For: 12.5
|
 N+F. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 17:08, September 15, 2012 (UTC)- For. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!)
 00:33, September 16, 2012 (UTC)
- For.
 Sir Ptok-BentonicznyPisz tutaj • KUN 08:20, September 17, 2012 (UTC)
- For -- Kip > Talk • Works • •
   16:43, Sep. 18, 2012
- For.
 RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 18:54, September 19, 2012 (UTC)
- For.
 MATTHLOCK 00:17, September 20, 2012 (UTC)
- For. I like it. I actually think it can and should be longer - there are good opportunities missed here. But I don't vote something funny down just for that, that would be lame. --
 GlobalTourniquet: UnAstrologer, UnJournalist, shameless narcissistic America-hating liberal atheist award-winning featured writer 17:27, September 21, 2012 (UTC)
- For. 70.48.193.52 20:32, September 21, 2012 (UTC)
- For. zheoliel 16:12 September 22
- For -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 17:52, September 29, 2012 (UTC)
- For. Crazyhorse (talk) 12:45, September 30, 2012 (UTC)
- For. —Sir Socky
   (talk) (stalk)  GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 15:34, 1 October 2012
- For. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 16:35, October 1, 2012 (UTC)
|
Against: 2
|
 Against. I quoth the Book Of RAHBelations, wherein it is written, "Explaining why something is ridiculous isn't particularly funny in its own right." -RAHB 23:43, September 25, 2012 (UTC)- Against Just doesn't make the cut for me. -- Rei (talk) 13:31, September 27, 2012 (UTC)
|
| Comments:
|
RAHB I think you're wrong here. Your statement in quotes is correct, but it doesn't apply here. This is doing so much more than that - it is making use of a very strong and well-used method of satirizing practices or attitudes that one, should not be real but are, and two, no one really admits to, and three, are ridiculous. And it does it well. I'm not trying to convince you to change your vote or anything, I just want you to change your vote - in light, of course, of my brilliant and incontrovertible counter-argument. Plus, no dick jokes. -- GlobalTourniquet: UnAstrologer, UnJournalist, shameless narcissistic America-hating liberal atheist award-winning featured writer 15:17, September 26, 2012 (UTC)
- Oh, and also you suck because you used the third person singular verb form in the first person and made my teeth hurt. -- GlobalTourniquet: UnAstrologer, UnJournalist, shameless narcissistic America-hating liberal atheist award-winning featured writer 15:19, September 26, 2012 (UTC)
- I was sent here to make your teeth hurt. It was destined from the very beginning. I don't know how to find out the third person singular form of any of these words which makes me feel really stupid for not being able to get all sarcastic and stuff with a snappy remark in the third person singular. But I'll re-read the article anyway. -RAHB 04:25, September 27, 2012 (UTC)
- "I" - first person singular, "quoth" - third person singular. To every comic's dismay, the Shakespeared/King Jamesed ye olde englishe version of "I quote" is "I quote". -- GlobalTourniquet: UnAstrologer, UnJournalist, shameless narcissistic America-hating liberal atheist award-winning featured writer 16:38, September 27, 2012 (UTC)
- Yeah, I know that part. I just don't know any other cool words like "quoth" that are also third person singular. -RAHB 01:02, September 28, 2012 (UTC)
- How about, "Quoth the raven, you're a god damn pedantic asshole, GlobalTourniquet"? -- GlobalTourniquet: UnAstrologer, UnJournalist, shameless narcissistic America-hating liberal atheist award-winning featured writer 02:54, September 28, 2012 (UTC)
- To be fair, the raven did say that. -RAHB 03:14, September 28, 2012 (UTC)
|
RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 19:04, October 5, 2012 (UTC)