Why? talk:Nuke the whales

Fuckin Shit.

Um, way to fucking plagiarize Maddox, you tools. How about thinking up your own shit, you uncreative fucks? Good god. At least learn how to write yourself so you aren't embarrassing yourself in front of people who know what the hell they're talking about.

Bastards. 24.159.254.71 01:09, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

If you'll look at the edit history, you'll see that I plagiarized only one person, a user named Roboriath. And that shit was creative commons. Dunno too much about maddox, though. Link? - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 03:37, Apr 21

This or that. --Hotadmin4u69 ^[TALK] 10:16 Dec 13 2010

WHALES DO NOT EAT PEOPLE AND BOATS, THEY ARE PEACEFUL SEA CREATURES THAT EAT PLANKTON! FUCK ALL OF YOU WHO THINK WHALES NEED TO BE NUKED!

I simply think your spouting bad science about the whales. I have relatives who have been attacked and I think you should show some respect to their losses which include arms, legs and penis.--Sycamore (Talk) 14:15, June 5, 2010 (UTC)

good job plagiarize maddox, who ever posted this is a douche

From Pee Review

Why?:Nuke the whales

Found this in Newpages and fixed it up. Good, bad, suggestions for improvement? Thanks in advance, P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 18:43, Sep 16

Humour:	7	Definitely a laugh here and there, but at the moment it's mostly untapped potential than actual funny. For example, you have the rants about the whales, but you never specify why you should use nukes as opposed to, say, anything else. If you're looking to flesh it out, that's definitely an area to expand upon.
Concept:	9	See above
Prose and formatting:	5	The grammar was pretty poor and the flow very choppy. I fixed it up here and there, and I know you kept a lot of the original content as it was, but you should seriously consider giving it another run-through and fix what you find. You wrote volcano. You can do it!
Images:	8	All of the pictures were appropriate, spare the whaling boat. What do we need them for if we're using nukes?
Miscellaneous:	10	Miscellany present
Final Score:	39	Has a lot of potential, like you said, but the prose needs somewhat of an overhaul.
Reviewer:	T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 01:28, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

disgusting topic though