Forum:USA - Do You Really Want To Waste Your Vote?

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forums: Index > Village Dump > USA - Do You Really Want To Waste Your Vote?
Note: This topic has been unedited for 5640 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over.


We're Doomed '08

A lot of my coworkers are considerin' wastin' their vote on me. So if you feel like it, write-in Premier Tom Mayfair on the ballot. Talk 'bout change. It'd be great. I can't even fly on any airlines for bein' on the terror watch list & my own Secret Service will be watchin' me instead of my potential attacks. Woohoo! Spacer.gifSpacer.gifPremierTomMayfairChe.png RedPhone.png Unsoc.png Hammer and sickle.png 02:52, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

If I'm wasting my vote, I'm writing in Ron Paul. Sorry, Tom.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 13:39, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
Cool. I'm still debatin' on writin' in Ron Paul or Chuck Baldwin. Probably Ron Paul though. Spacer.gifSpacer.gifPremierTomMayfairChe.png RedPhone.png Unsoc.png Hammer and sickle.png 13:52, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
The only downside to that is it won't be counted. Baldwin and Barr's write-in votes will be counted, even if they arent on the ballot, since they registered as a write in candidate. ~Sir Rangeley Icons-flag-us.png GUN WotM UotM EGA +S (talk) 18:10, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
mayfair has my vote. finally those capitalist pigs will get what's coming to them, right comrades? SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 14:46, 3 November 2008 (UTC)


Don't waste your vote on Tom. Tom isn't the candidate for hope and change and hope. Instead, waste your vote on BradaMO.


Or you could vote for Obama and feel that warm sense of satisfaction when he restores America's pride and dignity. Your call. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 19:32, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

I thought Obama was a liberal communist type, a black one but not a Humosexual - certainly a Yadsman if ever I saw one though.--Sycamore (Talk) 19:36, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
Restoring dignity to the White House? Where have I heard that slogan before? Besides, I'm afraid Obama is socialist and could do something radical, like nationalizing our banks.--<<Bradmonogram.png>> 01:40, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Obama?!? Oh, drats, I voted for Oprah. --Carlb 21:47, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

I'd prefer the old guy over the terrorist. VT 22:17, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

I prefer the constitution versus the 2 evils. Spacer.gifSpacer.gifPremierTomMayfairChe.png RedPhone.png Unsoc.png Hammer and sickle.png 22:21, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
Agreed. 3rd Evil FTW! -- Kip > Talk Works Sophia Commander of the Order USA! 22:47, Nov. 3, 2008

I hear that STM has some opinions on this election-type topic. Vote Obama, you idiots Spang talk 00:05, 04 Nov 2008

Who, meeeeeeeeeeeeee? A vote for anyone but Obama puts Palin that much closer to the nuclear codes... THINK ABOUT IT!!! -- Tinymooose.gif » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 04:29, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
Nucular. Duh. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 04:47, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
Spang, nobody asked you. VT 13:57, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
They are right. Don't waste it on me. Waste it on Chuck Baldwin or Ron Paul. Either that or you'd be wastin' it on McCain. I'm sorry, but he doesn't have a chance. Makes me a little sad but then again I dislike both the bastards in the bipartisanship. Spacer.gifSpacer.gifPremierTomMayfairChe.png RedPhone.png Unsoc.png Hammer and sickle.png 14:17, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
I think that you're underestimating the power of the scared and angry lower-middle & lower class white male vote. I do hope that I'm wrong in my estimation of the intelligence of the Real American voter. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 14:28, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
You know, Democrats are often less educated than Republicans, yet are more powerful. Because we all know that large amounts of stupid people is a good thing. VT 15:34, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
[citation needed] -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 16:26, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
So educated people are voting "Country First"? Really? They sold you a tag line, just like "Life Tastes Better with KFC" except this one is slightly more aggressive because it suggests everyone who doesnt vote McCain cares fuckall about the future of their country. While "Change We Need" is another slogan sold to you, at least it avoids attacking the individual. PaddyAtkinson 18:02, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
Sorry to bust your bubble, Codeine, but I drove through a neighborhood of poor, high school drop out hicks today, and all I saw was McCain signs. Then there's the fact that when (not if) McCain dies in office, Parah Salin will be our president. Do you really want a woman who can't even say what her and McCain plan to do if elected running our country? I sure hope not. --Suomynona 19:22, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
No. That's why I've been advocating Obama all over this page. Read again, slowly this time. I think you meant to address that comment to Velosi-T. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 19:45, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
Except hope and change were also taglines. In fact, I'd argue that every single politician ever had some kind of tagline, at least going back to Andrew Jackson, and probably even further than that. My point is, never debate with someone whose opinion you do not respect. My other point is that stupid poitical debate sinks us to the level of yahoo answers, which is probably the worst insult I know, so my third point is sorry about that. My fourth point is probably I'm hungry, leading nicely into point number five, what's for breakfast? - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon Baloon.gif(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 18:07, Nov 4
BradaMO '08: This time it's personal Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 22:28, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
"While "Change We Need" is another slogan sold to you, at least it avoids attacking the individual"--never said there weren't taglines on both sides, just made a comment about their nature PaddyAtkinson 16:55, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
Wow, I think I just completely skipped over the second part of your above post, didn't even see it. In that case, I only have two points this time, sorry about getting a bit condescending there and ME WANT COOKIES NOW. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon Baloon.gif(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 05:44, Nov 9

Ahem, duh?

Joe the Plumber for '08.

Come on. Were you seriously considering anyone else to waste a vote on? --SPY Administrator (Complain|I rock|In memoriam) HMRFRA Bluegarrisoncapsig.png Sucrose b.gif WH 21:49, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

I did consider Huey Lewis & the News. Spacer.gifSpacer.gifPremierTomMayfairChe.png RedPhone.png Unsoc.png Hammer and sickle.png 22:13, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Tina Fey for president... because I see no way that user:savethemooses could support Palin. --66.102.80.212 14:17, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

Mel Brooks predicted an Obama win long ago here is proof Sheriff Bart Obama represents President Barack Obama and the town of Rockridge represents the USA and on Janauary 20th 2008 when Obama takes office that will be the reaction from the nation. :) Just kidding. --Lt. Sir Orion Blastar (talk) 15:33, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

Well...

I didn't win. My 2nd rate, loser party will start at 8pm EST in Kentuckistan. Pie & Chips... Spacer.gifSpacer.gifPremierTomMayfairChe.png RedPhone.png Unsoc.png Hammer and sickle.png 16:20, 5 November 2008 (UTC)


2016 Campaign

What do you think, is it too early to start campaigning?

Mingewebelievein.jpg

"Yes we do!..er...can?" The preceding unsigned comment was added by PaddyAtkinson (talk • contribs)

Surely the slogan would be "No we cunt"? Sorry. *gets coat* -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 02:14, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
http://instantrimshot.com - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon Baloon.gif(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 06:07, Nov 9
Hmm, I don't know. That might seem too antagonistic to my competitor's slogan - "Cunts First" --PaddyAtkinson 18:33, 9 November 2008 (UTC)