From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
|
This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at VFD.
|
Score: 0 • voting closed
|
Delete (1) |
- Delete. I moved for this to be deleted during our clean up last year on British towns and cities, but it somehow never got done. Not notable or funny, and starts with the quote "Shower of Cunts". Oh, and yeah, I'm back for the time being. Sir Reverend P. Pennyfeather (fancy a chat?) CUN VFH PLS 19:53, June 24, 2014 (UTC)
|
Keep (1) |
- Keep. Welcome back! Without debating what the problem might be with a Shower of Cunts, I removed that bit and the list of neighborhoods, and copy-edited it to make it read more encyclopedic. The humor is a bit generic but it is okay. Spıke Ѧ 20:05 24-Jun-14
|
Comments |
|
Score: -1 • voting closed
|
Delete (0) |
Delete. This article falls under "Sir TheWikiMan026 CUN,UmP, (Chatter) 13:42, June 28, 2014 (UTC) Top Ten most stupid articles ever read"
|
Keep (1) |
- Keep. Jumbling intercourse with relativity is done cleverly, though the structure as a Top Ten is pointless, and no one has finished it in its nine years on the website. Spıke Ѧ 13:48 28-Jun-14
- Article is now completely copy-edited and illustrated. Spıke Ѧ 15:56 28-Jun-14
- Keep. now that it is rewritten Sir TheWikiMan026 CUN,UmP, (Chatter) 15:51, June 29, 2014 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Clock reset; ConCass2 added {{VFD}}. Spıke Ѧ 14:45 28-Jun-14
|
Score: 4 • voting closed
|
Delete (4) |
- Delete. Starts ranty, digresses pointlessly to Rush Limbaugh, then on to supposed lyrics, huge ASCII art, and an appeal for the article not to be deleted. A giant plea of Read me by an article that is as painful to read as it is pointless. Spıke Ѧ 18:51 17-Jun-14
- Delete.--Sir TheWikiMan026 CUN,UmP, (Chatter) 09:52, June 25, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. I think the Rush Limbaugh bit is supposed to be a (poor) joke referencing the band "Rush", which is Progessive rock not metal. Even though I get the jokes, I still don't think they're funny. So, delete. ConCass2 (talk) 12:19, June 26, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Seems to have one joke: Rush/Rush Limbaugh but that doesn't sustain this as a keep. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 06:55, July 2, 2014 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. Ranty, listy, awful. Spıke Ѧ 13:12 15-Jun-14
- Delete. The author's probably pissed off that he failed BTEC Salon. An article about BTEC/GSCE stuff sounds like it has good potential, but this article is crap. ConCass2 (talk) 15:57, June 15, 2014 (UTC)
- Rewrite--Sir TheWikiMan026 CUN,UmP, (Chatter) 12:54, June 21, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Hint for future: A comedy BTEC may be required to write a BTEC article. Sir ScottPat (converse) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 19:17, June 28, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Irrecoverable Mess. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 06:51, July 2, 2014 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
|
Score: 4 • voting closed
|
Delete (4) |
- Delete. A send-up of the drug-addled mayor of Toronto; has a Facebook page. If this article has any humor, it is not original to Uncyclopedia. Spıke Ѧ 13:15 29-Jun-14
- Delete. Sir TheWikiMan026 CUN,UmP, (Chatter) 16:00, June 29, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Does this mean every country gets their own equivalent of Jesus, which is the same as the main Jesus except mixed with cultural stereotypes? No, so Canada isn't different. ConCass2 (talk) 16:54, June 29, 2014 (UTC)
- The lack of consistency in not having, say, Belgian Jesus, is a non-issue. If anyone could do it well, it should be welcome to remain in the encyclopedia. But this guy didn't. Spıke Ѧ 22:53 29-Jun-14
- Delete. Random, a load of meaningless quotes and basically pants. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 06:54, July 2, 2014 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
|
Score: -1 • voting closed
|
Delete (2) |
- Delete. A dormant pseudo-namespace created by fallen-away Uncyclopedians who wanted to blog rather than create content that would amuse the reader. Spıke Ѧ 12:25 1-Jul-14
I don't know what that is, but it ain't pretty. Aleister 16:27 1-7-14
- Delete. One for the bucket.--RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 06:53, July 2, 2014 (UTC)
|
Keep (3) |
- Strongly Keep Nothing wrong with it and it's quite good Sir TheWikiMan026 CUN,UmP, (Chatter) 13:37, July 2, 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks TheWikiMan. I actually spent time with it because of your vote, and clinked on the links, which I didn't do before. We sell bones. Aleister 21:00 2-7-14
- Keep. Some of the links are still funny, even if no longer maintained. A namespace for users to create pseudobusinesses with funny ideas. The only drawback I see is that nobody is maintaining or updating these. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 11:28, July 4, 2014 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 4 • voting closed
|
Delete (4) |
- Delete.No comments--Sir TheWikiMan026 CUN,UmP, (Chatter) 17:25, June 18, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. One edit. One quip, already published somewhere else. Spıke Ѧ 18:07 18-Jun-14
- Delete. No loss if this goes. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 06:57, July 2, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. The version on the mirror site is better, and that got deleted, so that should tell you something. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 20:01, July 7, 2014 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
|
Score: -2 • voting closed
|
Delete (1) |
- Delete.WTF? Sir TheWikiMan026 CUN,UmP, (Chatter) 10:49, July 7, 2014 (UTC)
Delete. Not an UnNews. Presumably made into an UnNews simply in order to appear at the top of the Recent Stories column. Spıke Ѧ 18:10 7-Jul-14 Rescinded Spıke Ѧ 21:11 7-Jul-14
|
Keep (3) |
- Keep. A good concept. I'd like to see it explored a bit more (i.e. make the article longer) but it's miles above VFD level. --ChiefjusticeGameCube 17:13, July 7, 2014 (UTC)
- Keep I too like the concept and the idea that the reporter turns out to be a spider. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 19:49, July 7, 2014 (UTC)
- Keep. Decent. Could use a lot of work, but to paraphrase Chiefjustice, it's not VFD material. ConCass2 (talk) 21:04, July 7, 2014 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- {{VFD}} added and clock reset. Spıke Ѧ 18:10 7-Jul-14
|
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. The Person who made this page is the sadest person ever Sir TheWikiMan026 CUN,UmP, (Chatter) 10:44, July 7, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Written to shock rather than amuse. One photo+caption is not an Uncyclopedia article. Spıke Ѧ 18:05 7-Jul-14
- Delete. We don't need this. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 19:30, July 7, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. You could fill a whole page with "this page is like, real heavy, man" and it will still be funnier than this. It couldn't even stick to the title. ConCass2 (talk) 21:01, July 7, 2014 (UTC)
- Only one dead puppy? Now a whole litter lying there, that might be sad. Epic fail. Aleister 1:25 9-7-14
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
- {{VFD}} placed and clock reset. Spıke Ѧ 18:05 7-Jul-14
|
Score: 1 • voting closed
|
Delete (1) |
- Delete. I think not. Sir ScottPat (converse) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 08:55, July 17, 2014 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
- Deleted administratively. The Uncyclopedia: namespace is not for pictorial rants about the (2010) Admins. This sole creation of self-described cyberbully/troll Stopthebus does not belong there. Spıke Ѧ 12:27 17-Jul-14
|
Score: 1 • voting closed
|
Delete (1) |
- Delete. We don't need this unfunny stub. Sir ScottPat (converse) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 09:01, July 17, 2014 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
- Deleted administratively. Anon created (in 2008) an article in the Uncyclopedia: space that is neither funny nor helps explain or manage the use of the website. Spıke Ѧ 12:21 17-Jul-14
|
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. Ranty. The Intro never gets far away from serious criticism of the subject as extreme, about which, see my recommendations in CoW#Extremists. It is followed by a list of party positions, combining exaggeration and randomness, and a list of members: mostly randomness. Canada's Conservatives are only slightly less worthy of mocking than its Liberals; simply be a little clever about it. Spıke Ѧ 12:48 28-Jun-14
- Delete. Sir TheWikiMan026 CUN,UmP, (Chatter) 13:31, June 28, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. I'm no expert on Canada, but I'm pretty sure they don't have the death penalty, they're higher on the Freedom Index than the US (which is pretty high) and this is another one of those anti-conservatives that doesn't actually have a clue why he hates conservatives, he just does, especially because there's nothing in here that criticises the party, it's just insults. ConCass2 (talk) 14:03, June 28, 2014 (UTC)
- The question is not whether the country has the death penalty but whether the Conservatives want one. Inaccuracy is not a reason to VFD an article, but your later comments are more on-the-mark. Spıke Ѧ 16:14 28-Jun-14
- I don't mean accuracy, I mean making up facts. As the HTBFANJS puts it, basically instead of warping the truth into something funny, they just apply random statements with no background that are made-up. ConCass2 (talk) 17:55, June 28, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Sir ScottPat (converse) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 14:40, July 14, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 19:05, July 19, 2014 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
Delete (5) |
- I am determined and have made my decision. No matter how much edits are made, No matter how old it is, this article has no place in the wiki. I have my reasons. There is no such thing as Super Smash Sises. Brawl, and there is no actual fanmade game with the same title to be seen, whilst the beginning of the article has fake history and information, as Uncyclopedia encourages, There is no comedy to be seen and is mainly just sexual cartoon fantasies and "useful" guides on how to play this "game", Yes, sexual innuendos are common on Uncyclopedia, but they are usually accompanied by comedy, I read the article twice, I coudn't find anything funny. I strongly suggest it is worth being on VFD. HoratioMan64 (talk) 19:52, July 9, 2014 (UTC)
- Indeed there is no such thing; "Smash Sises." is a take-off of "Smash Bros." with a nod to Equality of the Sexes But, as I always say, a pun as a page title means that the reader has to guess the punch line before he can read the joke. Spıke Ѧ 20:36 9-Jul-14
- Delete. In addition to the above problem, a great deal of the humor is lolicon (simulated child porn) and sexual violence. Much more fun for the typist than for the reader. Spıke Ѧ 20:36 9-Jul-14
- WTF? Sir TheWikiMan026 CUN,UmP, (Chatter) 10:35, July 10, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Looks like VFD was just one boss that Mario-nette couldn't beat. Sir ScottPat (converse) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 14:47, July 14, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 19:06, July 19, 2014 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
- Mate, your deletion comment goes in the "delete" box, not the "comments" box. ConCass2 (talk) 20:34, July 9, 2014 (UTC)
|
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete.Normally, an article on a musician would have something written about said musician. This is a picture of a monkey with a gun. I checked the page history, and somehow this has existed since August 2011 in this exact form. Yikes. ConCass2 (talk) 23:36, July 9, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Spıke Ѧ 02:34 10-Jul-14
- Delete. Sir TheWikiMan026 CUN,UmP, (Chatter) 10:36, July 10, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Ahhhhhhh! Sir ScottPat (converse) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 14:48, July 14, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 19:06, July 19, 2014 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
- Also, this page is protected and I can't tag it. I assume only admins can edit this, which is just slightly ill-fitting considering the quality of the page. ConCass2 (talk) 23:38, July 9, 2014 (UTC)
- Often, crappy pages are Anon magnets and an Admin finally protects the page. In this case, an Admin created the page and immediately protected it. I have applied the tag and unprotected the page. Spıke Ѧ 02:34 10-Jul-14
|
Score: 4 • voting closed
|
Delete (4) |
- Delete Although this is a largely well written article, I question whether it has a place on Uncyclopedia. I've only ever heard of him through ED and then subsequently finding this article here. This person is not a famous person. They may be internet famous (for all the wrong reasons), but if you walked up to people on the street, nobody would have heard of this man. So yeah, UN:CM and UN:CB make me think we shouldn't have this article. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 12:20, July 10, 2014 (UTC)
- If Wikipedia hasn't a page for it, very few people should give a shite. ConCass2 (talk) 16:12, July 14, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. You've persuaded me. I could write a funny article on myself but no one would give a bleep because I'm not noteworthy enough. Same goes for Mr. Chandler. Sir ScottPat (converse) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 17:11, July 14, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. All right. Indeed Uncyclopedia ought not be used to propel a hopeful new web meme. Spıke Ѧ 17:32 14-Jul-14
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
- Simsie and I discussed this question on the talk page, and I was satisfied with her answer. Spıke Ѧ 12:25 10-Jul-14
- If anyone gets internet memes its Simsie and she says it's funny. Sir ScottPat (converse) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 14:49, July 14, 2014 (UTC)
|
Score: -2 • voting closed
|
Delete (1) |
Delete. I doubt the show is still airing, if it ever was, in my part of the country. If I knew something about the show I might find this amusing, but as it is, it needs to go. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 19:46, July 7, 2014 (UTC) See keep vote below -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 17:01, July 20, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Spock! Sir ScottPat (converse) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 14:41, July 14, 2014 (UTC)
Delete. Written by Saberwolf116, presumably before he learned how to code illustrations; Creation Summary: A silly, stupid idea I had. Watch the show; it makes sense. I cannot, it does not, it isn't funny, and it isn't clever. Tell jokes, not riddles. Spıke Ѧ 17:21 19-Jun-14 Rescinded. Spıke Ѧ 11:12 19-Jul-14
|
Keep (3) |
- Keep. Another save by Burritoqueen. Spıke Ѧ 11:12 19-Jul-14
- Keep. It's not the best but it's better Sir TheWikiMan026 CUN,UmP, (Chatter)
- Keep. Keepable now. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 17:01, July 20, 2014 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. Not humor but Syllable Association. Spıke Ѧ 03:39 17-Jul-14
- Delete. "The general rule is to replace any 1 syllable word with "fu"" - well the general rule of comedy is to not explain your own joke. What is "fu" supposed to be a parody of? "F-U" or something? Because it isn't a very good one. ConCass2 (talk) 10:46, July 19, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Feeble with list to boot. Boo to FU! --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 19:09, July 19, 2014 (UTC)
- WTF? Sir TheWikiMan026 CUN,UmP, (Chatter) 15:12, July 20, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Lame and listy. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 17:04, July 20, 2014 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
|
Score: 2 • voting closed
|
Delete (2) |
- Delete. No comments--Sir TheWikiMan026 CUN,UmP, (Chatter) 21:07, June 22, 2014 (UTC)
- Replace. If anyone would like to take on the task, that is. With an actual article on quizzes, not a quiz. ConCass2 (talk) 20:54, July 2, 2014 (UTC)
Delete. The concept is worthwhile, though doesn't get beyond "pages that look like the things they are about." The body is executed with no skill at all, even at typing in English. This would be easy for someone to do well. Spıke Ѧ 11:15 23-Jun-14
- Rescinded after Simsie's work. No longer executed with no skill at all, but still doesn't get beyond "pages that look like the things they are about." Exam does it better. Spıke Ѧ 09:32 21-Jul-14
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
- I made some modifications, and hope it has improved enough. Yes, I made up a word, and some better answers to the questions. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 20:34, July 7, 2014 (UTC)
- 762 hours, no consensus. Kept. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 16:00, July 24, 2014 (UTC)
|
Score: 4 • voting closed
|
Delete (4) |
- Delete. The only things this page has going for it is (1) randomization of facts in the very first paragraph, and (2) the fact that the article on Eclipse is eclipsed by a big ellipse. That's clever, then? Yawn. Spıke Ѧ 02:11 22-Jul-14
- Anon last night removed the ellipse, which improves the article, except that it still has only one paragraph with humor. For remedy, see Comments. Spıke Ѧ 11:36 23-Jul-14
- Delete. As above + You can't read anything Sir TheWikiMan026 CUN,UmP, (Chatter) 10:34, July 22, 2014 (UTC)
- If you have a long-rather-than-wide screen, or disable images, you will see that the entire body is a spork of Wikipedia with no humor anywhere. That is: It is not comedy writing but a single pictorial gimmick. Spıke Ѧ 11:32 22-Jul-14
- Delete. Dumb. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 16:46, July 22, 2014 (UTC)
- Replace. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 16:21, July 24, 2014 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
- Finish deleting this, as my replacement article ditches the eclipse ellipse, takes the unfunny sporked text, and makes it funnier. Spıke Ѧ 03:28 23-Jul-14
|
Score: 2 • voting closed
|
Delete (4) |
- Delete. Only one joke, and not a very good one (a page that is self promotion). Anton (talk) 11:07, June 24, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. As this piece of vanity has been on the site since 2007, I'll suppress the notion to just huff it administratively. "Look at me, I'm breaking the rule" against planting links to userspace in the encyclopedia. An article on Self Promotion (should be "Self-promotion") that self-promotes is not a joke but a conundrum, and it has nothing else going for it. Spıke Ѧ 11:18 24-Jun-14
Delete.--Sir TheWikiMan026 CUN,UmP, (Chatter) 16:51, June 24, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Self abuse. Go. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 07:00, July 2, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Don't have time to re-write it. Maybe at a much later date as a new article. Sir ScottPat (converse) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 08:26, July 7, 2014 (UTC)
|
Keep (2) |
- Keep (Formaly Delete) Now that it is rewritten Sir TheWikiMan026 CUN,UmP, (Chatter) 19:57, July 2, 2014 (UTC)
- It isn't. Sir ScottPat (converse) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 08:26, July 7, 2014 (UTC)
- Well it's better than the old one Sir TheWikiMan026 CUN,UmP, (Chatter) 10:38, July 10, 2014 (UTC)
- Keep. Now that is indeed a joke and not real self-promotion, it may be salvaged. ConCass2 (talk) 22:30, July 7, 2014 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- I don't know if it's possible, but is there a way to replace all the links to the reader's userpage instead of the author's? You know, if there is some sort of Template:Username link that would work that way (so that is a joke instead of actual self-promotion)? ConCass2 (talk) 12:12, June 26, 2014 (UTC)
- Possible. Look! However, another problem is that it is one of the main jokes, and the content itself is pretty weak. Anton (talk) 15:20, June 26, 2014 (UTC)
- Attempting a re-write. Sir ScottPat (converse) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 19:22, June 28, 2014 (UTC)
- I'm going to replace the links with Special:Mypage, since I for one really don't give a shit about who User:Dantoller may be. Perhaps we could have one section dedicated to this joke so that it doesn't go stale? ConCass2 (talk) 20:40, July 1, 2014 (UTC)
- ScottPat replaced the links with links to a FA collaboration of his (and mine); while that is self-promotion, it's hardly clear to the reader. The article is more cryptic than before. Spıke Ѧ 10:29 5-Jul-14
- I didn't just replace links. I attempted to write the article as a sport (it isn't finished only intro done). Looking back the Cotswold Olimpicks thing was overdoing the secondary theme of self promotion but it was more aimed at the appearance of the Olimpicks advertising itself on an encyclopedia instead of me, the author advertising myself, a joke that no one but Spike and I could have got. It hasn't been finished though and probably deserves deletion as I have very little time to finish it. Sir ScottPat (converse) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 08:26, July 7, 2014 (UTC)
- Kept after 744 hours. Spıke Ѧ 13:50 25-Jul-14
|
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. This is more offensive than funny. And I don't even belong to any of the listed ethnic groups. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 17:12, July 20, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Any humor relies on the belief that "italian, amerindian, jew, asian, oriental, nigger or gypsy" is inherently funny without working at it. We call this fallacy listcruft, even before it gives offense. Spıke Ѧ 23:15 20-Jul-14
- As above Sir TheWikiMan026 CUN,UmP, (Chatter) 19:21, July 21, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Yeugh! --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 16:43, July 22, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Very offensive. Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 13:52, July 26, 2014 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
|
Score: -1 • voting closed
|
Delete (1) |
- This article may have one or too jokes, but not enough BS and satire to be an Uncyclopedia article. It is basically a slightly "funnier" Wikipedia article. We also already have an article on Asexual.Grandpafreddie (talk) 18:45, July 18, 2014 (UTC)
|
Keep (2) |
- Keep. It is clear from the first sentence that this article is joking. I don't like the patches of self-reference, but it was voted onto our main page and ought not be deleted. Having multiple articles on related or even identical topics is explicitly permitted. Spıke Ѧ 18:48 18-Jul-14
- Good Anton (talk) 09:26, July 28, 2014 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- I'm no expert, but I'm sure that admins automatically "keep" featured articles or something like that. Also, this article is bigger and much more elaborate than the article you linked to. Speaking of which, why do several articles have duplicates? I mean, there are two different articles for dog and dogs. I'm sure we only need one for asexuality. ConCass2 (talk) 18:52, July 18, 2014 (UTC)
- It is not automatic for me, though deleting an FA should take more than a routine vote at this forum. Most of the other Admins do treat it as a hard-and-fast rule. Again, having only one Uncyclopedia article per subject is a giant non-goal. We explain the utility of multiple competing versions at HTBFANJS#Write nonsense well. Spıke Ѧ 03:13 19-Jul-14
- Vote closed. Spıke Ѧ 13:14 28-Jul-14
|
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
Delete (5) |
- Wait, I've been a good, religious, crime-free, charitable person my whole life and yet I have to go to Hell now for stumbling on this Uncyclopedia article? Well, that sucks. So, delete this bad news. ConCass2 (talk) 19:36, July 22, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Unclever cruft from 2009 merely rants at the reader. Spıke Ѧ 19:58 22-Jul-14
- Just so damn stupid Sir TheWikiMan026 CUN,UmP, (Chatter) 18:44, July 23, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Stub it out - right out. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 09:33, July 25, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 23:35, July 27, 2014 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
|
Score: -1 • voting closed
|
Delete (2) |
- Delete. This is featured?? Sir TheWikiMan026 CUN,UmP, (Chatter) 12:06, July 25, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. This was featured back in 2007 apparently. Back in those days even Wikipedia was sub-par, let alone Uncyclopedia. ConCass2 (talk) 09:17, July 26, 2014 (UTC)
|
Keep (3) |
- Keep. I will anticipate other Admins and say that the usefulness of showing what we used to be outweighs the joy of nuking a bad and ranty article. Spıke Ѧ 12:47 26-Jul-14
- Keep. For historical value and the fact that so many other articles link here. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 23:34, July 27, 2014 (UTC)
- Keep. It was a feature in the day even if I don't think it's much cop. Reluctant keep. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 15:36, July 28, 2014 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Kept. Admin bingo. Spıke Ѧ 15:44 28-Jul-14
|