Uncyclopedia talk:VFH/Superannuation
A good opportunity for a good satire piece, completely wasted. Until one day you realise how many of those who are supposed to contribute to your super are in fact not paying a single dollar and get away without so, you will then realise why I voted "against" today. And remember, you will likely need that money to pay off your medical bills and your burial when you hit the age of retirement, and that's a problem that neither John Howard nor Kevin Rudd will care about at the end of the day. -- Just a Nobody 14:53, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- /me drops ice cream. O_O, OMG...Col.swordman has gone off his meds! /me goes for ice cream Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 18:33, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- Col. Swordman still exists? -- 19:30, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
I move to strike the vote, on the grounds that it was apparently motivated by a dislike of the superannuation system, and not by the quality of the page. Isn't there something in RTFM about that sort of thing? P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 03:48, Sep 11, 2007
- I agree, but you should; a) ask on his talkpage just what he was thinking (and, by extension, whether he's gone mad) and b) wait for an admin to make the decision (having users take the law into their own hands would set a bad precedent, IMO, no matter how much of a loose cannon they are. Just imagine what would happen to their by-the-book partner, who is mere days from retirement). Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 04:00, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
Well, I'd ask him, but this is his only contrib in a few months, and regular contribs go back even further. I'll still drop him a message, but I don't know how much good it'll do. P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 01:12, Sep 12, 2007Erm, never mind, I see you've already done the dirty deed. Anyways, I still don't think he'll answer, though I've been wrong before. P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 01:13, Sep 12, 2007