Forum:Still no Poopsmiths...

Forums: Index > Village Dump > Still no Poopsmiths...

Note: This topic has been unedited for 4335 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over.

Template:Poopsmith is up for VFD. I propose we give it one last chance by attempting to promote a few more users to poopsmiths, and if that goes nowhere, we huff it.

There was a forum post a while ago, with a request for poopsmith status section, but that didn't go anywhere. —Pongo (talk) (gs) 17:06, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Derisive name says something? -- herr doktor needsAshuttle  [scream!] 13:07, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

I always wondered about this; surely the poopsmith (if indeed there ever was one) can't have had deletion powers, since that would pretty much have made them an admin. So... that makes the poopsmith's job to move stuff that admins have already dealt with into the archive? Truly, it's as glamourous a job as the name implies. -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 13:50, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Fer Gods sake, let it rest after dying a natural death. Cease and desist. This is one dead topic. This is in fact one ex-topic. Look, it's lying in the cage belly-up. Dead, I tell ye. -- di Mario 20:56, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

uf for poopsmith

Score: 0 FU UF

• nom --» >UF|TLK|▋» 16:57, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
• Against. With this name, no way. What about something on the military ranks, as sarge? -- herr doktor needsAsample  [scream!] 17:03, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
• i'm a poopsmith. why not. ONX 17:05, 17 May 2007 (UTC) (I think that's a For —Pongo (talk) (gs))
• For He's a good member, who I trust. —Pongo (talk) (gs) 17:07, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
• Against - Just ask Hinoa for a free template, the heathen! *grumbles* - Pigeon 19:23, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

/me reads that as "Thank you sir, may I have another?" —Hinoa talk.kun 17:47, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

• Abstain, on the grounds that I don't want to see people working in the stool industry. --General Insineratehymn 23:07, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
• HA HA HA -Han Solo (High Gen. Grue) Comlink Grueslayer

bugger --» >UF|TLK|▋» 23:20, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Pongo for Poopsmith

Score: +0 morons

• Nom and against - just to see how many againsts I can get. —Pongo (talk) (gs) 16:07, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
• For Just to be difficult, as per usual! :-) -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 18:29, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
• For, as per SbU. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 15:46, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
• Against to cancel all the scores again. –—Hv (talk) 20/05 15:49

Olipro for Poopsmith

Score: +0 User That Is Already Pretty Good At This Job

• Nomination and For, there was this one time that I forgot to archive VFD. It was like a week ago. And then Olipro did it. He should be a poopsmith or something. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 19:21, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
• he's an admin but what the hey, for --» >UF|TLK|▋» 20:58, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
• Against Must... cancel... all... scores... -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 22:30, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
• Hellz no! Olipro is a dirty vandal? -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 22:32, 18 May 2007 (UTC)