Forum:PLEASE CHECK THE MINISTRY OF LOVE FOR NEW MESSAGES
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Forums: Index > Village Dump > PLEASE CHECK THE MINISTRY OF LOVE FOR NEW MESSAGES
Note: This topic has been unedited for 4508 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over.
Sorry for shouting in the title. But seriously. I've posted a lot of stuff to MiniLuv recently and haven't got a fucking response on any of them! I understand if the sysops are all on vacation in Auschwitz Theme Park, but seriously. Aren't they responsible enough to check MiniLuv about every other year at the least? -- 22:08, May 25, 2012 (UTC)
- The truth is, nobody hardly ever posts something on the Ministry of Love because it's reserved for big things. If you are having to make a heap of Ministry posts, some of them probably belong on the dump. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 22:14, May 25, 2012 (UTC)
- Oh. Because so far, I've got three:
- Why isn't UN: a namespace alias for the Uncyclopedia: namespace? (There were posts but for some reason the watchlist thingy didn't activate.)
- Why don't we implement MediaWiki:Blockedtext through a template so that the box can be readily used on other articles?
- Why hasn't anyone checked MiniLuv?
- I actually moved Maybe why we don't have lots and lots of new writers back to main Dump because it wasn't getting responses from anyone and I had something to say still. -- 22:22, May 25, 2012 (UTC)
- I seriously wonder why you would put Maybe why we don't have lots and lots of new writers in MiniLuv. It's clearly a matter that concerns both admins and non-admins and that should be discussed among all users. 23:42, 25 May 2012
- Oh. Because so far, I've got three:
- Forum:Help is also historically used for technical problems I believe. Or User talk:Dr. Skullthumper -- 23:59, May 25, 2012 (UTC)
- Okay. So MiniLuv is just for stuff that only the sysops need to see? -- 00:05, May 26, 2012 (UTC)
- Generally, yes.
- Okay. Now on to the real business I have here... -- 00:46, May 26, 2012 (UTC)
- That's sort of the entire purpose of the MiniLuv. Admin-related things only.
- All right. Now, may I kindly direct y'all to this forum? -- 00:56, May 26, 2012 (UTC)
00:49, May 26, 2012 (UTC)
- That's sort of the entire purpose of the MiniLuv. Admin-related things only.
00:39, 26 May 2012
- Okay. Now on to the real business I have here... -- 00:46, May 26, 2012 (UTC)
- Generally, yes.
- Okay. So MiniLuv is just for stuff that only the sysops need to see? -- 00:05, May 26, 2012 (UTC)