Uncyclopedia:VFH/Ark of the Covenant

Vote	Score: 1 Snickering Philistines
Nominated by:	Self-Nom because God told me to on the speakerphone. 00:59, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
For: 4	00:59, 6 January 2009 (UTC) For. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 12:04, 6 January 2009 (UTC) For. I'd make a witty comment, but then I'd be breaking the 7th Commandment. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 16:10, Jan 6 For. View the article, folks; you'll be pleasantly surprised despite the dry subject matter. IronLung 06:35, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
Against: 3	meh not quite feature worthy. --Mnbvcxz 18:27, 6 January 2009 (UTC) Erm...I love you, DrS. I really do. But this just didn't grab me. I think it needs some work before it's featurable. —Sir SysRq (talk) 23:50, 9 January 2009 (UTC) AgainSt. TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 00:13, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
Comments:	Pee review here. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 06:49, 6 January 2009 (UTC) Kudos to the reviewer for playing "burning bush" and telling me it's OK to delete excessive facts and be sillier. -- 10:16, 6 January 2009 (UTC) Comment: I think it's safe to say that it's mostly a subject matter issue. Fact based bible jokes aren't going to fly well in VFH. I'm sure that half the humor is lost without a certain level of knowledge about the subject that I shouldn't have expected/assumed the average reader to have. It's one thing to read the bible or go to church and it's another to spend many an hour listening to PHD's talk about Hebrew/Greek translations and "biblical metaphysics". I'm not going to alter this one for VFH acceptance because it would ruin the in-jokes for people who do get them. In other words, if you don't like it you may be guilty of having a life. I think it's fucking hilarious as-is and I really don't want to strip out any more boring facts. Thanks for everyone's input! Its a learning experience-- 01:49, 10 January 2009 (UTC) It's got nothing to do with your subject, my friend. It's just that the writing needs cleaning up. Maybe that's not even the right word to use, since it's not like it's bad writing. It just needs to be funnier. You're right, it's a learning process. But this can certainly be improved and made VFH ready, and it can be done so very easily. I BELIEVE IN YOU BUDDY! —Sir SysRq (talk) 03:57, 10 January 2009 (UTC)