From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
 |
This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:VFD.
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete From what I can tell, just a big list. --General Insineratehymn 00:38, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- Should Be Qvfd'd--☭Mr.Huffy☭ 03:59, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- it can't be qvfd'd. qvfd is for articles that have only recently been created. so kill this --
 » >UF|TLK|▋» 04:11, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- Blarch this list. --
 Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 06:03, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch
 06:57, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - awardcruft. --
 (but) Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 09:51, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. User:Solar penguin/sig 10:15, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete Your expiration date is coming near, o' crappy article! --General Insineratehymn 00:54, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. And none too soon.Rogpyvbc 04:07, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- it's past it, though --» >UF|TLK|▋» 04:09, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- Huff List stub. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 06:19, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 07:07, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Not funny. User:Solar penguin/sig 09:48, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete How did this survive nearly two years? --General Insineratehymn 00:52, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Bye.Rogpyvbc 04:09, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- you see insinerate, in the early days of uncyc there was no such thing as quality control. like i've said before you can just invent a time maching, go back to 2005 and invent qvfd then. however that takes too long so kill this --» >UF|TLK|▋» 04:16, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- Huff Short, muddled. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 06:28, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 07:06, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. User:Solar penguin/sig 09:50, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- Bye —– Sir Hv » | Talk | Contribs | KUN | UotM | RotM | VFH | Kidney | 14/04 13:18
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete *barf* --General Insineratehymn 00:50, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Holy Smother of Gerbils.Rogpyvbc 04:10, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- holy jesus on a stick --» >UF|TLK|▋» 04:19, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 07:05, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. User:Solar penguin/sig 09:52, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete Ugh. --General Insineratehymn 00:43, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- Fuck... Wow, Articles Are Crappy. --» >UF|TLK|▋» 04:11, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- Ripped off from the Dilbert TV show. Huff --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 06:12, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 07:01, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Unfunny. User:Solar penguin/sig 09:57, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - I've started a group called UWAATA (Uncyclopedians Who Are Afraid of This Article) if anyone's interested. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 09:59, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
- Weak keep. Remove the bits about raping boy scouts, and add a picture of the half-goat half-tree creature, then you might have an acceptable stub. User:Solar penguin/sig 10:14, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Huff Enormous size, doesn't loop (?), unfunny premise. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 07:26, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete I removed it from the Spongebob article in readiness. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 09:41, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- Hindleyite Converse 10:20, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 10:29, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete I'm for killing anything Spongebob-related. --Dexter111344 13:28, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- doesn't display so kill --» >UF|TLK|▋» 15:17, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
|
| Comments |
Sorry my bad i fixed it wrong link. Capercorn 01:13, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete
 Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 07:21, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 07:40, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
- very cruft --» >UF|TLK|▋» 13:32, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
- Huff - It needs to die. --Capercorn 00:00, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete. Not only a list, but a badly-formatted stupid list as well. --El Zoof 06:50, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 07:06, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 07:39, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
- no thanks --» >UF|TLK|▋» 13:29, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
- Huff - Everyone knows that only He can do all those things at once, not some anime ripoff. --Capercorn 23:38, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
- Listcruft --General Insineratehymn 23:46, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- Oh, the frabjous joy of selecting a Random Page! Occasionally you find a gem. Well, I'm assuming I might one day. --El Zoof 06:50, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
- Deleted. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 00:06, 14 Apr 2007
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete. Possibly the stupidest article I've read in Uncyclopedia. And that says a lot. I'm amazed it has survived almost two years.Rogpyvbc 05:22, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete-Per nom--Scott 05:27, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
- Um, yeah. What Scott said. --Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 05:45, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 06:49, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. It's certainly not the stupidest article I've ever read. Well. Possibly. --El Zoof 07:11, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
- Blarch as vanity. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 07:12, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Another one that's never been anywhere near non-awful. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 08:50, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
- wtf --» >UF|TLK|▋» 13:27, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete I nearly developed cataracts after reading this eyesore. --General Insineratehymn 23:45, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- pretty long cruft by someone who thinks the word fag is funny --» >UF|TLK|▋» 20:43, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --General Insineratehymn 20:54, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
- Has 6 whole pages of history and maybe one or two funny sentences between the lot of them. Much as I like voting keep for long articles, delete. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 23:12, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per Strange. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 01:03, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
- A couple of lists, too many quotes, six mentions of variants of "fag"...and those are the best parts. --Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 05:49, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete and CRP I think stuff like this needs to be CRPed. If anyone thinks they can rewrite a half decent version of this, they should do it in their userspace and then ask the admins to remove the CRP. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 07:18, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
- Comment: You mean CVP? CRP's more a temporary measure, used when people are recreating the same article and it's getting on our nerves. CVP's the more permanent of the two. —Major Sir Hinoa prepare for trouble • make it double? 13:35, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- For Man in the Ceiling. Are you going to rewrite it? Because few crappy pages ever get rewritten. They just sit there, sucking out the souls of those foolhardy enough to read them. Like vanity plates. --Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 05:49, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
- maybe i will! or... maybe i'll sit here like an asshole and bitch about how shitty it is instead... that's probably more gratifying. Man in the Ceiling 23:42, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
- Deleted. If anyone wants any of the history restored to their userspace for rewriting just ask. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 23:55, 13 Apr 2007
|
| Keep |
- Keep Randomator 13:49, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - I play Battlefield 2 (Guess my username!!), I understood most of the jokes, however it needs work, the game isn't that buggy... Yay 1.41. Perhaps it should be a locked page, so that It could be edited only by non-n00bz. Capercorn 00:58, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
Weak keep I cleaned it up somewhat. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 01:08, 12 April 2007 (UTC)- Keep. Kind of funny. Better than some of the other stuff we put up with. Makes fun of a real world... thing. We do have a real world to make fun of, people. Also, I like pie. --Medvedev (scream)
 21:42, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
- This one became the private playground of various players and Haxxors (whatever the fuck that means, pardon my French). It probably falls under the following categories: ugly, vain, notfunny, nonamusing, annoying, etc. ~
 07:46, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete all unfunny articles that are too long and random and are edited repeatedly by idiots. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 16:38, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete: How about considering the too many quotes on the top, wit about as sharp as pudding, Everyone-Loves-My-Favorite-Tactical-FPS-Of-The-Week Syndrome, overuse of the phrase "is a conspiracy" (i.e. more than zero), overexplaining acronyms, acronyms that need overexplaining before anyone can understand them... --CaptainSpam MUN PUTPBAA 18:21, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Video game articles are normally highly unamusing. What sort of people would choose to do one? This one doesn't disappoint in disappointment. Matt lobster 21:09, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - crappy vandal target. —– Sir Hv » | Talk | Contribs | KUN | UotM | RotM | VFH | Kidney | 12/04 21:30
- Delete-I think it could be rebuilt but it's such a big target for vandals and vanity being that it will become overwhelming to clean that even if we did rewrite to meet Uncyclopedia's quality standard it would be too hard to clean up and the article will become full of crap and vanity again--Scott 05:42, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
We can rebuild it, better, stronger, funnier --Nytrospawn 00:49, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
- If you didn't catch the 6 Million Dollar Man reference, what I said was that this article is salvageable, but if more votes come it for its deletion, I will aks it. --Nytrospawn 00:49, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
- "aks" is a reference to Leela from Futurama--Nytrospawn 00:49, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
- But what will you aks it? -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 23:16, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
- Since it's obvious that this is going to be huffed, I copied the page a user subpage, feel free to edit it There. --Capercorn 23:41, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
- Deleted. I moved the rest of the history to capercorn's subpage here if that helps. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 23:53, 13 Apr 2007
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
|
| Comments |
Deleted —Braydie 11:52, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Huff It uberly sux plus delete the link on the page when you press 6 until you get to satan. :(
|
| Comments |
- To the first delete voter: Please sign your comments by typing ~~~~. Pentium5dot1 06:11, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
Kept and moved. —Braydie 11:52, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
- Keep Rubbish as an article, but a good link to a few good pages, so I'll change it to a disambig if there are no objections. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 22:55, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- Redirect to Link. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 00:46, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
- Keep So long it links to articles, and only as disambiguation. Ethereal 11:02, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
- Keep this disambig version. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 14:33, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
- The disambig is fine. -- Hindleyite Converse 20:31, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Dismbigs re supposed to look like this, doy.--Witt,
 of  UNion Entertain me* 05:48, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
- Huff The article sucks huff it. Capercorn 22:34, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- stup stub --» >UF|TLK|▋» 23:58, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --Naughty Budgie 06:34, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
Sorry about that carry on fixed link =)
- Possibly redirect to hyperlink as on Wikipedia. Not sure whether it needs to be deleted first. Pentium5dot1 00:06, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
Kept —Braydie 11:52, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- oh dear, not another old article that I don't find funny --» >UF|TLK|▋» 20:38, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. This a fantasy riff, neither comedy nor satire. ----OEJ 21:14, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
- Huff - I do say: C3-PO Human-Cyborg Relations deserves better. Capercorn 02:50, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- Oh dear, the odds of this article surviving are precisely 237 to 1. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 04:37, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete If you are going to mock C3-PO you need to make C3-PO seem gayer than he appears on Star Wars. Not that there is anything wrong with that, he just seems to be a bit effeminate most of the time. --Lt. Sir Orion Blastar (talk) 14:42, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Too bad it's "C-3P0", and that this article is terrible. --Sir Judgement F@H UmP VFH {talk} 02:05, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
Deleted and redirected. —Braydie 10:48, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
|
| Comments |
Deleted —Braydie 10:48, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
- Keep. Oddly enough, I think it's a very good satirical premise. As a screenplay it's pretty good. ----OEJ 14:14, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Very good and funny - I can just see the Pythons performing it. If they haven't already... -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 17:35, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
- But what about merging? Dubanka is rather stubby - should it be deleted? If UnBooks:Dubanka is kept, it really needs to be moved to the right namespace (which is probably the main namespace, as the article fits into neither UnBooks nor UnNews, and thus the page currently at Dubanka needs to be dealt with somehow). Pentium5dot1 22:51, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
- Screenplay, book, same kind of thing. At least from an Uncyc point of view. I think it's fine where it is. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 19:51, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- Keep and move to UnScripts. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 01:29, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
- Delete or Weak Merge to Dubanka (which is by the same author). Article has severely limited humor value, and its namespace (UnBooks) does not match its templating (UnNews), indicating laziness on the part of the author (who has not been active recently). If this is deleted, Dubanka needs to go too. If it is not deleted, a substantial rewrite effort is needed. Pentium5dot1 23:15, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
Kept —Braydie 10:48, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- ok, last of my 2005cruft batch huff votes, now time to have some lunch and do some homework --» >UF|TLK|▋» 17:21, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- Gogogo let's get tactical marines! --officer designate
 Lugiatm MUN NS CM ZM WH 17:28, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- 'Delete Any article here has gone too far - nice to use copy/paste for a while Guutog 15:59, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
- Guutog, did you actually read any of the articles on here? Because you're kind of implying you haven't. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 17:28, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
- Huff - It isn't funny... Capercorn 21:56, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - can be rewritten after huffage if anyone can be bothered. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 16:36, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
Taking Guutog's vote in mind, it's a draw after 5 days. So Kept —Braydie 10:48, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
- There is. It's called Constitution of the United States. Most of the huffed Amendment articles stemmed from it.--Abc 20:20, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - Not so funny taken on it's own, but essential to the Mothers against Iceland page.
- Keep on the grounds of it being part of a series. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 01:33, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
- Can you guess what this is? If you answered "2005cruft", you're correct! --» >UF|TLK|▋» 17:13, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- Bye. --officer designate Lugiatm MUN NS CM ZM WH 17:28, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete- Way to short for an article Randomator 14:36, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
- 'Delete Any article here has gone too far - nice to use copy/paste for a while Guutog 15:59, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
5 days without clear decision, so it's being left how it was. Kept —Braydie 10:48, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
- Keep! What the hell is wrong with you people!? You all suck pussississies and vaghimnieystxrs! FEG FOOG FICK FUKK FLAGG FOGG! Mr. Briggs Inc. 00:43, 12 April 2007 (UTC) Eh?
|
| Delete |
- Delete! for some reason, people on this site hate the people from Jackass. This article was no doubt written by a young kid, judging from the way he insulted me, and two others on pee review., i think we all know it needs to be deleted.--Reubnick 00:19, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete hard and fast -- another QVFD-quality article. ----OEJ 00:27, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
- QVFD --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 00:41, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
- Huff - 'Nuff Said... Capercorn 00:42, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
Hinoa, hard and fast. —Braydie 10:48, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
|
| Comments |
Nytrospawn'd. —Braydie 10:48, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- I realize that it's actually on topic, but the concept of "lame" should be done in a way that's not lame. A 62kb page that's mostly the word "lame" repeated ad nauseum isn't lame; it's stupid. --Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 07:29, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- Ad nauseum indeed. ~ 07:43, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- Wow! that's a lame page HUFF IT--☭Mr.Huffy☭ 07:57, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- LAME!!! Randomator 13:47, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Cheese and crackers this article is Lame and not funny at all! --Lt. Sir Orion Blastar (talk) 14:37, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete I'm back from holiday, and back onto the short pages list to find Back-to-the-Future-esque things like this. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 19:01, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
- stubcruft=instahuff --» >UF|TLK|▋» 20:34, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Wow, this is spectacularly bad, short, and randumb. A real gem of a VFD nommie.----OEJ 21:12, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - This page could potentially be good if someone rewrote it though... Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 04:35, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Way too short Randomator 13:40, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
Even though the author doesn't know how to read or write too well, I bet he can play the guitar clear as ringin' a bell. However, it's reading & writing--specifically funny--that we're looking for here, so article's been deleted. Voting closed. —RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY)14:16, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Huff - It had not one joke in it not a laugh or a chukle. Capercorn 11:43, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Just not very good. ----OEJ 14:19, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - not at all funny. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 15:21, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
- Would emos-in-denial/emos just SHUT THE FUCK UP!!! Thank you. --» >UF|TLK|▋» 20:36, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
- DELETE IT! DELETE IT! IT BURNS!--Joseph5626 04:34, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- Weak delete.L 05:06, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- Weak delete.--☭Mr.Huffy☭ 08:08, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Randomator 13:38, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
Look, it may be parody, but it is not funny and the athor should have put the Under Constuction template on it if he wished to improve it for the future.--☭Mr.Huffy☭ 08:08, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
I'd like to mention that if this had been along the lines of St. Elmo's Fire, it might have stood a chance. As it is, it did not. Executed; voting closed. —RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY)14:17, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 04:26, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. ----OEJ 14:17, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
- This really should've been QVFD'd, but oh well... --L 03:26, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- DeleteThis should have been QVFD'd in 21 seconds of it's creation--☭Mr.Huffy☭ 08:03, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete See above comments Randomator 13:37, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
I would like to remind the newer meatmembers present that thou shalt not QVFD old articles. Executed; voting closed. —RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY)14:19, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
|
