Talk:Uncyclopedia is the worst
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Uncyclopedia is the worst article.
| ||
---|---|---|
|
Article policies |
This article was nominated for deletion on May 8, 2006.
The result of the discussion was Keep (withdrawn).
|
|||
gawd this comment page is the worst![edit]
Allow me to write a fully detailed essay on why: 1. it sucks 2. it's w0rds have long and boring 3. y00 all have no lives. any1 reeding this noes that I do because I no how to spell "additionally" 4. ur al n3d5!!! 5. i m twi53 as funy s u 6. n gd cmments 7. ihtual 8. ulme 9. mgnaklual 10. udicsikual 11. npoignsdrdsabfdssardv
Comment[edit]
dumbasstica*
haha, i like the audio files, that dramatica is really batfuck insane, i aien't even been there and they said i've been banned
- User:Iateyourgranny
Seriously this is one article that only helps show that everyone hating on America is just as, or even more idiotic than the USA itself. I nominate this article to be an example against the British, to help knock them from their high horses.
-Ahmed, on an airplane...watch out.
I don't know why they haven't awarded this Article for Best Thing Ever, i mean, it's so stupid and poorly made that i ROFL'd for 5 minutes straight. Also, i don't masturbate to Hentai everytime... Just once a Day.
“HATE HATE HATE HAT!”
WHERE THE HELL IS HATE HATE HAT?!?!?!! -- 23:21, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
- It has been lost under the mountain of edits! It must be replaced! -- Hindleyite 11:01, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
The contents of this page do not represent the feelings of the author (ie. me).
Please see here for more information. --Hindleyite Talk 18:56, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
I want a t-shirt that says "HATE HATE HAT". -- 21:38, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
- Or an alternative to the NRV shirt - a "Junky junky junky junky junky junk" tee? —rc (t) 21:44, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
- That HATE HATE HAT thing absolutely kills me. It doesn't get better than this!
- --Hrodulf 18:28, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
Somebody listed this article for deletion. Do you think it should be made more blatantly satirical/sarcastic in some way (if this is possible)? --Hindleyite Talk 11:07, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
This article should be protected and voted onto the main page immediately!--The Freed Mind Sutoth the Black Mage [FACEHOLE HERE] [MUN] [YvJP]I am not a driptray.
This article made me want to cry. The writer obviously has a lot of hat in their heart, hate in their hat to want to actually sit down and type out this pitiful baboon-like whimpering when there are grown men and women out there who actually make sense and work hard for a better future for all of us. Oh the humanity! The humanity! It just makes me want to stick my head in a bucket and then beat the bucket with a brick and I would too, except that I am the kind of person who respects the dignity of buckets. Unlike the absolute mugnugget who was moved to write this... this... I can't say the word .... offal. They probably don't care about buckets at all. How can this happen when there are lovely little lambs skipping in fields? --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 19:32, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
- Hey... who are you calling a mugnugget? :) --Hindleyite Talk 19:36, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
- It's an ancient Aramaic word meaning he who masters satire, and as is according to custom, you owe me a camel. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 19:59, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
Gaaargh! The anonymous IP's have seriously mucked this up... --Hindleyite Talk 12:44, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
- I think we should start working on coping all of Uncyclopedia:Praise into this article. I know I am. ~ 10:05, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
- Good idea. --Hindleyite Talk 11:02, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
- I've done enough more for now... ~ 11:18, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
- Good idea. --Hindleyite Talk 11:02, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
That 'whining' tag is a nice addition. --Hindleyite | PL | CUN | Converse 09:34, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
Hate should be replaced with haet, just for the sake of KeiteiKeiteiKeitei. Uncycopedia haet haet haet!!!!!!!!!! >:( --Singaporekid 05:04, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
- I chenged a "HATE" to a "HAET". Just one, for effect. --epynephrin 18:11, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
- NRV shirt? Like [katiefromuncyc.googlepages.com/unmerch here]? - User:Guest/sig 06:18, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
This is really a weird homepage... who the hell are making all the racist jokes!?
Wish I had a contribution to make...maybe I do? still a n00b though so will have to carefully plan. Just wanted to say - this is great, so very very great Oddbod 09:27, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
Go for it. I'm a n00b and I contributed. Never regretted it. Turned to drink, though. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 09:43, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
- Are you sure it was this particular article that turned you to drink? Uncyclopedia has been known to produce its share of alcoholics, particularly after reading some of its less funny entries . . . in fact I heard this website is the 41st cause of liver disease, right behind watching too much VH1. --Captain Finding Nemo 23:19, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
- I just knew there was something wrong with it. I'm writing to the National Council for the Protection of Decent Livers
right now!Right after I drink a bucket of absinthe.--Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 03:03, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
- I just knew there was something wrong with it. I'm writing to the National Council for the Protection of Decent Livers
Here is a short list of what I know you bastards do all day. Wake up. Masturbate to hentai. Edit Uncyclopedia. Masturbate to more hentai. Suck the big cock. Edit Uncyclopedia more, or maybe make a piece of shit article. Masturbate more to hentai. Go to sleep.
How on earth did he guess?!--Imp88 22:39, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
Dumbassaywha?[edit]
Um, is the joke here that Uncyclopedia is obviously so overall amazing that anyone who criticizes it would have to be a babbling nutcase? Or that only such nutcases want a quality Uncyclopedia? Or what? I mean, Uncyclopedia is great and all, but it almost seems pompous to have this addition. Either that or uncessecarily self-deprecating. I still don't get it. Any help here (my talkpage is best for reaching me, but you can also double-post or whatever.) --Lenoxus 17:43, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
- If you closely read it you can see that it would have been written by a 'babbling nutcase'. ~ 17:54, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
- I was considering fixing the typo on "Brail", but it makes it seem more like a Flame War to leave typos in, says I. --epynephrin 18:03, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
- OK, I get it now. Thanks Hindleyite — Lenoxus 02:49, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- (There used to be a page just like this in dramatica, though dunno where it went now. Well, after hearing the audio versions, you know why it's here. User:Iateyourgranny)
"The Knowledge, it fills me. It is neat."[edit]
For some reason (I apologize for the randomness of the comment) one of the lines in this article reminds me of an Invader Zim line:
“Your methods are stupid! Your progress has been stupid! Your intelligence is stupid! for the good of the mission, you will be destroyed!”
This is what happens when epy watches too much Zim. --epynephrin 18:51, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
- I thought it was what happened when the nurses forget to lock the doors to the ward. --Captain Finding Nemo 23:17, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
- that too... --epynephrin 03:45, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
DUMB ARTICLE[edit]
your awesome!
- he yeh they are awesome-- Hindleyite Converse 12:12, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
Please at least spell properly![edit]
It would have been better, if you (whomever "you" is) could spell properly.
- Who should spell what properly? And if it's about the Hate hate hat thing, I like it mispelled, lol. --Hrodulf 22:00, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
- Don't you just love it when people do a drive-by commenting like that? I think I heard this one on the scanner. At any rate, whoever the OP was obviously doesn't "git" the article. If there's anything to git, which of course there ain't sice it iz a bad artikle. --Captain Finding Nemo 23:16, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
- alternately, to quote the above:
- Don't you just love it when people do a drive-by commenting like that? I think I heard this one on the scanner. At any rate, whoever the OP was obviously doesn't "git" the article. If there's anything to git, which of course there ain't sice it iz a bad artikle. --Captain Finding Nemo 23:16, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
If you closely read it you can see that it would have been written by a 'babbling nutcase'. ~ 17:54, 19 May 2006 (UTC) I was considering fixing the typo on "Brail", but it makes it seem more like a Flame War to leave typos in, says I. --epynephrin 18:03, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
- --epynephrin 03:47, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
Undeterminable sarcasm[edit]
Reading the various comments on this page, I honestly have no idea how to tell who's being sarcastic and who isn't. To quote the RoflCopter (may his brain rot in peace), "ROFL!"
- I know, I've been having trouble figuring it out to. I guess we should just Assume Sarcasm. ;) --Dandin1 18:07, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
- Oh man, we should have that page to mirror WP's policy. --User:Nintendorulez 18:10, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
- This is easily one of the most hilarious articles on Uncyclopedia! --The sound
- Oh man, we should have that page to mirror WP's policy. --User:Nintendorulez 18:10, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
Fresh material[edit]
Forum:Fuck Uncyclopedia. Please someone rework this into the article.---Asteroid B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 19:26, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
- Yes! Just what this article needs: A fresh perspective.--Emmzee 21:03, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
What the fuck...[edit]
BEING STUPID IS WHAT UNCYCLOPEDIA'S FUCKING FOR, RETARD!!
- ^You forgot to sign. I TYPE IN ALL CAPS TO SIGNIFY THAT I AM ANGRY AND TO HELP MY 85 YEAR-OLD GRANDMOTHER MORE EASILY READ MY WRITING, BUT MOSTLY TO SIGNIFY THAT I AM ANGRY BECAUSE YOU WOULDN'T BE ABLE TO TELL THAT IF I DIDN'T TYPE IT IN ALL CAPS!!!! Huh huh, beavisth. Vandalism is cool.
Mrthejazz 18:30, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
HOLY FUCKING CAMEL SHIT![edit]
I AGREE WITH THIS ARTICLE 100 PERCENT THERE IS NO SIT WORSE THAN UNCYCLOPEDIA I TRIED TO EDIT AND THOSE BASTARD FAGGOT HOMO JACKASS MODS BANNED MY ACCOUNT, WELL I AM BACK AND HERE TO SAY YOU FLYING FUCKERS SHOLY SHIT YOU SHOULD ALL JUST TO TO THROW YOURSEL FINTO A TANK FILLED WITH SHARKS I JUS HOPE YOU DONT FUCK IT UP LIKE U DOD TO THIS SITE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! MOTRF FUCKER! ASSHOLES!!!!!!! I HATE YOU GUYS!!!!!!!! CANT WAIT FOR THIS SITE TO BE SUED BY BILL GATES! --Uncyclopedia Sucks 04:19, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
- Troll. -Sir Hat-a-lot the great, who is feeling: In need of a piss # My contributions|My talkpage|My templates 23:24, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
- Do you happen to be a "computer hacker" by any chance? --Kenmcfa 09:21, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
- Why would Bill Gates sue? He made Wikipedia? If he did, HOLY FUCKING CAMEL SHIT! But I completely disagree with this guy! --SanDemonMax 19:28, May 31, 2011 (UTC)
- You do realize you're responding to a post that was made almost 5 years ago, right? --Roman Dog Bird 19:30, May 31, 2011 (UTC)
Denial should be changed to e-denial in keeping with the theme. --OpenFaceSurgery 00:14, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
HATE HATE HAT[edit]
We really need an article about that. ~ 11:08, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
- I agree, that line made me laugh on roughly 3 or 4 different levels. -- Kaptain 13:40, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
What is Hate Hate Hat? - O&E fan 21:23, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
- Probably something someone said in a forum, either someone ranting about hating uncyclopedia or someone making fun of them. - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 22:34, May 31
Why is this article protected?[edit]
MAD GAY!!!!
Erm, you just answered your own question...--Kenmcfa 18:29, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
Audible article[edit]
I loved this article and I was wondering if I could make an audible version of the article for the seeing impaired. -- 00:35, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
you fucking asswhores are real clever, arent you?[edit]
well congratulations, you just put my forum post "You and you Shitty Website should go die" into your article, complete with added misspellings, so I'll look stupider in everyone's eyes. I bet your just patting your asses with pride, you racist fascists, at your "ironically humourous" accomplishment in making me look like a flaming jackass. I'm here to tell you you arent worth the shit on the bottoms of your shoes. why don't you go back to playing pokemon instead of polluting the internet with your worthless writings? shit like How To Convince People You're a Heterosexual Male (you REALLY need that bad), Oscar Wilde (wtf your making him out to be like some kind of god. He was a gay faggot who really wasnt that great), AAAAA! (how the fuck is one letter over and over again funny? you guys are LAME), making false history that really isnt that funny (1927? GET A PROFESSIONALY HUMOUR WRITER), Redundancy (I FUCKING GETIT!!!! REDUNDANCY REDUNDANCY REDUCNDACY omg this is funnay), 001 (OMG you are SO NOT FUNNY!!!! wtf a guinea pig? the only people who think those are funny are 10 years old. AND GAY), you even make fun of jews, asians and black people!!!! thats old, unfunny, and people dont like it anymore except racists like you!!!! YOU BETTER HOPE I NEVER FIND YOU BECAUSE I WILL TOSS YOU INTO A PIT OF BURNING METAL ALONG WITH YOUR COMPUTERS SO YOUR SITE WILL BE ENDED FOREVER -67.72.98.45 23:24, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
- There you go again, stating the obvious. Now calm down and have some Christmas pudding. -- Hindleyite Converse 13:20, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
- "why don't you go back to playing pokemon"... man, pokemon was great wasn't it? --—Braydie 13:23, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, I clean my shoes. So I am not worth something that is not there. Do you wipe shit off your shoes? Bilky Asko Talk Here 14:18, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
Actually, some poeple will find this page really funny... Even if it was meant to be serious, Uncyclopaedia's mighty team of 9999999 level 30 Enchanters will make everyone think it's a joke. Of course, it looks like one. MorkaisChosen 14:25, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
Do you guys mind if I censor every single word this guy said? Ineedhelpalot
Re: A Criteek[edit]
May I point out that the original post was never named "A Critique." Hinoa renamed it that. Consider renaming the "A Criteek" section to the far more hilarious and benighted original name, "Editing How to post comments" or some variation. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 21:12, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
Amazing[edit]
I love it!
LOVE IT![edit]
it really explains enough of some of the articals and lies here. write more! I LOVE YOU!(Not to sound homosexual) but, I think your are just too smart. seriously. I am NOT kidding. I am fucking serious. Btw, why ARE you reading this when i made my point?
We really need an "Uncyclopedia is the Worst" T-shirt[edit]
Explain?[edit]
I think uncyclopedia is great, but IMO, this article doesn't deserve to even be featured let alone be in the top 10 of the year. I get the concept here, but I just don't think this is a funny article. It's a cheap knockoff of an actually GOOD article "I Fucking Hate the Bermuda Triangle". I remember everyone was worried someone was going to copy the format and try it again and it wouldn't be funny anymore. This article killed the joke. In my opinion. The HATE HATE HAT was a little funny, and make me snicker, but I don't see what comedy genius you find in this article. I guess I'm just asking for someone to explain why they think this article deserves a top 10 position, because, frankly IMO this article isn't very good. Nothing personal to anyone involved. 24.94.19.107 02:25, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
- The anyone involved you mention here must be a least 100 people because this is meant to be a collection of comments made about Uncyclopedia and its users. Nearly all of them are real or have been recontextualised slightly. It's kind of an in-jokey thing. Don't look at me, I didn't vote for it as Article of the Year. -- Hindleyite Converse 15:47, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
- Oh, and the best bit of the article, the HATE HATE HAT bit, was written by me. *grins smugly* *gets slapped* -- Hindleyite Converse 15:48, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
A long rant...[edit]
"This so called HUMOR is less fun than watching Barney! I LOVE BARNEY! BARNEY IS TEN TIMES THE DINOSAUR YOU COULD EVER HOPE TO BE! The fact that you abuse my favorite purple dinosaur makes my heart cry."
who likes BARNEY!?! a kindergardenerd (maybe...?)
"Your hostility towards 'noobs' scares potential new users away, and I am surprised you have more than 50 members!" do they NOT get the true meaning of "n00b" (its with two "0"s not two "o"s!
"so much JUNK on this webcite"
darnit! learn to spell!
"Some 12-year old on crack?"
like them? well they are not an adult.
"scientists who carfully craft each Wikipedia article"
scientists?!?!?! GIVE IT A BRAKE ALREADY! Alot of pepole makes WP articles and not even been to school!
"thanking your lucky stars that he even allows you the honor of copying his site instead of suing the hell out of you."
1). if they had a BRAIN they would know that WP is FREE!!!! 2). riping wikipedia OFF? whats one thing they have "Riped" off of WP?!?!?
"If you want a good wiki, go to Enclyclopedia Dramatica where thay at least know how to spel"
ROFLOL! liek ho abuot yuo laerning to spell?
"I read an Uncyclopedia article and it almost made me CRy"
Why? because your a baby?
"hope you find Jesus Christ"
+
"bURN UNCYLOPEDIA DOWN!!!1 BURNBURNBURN!! bURN IT AND LET US WATCH11!!!!!1!11111 URN UNCYCLOPEDIA AND SET IT IN SMOK AND LET IT BURN BURN BRUN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!111!!!!!!!!1111!!!!11111!!!!!"
= means one thing: you're a bible thumper to the extreme!
- Right back acha, bucko! And I didn't even write this PERFECT! article! Got it? HMMM?
"I am going to get you shut down"
lol!!! yeah right! i'd like to see you try! dumb n00b!
"They deleted all of my pages for christsake!"
i dont put it pass them to do just that! i'd rather they just delete you! with you witing poop like this! dumb n00b
"you should be ashamed if u even think of going here"
then why are YOU here?!?
"YOUR SITE SHOULD BE DESTROYED FORVR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! "
i hope that "SITE" = dumb n00b
"I WILL TOSS YOU INTO A PIT OF BURNING METAL"
Yes, well thats VERY humain compared to what i was thinking...
"halfwits who think that calling something "gay" is big and clever"
you've put "GAY", "Gay", "gay", "GAy", or "GaY" every other word!
You are the dumbst most wothless pice of poo poo! i feel like putting you in a shredder!
xD[edit]
ahh i do so love this one, it seems that most of it was made by the same "COCKFAG" and really they all dsperatly love un wiki, but pretend they dont cos, you know they are cool like that, and of course ED is so much better xDDD, at least this site has some wit, ed is just penis jokes that were written on a public bathroom wall, if mr wild had been cottaging in these toulets they maye have got something vagely funny, but alas they did not
so unencyclopedia FTW
and if you deelet this then ur all gay cock faqs who qwill burn and dy
hate hate hat!!
This article was a waste of time. The only funny part IMO, was the HATE HATE HAT! ...you mean shit. Anyways, Ican tell this page was sarcasm.
I could say something different[edit]
Encyclopedia DRamatica is the worst, however, uncyclopedia also sucks, not as much as them, at least you arent like ED bastards(and bastardesses) that masturbate to SUper Gay-Porn, but lets hope you dont masturbate to yaoi hentai, well, lets hope you bastards (and bastardesses, of course) dont insult like ED, and make more paris hilton cliches
You're right, Encyclopedia Dramatica IS the worst! It's not funny, and it thinks that we uncyclopedians are stupid. :/ I mean, sure we have some articles that could use improving, but we don't suck!--Just!n 21:25, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
For the writer of this text[edit]
Son,you are deeply disturbed and mentaly ill.In other words-you are crazy.Get some help.There is a very nice place filled with nice people in white coats,its called a madhouse,you will be very happy there,i just know that
- lol -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 21:12, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
Greatest Article on this Site, ever![edit]
If I wasnt such a Communistic Bastard, Id worship the writer of this article, the admins on this site suck as....I mean, they're okay, please no more banning....{mutter}evil elitist tyrants!{mutter}....... Comrade Z 02:10, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
NO![edit]
IP users continue to be stupid while you don't contribute at all. This is an encyclopedia that anyone can edit, AND FIX!--Dummmmmmy 21:04, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
- What on earth are you talking about? --THE 21:53, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
Can I just ask...[edit]
...why is nearly everyone with a comment on this page irrationally homophobic?
Ah, I remember, of course, it's America, and more particularly the litttle halfwits who think that calling something "gay" is big and clever.
UNCYCLOPEDIA IS THE GAYEST SHIT EVER!!!1
wait nvmd BECAUSE IM NOT GAY LIKE YOU HOMOSEXUAL FAGS!!!
Serously you guys are fags join over to the good side where Gay, ... jokes are funny.
Wow, this site is really, really gay.
shit like How To Convince People You're a Heterosexual Male (you REALLY need that bad)
the only people who think those are funny are 10 years old. AND GAY
hey for all you fags on uncyclopedia and dick suckers have fun with anal sex
You like the hard cock, I just know it.
You fucking faggots...
-Sir Hat-a-lot the great, who is feeling: In need of a piss # My contributions|My talkpage|My templates 23:36, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
For the love of...[edit]
THIS ARTICLE ISN'T ACTUALLY MEANT!! IT'S NOT SERIOUS!! STOP WHINING 'CAUSE IT'S FUNNY!!
Are you sure? --72.230.135.196 18:20, August 31, 2012 (UTC)
A great entropy pool[edit]
Uncyclopedia, a better entropy pool than a comedic website. The infinite monkey theorem applied to comedy, with tweenagers for monkeys. Almost as funny as Randopedia, the wiki generated entirely from automatically chosen random words. Nearly as much thought put into its writing as into the scenario of a midget porno. Comedic writing made accessible. And by accessible I mean AAAAAA AA AAAAA AAAA AAAAAA AAA AAAAA AAA AAAAAAAAAA AAAAA AAAA. --89.127.175.172 21:46, September 6, 2009 (UTC)
- I know, right? - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 21:55, Sep 6
I laughed for 20 minutes straight[edit]
This article is great, and I just felt the need to post it here. There I was just a fresh n00b wandering through all those repressed articles about indie art films and parodies of philosophical texts, thinking that they're the best of humour Uncyclopedia has to offer, then I see this. It's the funniest thing I've ever read, seriously, I even went back to listen to the audio which I have never ever done. You guys are geniuses. --~ 13:55, November 6, 2009 (UTC)
Conservapedia[edit]
Both ED and Uncyc are pretty crap,
for true comedy gold, go to conservapedia,
5 minutes there and you will be filled up with so much laughter and RAGE at the same time; youll be forced to go crazy on all three sites
So much fun
HAET HATE HAT --[The] [Green] [Arse] [user:lachybus|Lachybus] 12:49, May 19, 2010 (UTC)
OH MY GOD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!![edit]
How could you? call Uncyclopedia Horrible like this?!?! YOU ARE SO FUCKING GAY!!!!!!!!!!!!! GET A LIFE YOU FUCKING BITCHY-ASS MORON POSED AS A HUMAN BEING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Lordhood (talk • contribs)
An old favorite![edit]
Hate Hate Hat!!!!
...It's still funny after all these years! -- 09:24 May 2, 2011 (UTC)
LOL[edit]
I just realised I blanked this is September 2010 and got banned for it... -- Frosty dah snowguy contribs KUN PLEB 07:34, May 13, 2011 (UTC)
+CPL 2011[edit]
Just... add this section if you are okay with it because this article is semi-protected.
- Micro$oft Window$ (first thing you see there says "shit" a few times, but maybe you can keep it just if you remove the Microsoft Windows redirect to it and re-create Microsoft Windows as a non-crass version of it) --218.186.15.10 12:52, December 27, 2011 (UTC)
- Apple (the first thing you see says "ass" many times, "bastard faggot Bill Gates" once, and "douche nozzels" three times) --218.186.15.10 12:52, December 27, 2011 (UTC)
- Bat Fuck Insane, a. k. a. Bat Shit Crazy (whatever that means, there is no reason to have "fuck"/"shit" in that name) --218.186.15.10 06:36, December 28, 2011 (UTC)
- Template:Nigga Please (who would categorize their own articles as "bullshit"?) --218.186.15.10 06:36, December 28, 2011 (UTC)
- run like hell (redirects to HowTo:Fuck Off, but how does this title relate to that and I think only titles with the word "fuck" in them should be allowed to be redirected to HowTo:Fuck Off) --218.186.15.10 12:52, December 27, 2011 (UTC)
- Many talk pages (for example, there is a section named Enough of this bullshit on Talk:AAAAAAAAA! and in this section on ChiefjusticeDS' talk page Dr. Skullthumper said "Sure. Sounds great. Fuck that shit.") --218.186.15.10 12:52, December 27, 2011 (UTC)
- Even the article about Uncyclopedia (the sections about Uncyclopedia as it currently is reflects all the crassiness in Uncyclopedia with more crassiness) --218.186.15.10 12:52, December 27, 2011 (UTC)
- Even Uncyclopedia is the worst, although [[Uncyclopedia is the worst] for this reason (sections like "Fuck Uncyclopedia" and "you fucking asswhores are real clever, arent you?", but sections like "wat da hell?!?!?! are acceptable) --218.186.15.10 14:19, December 28, 2011 (UTC)
Anyone thought this?[edit]
Don't tell me nobody considered the possibility that this article was made by a 13-year-old troll/vandal and he accidentally made a contribution? --72.230.135.196 18:17, August 31, 2012 (UTC)
- Hindleyite, the user who wrote this article, is not a troll/vandal, instead he/she writes good articles and is being creative. SERVED! 18:23, 31 August, 2012 (UTC)
How would I get a rant on this page?[edit]
I would like to sarcastically write about how much I sincerely hate Uncyclopedia. How shall I get my obnoxious rants on this page? I expect I might need to put a stupid rant on the forums.
--MrRatermat2 (talk) 15:37, November 29, 2012 (UTC)
- Just keep typing--and I might add, sir, that this page is a damned fine place for it. Also be sure to type at the bottom of pages so anyone notices it. Spıke Ѧ 17:38 29-Nov-12
- Afterthoughts: As I understand it, this article is not an effort of creative writing but a collection of rants, submitted in complete seriousness by butt-hurt n00bs whose stubby little articles were "unfairly" deleted out from under them. Your username is new and I hope you weren't one in a former "life." Separately, to become a member in good standing, you ought to pick a theme to which you uniquely can do justice, and write a funny article. That is, fit in by furthering the goals of this website, not by appealing to members' vanity and writing about us. Spıke Ѧ 17:53 29-Nov-12
- I have just joined this site simply because I've just found it. And the howto tells me that my name should be low ranked and I should be as annoying as hell. :D --MrRatermat2 (talk) 22:19, November 30, 2012 (UTC)
- No you haven't just joined this site. Or maybe you did and you logged back out. And if you had read the HowTo, you would have signed your message, and perhaps indented it differently from mine. Now, being annoying will always stand you in good stead. But you are doing fine at that. Spıke Ѧ 18:30 29-Nov-12
- Yeah, I do know how to sign my posts, and I simply forgot generally because my browser was being a dick, like my awful attempt to get onto this page and look like an idiot forever. (Forum:UNCYCLOPEDIA_IS_DA_WURST! Hint hintedy hint.) --MrRatermat2 (talk) 22:21, November 30, 2012 (UTC)
- No you haven't just joined this site. Or maybe you did and you logged back out. And if you had read the HowTo, you would have signed your message, and perhaps indented it differently from mine. Now, being annoying will always stand you in good stead. But you are doing fine at that. Spıke Ѧ 18:30 29-Nov-12
- I have just joined this site simply because I've just found it. And the howto tells me that my name should be low ranked and I should be as annoying as hell. :D --MrRatermat2 (talk) 22:19, November 30, 2012 (UTC)