Uncyclopedia:VFH/Virginia Tech Massacre (3rd nom)

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

Virginia Tech Massacre (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Vote	Score: 14.5
Nominated by:	--Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 04:54, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
For: 15.5	NF Yes, I read the controversy around this, I read the previous noms, but I think this is a good article and it's time that we gave it another go. It's tasteful in a way that separates us from the rest of the internets. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 04:54, 6 October 2008 (UTC) Fuck taste. Fuck offense. Funny is funny. -RAHB 05:01, 6 October 2008 (UTC) For, again and again.... -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me) For. 87.165.215.111 10:40, 6 October 2008 (UTC) For. Style  Guide 12:42, 6 October 2008 (UTC) For. Can you say sequel?! Dark Ermac 15:07, 6 October 2008 (UTC) Weak for — Sir Sycamore (talk) 15:21, 6 October 2008 (UTC) For. Awesome concept, cleverly executed, and it's been long enough so that the title doesn't sting. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • SU&W) 15:38 Oct 06, 2008 for. the last part makes me feel like not such a terrible person. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 14:43, 7 October 2008 (UTC) For as per Dr. S • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 15:07, Oct 7 Foar Hilarious Pirate Lord__Sonic80 (Yell  •  Latest literary excretion) __ 19:50, 8 October 2008 (UTC) For I can't believe this hasn't been featured yet! I voted for it before if I remember correctly. Or maybe I didn't vote. Who cares? Feature this NOW!!! Preferably next Tuesday when I go on my spree. Um... Yeah. --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 04:00, 9 October 2008 (UTC) For, ah why not. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 11:43, 9 October 2008 (UTC) This should've been featured months ago. Also, rereading the past nom, Smackbot was kind of a douchebag. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 15:45, Oct 9 This must be the 32nd time I'm voting For -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 20:40, 9 October 2008 (UTC) For. JudgeZarbi TALK 20:43, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
Against: 1	Simply tragic. To be honest with you, I am already completely sick of all the documentaries, rumors, tales and legends surrounding this very tiny incident occurred in this very large, cruel planet. But, heck, if you wanted to make fun of it, you might as well just stop playing safe and go all the way. -- JoeMonco 09:58, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
Comments:	A clever piece. The humour is not obvious all the time, a good read. Style  Guide 12:43, 6 October 2008 (UTC) Yeah, this tripe sort of garners a few chuckles at times, but, really, is it providing any provocative argument or anything worthwhile reading, or simply picking and choosing a random sensitive topic, waffling around it and pretending to be edgy or something? -- JoeMonco 09:58, 8 October 2008 (UTC) Have you read anything on Uncyclopedia? That is our base of operations, Tragic and sensitive! Without it we would just be gay jokes. Pirate Lord__Sonic80 (Yell  •  Latest literary excretion) __ 19:50, 8 October 2008 (UTC) It's not meant to make fun of it because it's tragic, it makes fun of it like any historical event. Because that's what it is - an event. And don't tell me it's something more than that, because there's plenty of good satire around wars and the like around this here site, and plenty more people died in those things for no reason. So shut up. Vote on if it's funny or not, not because it's based off of something that just happened to occur recently instead of a few decades ago. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • SU&W) 22:11 Oct 08, 2008

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article