From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
|
This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at VFD.
|
Colouring Book University
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. Listicide.--EpicWinner (talk) 03:33, November 24, 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Seems to refer to WP:Cape Breton University. Apart from giving a page a wrong name, rather than giving it the right name and using {{Title}} to spoof the reader once he's safely inside, this is a bunch of lists. (The Wikipedia article is not in great shape either.) I've already deleted the "Famous Alumni"; "Faculty" has Bush as Peace Studies (get it? get it?), Osama bin-laden in Islamic Studies (a laugh riot), and so on. Part blog about where I go to have fun, a little cyberbullying, and throughout, multiple lists of wisecracks with no comedy concept. Spıke 🎙️03:45 24-Nov-15
- Delete. Listcruft/randumbo Cg097 (talk) 07:08, November 24, 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. EStop ⚓ 13:44, November 26, 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Listing, drifting, sinking. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 19:58, November 29, 2015 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
|
Sega Micro CD
Score: 4 • voting closed
|
Delete (4) |
- Delete. Just a barrage of insults and ranting.--EpicWinner (talk) 22:52, November 24, 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. I'll cut out the worst bits, but there is nothing of value on the page. Spıke 🎙️03:43 25-Nov-15
- Delete. Concur with above comments. EStop ⚓ 14:05, November 26, 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. "Insults and ranting" is an understatement. The article seems to be nothing but a sandbox for the writer to express their anger over something. - ConCass2 (talk) 18:07, November 27, 2015 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
- Abstain. I am planning on fixing this article, as old consoles interest me and have great potential for humor. However, it won't happen any time soon. (Grad school beckons, which is why I've been quite inactive lately) If it gets deleted, that is fine, as I have already saved the source on my PC. In this case, I will make sure to request admin permission before republishing the new version. --Alec Pradeux (talk) 19:42, December 4, 2015 (UTC)
- Userspaced to Alec based on the above. Indeed, have someone else review it before returning it to the encyclopedia. Spıke 🎙️19:51 4-Dec-15
|
Score: 1 • voting closed
|
Delete (2) |
- Delete. This article, since its creation in 2006-07, has had no humor concept (apart from Toilet Humor and Randumbo) except the gimmick of putting subliminal messages in an article on subliminal messages: trite and unentertaining. Spıke 🎙️18:08 17-Nov-15
- Delete. Not sublime enough. EStop ⚓ 20:17, November 19, 2015 (UTC)
|
Keep (1) |
- Keep. I don't think it's that bad to be deleted. The list at the end can go. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 15:10, November 25, 2015 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- The only problem I can see is over-egging the pudding. Cleaning out some if the worst randumbo, stripping out half of the messages, giving a little more based-on-reality humour, and this could be something. If this is voted for deletion I wouldn't mind userspacing it for my long list of projects I'm not doing. The previous edit was signed by PuppyOnTheRadio, but he is too lazy to create a signature yet. 10:07 pm 23 Nov 2015
|
Score: 0 • voting closed
|
Delete (1) |
- Delete. Blanked by creator, but he is no longer the only contributor. A biography of an Australian band with Stoner Humor added. Spıke 🎙️11:30 5-Dec-15
|
Keep (1) |
- Keep. Hmm... borderline on this one... not particularly clever and not great humour, but not an offensive smorgasbord of dead memes and cruft either. EStop ⚓ 07:05, December 10, 2015 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Video
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. Very stale humor.--EpicWinner (talk) 08:13, November 19, 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Considering the broad potential of this topic and its look-upabilty, it is perhaps the comedy concept that Buggles. There is The Radio Star Murder which was featured and part of a plethora of Radio articles however, a search of Video is all video games. Music video also links here and there is every type of Videophile. In my mind and in my car, we can rewind we've not gone to far... needs rewinding a lot though. Will userspace title for later if huffed. EStop ⚓ 09:49, November 20, 2015 (UTC)
- One paragraph in and all humour in concept is exhausted. Internet - please kill the video star. The previous edit was signed by PuppyOnTheRadio, but he is too lazy to create a signature yet. 10:16 pm 23 Nov 2015
- Delete. Painful to read. ConCass2 (talk) 11:17, December 15, 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. All right. Spıke 🎙️22:35 15-Dec-15
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
- This red-linky article, from 2005, started as a story written around Video Killed the Radio Star by The Buggles, but started to tell the story of obsolescence of different video formats, which it might be a simple job to tell well (comparable to Audiophile). Spıke 🎙️16:41 19-Nov-15
|
Uncyclopedia:Imaginary Admin Guidelines
Tax (dance)
Jerry Jackson
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. The comedy concept for this page seems to be to write badly and compose ugly and slap Category:Articles about a person written in the style of that person. I assume the person is a moron in real life, but cannot tell from Wikipedia which Jerry Jackson that would be. Spıke 🎙️02:04 7-Dec-15
- Delete. Article's sole aim is to amuse its writer by typing literal gibberish. ConCass2 (talk) 11:22, December 8, 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Nonsense. Cg097 (talk) 02:24, December 10, 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. fat-pie.com/jerryjackson looks like the source, a crap parody of a crap parody. EStop ⚓ 07:16, December 10, 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. An article in the style of 'I Maed a Yukky Do-do' and all the worst for it. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 23:18, December 18, 2015 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
|
Big Bill Hell's Cars
Score: 4 • voting closed
|
Delete (4) |
- Delete. The glee of swearing and ranting at strangers. Est. 2010. Spıke 🎙️19:04 27-Nov-15
- In addition, WP:Baltimore in fiction states: 'Baltimore is featured in an Internet meme based on a vulgar commercial of fictional car dealership Big Bill Hell's cars, notably including the beginning statement, "Fuck you Baltimore!"' In other words, this article exists to promote someone else's meme, and certainly adds nothing original. Spıke 🎙️22:59 27-Nov-15
- Delete. "This article is designed to offend", the article warns. Too lazy to come up with real humour, the article resorts to vulgar name calling. - ConCass2 (talk) 21:38, December 1, 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. I would buy this if it was less specific (and had a better quality interior). What was funny and refreshing is the idea it's written by "the company" and slipped through the net. An extreme "sales" style might be a good strategy if the company was notable and had a notably extreme sales style. EStop ⚓ 14:07, December 2, 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. One for the cruncher. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 23:29, December 18, 2015 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
|
WTFCENTAURS
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
Delete (5) |
- WTF An unencyclopedic and unclever question-and-answer session. Surely you remember Kalir from 2006? Spıke 🎙️19:58 15-Dec-15
- To pasture. Spurred on by a cantering opening paragraph, the article quickly became saddled with old memes and neighvelism. EStop ⚓ 19:32, December 17, 2015 (UTC)
- Manure --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 23:25, December 18, 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. ConCass2 (talk) 10:13, December 19, 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. A pointless article that nobody would ever search for, and not too funny to boot. --Alec Pradeux (talk) 22:53, December 22, 2015 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
|
Score: 2 • voting closed
|
Delete (3) |
- Delete. Written not to amuse the reader but to amuse the writer by grossing out the reader with Cannibal Humor. Reader must create the pun and type it in to see if there is an article telling it. Spıke 🎙️21:04 16-Nov-15
- Delete. Two for one on crispy dippers, nice. Yes, a bit too much of an aquired taste. I found the concept palatable comedy wise, until I looked at the article. Better left to the imagination this one. EStop ⚓ 10:11, November 20, 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. ConCass2 (talk) 16:31, December 1, 2015 (UTC)
|
Keep (1) |
- Keep. Macabre to say the least and not a feature as it is but don't think it should be chopped for that reason.--RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 23:15, December 18, 2015 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Feature worthy no. Redeemable maybe. Not one I'm going to do myself though. The previous edit was signed by PuppyOnTheRadio, but he is too lazy to create a signature yet. 09:57 pm 23 Nov 2015
|
Space/Time Conflibulation
Mothers Against Swearing Association
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. Found through a link near the bottom of swearing. Almost devoid of comedy, this short article's sole purpose seems to be to ridicule a small Geocities page which isn't even on Wikipedia, and maintain an external link to it. Chunkles ☎ talk ✏️ contribs 01:47, December 26, 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. It seems to be an article written to make the case against the authors of that website (among other things, for "being assholes"). Authors show their devotion to campaigning over humor with quotes like: "there is no evidence shown to support this on their website." A website is set up to nag, and someone proposes to use Uncyclopedia to nag them back. Spıke 🎙️01:52 26-Dec-15
- Delete. Some clumsy oaf put his article here instead of RationalWiki. I hope it was an accident. ConCass2 (talk) 10:25, December 26, 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. An article we can do without. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 13:19, December 26, 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. A load of f...... b....... EStop ⚓ 09:58, December 28, 2015 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
|
Zilko
Score: 0 • voting closed
|
Delete (2) |
- Delete.
As per previous VFD, another legacy article that has an expired shelf-life. EStop ⚓ 16:54, December 17, 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Uncyclopedian emerita Prettiestpretty sets down in writing her annoyances about Uncyclopedia, from the trite (Brits versus Yanks) to the personal (disputes with specific other Uncyclopedians). This belongs in userspace, not in the content or project spaces. Spıke 🎙️17:08 17-Dec-15
- I would move this into user space for the reasons of all the voters above and below. I like it, but it's personal, whiney (but well done), and navelism. Not a main space article though. The previous edit was by PuppyOnTheRadio (Talk). 06:45, December 19, 2015 (UTC)
|
Keep (2) |
- Keep. I know it's navelism but as it is from the Great Dame, I would like it to stay. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 23:28, December 18, 2015 (UTC)
- Flip Okay Rom, if it has legacy value. EStop ⚓ 10:10, December 28, 2015 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: -2 • voting closed
|
Delete (0) |
Delete. Having just cleared out all the initial quotations (EStop has also been in trying to stop their proliferation), it strikes me that there is nothing clever on this entire page, that Swearing is nothing more than an excuse to perform swearing (including "FAG") that falls in the supposed Safe Harbor that I have been trying to mine, of "articles in the style of the thing they are about." Spıke 🎙️23:19 25-Dec-15
|
Keep (2) |
- Keep. Sure, parts of it are garbage, but I enjoyed the first paragraph of the History section (the rest should be burned), as well as the attempt to analyze the linguistic structure of swearing. I think this should stick around after some cleanup (at least it's nowhere near as bad as Tourette's Syndrome as far as purposeless swearing is concerned). Chunkles ☎ talk ✏️ contribs 01:37, December 26, 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, that part is creative. A rewrite of this article to describe swearing without swearing (as opposed to swearing that is at best hypocritical) would be an instant Feature. Cf. Tetragrammaton. Spıke 🎙️01:57 26-Dec-15
- Keep (formerly Nominator). Been worked on. Spıke 🎙️13:36 29-Dec-15
|
Comments |
|