From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
|
This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at VFD.
|
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. Just terrible. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 05:54, November 30, 2014 (UTC)
- Had a penis to love men and explosives. Worthless. Spıke Ѧ 10:13 30-Nov-14
- Delete. Short, no quality, and very little humor. Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 21:30, November 30, 2014 (UTC)
- Boooo! ConCass2 (talk) 07:40, December 3, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. The author got on with it and produced a mighty turd. Bin. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 13:44, December 5, 2014 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
|
Score: 1 • voting closed
|
Delete (3) |
- Delete. Just seems to be random nonsense with names thrown into the mix for no reason other than randomness, but I don't find any of it funny. Nor is any of it clever or witty. Just seems like a pointless article that should be scrapped.---Maniac1075Complain Here 09:30, December 5, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Looks messy and isn't really that funny. ConCass2 (talk) 16:27, December 5, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. I agree it seems more random than clever. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:02, December 8, 2014 (UTC)
|
Keep (2) |
- Keep. This group of nominations seems to be a vendetta after I reverted an edit of the nominator. Spıke Ѧ 10:56 5-Dec-14
- Keep. This page might not have one concept that would link together every part of it, but it's good, all in all. Anton (talk) 17:56, December 12, 2014 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 4 • voting closed
|
Delete (4) |
- Delete. I can't see the humour. Anton (talk) 19:59, December 8, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Agreed. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:12, December 8, 2014 (UTC)
- I think your ready. Spıke Ѧ 21:15 8-Dec-14
- Delete. This is horrible, shocking, has drug references, and mentions that some of the characters were getting killed in this article. The overall humor was not funny at all. Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 13:52, December 23, 2014 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
- Deleted. Also, was a very poor attempt to code a page in the UnScripts space. Spıke Ѧ 14:01 23-Dec-14
|
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. There are some funny places, but, all in all, it's very unoriginal and tells one unfunny joke. Anton (talk) 17:46, December 21, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Author amuses himself by berating the reader. He does it in many different ways, but the laughs are as sparse as they would be with a catalog of Your Momma one-liners. Spıke Ѧ 14:14 23-Dec-14
- Delete. What a waste of letters! -- Zyniker (talk) 21:10, December 23, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Everything I want to do to this article is conveniently written inside it. ConCass2 (talk) 12:41, December 24, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Dull and duller. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 15:44, December 26, 2014 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. SEHS being "Sudden Head Exploding Syndrome," a Wacky Ailment with which to piggyback off A splode in this article from 2005, which has little to say about the ailment no one will look up except that it runs in things — and American politicians — the authors don't happen to like. Before deleting the external links, I didn't follow them, so I can't say whether this entire Syndrome was invented at an external website, as our recent "Dihydrogen monoxide" was. Spıke Ѧ 21:15 22-Nov-14
- Unlike Dihydrogen monoxide, this doesn't deserve an article. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 00:13 23 November 2014
- Delete. It's not terrible, but it's not good either. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 02:22, November 23, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. A ramble and a rant. ConCass2 (talk) 12:43, December 24, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Sir ScottPat (converse) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 10:50, December 29, 2014 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
- Keep. This article is not all that well writen but there are certainly things much more worth deleting. --User:Nea Teta 04:23, December 6, 2014 (UTC)
- It is not this forum's job to identify the worst articles on the entire website — just very bad ones. Spıke Ѧ 12:55 29-Dec-14
|
Comments |
|