Why? talk:Remove Your Penis
From Pee Review[edit]
User:RAHB/Penis_Removal[edit]
Admittedly, this really isn't great. I hope to make it better later on, but any suggestions now would definitely help. It's another I found on the requests page by the way. -RAHB 05:43, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
| Humour: | 7 | Relevant humor. |
| Concept: | 10 | Cool concept. |
| Prose and formatting: | 6 | No spelling or grammer errors but needs some Minor touch-ups. |
| Images: | 10 | Not applicable. |
| Miscellaneous: | 10 | Perfect for HowTo: |
| Final Score: | 43 | You got yourself a hit. |
| Reviewer: | NXWave | |
I'm just saying because the article is well written and based on a good subject, In fact the basis of the article is perfect for a HowTo article, But the article needs some minor touchups in formatting to make it look professional. --NXWave 13:41, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
- As a second opinon, I don't see any flaw in the formatting, it's quite damned funny, but you definitely need more pictures. I recommend a circular saw, or something.--
TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 
19:08, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
Take Two[edit]
Why?:Remove Your Penis[edit]
This used to be called Penis Removal. Vfh'd it, got a positive score. Lots of people suggested a namespace move. I'm gonna probably add some to this to make it more fitting to the space, but I'd like a (second) review of it, as of now. Thanks. -RAHB 06:22, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
| Humour: | 10 | Damned funny, everything from life without a penis to doctors' clipboards. But seriously, what is up with that? |
| Concept: | 10 | It's crazy. |
| Prose and formatting: | 10 | Second person, but in the Why?: namespace (see a bit below). Even managed to pull off footnotes without being distracting. Found like, one error & fixed it. |
| Images: | 7 | Relevant pictures, particularly loved the first one. Changed "chainsaw" to "circular saw" in the article to match the picture. Can't think of anything you ought to add. |
| Miscellaneous: | 8 | Okay, one comment. It doesn't feel very much like a Why?, because it's not persuasive, it takes the reader through the process of chopping off his penis. But it's not a HowTo, either. Maybe UnBook it? I'm thinking of UnBooks:Only Business, which isn't really a book either, but it wouldn't have fit in those other namespaces. |
| Final Score: | 45 | Can I sew it back on? |
| Reviewer: | – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • SU&W) 14:38 Aug 29, 2007 | |
