From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
 |
This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read.
|
|
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
| Delete (5) |
 Delete. This article lacks formatting, pictures, and humor. Seriously, it is only 2 sentences, but has been around too long for QVFD, probably due to its lingering on Pee Review. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 14:51, January 9, 2019 (UTC)- Delete. Kill it with fire. --
 (talk) 01:22, January 10, 2019 (UTC)
- Delete. Concur. --
 RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 19:27, January 22, 2019 (UTC)
- Indeed. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 00:50 31 January 2019
- Delete. Five seconds of rant. Only hint at a comedy strategy is the trite one of an article contemplating its own funniness. Spıke 🎙️16:36 19-May-19
|
| Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
| Comments |
|
|
Score: 1 • voting closed
|
| Delete (3) |
- I quick deleted this for legal reasons. If anybody puts it back, remove me as an admin because I don't want to get sued.
 DAP Dame Pleb Com. Miley Spears (talk) 17:40, October 28, 2018 (UTC)
- Reasons below, even though this vote is rather post-mortem.
 Queen's Counsel A.L.??? (legal consultations) 21:49, October 28, 2018 (UTC)
- On second thought, I don't much care for it and it should probably have stayed gone. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 20:48 29 October 2018
|
| Keep (2) |
- Keep --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 23:03, November 15, 2018 (UTC)
- It is post-mortem, Alden, it certainly is -- (talk) 03:23, November 26, 2018 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- Well this is an odd nomination. More of a deletion review. I didn't think it was deletion-worthy before this issue came up, but there are aspects of it I definitely don't like and I'm not particularly attached to it. File:Mandlebug.png is nice though. I'm not enough of a legal expert to express an informed opinion. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 20:23 28 October 2018
- I'm not an attorney-at-law but I play one on the Internet. The American libel side is rather grey. But I did some checking and he was a dual citizen of France and the USA--it's not so grey in France. I posted more on the Serious Legal Problem link above. Queen's Counsel A.L.??? (legal consultations) 21:46, October 28, 2018 (UTC)
- Quit blowing smoke out of your holes, Miley and Alden. First off, anyone can sue you for any reason in the US. How stupid they and you are in court is another matter, if it gets that far. You two have a paranoid and personal agenda only. Couldn't just delete the personally offensive part? No. Certainly couldn't wait for someone else to do it. No. If anything, Miley, you've weakened Uncyclopedia's rights under parody (that FANDOM does not have) by taking it to staff and taking it down unilaterally rather than following an accepted and acceptable procedural chain. You've made the legal side in the US gray, in other words; it was pretty black and white before then. Remember the guy in the March after the French Charlie Hebdo shootings with the sign that translates to "I march, but I do not agree" -- I figure you likely don't agree with that stance if you even understand the point. Rather, you are much like the cops after the French Hypercache attack that arrested black and Muslim Lassana Bathily who went to get help after others were too afraid to escape. They held him for over an hour since black+non-citizen+Muslim = terrorist. None of this "better safe than sorry" crap. Hour and a half? Luckily, the shooter was too stupid to keep looking for victims. -- (talk) 03:23, November 26, 2018 (UTC)
- Added tag, reset clock. Should have been done earlier. Oops. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 08:15 6 November 2018
- Can we knock off the personal stuff and avoid argument tangents please? --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 00:08, November 27, 2018 (UTC)
- Vote closed. This nomination (with threat to rage-quit) was made by a user now permabanned, and seconded by a user now regarded as a sockpuppet of the first user. By our rules, it can be renominated in a month's time. But it ought not be renominated out of a supposed precept that comedy equals libel under French law, or that we care about that. Spıke 🎙️17:19 19-May-19
|
|
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
| Delete (5) |
- Delete. Half an idea at best but article is stuck. Mercy kill. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 11:10, July 3, 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. Stalled for too many years, even after some trying. This one really makes no sense. -- (talk) 07:21, July 31, 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. Sir Roger (talk) 04:55, October 27, 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. Passable fanfiction, lacking only any comedy. Llwy's "two other starting points" would still require the arrival of a comedy strategy. Spıke 🎙️17:31 20-May-19
- Delete. Unholy crap -- it's awful. The two false starts linked by Llwy-ar-lawr (below) are not as bad but still seem kind of tired and obvious, and not at all excitingly chunky, pneumatic, or effervescent. Snarglefoop (talk) 03:03, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
|
| Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
| Comments |
|
|
Score: 2 • voting closed
|
| Delete (2) |
- I wrote this in 2014. I deleted it in June because I think it's bad, but I've recently discovered that speedy deletion of articles by author request isn't allowed here (sometimes?). It's also not mentioned in the deletion policy. Anyway, it's bad. I was trying to make a point, and the sarcasm doesn't come across well or succeed in being funny. No one else has ever edited it, so there's no issue of deleting other people's work here if that's a concern. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 04:58 4 September 2018
- Good concept, but would take a lot more work I think. Sir Roger (talk) 04:55, October 27, 2018 (UTC)
|
| Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
| Comments |
- I quite like it. A few suitable images and it could be a feature. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 21:27, September 4, 2018 (UTC)
- Sarcasm that "doesn't come across well or succeed in being funny" deserves a resculpt. I am reluctant to vote against nominator, as she does not seem inclined to do more work on it, nor will anyone else, but the rationale is unconvincing. Yes, you don't "own" an article contributed to mainspace even if there are no other editors. Spıke 🎙️23:53 20-May-19
- It's got potential. A few illustrations -- maybe a field of running dinosaurs, with a caption along the lines of "If they hadn't been spayed and neutered we'd be overrun with them", or maybe a photo of a maternity ward, with a caption in bold saying "CONSEQUENCES OF FAILURE TO SPAY AND NEUTER" ... push it just a little farther over the top. (Or maybe I've just spent too much time on Illogico and my sense of humor's gotten all weird.) -- Snarglefoop (talk) 03:22, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
- Kept. That's three Keep votes except for the unanimous reluctance to vote against author. Please take this further, Llwy; or, Snarglefoop, get italic and add the illustrations yourself. Spıke 🎙️11:22 21-May-19
|
|
Score: -1 • voting closed
|
| Delete (2) |
- I totally understand why IPs have been attacking this page. It's not funny unless perhaps you share the author's racist, misogynistic ideas about Korean(-American) women. It also has a {{fix}} tag, which once meant deletion in 30 days, and that has been there since 2012. Long past its due date and never been "fixed". I don't think this topic needs a dedicated article anyway. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 05:47 23 November 2018
- It's a crapfest. Remove. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 00:10, November 27, 2018 (UTC)
|
| Keep (3) |
 Keep. Now passable after Nigel's edits. Certainly not politically correct due to the way Korean women are portrayed as so interested in making babies, but at least passable. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 14:57, January 9, 2019 (UTC)- Keep. Eminently keepable. Cheap stereotyping is what we do here sometimes; the specific stereotypes range from laughably crude to seriously witty. I don't sense racial hatred, I do sense a grudge toward an ex-lover, but that's a comedy strategy I too have used. Simsie is both a woman and a leftie concerned about gratuitous stereotyping, so her Keep vote carries extra weight with me. Spıke 🎙️16:58 19-May-19
- Last I heard, she was a conservative. Did something change? ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 19:13 19 May 2019
- Keep. I should vote for my own revision. No talk page critics as yet. Certainly further rewriting is always possible. -- (talk) 02:53, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- It's racist and misogynistic only if you decide to take it this way. There's far worse elsewhere on Uncyclopedia. It is pretty stupid and low-class at times but as parody, it is not far off the mark on many (but not all) points. I have known gutless spouses that always ditched homemade Korean food, but that would not be made by adoptees as the article intro supposes. The fix tag is only a warning as is Add A Picture, and was for bad syntax which looks to have been fixed (and nobody removed the fix tag). A candidate for surgery, I feel, not deletion, which I will get to within a week.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Nigel Scribbler (talk • contribs)
- Revised the article. Please vote on the revised version, still marked for deletion. -- (talk) 10:35, December 4, 2018 (UTC)
- Well, it's certainly different now. Not sure what to make of it. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 19:21 19 May 2019
|
|
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
| Delete (5) |
- Delete..--The Pioneer JP (talk) 13:02, March 18, 2019 (UTC)
- Delete.. Mediocre at best, but I hate Hawaiian pizza. -- (talk) 21:24, March 18, 2019 (UTC)
- This is why Pearl Harbor need to be bomb! Stubby, Randumbo. Spıke 🎙️17:02 19-May-19
- Delete.. Mashup of stupid non-facts (invented in 1812 during a war oh yeah) and errors (Hawaiian pizza also has ham on it, as all Canadians know) and written in some variety of not-quite-English Snarglefoop (talk) 03:09, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete. Randumbo. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 11:20, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
|
| Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
| Comments |
- This article was ICU'd by Romartus back in last August, and have had no major improvement ever since. Although I think this could be QVFD'd because of the very fact that it's an article of an expired ICU with no improvements, I would like to hold a vote as a safer measure, considering that the original ICU was not added in a proper style.--The Pioneer JP (talk) 13:02, March 18, 2019 (UTC)
- Abandoned {{ICU}} can be deleted without further safe procedures. Spıke 🎙️17:02 19-May-19
- VFD thinks this article isn't tagged, but it is. Cache? Incompatible code? Mice in the computer? ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 04:20 21 May 2019
|
Benoit Mandelbrot 
