From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
|
This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at VFD.
|
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. Crufty, stub, not that funny. A pale shadow of its counterpart.--EpicWinner (talk) 17:12, November 25, 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. The parts of this article that are even coherent are coded references to policy disagreements with our webhost, which could only be funny to authors. Spıke 🎙️17:21 25-Nov-15
- Delete. EStop ⚓ 15:18, November 26, 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. An ugly mess. ConCass2 (talk) 10:39, December 26, 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. and redirect to its better counterpart. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 23:03, December 31, 2015 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
|
Score: 4 • voting closed
|
Delete (4) |
- Delete and redirect to drugs. As well as being unable to spell "heroin", the article is unable to make decent jokes, instead opting to go on about Communists and the USSR, two intro quotes that really aren't funny, and only one relevant "joke" which is a broken to link to a "Kurt Corbain" [sic]. ConCass2 (talk) 15:16, December 1, 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. There is a lesson here: Don't Edit Stoned. Spıke 🎙️15:23 1-Dec-15
- Delete. Sadly, despite the many potential comedy rehabilitation opportunities during this article's life, it chose to remain on the path to oblivion. EStop ⚓ 13:48, December 2, 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Because communism and heroin are not linked, and even if they were, it would be about as unfunny as this article. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 23:30, December 31, 2015 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
- Deleted and created a short replacement article. Spıke 🎙️23:54 31-Dec-15
|
Newbie Friendly Uncyclopedia Almanack 2006
Score: 4 • voting closed
|
Delete (4) |
- Delete. Not particularly helpful. The new editor would be better reading up elsewhere on what the imaginary book offers, rather than an article on the imaginary book. EStop ⚓ 16:45, December 17, 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Navelism; a fake Uncyclopedia policy page that, if the newbie takes it seriously, will merely embolden him to write imitative articles rather than clever and novel ones. Spıke 🎙️16:50 17-Dec-15
- Complete pants --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 23:26, December 18, 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. the article, keep the image. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 23:38, December 31, 2015 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
|
Uncyclopedia Defence Force
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. Starts unpromisingly with rape as a Wacky Religion, then continues downhill. Spıke 🎙️05:22 6-Jan-16
- Delete. Before the first paragraph ends the article already becomes a mess of incoherent gibberish, including jokes about the reader's grandmother and several references to Michael Jackson, both executed poorly. The rest of the article is lists and random celebrity references. ConCass2 (talk) 09:29, January 6, 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Obvious reasons. And there are a lot of lists. Cg097 (talk) 04:01, January 10, 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Random listicles, a meme meander to nowhere in particular. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 00:38, January 14, 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Keep it out of the park. EStop ⚓ 12:00, January 15, 2016 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
|
Buy-to-let
Score: 4 • voting closed
|
Delete (4) |
- Delete. This article about the landlord as a parasitic life form is all class-warfare advocacy and not a bit of humor that won't be mistaken for advocacy. Spıke 🎙️01:13 8-Dec-15
- Delete. Agree. A good title for a quick satire though, will probably add to the to do list if no one else is interested. EStop ⚓ 07:20, December 10, 2015 (UTC)
- "GRRRR!" - this article was likely the frustration of someone who just got screwed over by his landlord manifesting itself as text. ConCass2 (talk) 13:11, December 25, 2015 (UTC)
- Delete I hope the author is more careful drinking red wine in the future. Matt lobster (talk) 00:13, January 3, 2016 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
- Mentioned in the related section in Bourgeoisie. Spıke 🎙️13:32 25-Dec-15
- I don't understand the concept properly, having never been to the UK. Is this like a reverse mortgage, or a rent-to-own? The article certainly doesn't explain it well to those of us who are not British or European. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 23:34, December 31, 2015 (UTC)
- Userspaced to EStop to either work from or start over. Spıke 🎙️18:32 19-Jan-16
|
Mike Gravel
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. An Admin who is no longer with us created this copycat sight gag and then immediately gave it full protection in the absence of any vandalism or other reason, then registered it as a website in-joke. The reader must click over to YouTube and watch an inept video to realize what the point is, and even then the point is nothing more than wordless ridicule. Spıke 🎙️15:17 13-Jan-16
- Delete. For future generations wondering what this article contains, it is a picture of some bloke and the word "splash". Nothing else. ConCass2 (talk) 22:38, January 13, 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Root out vanity! --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 00:45, January 14, 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. EStop ⚓ 12:05, January 15, 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Nonnotable. Cg097 (talk) 18:22, January 19, 2016 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
|
Interociter
Score: 4 • voting closed
|
Delete (4) |
- Delete. Short, listy, themeless, awful. Spıke 🎙️22:40 13-Jan-16
- Delete. Crap article, but like the concept of a spec sheet for evil tech. EStop ⚓ 12:09, January 15, 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Its pretty much a list with a bit more details, not interesting at all Lilymnky (talk) 23:05, January 18, 2016 (UTC),
- Delete. Padded out with lists and quotes. Take that away and you'll have a stub no one is going to improve. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 00:07, January 20, 2016 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
|
Score: -2 • voting closed
|
Delete (0) |
Delete. If one were to remove the meme-ridden mess that makes up most of this stubby article, there would be one section (the cleverly-written "Etymology") left; hardly enough. Unless anyone cares to use that as a basis for a rewrite. ConCass2 (talk) 10:17, January 23, 2016 (UTC)
|
Keep (2) |
- Keep. I reverted to the Oceanray version of 2006 and cleaned some stuff up. Still could use more content and its first photo. Spıke 🎙️13:42 23-Jan-16
- Despite the rules maintaining I should check the history, I completely forgot to. Count it as a blunder on my behalf. ConCass2 (talk) 14:05, January 23, 2016 (UTC)
- The small article could do with some more. Of course, I'm too lazy to do it. I will nontheless vote keep, as per right above. ConCass2 (talk) 15:44, January 23, 2016 (UTC)
- Vinylrecordprotectress is now in with enhancements. Spıke 🎙️16:39 25-Jan-16
|
Comments |
|
Rapist van
Rusty's Raping Rampage
Score: 4 • voting closed
|
Delete (4) |
- Delete. And another in our series, found by its link to Rapist van. Spıke 🎙️14:01 15-Jan-16
- Delete. Still waiting to come across a Hitler meme in the ongoing rape series, this one has a Bush. EStop ⚓ 14:34, January 15, 2016 (UTC)
- Haven't you heard that a woman has come forward and repeated her accusations that Bush raped her, decades ago? No, wait... Spıke 🎙️14:51 15-Jan-16
- Delete. Randumbo. Also, Rusty's Raping Rampage/book relies entirely on this article. Cg097 (talk) 18:21, January 19, 2016 (UTC)
- Hmmph, Who Would Jesus Rape (WWJR). Recent Admins Frosty and Xamralco have both attached time-bombs to the subpage. I will consider it deleted if the main page is. Spıke 🎙️18:36 19-Jan-16
- Delete. About us funny as witnessing a road crash. Terrible. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 00:13, January 20, 2016 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
|
Crawley
Score: 0 • voting closed
|
Delete (2) |
- Delete. I will be honest, I laughed when I first opened this. Now that I've already seen the one joke this article has to offer, it is pointless. ConCass2 (talk) 22:46, January 23, 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Sight gag devoid of original comedy writing. From 2006, when it was clever to create a page on Blur that was simply a blurred page. Spıke 🎙️23:55 23-Jan-16
|
Keep (2) |
- Keep.I Like the idea. What this page needs is a development grant. I'll add it to my list. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 08:56, January 27, 2016 (UTC)
- Keep. Agreeing with Romartus here. Perhaps the biggest change this should get though is blurring the page through CSS rather than making a static image (which, for one thing, will make it easier to edit the article contents). For text, making it transparent and abusing
text-shadow should achieve the desired effect. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Chunkles (talk • contribs)
- But that will require that someone write funny stuff. The blur effect could be progressive as one reads further down the page. The underlying text could reflect a writer who thinks he is sharp and is clueless as to what blur might be, though there are many references to it in the literature. This would be the difference between HTML tricks as a garnish versus as the whole payload of the article. Spıke 🎙️13:25 29-Jan-16
|
Comments |
- Here's an idea: blur all the images, keep the text readable. Blurring the text could end up being a pain in the arse for someone trying to read it. ConCass2 (talk) 18:15, January 29, 2016 (UTC)
|