but it plays out good irreality. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) • (stalk) -- 20101130 - 20:00 (UTC)
- It's a bit mad but might have some potential in there. Reminds me of a joke in one of the Spinal Tap documentaries where a film maker talks about his 'all white' version of Carmen Jones --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 23:56, November 30, 2010 (UTC)
- Keep. --Chiefjustice32X 08:19, December 2, 2010 (UTC)
|
Delete (1) |
- Delete. This is too factual to be funny. -- 16:38, November 30, 2010 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. What's not sporked from Wikipedia is in violation of article 14 of HTBFANJS: Outright sarcasm is Not a Replacement for Humor. --Count of Monkey Crisco 12:27, November 30, 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. It's worse than that: author creates a mirror-world version of the PowerPuffs (classified under the fake name: an example of forcing the reader to look up an article by its punch line), then thinks we care how tartly he can insult his own creation. Spıke Ѧ 13:10 30-Nov-10
- Delete. Carries all the hallmarks that signal you're in for a crap read here...The idea that you know what the writer is on about without any explanation..a stupid reworking of the cast list..some fictional and mind crunchingly dull/abusive adventures that are just screamingly unfunny in all languages. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 00:02, December 1, 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. Bad, not made-upness... that may be even worse than just bad. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) • (stalk) -- 20101201 - 01:22 (UTC)
- Delete. --Roman Dog Bird 03:17, December 1, 2010 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Comment. It's worse than that Spike, these were real characters in the Powerpuff Girls continuity. This is another example of taking a one off joke/character/episode from a popular cartoon and trying to articlize it. --Count of Monkey Crisco 19:23, November 30, 2010 (UTC)
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. Made up character, random stuff, ramble, ramble, ramble. It's Evil Pizza, what were you expecting? --Count of Monkey Crisco 09:30, November 30, 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. Kiddie scribbles. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 10:37, November 30, 2010 (UTC)
- Scary, isn't it. Don't forget memes, nonsense numbers, and lists of things with no connection. Spıke Ѧ 10:47 30-Nov-10
- Delete. Eat it. Aleister 13:29 30 11
- It's so bad it's scary. See Spike, it's done like that. -- 15:34, November 30, 2010 (UTC)
- Ugh. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 15:46, November 30, 2010 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Does anyone know of a good cheese pizza pic? The only one I found of any use for a page I'm fucking (and she is demanding) is too small and can't be enlarged. Thanks, if you a know of a one. Aleister 13:31 30 11
|
Score: 4
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (4) |
- Delete. For a long time, our article on the cute child star has had an introductory section on his cuteness as a diabolical plot, but that and the photo is the only link to reality; the rest is History of the Future as Lewis becomes the US's 43rd President--in 2359. In the current version, moreover, the intro is an intro of Michael Knab. Has suffered death by Anons; if anyone has anything funny to say about the real Lewis, he should start over. Spıke Ѧ 23:41 29-Nov-10
- Delete. Textbook Uncyclopedia dross. --Count of Monkey Crisco 01:43, November 30, 2010 (UTC)
- Delete.A vintage turd. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 10:33, November 30, 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. --Roman Dog Bird 03:24, December 1, 2010 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 4
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (4) |
- Delete. Count of Monkey Crisco invited this nomination in his nomination of Samurai Cowboy Island, below, and I'm happy to, though I don't see why he didn't himself--both articles start out virtually identically and they are in the same, unfunny business, though they had different authors (Farbus vs Pizzacake). If, like the card game where several people play out the same hand, this was a 2006 writing contest where two authors took the same text to see who would produce the better article, the jury is out. Spıke Ѧ 20:48 29-Nov-10
- Delete. I think this one manages to be worse than the other. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) • (stalk) -- 20101129 - 22:23 (UTC)
- Delete.Yup, don't mind.--Count of Monkey Crisco 03:30, November 30, 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. Rubbish comes in pairs here. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 10:32, November 30, 2010 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- This one has a Russian Reversal. Spıke Ѧ 20:49 29-Nov-10
- Samurai was sporked from Ninja, and the changes since its first edit are trivial. Spıke Ѧ 20:53 29-Nov-10
|
Score: 0
|
Keep (5) |
- Keep. Revert to early 2009 version, give it a little listectomy and some formatting and it'll work just fine. Those two bits where Uwe Boll talks about how he would direct The Duel, Jaws and Taxi Driver are funny and strongly written. Hell, if this gets deleted put this version in my user space and I'll revive it. There's enough to work with. --Count of Monkey Crisco 04:13, November 26, 2010 (UTC)
- Keep.--Sycamore (Talk) 09:18, November 26, 2010 (UTC)
- sympathy keep the author is actively working on it. If it takes him a while to get the hang on not writing stupid stuff, its better his "sandbox" be confined to as few of articles as is possible. And, there is savable content in the history. --Mn-z 02:39, November 28, 2010 (UTC)
- Preposterous. As in the nomination below (which no one will be looking for), if this author is so untrainable that we must sacrifice an article on a noted director to keep him captive, it is why the ban-stick was invented. Spıke Ѧ 11:47 28-Nov-10
- Relax. ~ 12:23, November 28, 2010 (UTC)
- Keep. Boll is listed as the director of Spang's user page, so if Spang were here he'd probably vote to keep, so I'll stand-in for him. And this guy has been working on this page and is emotionally attached, so his determined rewrites and our reverts may polish his writing style and create a good user (we can only dream). Aleister 11:44 28 11
- Keep. I think we'd be better off just putting in a rewrite template. The introduction's pretty good, and one of my UnNews articles links to it! --Scofield 15:34, November 30, 2010 (UTC)
|
Delete (5) |
- It's just awful... been getting longer of late, but it was awful even before, so far as I could bring myself to check. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101125 - 22:35 (UTC)
- Weak delete. The Wikipedia article offers many ways in which this German director of films, some based on video games, is just awful. The overlong Uncyclopedia rendition tells us he was "created by Adolf Hitler's penis Urethra," then wheelbarrows more of the same. We need an article on him, or this article needs an owner with a sharp scalpel. Spıke Ѧ 22:44 25-Nov-10
- uh huh huh huh, this guy's a dumbass --Roman Dog Bird 22:58, November 25, 2010 (UTC)
- This needs to be torn down and rebuild from scratch. There's a lot you can say about Mr. Boll and this piece doesn't cut it. ~ 12:27, November 28, 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. Remove unless it is radically rebuilt. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 10:30, November 30, 2010 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- MaxRebo120 has applied 6 edits (and possibly 2 more as I.P.Anon) (at one point removing the {{VFD}}) (among other things, adding the coveted {{Satan Approved}}) since this article was nominated; on his talk page, he admits being a sockpuppet and Sycamore and Mordillo implore him to stop randomizing articles by the addition of categories. I'll withdraw my Delete vote if the Count does what he proposes; but in the longer term, our problem is not with Uwe Boll.Spıke Ѧ 00:09 27-Nov-10
- Kept. --Chiefjustice32X 15:52, November 30, 2010 (UTC)
|