From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Vote
|
Score: 15.5 public events the President would otherwise be hapless at
|
| Nominated by:
|
Funnybony 17:36, September 5, 2009 (UTC)
|
For: 19
|
- Sure YES! I was planning to write a Pee Review, one read made me laugh, and the 2rd read I was looking for faults to make my review. After all, I realized it was so perfect in content, pics, and format, that there was nothing to write. So I just went straight to Nominate. What's the use in finding faults in the faultless. If it's already perfect, and also very funny (and real), then there's nothing to but nominate. I'd love this on the feature article, although my sisters would hate it because they're not Obama supporters, they're Obama freaks. Fuck them!!! --Funnybony 16:19, September 6, 2009 (UTC)
- Reluctant Self-For. I would have liked some feedback, though if others think this is of VFH quality, then I guess I can't complain. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 18:14, September 5, 2009 (UTC)
- Sure. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 18:23, Sep 5
- I think it's great! —Sir Socky
   (talk) (stalk)  GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 21:16, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
- Just kidding -
 For. -- spine-chilling Ape (google) (Riot Porn) 22:30, September 5, 2009 (UTC)
- For. It's an original idea and deserves a front page nomination.
 RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 23:12, September 5, 2009 (UTC)
- For. I read this earlier, but it completely slipped my mind until it came up on the teleprompter. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 01:25, September 6, 2009 (UTC)
- For. -OptyC Sucks!
 CUN19:15, 8 Sep
- For. Brilliant.
 Sir Unknown User (Talk : Cont : VFH : PEE : CUN) 22:46, September 8, 2009 (UTC)~
- For Hilarious! User:Zeitgeist/sig 23:34, September 8, 2009 (UTC)
- For. 63.243.144.7 03:14, September 10, 2009 (UTC)
- For This is exactly the kind of article I love: Great concept, brilliantly written and razor sharp. It would be rediculous if this did not get featured. I do agree that it's a shame that it does seem to claim that far-right nut-ball Limbaugh can make a rational argument. If this nomination fails I'd suggest the author rewrite this section and extract the bizarre pro-Limbaugh statements and try again. mAttlobster. (hello) 12:14, September 10, 2009 (UTC)
- Godly For. Thou teleprompter is madeth of win and mediocre politics.--Almost Sir Random Crap
- For. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey) 19:15, September 10, 2009 (UTC)
- For. per above. Mn-z 21:03, September 10, 2009 (UTC)
- For. I approve of Guildy's conservative satire. Sir Groovester | Contributions | Talk Page 21:26, September 10, 2009 (UTC)
- I forget what I was going to say. Fort? Ford? Fjord? Yes, I think it was fjord. --S0.S0S.0S.0S0 00:43, September 11, 2009 (UTC)
- Dig Kathleen Turner. --THINKER 09:44, September 11, 2009 (UTC)
- For. Dame
  11:47, September 11, 2009 (UTC)
- For. 67.241.123.223 02:53, September 13, 2009 (UTC)
|
Against: 3.5
|
Against. Not from a left-liberal perspective. -- spine-chilling Ape (google) (Riot Porn) 22:29, September 5, 2009 (UTC)- Well written, didn't get laughs out of me. ~
 22:46, September 8, 2009 (UTC)
- Against. I'd have to side with Mordillo, well written but the last section slides somewhat into unfunny political-ness. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent
     01:34, September 9, 2009 (UTC)
- Against. Not really funny, now is it? Keep your politics off my internets. 99.166.75.246 02:02, September 10, 2009 (UTC)
- Against. Yeah, nah. Should be about a teleprompter, not Olberman and Limbaugh. IronLung 02:45, September 10, 2009 (UTC)
|
| Comments:
|
Very funny and also educational. Top notch stuff. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Funnybony (talk • contribs)
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
