Template talk:Vfd

Cool picture

I suggest adding this cool picture. Tis from Wikipedia:V.F.D. --   Nerd42    chat  talk  h²g²  pedia  news  21:51, 5 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Timestamping

We should put a timestamp feature on this. --Micoolio101 00:19, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

No we should not. This is not an ICU template. --General Insineratehymn 17:32, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, but maybe we should mark VFD survivors someway. Just to avoid sucessive failed nominations. -- herr doktor needsAbeam  [scream!] 17:36, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

{{editprotected}} May the image be updated to the newer version, which is: ? Mrdr4 00:36, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

No. --General Insineratehymn 01:16, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

Formatting Hiccup

When this template is placed above some other templates, for example, {{Salapproves}}, it centers everything below it. I think it might be an unclosed <center> command in {{Message box}}. I.e. a </center> command needs to added or moved somewhere. It does not center the text if either template is used by itself or if the VFD template is on the bottom. --Mnb'z 16:49, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

VfD Template v2.0

{{editprotected}} Hello. For the past few hours I've been working on a new version of this template atTemplate:Vfd/Sandbox, which, if you look at it, appears to be much more presentable, neat, organized, and informative then the current incarnation. My request is for someone to update the template to this newer version. If there's any concern with the template I can immediately address it, whether it be the border, background, the way the text is written, etc. Sooo... get to it and respond!  Dylanlip  (talk) 03:39, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Okay. I've added another two copies of the template because I'm needing some opinions on the images in the three. I can't decide on which of the three images to choose for it.  Dylanlip  (talk) 03:39, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Deja vu... also, your signature is horrendously out of control. Fix your own most rudimentary template before proposing a change to long-standing templates. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 19:10, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

It does look better, and is more informative. I think that's a good thing. As for the image, I think if there was some cross between the 1st and 3rd ones, with an exclamation mark in a circle, that'd be perfect. Also the last line is a bit superfluous. Also I never knew we had a deletion policy. You learn something new every day. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 00:20, 05 Jul 2009

Oh, you are telling porky pies Spang! I know you went to VFD once. :P But yea, we are meant to be parodying that UN:WP place and all... MrN  Fork you! 00:30, Jul 5

I found and uploaded the image you were looking for Spang. File:Emblem-important-red.svg I'll go right ahead and update the sandbox template right now.  Dylanlip  (talk) 11:44, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

Awesome! Done. I took the last line out for now, not sure how needed it is, but can always be added in again if people prefer it. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 22:14, 09 Jul 2009

Thanks! It's finally all done. Now onto the next outdated template. :D  Dylanlip  (talk) 23:08, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

Could we either center the text in that box, or shorten the horizontal length of the box? It looks very poorly formatted right now. Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 14:04, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

Better? • Spang • ☃ • talk • 01:50, 14 Jul 2009

Much. Thankie! Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 02:58, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Another Template Fix-Up

Pretty simple thing to fix. Just replace the word "article" in the top line and bottom line with "page", as sometimes Templates and Categories are put up for deletion.  Dylanlip  (talk) 15:30, September 15, 2009 (UTC)

Done. Spıke 🎙️09:08 27-Sep-20