From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
|
This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at VFD.
|
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete.I copy it to Coca-Cola. 071058s (talk)
- Reverted. The {{Merge}} tag means merge, not concatenate creating a mess. Spıke Ѧ 15:08 30-Mar-15
- Delete. The New Coke/Coke Classic fiasco is a fine candidate for our treatment; by comparison, what is Real Coca-Cola and who would look for this page? Invents a product, tells us how vile it is, and nags the reader to avoid it. Useless. Spıke Ѧ 15:08 30-Mar-15
- Delete. External linkage. Ye Blacke Adder (talk) 05:17, April 19, 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Plagiarism of Coca-Cola and it isn't funny Sir TheWikiMan026 CUN,UmP, (Chatter) 19:05, April 28, 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Lacks fizz. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 12:50, April 30, 2015 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. The only contribution of Yafie Achmad Raihan (2013). Not English. Not funny. Spıke Ѧ 16:15 14-Apr-15
- Delete. Also not humor (I might have missed something, but there appears to be no attempts at humor in the article.) CarnassisChaosbringer (talk) 19:30, April 14, 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Unfunny Engrish. Could not be the topic of a funny article, therefore cannot be saved. Burn. --not Molbanhan but actually <insert name here> talk to him/her 20:00, April 18, 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Humour, if any, is Indonesian. Ye Blacke Adder (talk) 05:17, April 19, 2015 (UTC)
- Delete.WTF? --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 12:51, April 30, 2015 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. As this forum has just deleted 1901 Uncyclopedia Supreme Symposium Spectacular at Buffalo, New York, here is Joe9320's cheap imitation of 2006 feature 1846 Uncyclopedia Convention at Aurora, New York. This was an attempt to create another "My sojourn" franchise of imitation comedy, without the comedy. Spıke Ѧ 23:09 29-Apr-15
- Delete. Navelism. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 12:52, April 30, 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. SirScottPat VFH NotM WotM WotY UotM 12:47, May 1, 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. --Sog1970 (talk) 21:08, May 2, 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. --EStop (talk) 10:20, May 4, 2015 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. Not funny. SirScottPat VFH NotM WotM WotY UotM 12:46, May 1, 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Pranks the reader without amusing him. Spıke Ѧ 12:49 1-May-15
- Delete. A bit light on text.--EStop (talk) 10:17, May 4, 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. The writer should consider an exorcism. BrokenKnives (talk) 15:50, May 4, 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Really? Sir TheWikiMan026 CUN,UmP, (Chatter) 17:20, May 4, 2015 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
- The title has a subtle charm, though I believe it's a direct lift from Charlotte Bronte--Sog1970 (talk) 20:46, May 2, 2015 (UTC)
- Dunno; I am not as versed in the Classics. Spıke Ѧ 20:54 2-May-15
|
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. Reflecting our chronic debate about whether we turn off readers by having too many crap articles, faster than we turn off authors by being too quick to purge crap articles, this is a piece of noise masquerading as policy. Spıke Ѧ 20:53 2-May-15
- Delete. Not sure what point the author was trying to get across.--Sog1970 (talk) 21:07, May 2, 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Hitting saucepan with wooden spoon. --EStop (talk) 10:14, May 4, 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Such a waste of precious time and use of finger muscles. BrokenKnives (talk) 19:23, May 4, 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Ctrl+VVVVVVVVVVV(I'll show them! I'll show them ALL!)VVVVVVVVVVVV CarnassisChaosbringer (talk) 20:28, May 5, 2015 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
|
Score: -1 • voting closed
|
Delete (0) |
Delete. I really don't see enough legitimately entertaining content to justify keeping this article. CarnassisChaosbringer (talk) 20:13, May 5, 2015 (UTC)
|
Keep (1) |
- Keep. Nominator says in the change summary that he tried to clean it up but there was nothing left, but I think this is doable. It would be nice to have an article at this name. Spıke Ѧ 20:24 5-May-15
- I looked over your edits, and I like them. Perhaps I was too quick to throw out the baby turtles with the bathwater. CarnassisChaosbringer (talk) 20:47, May 5, 2015 (UTC)
- Then the thing to do is
strike through your nomination — Then volunteer to teach author how to code a wikitable inside a wikitable, rather than just type enough <br>s to make it come out right on his screen until someone adds or deletes an entry, grr! Spıke Ѧ 20:53 5-May-15
|
Comments |
- Nomination withdrawn. Spıke Ѧ 19:33 7-May-15
|
Score: 4 • voting closed
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. Amuses author at expense of reader, instead of amusing the reader. Uses typography instead of humor. Not to be confused with the entirely different Men In Black, to which it should be redirected. Spıke Ѧ 15:11 17-Apr-15
- Delete and redirect as per Spike. ConCass2 (talk) 22:06, April 29, 2015 (UTC)
- Delete and redirect Funny in a one-liner sort of way, but not Uncyclopedic. --EStop (talk) 10:29, May 4, 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Belongs on Reddit. BrokenKnives (talk) 15:46, May 4, 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Not funny. Stranger195 (talk) 07:03, May 8, 2015 (UTC)
|
Keep (1) |
- Keep. I did some edits (as per SPIKE's practice and suggestion for these things). The article is now perfect in every way. Have a nice day. DAP Dame Pleb Com. Miley Spears (talk) 20:00, April 28, 2015 (UTC)
- Removing the cruft from the single paragraph was an improvement, but it addressed none of my concerns. Spıke Ѧ 10:30 4-May-15
|
Comments |
|
Score: 0 • voting closed
|
Delete (2) |
- Delete. A page in the cutesy "style of the thing it's about," namely, unreadable stupidity. Spıke Ѧ 15:30 18-Apr-15
- Delete. If only spambots were human, and had the capacity to be amused. BrokenKnives (talk) 19:21, May 4, 2015 (UTC)
|
Keep (2) |
- Keep. OK it's not the greatest article I ever read, but worth keeping. Also on a wiki I admin I made a Fixit tag for articles that could use work. You might want that here. DAP Dame Pleb Com. Miley Spears (talk) 19:14, April 28, 2015 (UTC)
- We have plenty of tags, such as {{Fix}}. I could tag it and delete it in a month, or I can bring them here to solicit other opinions. Spıke Ѧ 23:11 29-Apr-15
- Keep. It has its issues, but I think it also might have potential.CarnassisChaosbringer (talk) 19:41, May 5, 2015 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- If you do delete this please send it to User:Miley Spears/Spam (electronic). I have some ideas I don't have time to do now. DAP Dame Pleb Com. Miley Spears (talk) 20:04, April 28, 2015 (UTC)
- Abstain. At the moment I am pondering whether this article like one of those town bars that is known for dodgy clientele and shady dealings. The local constab would be very happy to close it, or hoik them all out; but know it's better not to because at least it is contained, and not rampant throughout the town. --EStop (talk) 18:49, May 5, 2015 (UTC)
- If you think that this Cruft Centre precludes cruft from accumulating elsewhere, you are mistaken. Spıke Ѧ 18:50 5-May-15
|
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. It's a dreadfully long list of things that are suggested to be parodies of other things. BrokenKnives (talk) 16:44, May 4, 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. It's a dreadfully long list whose point is to tell a single joke repeatedly, as we advise against at UN:LIST. Spıke Ѧ 16:58 4-May-15
- Delete. It's a dreadfully long list. --EStop (talk) 18:31, May 5, 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. It's a. SirScottPat VFH NotM WotM WotY UotM 08:11, May 10, 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. It's. Stranger195 (talk) 01:05, May 11, 2015 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
- It also makes use of the Russian Reversal joke, which grew old about 1 month after that one episode of Family Guy aired. BrokenKnives (talk) 16:52, May 4, 2015 (UTC)
- Is that what that's from? Wow, it just got even less funny... CarnassisChaosbringer (talk) 20:29, May 5, 2015 (UTC)
|
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. Oh, ȴ☉⚇₭, a stubby article in code. Spıke Ѧ 11:31 5-May-15
- Delete. Making an article virtually unreadable is not funny. It just makes the reader squint. BrokenKnives (talk) 12:40, May 5, 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Harder to read than my handwriting. --EStop (talk) 18:34, May 5, 2015 (UTC)
- ᎠᎬᏞᎬᎢᎬ. Even if there was the greatest joke of all time in this article, nobody can read it so it's pointless to make. ConCass2 (talk) 22:00, May 6, 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Brain damage works. This doesn't. SirScottPat VFH NotM WotM WotY UotM 08:13, May 10, 2015 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
- To be clear, whether any reader sees all/part/none of this article depends on his computer and on what fonts he has installed. But that obstacle was created by relying on gimmicks rather than humor. Spıke Ѧ 23:13 6-May-15
|
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. This article is the same joke over and over again. It wasn't particularly funny the first time. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by CarnassisChaosbringer (talk • contribs)
- Delete. Written in 2010, during Maniac1075's Anal Phase of development. Spıke Ѧ 20:23 5-May-15
- Delete. A great article if you operate under the assumption that your audience is 12 year olds. BrokenKnives (talk) 12:34, May 6, 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. This is shi.... no, I'm not doing it.--EStop (talk) 22:55, May 6, 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Teenage Mutant Ninja Assholes. Heroes that are assholes, with turd power. They're the worlds most stinkiest fighting team. They're heroes that are assholes, and they heave. Absolute poetry. SirScottPat VFH NotM WotM WotY UotM 08:15, May 10, 2015 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
- In fact, author put enough Butthole Humor in Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles, which I voted to Keep, above, that we surely don't need a Butthole version of Butthole Humor. Spıke Ѧ 20:41 5-May-15
|
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. An obvious repository for cruft: To play, all you have to do is ramble about a nonexistent subject. If any of these were funny, they would be at UnDictionary. Made up Words will still survive, although it has the same problem. Spıke Ѧ 13:33 8-May-15
- Delete. Less creative than Shia Lebeouf. BrokenKnives (talk) 17:37, May 9, 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Most of it is rubbish but I feel like a few deserve to be kept in UnDictionary. SirScottPat VFH NotM WotM WotY UotM 08:08, May 10, 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Good concept for comedy freedom, hence Undictionary. It is not unique and the execution is poor.--EStop (talk) 11:29, May 11, 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Depart hence, and haunt no more. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 18:38, May 18, 2015 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
|
Score: 0 • voting closed
|
Delete (1) |
- Delete. An attempt to highlight the link between the meanings of the word Labour in political parties and in childbirth. Ends up with an un-funny result. A re-write would be welcome, however having a page of Labour Parties seems odd when there is little connecting them but the name. SirScottPat VFH NotM WotM WotY UotM 13:54, May 10, 2015 (UTC)
|
Keep (1) |
- Keep. I am unaware of any "Labor Party" in a nation using the American dialect of English, and indeed this is by near-Admin Mnbvcxz (Creation Summary: "Just to clarify, this is parody, and I do NOT have a birth fetish....") He has a big one, but this article set out to do something funny (blur labour with childbearing) and succeeded. It is not the topical approach nominator, or I, would have taken to a political topic, but it is a valid, pun-based comedy approach. Spıke Ѧ 02:58 11-May-15
|
Comments |
|
Score: 4 • voting closed
|
Delete (4) |
- Delete. All the original humor was by Adolf Hitler; no particularly original take by Thetoastman in 2006. Spıke Ѧ 01:55 10-May-15
- Delete. If it is not original work, it should go.--EStop (talk) 19:06, May 25, 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Starts off okay, but loses its comedic value at an exponential rate past a certain point. The last two parts of the "Summary" section were cringingly unfunny. This might have been fixable, if not for what others have already pointed out about its unoriginality. Chunkles ☎ talk ✏️ contribs 22:38, May 25, 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Others have decided it is not original, I shall do the same. SirScottPat VFH NotM WotM WotY UotM 06:23, May 30, 2015 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
- This is a tough one for me. I read it through and laughed a lot. I find it quite funny. However, a quick google search brings up this: http://walterhumala.deviantart.com/art/A-day-at-the-barn-with-hitler-45718057, from 2006 and I can't tell whether the text was copied from Uncyclopedia along with the picture or if this was not an original concept from Uncyclopedia. Also the title is a punch line that no one will search for which means this doesn't really work on Uncyclopedia. If the humour is original, I would urge it to be kept in some shape or form (either put it in user space or re-title it) because I found it quite amusing. If it isn't original it should be deleted. SirScottPat VFH NotM WotM WotY UotM 08:06, May 10, 2015 (UTC)
- To follow that link, even Mr. Humala says it isn't his invention, but based on a Nazi recruitment pamphlet (at the heart of Bob the Builder). It is at deviantART and here to celebrate the macabre and not to amuse — never achieving Gallows Humor at the gas chambers. Spıke Ѧ 10:40 10-May-15
- Although I don't dig the subject...or the inspiration...before I vote against it, is this not satire? --EStop (talk) 18:15, May 25, 2015 (UTC)
- If it makes you laugh, you may even vote For, though I didn't because I saw it as a copy of work elsewhere. Spıke Ѧ 18:31 25-May-15
|